Amazon QuickSight vs Metabase comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Metabase are both solutions in the BI (Business Intelligence) Tools category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #3 with an average rating of 7.6, while Metabase is ranked #26 with an average rating of 7.7. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 6.7% mindshare in BIT, compared to Metabase’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 63% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Metabase users who would recommend it.

Amazon QuickSight

Read 29 Amazon QuickSight reviews

6,841 Views
6,491 Comparison Views

63% willing to recommend

Metabase

Read 4 Metabase reviews

424 Views
337 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Amazon QuickSight

Metabase

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 1, 2025

Amazon QuickSight and Metabase serve as competing products in business intelligence and data analysis. While Amazon QuickSight is noted for its cost-effectiveness and user support, Metabase often has an edge due to its robust features and perceived value.

Features: Amazon QuickSight offers strong integration within the AWS ecosystem, powerful analytical tools, and scalable infrastructure. Metabase is known for its ease of use when querying databases, appealing visualization options, and quick generation of detailed reports. QuickSight is advantageous for AWS users, but Metabase's user-friendly approach and versatility attract a wider audience.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Amazon QuickSight provides a seamless deployment experience in AWS environments, benefiting from tight integration with Amazon's support services. In contrast, Metabase offers straightforward deployment with options for self-hosting and cloud solutions, complemented by extensive community resources and adaptability, appealing particularly to tech-savvy teams.

Pricing and ROI: Amazon QuickSight is noted for a competitive pricing model especially within AWS, offering good ROI through scalability and integration. Metabase, being open-source, minimizes setup expenses and provides substantial long-term value through customizable deployment and functionalities. QuickSight is economical for AWS-centric organizations, while Metabase presents strong cost efficiency beyond initial setup, leveraging its flexibility and wide application scope.

To learn more, read our detailed Amazon QuickSight vs. Metabase Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Amazon QuickSight vs. Metabase

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 851,604 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Amazon QuickSight

Ranking in BI (Business Intelligence) Tools

3rd

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Metabase

Ranking in BI (Business Intelligence) Tools

26th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the BI (Business Intelligence) Tools category, the mindshare of Amazon QuickSight is 6.7%, down from 10.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Metabase is 0.9%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

BI (Business Intelligence) Tools

Featured Reviews

Nerissa Serrano

Sr. Business Intelligence Analyst at ClearSource Bpo

Useful for developing dashboards for various lines of business

Yes, before using Amazon QuickSight, I worked with other products, including Power BI and Tableau. We switched to Amazon QuickSight since it was more affordable. Compared to Amazon QuickSight, Power BI offers a broader range of visualization options and more flexible formatting capabilities. Power BI provides more visual choices, easier page formatting with specific control options, and the ability to use bookmarks to enhance the dashboard's appeal. One area where Amazon QuickSight could improve is its formatting features for dashboards. For small-scale businesses, Amazon QuickSight is cost-effective. However, for larger datasets, tools like Power BI and Tableau may be more efficient, even if they require additional AWS services. QuickSight's pay-per-view model is suitable for smaller data, but your choice depends on your data size and requirements.

Read full review

Ibrahim Izz El-Deen

Data Engineer at USYTech

Modern analytics tool enhances user interactions with neat visualizations for improved decision-making

One area for improvement could be in offering more advanced features even in the open-source edition or making the paid versions more cost-effective. Data scalability, especially if the data grows, requires manual infrastructure management, which could be improved. Increased customization and visualization options in the open-source edition would be beneficial. Additionally, it might be helpful if more complex queries and stored procedures were supported.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature of this solution is the user interface."

"From an analytics perspective, it's really good for self-service analytics."

"Efficiency has definitely improved, and the speed of developing analytics and insights has increased by at least twenty percent."

"One of the most valuable features of Amazon QuickSight has been the speed at which visualizations can be created."

"I like that with Amazon QuickSight, you don't need to install an app to use its services. With other BI tools, you need to install the app, so Amazon QuickSight is better for me in this area."

"Amazon QuickSight can provide insights from the available data. It supports various rule types. We get the options of machine learning and insights, which are not available in other intelligence tools. It is easier to use, more stable, and cheaper than other solutions."

"The best part about Amazon QuickSight is the filtration capability."

"A valuable feature of Amazon QuickSight is that it's a cloud-native service provided by AWS. As all platforms within my company run on AWS, that's the leverage of Amazon QuickSight. Amazon QuickSight is also easy to use, and I find the native connectors from AWS valuable as well."

More Amazon QuickSight pros

"Metabase's key advantage is its modern approach to business intelligence."

"It is easy for a new user to learn the tool."

"I rate the solution’s stability a nine out of ten."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is its interface, which is used to query data into Metabase. I think it is very useful and handy for a novice."

Cons

"The setup process falls somewhere in the middle. It is not straightforward, nor is it complex, but there is a significant amount of work needed on the back end to make it function."

"Compared to Power BI, I felt QuickSight lacks some features, like delayed drill-downs. Drill-downs were the main area where we found QuickSight lacking."

"Right now, you can't use Amazon QuickSight on other cloud providers, so I'd like it to have availability on other cloud providers. This is an area for improvement in the product. What I'd like to see in Amazon QuickSight in the future is a distributed centralized system where I can manage all reports in one place, and for Amazon QuickSight to become reporting as a service."

"QuickSight needs to add more visuals similar to what Power BI offers."

"An area for improvement in Amazon QuickSight is storage. Data cleanup also needs improvement because I'm experiencing errors when cleaning the data. Amazon QuickSight needs video tutorials showing its different functions and purposes."

"Amazon QuickSight's visualization could be improved."

"Amazon QuickSight has minimal features. The feature set can be improved to allow you to create good production-ready dashboards. This does not happen with QuickSite, it needs to mature to be used in production."

"Lacked connectivity with other third-party tools and data sources."

More Amazon QuickSight cons

"I think there is a need to add a few more advanced visuals in the tool. There are a standard set of visuals in the tool which are available."

"One area for improvement could be in offering more advanced features even in the open-source edition or making the paid versions more cost-effective."

"The solution could provide more customization."

"The tool must be made more user-friendly."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is cost-effective with a good plan."

"The solution is not affordable."

"A highly affordable cost structure with fixed membership and timeframe basis options."

"The standard edition is free to use for exploration purposes while the enterprise edition needs to be paid for. The pricing for this solution is very reasonable."

"I'm using a paid version of Amazon QuickSight, paying about $22 monthly. As I have yet to learn about the pricing for other tools, such as Power BI, I won't be able to compare."

"The product pricing is better than other vendors."

"It's affordable compared to other long-term contractor business tools available in the market."

"I rate the price of Amazon QuickSight a four on a scale of one to ten, where one is a low price, and ten is a high price."

More Amazon QuickSight pricing and cost advice

"I would not say it is a cheap tool, but it's viable."

"The product is open-sourced."

"Using the open-source edition of Metabase on AWS EC2 cost us around $29 per month for the EC2 instance, which was affordable."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which BI (Business Intelligence) Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

851,604 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Computer Software Company

25%

Comms Service Provider

16%

Government

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Amazon QuickSight?

The integration is very seamless. We stored our result CSV files in S3 and connected directly from there.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Amazon QuickSight?

Amazon QuickSight charges $250 per user, which becomes expensive when managing multiple departments. However, this cost is offset by the advantages it provides.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Amazon QuickSight?

One area for improvement is the cost, as it's a bit expensive. The caching mechanism also charges too much if I need to cache any data. Sometimes it takes time to display data, suggesting a need fo...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Metabase?

Using the open-source edition of Metabase on AWS EC2 cost us around $29 per month for the EC2 instance, which was affordable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Metabase?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Metabase?

I used Metabase for business intelligence and analytics in my organization. We connected Metabase to AWS Athena, allowing us to query and visualize data stored in S3 buckets.

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Power BI vs Amazon QuickSight

Compared 27% of the time

Tableau vs Amazon QuickSight

Compared 18% of the time

Looker Studio vs Amazon QuickSight

Compared 14% of the time

Qlik Sense vs Amazon QuickSight

Compared 6% of the time

ThoughtSpot vs Amazon QuickSight

Compared 2% of the time

More Amazon QuickSight Competitors

Omni vs Metabase

Compared 19% of the time

Microsoft Power BI vs Metabase

Compared 16% of the time

Hex vs Metabase

Compared 16% of the time

Mode Analytics vs Metabase

Compared 13% of the time

Oracle OBIEE vs Metabase

Compared 7% of the time

More Metabase Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Amazon QuickSight

May 2025

Download Amazon QuickSight product report

Buyer's Guide

BI (Business Intelligence) Tools

May 2025

Download Metabase product report

Also Known As

QuickSight

No data available

Overview

Amazon QuickSight is a fast, cloud-powered business analytics service that makes it easy to build visualizations, perform ad-hoc analysis, and quickly get business insights from your data. Using our cloud-based service you can easily connect to your data, perform advanced analysis, and create stunning visualizations and rich dashboards that can be accessed from any browser or mobile device.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Metabase is a business intelligence tool designed for analyzing data with ease. It's known for its straightforward setup, making data visualization and exploration accessible to teams without coding expertise.

Metabase simplifies the process of deriving insights from data. It allows users to pose questions and instantly view results in the form of tables or charts. Its open-source nature offers flexibility for customization, paired with a clean and intuitive dashboard providing an efficient way to manage and share data insights. Users appreciate its ability to connect with multiple databases, enabling seamless data integration and analysis across platforms.

What are the valuable features?

Ad-hoc Querying: Enables non-technical users to create complex queries visually.
Dashboard Sharing: Facilitates easy sharing of insights through customizable dashboards.
Data Visualization: Supports various chart types for better data interpretation.
Open Source: Offers the flexibility to tailor features to specific business requirements.
Database Connectivity: Connects with numerous data sources to unify data analysis.

What are the benefits and ROI?

Cost Efficiency: Lowers costs by eliminating the need for costly proprietary solutions.
Increased Productivity: Saves time with easy setup and quick data interpretation.
Improved Decision-Making: Access to actionable insights enhances strategic decisions.
Flexibility: Customizable to meet evolving business data analysis needs.

Metabase implementation varies across industries such as tech, e-commerce, and healthcare, allowing firms to leverage analytics for performance optimization. Companies in tech appreciate seamless integration with SQL databases, while e-commerce benefits from sales trend analysis. Healthcare utilizes Metabase for patient data evaluation, aiding in informed healthcare service decisions.

Metabase

Sample Customers

MLB Advanced Media, Infor, HotelBeds, Gemini, Jivochat, Edmunds.com

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Amazon QuickSight vs. Metabase

April 2025

Free Report: Amazon QuickSight vs. Metabase

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon QuickSight vs. Metabase and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

851,604 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Amazon QuickSight vs. Metabase report.

See our list of best BI (Business Intelligence) Tools vendors.

We monitor all BI (Business Intelligence) Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.