Amazon MQ vs PubSub+ Platform comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Solace are both solutions in the Message Queue (MQ) Software category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #9 with an average rating of 9.0, while Solace is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.8. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 3.7% mindshare in MQ, compared to Solace’s 5.7% mindshare. Additionally, 87% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Solace users who would recommend it.

Amazon MQ

Read 8 Amazon MQ reviews

1,523 Views
1,386 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

PubSub+ Platform

Read 20 PubSub+ Platform reviews

6,112 Views
1,650 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Amazon MQ

PubSub+ Platform

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 27, 2025

Amazon MQ and PubSub+ Platform are competing messaging services in the realm of communication solutions. PubSub+ Platform has an edge due to its robust features and functionality, making it a preferred choice for enterprises that prioritize features over cost.

Features: Amazon MQ offers high availability, seamless integration with AWS, and comprehensive protocol support, making it a secure and scalable solution for reliable message brokering. PubSub+ Platform provides multi-cloud capabilities, dynamic message routing, and flexible protocol exchange, enhancing its applicability for complex needs across multiple platforms.

Room for Improvement: Amazon MQ could enhance its multi-cloud integration and expand protocol flexibility to compete with wider environments. Improvements in feature diversity and global accessibility would strengthen its offering. PubSub+ Platform could reduce complexity in its initial configuration and strive for more intuitive user interfaces. Lower cost of entry and simplified deployment processes would further broaden its appeal.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Amazon MQ benefits from AWS's comprehensive documentation, making setup straightforward for AWS users. Its managed nature requires minimal maintenance effort. PubSub+ Platform excels in providing a seamless configuration experience backed by responsive support, ensuring clear guidance for users across various environments.

Pricing and ROI: Amazon MQ operates on a pay-as-you-go model, offering potential cost savings ideal for small to mid-sized businesses. PubSub+ Platform, while higher in pricing, aligns with its extensive feature set, promising high ROI for enterprises that leverage its capabilities, justifying the investment for organizations prioritizing comprehensive solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed Amazon MQ vs. PubSub+ Platform Report (Updated: November 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Amazon MQ vs. PubSub+ Platform

November 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,769 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Amazon MQ

Ranking in Message Queue (MQ) Software

9th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

5.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

PubSub+ Platform

Ranking in Message Queue (MQ) Software

10th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Message Oriented Middleware (MOM) (2nd), Event Monitoring (13th), Streaming Analytics (14th)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Message Queue (MQ) Software category, the mindshare of Amazon MQ is 3.7%, down from 4.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of PubSub+ Platform is 5.7%, up from 4.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Message Queue (MQ) Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Amazon MQ	3.7%
PubSub+ Platform	5.7%
Other	90.6%

Message Queue (MQ) Software

Featured Reviews

RamilCerrada

Solution architect at SM Supermalls

Has provided consistent functionality across on-premise and cloud while simplifying cloud integration

I have experience with on-premise setups using ActiveMQ and RabbitMQ, but with regards to AWS, I use it via cloud only. There's a free tier with Amazon MQ based on their website, which is a six-month free trial of a single instance, allowing per month usage of either ActiveMQ or RabbitMQ, five gig of Amazon EFS storage, and for ActiveMQ, it's 20 gig of Amazon EBS storage for RabbitMQ. I did not purchase Amazon MQ through AWS Marketplace. Amazon MQ has published information about having 650 hours of free trial usage. This can be found via the AWS website by searching for AWS MQ. On a scale of one to ten, I rate Amazon MQ an eight out of ten.

Read full review

Deepankar Bbhowmick

Integration Architect at a tech services company with 11-50 employees

Messaging design has become visual and reliable and now supports fast microservice communication

The unique functions I appreciate about PubSub+ Platform are that it allows me to design my solution in a graphical manner, which is not available in many other products, and the design can also be pushed to the actual infrastructure layer, making it quite advantageous. Mesh technology is useful in scenarios where different geographies have to be connected, although such situations are not commonly found. It is beneficial but not a super-used feature of PubSub+ Platform. The event replay function is quite mature in PubSub+ Platform, allowing me to replay messages that are days in the past, which is a good feature. The main benefits PubSub+ Platform provides for the end-user include building a robust and scalable system with very low network latency, which improves the customer experience, whether using mobile phones or applications. This type of messaging framework is extremely important, and Solace is a very good product in that space. Nowadays, most applications are built using microservices technology, with small microservices interchanging messages via PubSub+ Platform. Without it, realizing a scalable system would not be possible; for example, one cannot have Netflix or similar services that require quick data transit and a good user experience, ensuring that data cannot be lost in transit. The analytics part of PubSub+ Platform is quite useful as it can connect with many analytical software tools, mainly for analysis of system logs, such as Splunk, DataDog, or Prometheus. It has the flexibility to connect with any of these and supports OpenTelemetry, which is not available in many other products, making traceability very easy. I can see how a message travels from a source system to the target system, end-to-end, along with what happens to that message along the path, making the analytics quite good.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The tool's most valuable feature is its managed service aspect. It's simple to implement and use. It requires minimal effort to maintain business operations."

"Amazon MQ is a very scalable solution."

"Amazon MQ is managed by AWS and is easy to use."

"The initial Amazon MQ setup is very easy both when you do it on your own or use the self-managed instance."

"Since we utilize AWS, it's easy to integrate Amazon MQ and work with other third-party software, as they have standard communications via API or native language."

"Amazon MQ is a secure solution."

"Amazon MQ is important for being collaborative, allowing for centralized information."

"We have found Amazon MQ to provide scalability, robustness, and security."

"When it comes to granularity, you can literally do anything regarding how the filtering works."

"Solace has been incident free in HA deployment for seven years."

"The most useful features has been the WAN optimization and probably the HybridEdge, which requires some third-party adapters or plugins. The idea that we can position Solace as a protocol-agnostic message transport fabric is key to our company having all manners of asynchronous messaging protocols from MQ, Kafka, JMS, etc. I really like the WAN optimization: Send once over a WAN, then distribute locally as many times as there are subscribers."

"We've built a lot of products into it and it's been quite easy to feed market data onto the systems and put entitlements and controls around that. That was a big win for us when we were consolidating our platforms down. Trying to have one event bus, one messaging bus, for the whole globe, and consolidate everything over time, has been key for us. We've been able to do that through one API, even if it's across the different languages."

"The best features of PubSub+ Platform are its real-time simulation, real-time event data streaming, and integration with any IoT applications."

"As of now, the most valuable aspects are the topic-based subscription and the fanout exchange that we are using."

"If we talk about Solace, you see the value-add layer; I can say that Solace is a basic Kafka, but on top of that Kafka layer, they have added their own layer that is really good, as this is where it adds value and why we went for it."

"In my assessment of Solace against other products — as I was responsible for evaluating various products and bringing the right tool into companies in the past — I worked with multiple platforms like RabbitMQ, Confluent, Kafka, and various other tools in the market. But I found the event mesh capability to be a very interesting as well as fulfilling capability, towards what we want to achieve from a digital-integration-strategy point of view... It's distributed, yet it is intelligently connected. It can also span and I can plug and play any number of brokers into the event mesh, so it's a great deal. That's a differentiator."

More PubSub+ Platform pros

Cons

"In community support, especially with distributed systems and integration, there is a need for better system organization."

"The solution needs improvement in the back end and security."

"Monitoring capabilities are not yet fully developed, since it's a message broker service, so it focuses more on the health of Apache."

"The product should improve its monitoring capabilities. It needs to improve the pricing also."

"Amazon MQ isn't a cheap tool."

"Amazon MQ is a good solution for small and medium-sized enterprises. It's open-source software, which means it's cheaper than its competitors."

"Depending on your use cases, Amazon MQ can be cheap or expensive."

"If Amazon provided a templating engine, it would be great."

More Amazon MQ cons

"Additional in-line information about certain things on PubSub+ Platform could be more beneficial for new users who are just starting to use this technology."

"Make it open source :-) with limited features so that this is not a barrier for using the technology in some places where they will only use open source technology despite then just paying for support (and paid features) on any used open source technology in the organization, as its a misnomer in my view the amount of large companies claiming to only use open source but then using products that are paid versions with additional features included."

"Some improvement is required with Solace professional services. The professional services really needs to drive the solutions for the customers and share best practices."

"We have requested to be able to get into the payload to do dynamic topic hierarchy building. A current workaround is using the message's header, where the business data can be put into this header and be used for a dynamic topic lookup. I want to see this in action when there are a couple of hundred cases live. E.g., how does it perform? From an administration perspective, is the ease of use there?"

"I would like them to design topic and queue schemas, mapping them to the enterprise data structure."

"The section on observability pertains to understanding the functioning of an event crash. Instead of focusing on how the crash occurs, attention is given to the observable aspects, such as a memory pipeline where one person pushes messages and another reads them. However, this pipeline often encounters issues, such as the reader being unavailable, causing the system to become stuck and preventing the messages from moving forward. This can lead to the pipeline being permanently stalled."

"The ease of management could be approved. The GUI is very good, but to configure and manage these devices programmatically in the software version is not easy."

"The solution could be improved by enhancing the message pooling size for persistent messages to handle both small and large messages effectively."

More PubSub+ Platform cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Depending on your use cases, Amazon MQ can be cheap or expensive."

"As a client or as an end user, I would say that Google Cloud Storage or Google Cloud are cheaper than Amazon MQ."

"The pricing and licensing were very transparent and well-communicated by our account manager."

"We have been really happy with the product licensing rates. It has been free for us, up to a 100,000 transactions per second, and all we have to do is pay for support. Making their product available and accessible to us has not been a problem at all."

"Having a free version of the solution was a big, important part of our decision to go with it. This was the big driver for us to evaluate Solace. We started using it as the free version. When we felt comfortable with the free version, that is when we bought the enterprise version."

"The price of the solution is expensive."

"I would rate the product's pricing a ten out of ten."

"There are different tiers where you can choose what would work for you. As a customer, you need to know roughly how many messages a month you will use."

"We are looking for something that will add value and fit for purpose. Freeware is good if you want to try something quickly without putting in much money. However, as far as our decision is concerned, I don't think it helps. At the end of the day, if we are convinced that a capability is required, we will ask for the funding. Then, when the funding is available, we will go for an enterprise solution only."

"Having a free version is critical for our technology operations use case. This is primarily because our technology operations team is a cost center in our company. They are not profit drivers and having a free version for installation will probably meet our needs. Even for production, it'll support up to a 100,000 messages per second. I don't think in technology operations that we have that many events and alerts from our detection tools. Even if I have 20 or 30 event detection products out there, they're only going to publish the things which are critical or warnings. I don't think we'll ever reach a 100,000 messages per second."

More PubSub+ Platform pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Message Queue (MQ) Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Comms Service Provider

14%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Outsourcing Company

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Outsourcing Company

10%

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	3

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	15

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Amazon MQ?

Amazon MQ needs to have data collected on performance to analyze trends for improvement. Additionally, some tools can suggest how to improve performance in terms of speed, time, and processing, whi...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Amazon MQ?

I have some experience working with Amazon MQ.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Amazon MQ?

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for PubSub+ Event Broker?

The pricing and setup cost of PubSub+ Platform is very seamless and reliable for medium and large-scale enterprises. For small-sized enterprises, it may be a higher cost, or they may be looking for...

See all answers

What needs improvement with PubSub+ Event Broker?

PubSub+ Platform could improve by simplifying some advanced configurations and providing better visualization for event flow. Some advanced configurations in PubSub+ Platform could be made simpler ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for PubSub+ Event Broker?

PubSub+ Platform's main use case in our company is real-time data streaming using applications and API integrations. We are working on an IoT-based application, and our company handles most of the ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Amazon SQS vs Amazon MQ

Compared 22% of the time

VMware Tanzu Data Solutions vs Amazon MQ

Compared 17% of the time

IBM MQ vs Amazon MQ

Compared 15% of the time

IBM Event Streams vs Amazon MQ

Compared 8% of the time

Redis vs Amazon MQ

Compared 3% of the time

More Amazon MQ Competitors

Apache Kafka vs PubSub+ Platform

Compared 7% of the time

IBM MQ vs PubSub+ Platform

Compared 6% of the time

Confluent vs PubSub+ Platform

Compared 5% of the time

Azure Stream Analytics vs PubSub+ Platform

Compared 5% of the time

ActiveMQ vs PubSub+ Platform

Compared 5% of the time

More PubSub+ Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Message Queue (MQ) Software

October 2026

Download Amazon MQ product report

Buyer's Guide

PubSub+ Platform

October 2026

Download PubSub+ Platform product report

Also Known As

No data available

PubSub+ Event Broker, PubSub+ Event Portal

Overview

Amazon MQ enables organizations to manage messaging with scalability, security, and robust integration capabilities. Its seamless integration with AWS and third-party applications enhances transactional efficiency through reliable communication protocols.

Designed to support seamless user transactions, Amazon MQ stands out for its scalability, security, and robust communication integration. It provides high availability as a managed service, simplifying implementation and minimizing maintenance efforts. It aligns with ActiveMQ and RabbitMQ, introducing familiar features useful for those with a computing background. Despite its strengths, there are improvements needed in message templating, performance monitoring, IP management, pricing, backend enhancements, and security measures.

What are the key features of Amazon MQ?

Scalability: Accommodates growing messaging demands effortlessly.
Integration: Compatibility with AWS services and third-party software through standard protocols.
High Availability: Provides consistent uptime as a managed service.
Centralization: Offers a unified platform for information and collaboration.
Familiar Interfaces: Reflects ActiveMQ and RabbitMQ properties for ease of transition.

What benefits should businesses consider?

Reduced Maintenance: Managed services ease management responsibilities.
Enhanced Communication: Supports robust streaming and communication workflows.
Increased Efficiency: Facilitates quick deployment and operational efficiency.
Cost-Effective: Thoughtful pricing could lead to significant savings.
Data Management: Streamlined process improves data handling.

Businesses use Amazon MQ as a broker in AI model deployment, application integration, and notifications management. They configure brokers, queues, and users to manage and route messages effectively. Employed across domains like website hosting, storage, and system integration, it optimizes managed services for communication and streaming processes.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

PubSub+ Platform is designed for real-time message publishing and outstanding interoperability. With features like intuitive administration and topic filtering, it offers both stability and high performance for scalable deployments across diverse scenarios.

PubSub+ Platform enhances data integration with its event mesh and seamless protocol compatibility, providing a comprehensive solution for organizations tracking shipments, generating reports, and managing transactions. Its granular topic filtering and WAN optimization ensure high utility in event-driven applications and cloud deployments. Users highlight the platform's intuitive administration and ease of management, though some seek improved integration with third-party tools and enhanced observability. Concerns include scalability for large payloads and training resource availability. Despite its interface complexity, PubSub+ remains valuable for trading and market data distribution.

What are the key features of PubSub+ Platform?

Real-time messaging: Facilitates seamless communication across platforms.
Flexible topic hierarchy: Supports dynamic topic taxonomy for efficient data management.
Event mesh: Enhances integration and interoperability with diverse protocols.
Intuitive administration: Simplifies system management and configuration.
WAN optimization: Ensures efficient connectivity for global deployment.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Messaging stability: Offers consistent performance in dynamic environments.
Scalability: Provides seamless expansion to accommodate growing data volumes.
Security: Maintains robust protection for sensitive information.
Support and configuration: Accessible, reliable support, and UI-driven setup streamline the management.

PubSub+ Platform is widely implemented for asynchronous messaging in industries like finance for trading and market data, logistics for shipment tracking, and tech operations management. It enables companies to modernize applications while ensuring data accuracy and efficiency across global systems.

Solace

Sample Customers

SkipTheDishes, Malmberg, Dealer.com, Bench Accounting

FxPro, TP ICAP, Barclays, Airtel, American Express, Cobalt, Legal & General, LSE Group, Akuna Capital, Azure Information Technology, Brand.net, Canadian Securities Exchange, Core Transport Technologies, Crédit Agricole, Fluent Trade Technologies, Harris Corporation, Korea Exchange, Live E!, Mercuria Energy, Myspace, NYSE Technologies, Pico, RBC Capital Markets, Standard Chartered Bank, Unibet

Buyer's Guide

Amazon MQ vs. PubSub+ Platform

November 2026

Free Report: Amazon MQ vs. PubSub+ Platform

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon MQ vs. PubSub+ Platform and other solutions. Updated: November 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Amazon MQ vs. PubSub+ Platform report.

See our list of best Message Queue (MQ) Software vendors.

We monitor all Message Queue (MQ) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.