Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Amazon Route 53 vs Azure DNS comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 20, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
6.1
Amazon Route 53 delivers positive ROI with significant cost savings and robust security, despite higher costs and variable ROI reports.
Sentiment score
7.8
Azure DNS offers an 8% ROI with cost efficiency, reduced OpEx, pay-as-you-go pricing, and reliable functionality.
The main factors are time-saving and security, even if the cost is slightly higher.
The ROI is always high because Azure DNS setup is essential and does not incur high charges.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
8.1
Amazon Route 53 support is highly rated, with better responses at higher tiers, though basic plans may lack sufficient help.
Sentiment score
7.8
Azure DNS support is generally positive, with varying response times and quality based on the support plan and region.
Amazon services are very stable, and there are few problems.
Amazon's customer support is very good with a quick response time.
They provide a normal developer level of support, and within twenty-four hours for non-critical issues, which is acceptable for us.
Technical support is minimally required for DNS-related tasks if you have previous experience.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
8.1
Amazon Route 53 is praised for scalability and AWS integration, suitable for varying applications despite some cost concerns.
Sentiment score
8.4
Azure DNS is praised for its scalability, ease of setup, and reliability, making it ideal for diverse business needs.
We haven't faced any scalability issues, thanks to its integration with AWS services.
Scalability became more challenging as they expanded the product line.
Amazon Route 53 is scalable as I use automation with YML files to handle scalability needs, and it works well.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.2
Amazon Route 53 is stable and reliable with minimal downtime, though monitoring is important for optimal performance.
Sentiment score
8.2
Azure DNS is praised for its stability and robust performance, with minor installation challenges noted by fewer users.
I have not encountered any stability issues.
We use auto-scaling groups to manage load.
The solution is stable.
 

Room For Improvement

Amazon Route 53 needs better request handling, user interface, security, pricing clarity, automation, setup, and domain support enhancements.
Azure DNS needs improvements in registration, support, security, scalability, pricing clarity, documentation, integration, performance, and multi-cloud functionality.
They need to ensure that the threats reported on are actual threats.
There could be improvements in the configuration process, particularly in the options provided during setup, such as subdomain configurations and certificate management.
In my project, everything is already configured, and we focus on monitoring and health checks.
 

Setup Cost

Amazon Route 53 offers scalable, volume-based pricing that some find cost-effective, with a calculator aiding cost estimation.
Azure DNS offers cost-effective, usage-based pricing with seamless Azure integration, including free query allowances and charges for extra usage.
Route 53 is more expensive.
The pricing of Route 53 is slightly higher compared to other services, however, it is justified by its high availability and reliability.
Azure DNS charges based on the number of zones enabled, offering some free queries monthly, which keeps costs low.
 

Valuable Features

Amazon Route 53 offers scalability, DNS routing, health checks, and integrates with Amazon services for reliable, user-friendly domain management.
Azure DNS provides easy installation, security, integration, robust performance, and flexible domain management with a user-friendly interface.
They do not alert on non-actionable items, making their alerts reliable and focused on concerns that matter.
I find Amazon Route 53 valuable for its ability to manage DNS records and efficiently route traffic with features like failover routing and geolocation routing.
Route 53 is valued for its health check feature and reliability.
Azure DNS provides end-to-end P2P connectivity and enhances security, making it more secure and reliable.
 

Categories and Ranking

Amazon Route 53
Ranking in Managed DNS
2nd
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
33
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Azure DNS
Ranking in Managed DNS
5th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
32
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Managed DNS category, the mindshare of Amazon Route 53 is 6.2%, down from 9.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Azure DNS is 6.9%, down from 9.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Managed DNS
 

Featured Reviews

Jithin Scaria - PeerSpot reviewer
Provides clear documentation, easy to understand, simplifies management and efficiently handles our domain-related configurations and DNS records
For initial setup, we generally use provisioning tools for these kinds of DNS records. The choice often depends on the cloud provider and the Infrastructure as Code (IAC) tools the client prefers. We adapt our approach accordingly rather than focusing on a single method within Route 53. The documentation is very user-friendly. Even someone with no prior experience can easily understand it. It provides step-by-step instructions and explains things in a clear and concise way. You can find everything you need to know about Route 53 and its features in the documentation, including white papers. In addition to manual configuration, you can also use third-party tools like Terraform, Pulumi, or AWS CloudFormation templates to manage your Route 53 configurations.
Santhosh Varghese - PeerSpot reviewer
A reliable DNS service, easy to deploy, with no maintenance
I give the solution a nine out of ten. I have worked with probably five, or six clients in the last two to three years in consulting. Almost every one of them is using Azure DNS. I would say make use of Azure DNS. It is a very good solution. Rather than you try to build your own DNS. There are several ways you can build your own DNS. You can put your domain controller in Azure and install DNS on the domain controller because it is domain-integrated, Active Directory-integrated DNS. But that's not required now because there is DNS as a solution. So, you just deploy that service and you're up and running. Instead of putting your own servers in the cloud and trying to replicate your on-premise DNS, just make yourself a built-in DNS service.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Managed DNS solutions are best for your needs.
851,491 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
17%
Computer Software Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Computer Software Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Government
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

Azure DNS or Amazon Route 53?
Azure DNS is a hosting service of DNS domains. It has excellent operating time and performance, resulting in fast resolution. We like the ability to view everything in the Azure portal - this makes...
What do you like most about Amazon Route 53?
The most valuable features of the solution are the DNS, routing, and traffic features.
What needs improvement with Amazon Route 53?
There is a need for technical knowledge to use Amazon Route 53 effectively. If a person without much technical background could use it, I would have rated it a ten out of ten.
What do you like most about Azure DNS?
The tool is easy to manage and use.
What needs improvement with Azure DNS?
I did not see any improvements required. It functions as a standard DNS, which is very important, and it does not need separate improvements.
What is your primary use case for Azure DNS?
In network-related tasks, I use this DNS to ensure proper end-to-end connectivity.
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

Route 53
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Hess, Expedia, Kelloggs, Philips, HyperTrack
M-Files
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Route 53 vs. Azure DNS and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.
851,491 professionals have used our research since 2012.