Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling vs Apache NiFi comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Apache are both solutions in the Compute Service category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.9, while Apache is ranked #8 with an average rating of 7.7. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 10.3% mindshare in CS, compared to Apache’s 8.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of Apache users who would recommend it.

Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling

Read 46 Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling reviews

1,248 Views
965 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Apache NiFi

Read 13 Apache NiFi reviews

1,421 Views
485 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling

Apache NiFi

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on May 21, 2025

Apache NiFi and Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling operate in different domains but overlap in tasks related to orchestration and scalability. Apache NiFi demonstrates strength in data flow management and process complexity control, whereas Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling excels in server capacity scalability.

Features: Apache NiFi stands out with graphical flow-based programming, real-time analytics processing, and integration adaptability. Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling is recognized for its demand-based automatic scaling, comprehensive health checks, and broad AWS ecosystem integration.

Room for Improvement: Apache NiFi could enhance user-friendliness and simplify its setup for extensive deployment. Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling might improve by providing more cost-effective solutions for lower usage and enhancing its learning resources for new users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Apache NiFi's deployment can be intricate, necessitating expertise in data flow systems, which may challenge large-scale implementations. Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling leverages its AWS integration, facilitating smoother deployment with substantial support options.

Pricing and ROI: Apache NiFi, being open-source, offers low initial costs, although scaling can elevate expenses. Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling involves ongoing AWS-related operational costs yet delivers substantial ROI through efficient resource management and minimized wastage.

To learn more, read our detailed Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling vs. Apache NiFi Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling vs. Apache NiFi

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 860,592 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling

Ranking in Compute Service

3rd

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Apache NiFi

Ranking in Compute Service

8th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Compute Service category, the mindshare of Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling is 10.3%, down from 14.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Apache NiFi is 8.9%, up from 7.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Compute Service

Featured Reviews

Muhammad Awais Zahid

DevOps Engineer at Al Nafi

Pay-as-you-go and efficient with automated workload handling

I have been working with customers who use Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling for handling their workload on servers and scaling up the infrastructure as required. As an instructor and cloud consultant, I help clients maintain and scale their infrastructure using this service to achieve zero downtime…

Read full review

Bharghava Raghavendra Beesa

Senior Developer at Infosys

The tool enables effective data transformation and integration

There are some areas for improvement, particularly with record-level tasks that take a bit of time. The quality of JSON data processing could be improved, as JSON workloads require manual conversions without a specific process. Enhancing features related to alerting would be helpful, including mobile alerts for pipeline issues. Integration with mobile devices for error alerts would simplify information delivery.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It's good performance-wise."

"Auto-scaling is a good feature."

"The tool is a simple solution. You can deploy a new virtual machine in minutes. You can select options like memory and core number and connect storage. It's great because it's simple and fast. You can build a virtual machine in minutes, do your experiments, and then uninstall it without paying for it when it's not in use."

"The most valuable feature of Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling is scaling your intra based on the request. Additionally, you are able to map the solution with any load balancer, such as public or private load balancers."

"The auto-scaling feature is particularly useful. Additionally, CloudWatch and CloudTrail are also important features for us."

"The solution removes the need for hardware. We can easily create servers or machines. Just by clicking or specifying our requirements, like memory size or disk space, it's set up for us. The tool eliminates the need for hardware. We can choose what we need and pay as we use it. It is flexible and can integrate with any product."

"It uses features like target tracking scaling policy, which automatically maintains CPU utilization levels."

"The solution incorporates ease of maintenance and reduction in operational overhead and costs. Patching is also easy."

More Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling pros

"The most valuable feature has been the range of clients and the range of connectors that we could use."

"The initial setup is very easy."

"The initial setup is very easy. I would rate my experience with the initial setup a ten out of ten, where one point is difficult, and ten points are easy."

"We can integrate the tool with other applications easily."

"It is highly effective for handling real-time data by working with APIs for immediate and continuous data extraction."

"The user interface is good and makes it easy to design very popular workflows."

"It's an automated flow, where you can build a flow from source to destination, then do the transformation in between."

"Visually, this is a good product."

More Apache NiFi pros

Cons

"The price could always be a bit better."

"There is room for improvement in the pricing model."

"There should be an AWS instance in South Africa, where the latency would be even lower. It might happen soon since AWS has recently opened more data centres in Nigeria. AWS may extend its reach to South Africa, and offer hosted CLI servers there. Most of the problems with AWS are not to do with the solution itself but with configuration. It is something on design, more or less."

"Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling offers various benefits but lacks certain features for fine-grained customization compared to other cloud providers like GCP. Users are constrained by predefined instance families in EC2 when selecting instance types for scaling. Unlike GCP, where users can independently scale resources such as memory or CPU, EC2 doesn't offer this flexibility."

"The solution is not cheap."

"The product's technical support needs to be better."

"The technical support needs to be improved."

"When creating a new instance there is a set of questions that have to be answered, and this is something that can be simplified."

More Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling cons

"We run many jobs, and there are already large tables. When we do not control NiFi on time, all reports fail for the day. So it's pretty slow to control, and it has to be improved."

"There should be a better way to integrate a development environment with local tools."

"The quality of JSON data processing could be improved, as JSON workloads require manual conversions without a specific process."

"There are some claims that NiFi is cloud-native but we have tested it, and it's not."

"There is room for improvement in integration with SSO. For example, NiFi does not have any integration with SSO. And if I want to give some kind of rollback access control across the organization. That is not possible."

"The overall stability of this solution could be improved. In a future release, we would like to have access to more features that could be used in a parallel way. This would provide more freedom with processing."

"The use case templates could be more precise to typical business needs."

"I think the UI interface needs to be more user-friendly."

More Apache NiFi cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"As far back as I can remember, I have experience with two types of subscriptions. The first was my personal AWS base, and the second was a corporate license. I can't say much about the corporate license, but I recall they sent the bill every month for the personal subscription, though I could be mistaken."

"The solution's licensing is based on a pay-as-you-go model. You only pay for the resources you use, whether it's RAM, processing power, or storage. So, it's calculated based on the time you use those resources, typically billed in hours or minutes."

"The solution is less expensive than a few competitors."

"The solution pricing varies by service region is mid-range."

"Compared to the performance, the price is quite high. I would rate it a ten because it is expensive. There are additional costs including bandwidth costs, data transfer costs, and load balancing costs."

"There is no specific pricing for Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling, but we have to pay for the number of machines getting scaled up."

"The product is expensive."

"I rate Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling's pricing a seven out of ten."

More Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling pricing and cost advice

"I used the tool's free version."

"We use the free version of Apache NiFi."

"It's an open-source solution."

"The solution is open-source."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Compute Service solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

860,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

24%

Computer Software Company

13%

Retailer

Real Estate/Law Firm

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling?

The solution removes the need for hardware. We can easily create servers or machines. Just by clicking or specifying our requirements, like memory size or disk space, it's set up for us. The tool e...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling?

The pricing of Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling is moderate. It's not too expensive because we only pay for what we use. While there are cheaper options, the services provided are worth the cost. Previously...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling?

While Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling is continually updated and has improved over time, the dashboard has become more complex and tricky for new users. The interface was easier to navigate in earlier vers...

See all answers

What do you like most about Apache NiFi?

The initial setup is very easy.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Apache NiFi?

Apache NiFi is open-source and free. Its integration with systems like Cloudera can be expensive, but Apache NiFi itself presents the best pricing as a standalone tool.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Apache NiFi?

The logging system of Apache NiFi needs improvement. It is difficult to debug compared to Airflow ( /products/apache-airflow-reviews ), where task details and issues are clear. With Apache NiFi, I ...

See all answers

Comparisons

AWS Fargate vs Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling

Compared 66% of the time

AWS Lambda vs Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling

Compared 20% of the time

AWS Batch vs Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling

Compared 8% of the time

More Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling Competitors

AWS Lambda vs Apache NiFi

Compared 28% of the time

Google Cloud Dataflow vs Apache NiFi

Compared 25% of the time

Apache Spark vs Apache NiFi

Compared 16% of the time

AWS Fargate vs Apache NiFi

Compared 10% of the time

More Apache NiFi Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling

June 2025

Download Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling product report

Buyer's Guide

Apache NiFi

June 2025

Download Apache NiFi product report

Also Known As

AWS RAM

No data available

Overview

Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling helps you maintain application availability and allows you to automatically add or remove EC2 instances according to conditions you define. ... Dynamic scaling responds to changing demand and predictive scaling automatically schedules the right number of EC2 instances based on predicted demand.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Apache NiFi is an easy to use, powerful, and reliable system to process and distribute data. It supports powerful and scalable directed graphs of data routing, transformation, and system mediation logic.

Apache

Sample Customers

Expedia, Intuit, Royal Dutch Shell, Brooks Brothers

Macquarie Telecom Group, Dovestech, Slovak Telekom, Looker, Hastings Group

Buyer's Guide

Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling vs. Apache NiFi

June 2025

Free Report: Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling vs. Apache NiFi

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling vs. Apache NiFi and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

860,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling vs. Apache NiFi report.

See our list of best Compute Service vendors.

We monitor all Compute Service reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.