Amazon CloudWatch vs Mezmo comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Mezmo are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #13 with an average rating of 8.1, while Mezmo is ranked #75. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 1.3% mindshare in APM, compared to Mezmo’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Mezmo users who would recommend it.

Amazon CloudWatch

Read 48 Amazon CloudWatch reviews

4,548 Views
2,410 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Mezmo

Read 2 Mezmo reviews

974 Views
633 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Amazon CloudWatch

Mezmo

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

Amazon CloudWatch and Mezmo are key players in the monitoring and log management category. Mezmo appears to have the upper hand due to its robust analytical capabilities, which offer unique advantages over Amazon CloudWatch's AWS integrations.

Features: Amazon CloudWatch integrates seamlessly with AWS services, benefiting AWS Cloud users. It helps manage resources efficiently within the AWS ecosystem. Mezmo offers sophisticated log correlation capabilities, flexible reporting suitable for in-depth analysis, and powerful analytics that provide comprehensive insights. Mezmo's versatility in features is evident compared to Amazon CloudWatch's focus on AWS services.

Room for Improvement: Amazon CloudWatch users suggest improvements in scalability, enhanced navigation of complex metrics, and performance under heavy workloads. Mezmo could refine customization options, enhance notification settings, and address its initial learning curve. Each product has an opportunity to improve in these areas.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Amazon CloudWatch is easy to deploy for AWS-experienced users, offering stable customer service. Mezmo requires a longer deployment period but provides detailed guidance and highly responsive support. This highlights mezmo's strength in customer engagement, contrasting CloudWatch's integration ease.

Pricing and ROI: Amazon CloudWatch is deemed cost-effective for AWS-centric environments, with some critiques on billing transparency. Mezmo's setup costs may seem higher, but users are satisfied with the return on investment due to its comprehensive analytics offerings. Mezmo's users find its value worth the price despite the initial costs.

To learn more, read our detailed Amazon CloudWatch vs. Mezmo Report (Updated: January 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Amazon CloudWatch vs. Mezmo

January 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Amazon CloudWatch

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

13th

Ranking in Log Management

15th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Monitoring Software (11th)

Mezmo

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

75th

Ranking in Log Management

55th

Average Rating

9.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Observability Pipeline Software (7th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of Amazon CloudWatch is 1.3%, down from 1.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Mezmo is 0.5%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Amazon CloudWatch	1.3%
Mezmo	0.5%
Other	98.2%

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Featured Reviews

Azam S M

Infrastructure Lead at Danat Fz LLC

Has provided reliable monitoring and alerting through extensive metric tracking and dashboard configuration

Amazon CloudWatch itself provides a lot of data. However, for visualization, we need to use third-party tools. We are in a process of integrating Grafana, Loki, and Prometheus to have better visualization on Amazon CloudWatch. We are also integrating Grafana with the application itself to get the application data and logs. Alternatively, there is AWS Kinesis and Glue where you can scrape the logs and have visualization, but a more easy option is Grafana. If you want to get a proper visual representation to see what is happening, then you need to integrate a third-party tool. Amazon CloudWatch has all the data, but to see what is happening, you need some third-party tool.

Read full review

Theodore Omtzigt

President and Founder at STILLWATER SUPERCOMPUTING INC

It consolidates all logs into one place and provides required features and functionalities

Every once in a while, our IBM cloud operational implementation gets behind. Sometimes, when we have a customer event, we do not get access to the latest logs for about 30 minutes, particularly for the sites that are heavily utilized. This is clearly not good. It is impossible to do RCA when you can't look at the logs that pertain to the time period in which the event occurred. It could be more of an operational problem than a feature problem. I don't have visibility about whether it is a LogDNA issue or just an operational issue.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The scalability of Amazon CloudWatch rates as high scalability, scoring a perfect ten."

"The most valuable feature of Amazon CloudWatch is its ease of use and logs. You do not have to go to each separate system to see the logs, such as Syslog and they are located in one dashboard GUI."

"The solution offers very detailed metrics for their services."

"The product helps us collect and store various metrics to set test alarms."

"Most of it's around optimizing utilization, their cloud utilization. They're making sure that they're getting the most out of their in-cloud environments and their instances. Making sure that there's no strange behavior in the environment."

"The most valuable feature of Amazon CloudWatch is intrusion prevention."

"The product can be integrated with AWS very easily."

"CloudWatch provides essential monitoring capabilities that integrate seamlessly with other AWS services."

More Amazon CloudWatch pros

"LogDNA consolidates all logs into one place, which is super valuable."

"The solution aggregates all event streams, so that if there are any issues, it's all in the same interface."

Cons

"Adding conditional expressions would enhance its functionality."

"The solution's integration could be easier for laypersons."

"The solution should provide human-readable metrics."

"The product's configuration has some challenges. The solution needs to be more user-friendly."

"This product lacks some features: real-time data stream monitoring, application performance monitoring, mobile app monitoring, and live dashboards. Its workflows also need improvement."

"The integration with third-party tools must be made easier."

"There is some delay in logging that they need to improve on."

"Right now, in relation to monitoring services, there are too many services and too many metrics per service."

More Amazon CloudWatch cons

"No ability to encapsulate a query or a filter, and communicate or share that among the team."

"Every once in a while, our IBM cloud operational implementation gets behind. Sometimes, when we have a customer event, we do not get access to the latest logs for about 30 minutes, particularly for the sites that are heavily utilized. This is clearly not good. It is impossible to RCA when you can't look at the logs that pertain to the time period in which the event occurred. It could be more of an operational problem than a feature problem. I don't have visibility about whether it is a LogDNA issue or just an operational issue."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I consider it as a medium-priced solution."

"The price of Amazon CloudWatch is reasonable for detailed basic monitoring."

"The product's cost is relatively inexpensive."

"The price of Amazon CloudWatch is reasonable. When the rate of data collection is done the price will increase. The price is less than other solutions."

"The pricing is average."

"It is a free-of-charge service."

"We have monthly licensing costs. The licenses are probably in the vicinity of about $300 - $350/month."

"The pricing can be considered reasonable, especially when already operating on a cloud platform."

More Amazon CloudWatch pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Transportation Company

26%

Comms Service Provider

13%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	17
Midsize Enterprise	9
Large Enterprise	24

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Amazon CloudWatch?

The monitoring features are valuable.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Amazon CloudWatch?

No specific setup costs were mentioned.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Amazon CloudWatch?

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Grafana Loki vs Amazon CloudWatch

Compared 16% of the time

Amazon OpenSearch Service vs Amazon CloudWatch

Compared 8% of the time

Zabbix vs Amazon CloudWatch

Compared 6% of the time

Dynatrace vs Amazon CloudWatch

Compared 5% of the time

Datadog vs Amazon CloudWatch

Compared 4% of the time

More Amazon CloudWatch Competitors

Cribl vs Mezmo

Compared 21% of the time

Datadog vs Mezmo

Compared 11% of the time

New Relic vs Mezmo

Compared 10% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Mezmo

Compared 8% of the time

Snyk vs Mezmo

Compared 6% of the time

More Mezmo Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Amazon CloudWatch

January 2026

Download Amazon CloudWatch product report

Buyer's Guide

Cribl vs. Mezmo

December 2025

Download Mezmo product report

Also Known As

No data available

LogDNA

Overview

Amazon CloudWatch integrates seamlessly with AWS, providing real-time monitoring and alerting features. Its interface supports task automation, enhancing troubleshooting and analytics capabilities, while offering strong security and scalability at a cost-effective rate.

Amazon CloudWatch is an impactful platform for monitoring AWS resources and managing application performance. It simplifies infrastructure performance monitoring by providing comprehensive analytics capabilities, including application insights and event scheduling. Users appreciate CloudWatch for its detailed metrics, dashboards, and support in issuing alerts to detect anomalies. It efficiently tracks performance, optimizes resource utilization, and ensures service availability. CloudWatch is recognized for its robust alerting features and integration with other AWS services, further supporting its resource monitoring capabilities. However, there is room for improvement in dashboard customization, log streaming speed, and integration with non-AWS services. Enhancements in API integration, machine learning features, and support for third-party tools are also desired.

What features does Amazon CloudWatch offer?

Seamless Integration: Works effortlessly with AWS for cohesive service management.
Advanced Metrics: Provides detailed monitoring of CPU, memory, and more.
Real-time Monitoring: Offers up-to-the-minute alerts on infrastructure status.
Dashboards: User-friendly and informative for quick insights.
Automation: Supports task automation for efficient troubleshooting.

What benefits does Amazon CloudWatch provide?

Cost-effectiveness: Efficient resource monitoring without high costs.
Scalability: Easily adapts to growing infrastructure needs.
Security: Strong protocols for safe monitoring activities.
Improved Performance: Enhances application insights and operational efficiency.
Operational Insights: Provides comprehensive logging and performance analysis.

Industries implementing Amazon CloudWatch often focus on optimizing IT infrastructure. Companies in sectors like finance and e-commerce rely on its monitoring and alerting capabilities to ensure service uptime and performance. The platform's automation and analytics features empower teams to proactively manage performance and detect potential issues promptly.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Today’s enterprises must manage a massive amount of machine data. They require a platform that enables engineering teams to deliberately route and store structured and unstructured data for different teams with unique use cases. Legacy platforms weren’t made for this moment.
‍
Mezmo, formerly LogDNA, lets organizations ingest, process, route, analyze, and store all of their log data. Purpose-built for modern engineering teams—including developers, SREs, IT Operations, and Security Engineers—the Mezmo platform is trusted by thousands of companies for SaaS, cloud, and hybrid applications.

Mezmo

Sample Customers

AirAsia, Airbnb, Aircel, APUS, Avazu, Casa & Video, Futbol Club Barcelona (FCBarcelona), National Taiwan University, redBus

Instacart, Asics, Lime, Salesforce

Buyer's Guide

Amazon CloudWatch vs. Mezmo

January 2026

Free Report: Amazon CloudWatch vs. Mezmo

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon CloudWatch vs. Mezmo and other solutions. Updated: January 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Amazon CloudWatch vs. Mezmo report.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors and best Log Management vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.