Azure DNS vs Google Cloud DNS comparison

Microsoft and Google are both solutions in the Managed DNS category. Microsoft is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.4, while Google is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.3. Microsoft holds a 11.3% mindshare in MDP, compared to Google’s 4.4% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Google users who would recommend it.

Azure DNS

Read 33 Azure DNS reviews

6,815 Views
6,611 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Google Cloud DNS

Read 7 Google Cloud DNS reviews

3,740 Views
3,628 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Azure DNS

Google Cloud DNS

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 4, 2024

Azure DNS and Google Cloud DNS are competing in cloud-based DNS management. Google Cloud DNS seems to have the upper hand, praised for its high performance and global reach, compared to Azure DNS's integration capabilities.

Features: Azure DNS integrates seamlessly with Azure services, offers easy management through Azure Resource Manager, and supports DNS forwarding effectively. Google Cloud DNS excels with its low latency, strong global presence, and comprehensive DNS forwarding support.

Room for Improvement: Azure DNS could enhance its global reach and improve latency. It might also advance its DNS forwarding capabilities and expand feature sets beyond Azure. Google Cloud DNS could improve integration with non-Google services, reduce setup complexity for users not using other Google products, and simplify its management interface for new users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Azure DNS offers straightforward deployment with its services, benefiting current Azure users. Its customer support is efficient within the Azure ecosystem. In contrast, Google Cloud DNS uses Google's expansive infrastructure for setup and provides responsive customer service with comprehensive support.

Pricing and ROI: Azure DNS usually involves lower setup costs with a favorable ROI, especially for existing Azure users. Google Cloud DNS may have higher initial costs but compensates with a robust ROI due to its superior performance and global capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Azure DNS vs. Google Cloud DNS Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Azure DNS vs. Google Cloud DNS

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,707 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Azure DNS

Ranking in Managed DNS

3rd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Google Cloud DNS

Ranking in Managed DNS

8th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Managed DNS category, the mindshare of Azure DNS is 11.3%, up from 7.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Google Cloud DNS is 4.4%, down from 6.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Managed DNS Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Azure DNS	11.3%
Google Cloud DNS	4.4%
Other	84.3%

Managed DNS

Featured Reviews

Dieudonné-Nsabimana

Consultancy Manager at cidns

Overall experience improves efficiency and lowers operational challenges

* Add native management routing (geo‑routing, failover, weighted records) directly within Azure DNS zones to reduce dependency on extra services. * Cost Efficiency: Offer bundle pricing tiers or discounts for high‑volume enterprise customers, or an option for cost‑optimized internal DNS zones. * Improved Error Diagnostics: Provide more descriptive error codes and guided troubleshooting steps in the portal or CLI.

Read full review

Shikar Singh

Solutions Architect / IT Program Manager at Optum

Constantly improving and adapting to customer needs

The effectiveness of Google Cloud DNS largely depends on where an organization stands in its cloud journey and its overall technology landscape. For those heavily invested in Google Cloud Platform (GCP) and already embracing cloud solutions, Google Cloud DNS can be rated quite high, ranging from seven to nine out of ten.Deployment times for Google Cloud DNS can vary depending on the complexity of the infrastructure and configuration requirements. For straightforward setups and cloud-ready cases, deployment can typically be completed within a few minutes to an hour. However, in more complex infrastructure scenarios involving extensive configuration, deployment may take longer, possibly spanning days or weeks.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Data protection is paramount across cloud platforms"

"The solution is easy to use and flexible."

"The speed of the queries is valuable."

"One of the key benefits of Azure DNS is its integration with other Azure services. As it is a solution developed by Microsoft, it is easy to integrate with other Azure offerings. Azure DNS also includes Defender for DNS, a feature that protects against anomalies and threats on the DNS. This added security is provided directly by Microsoft. The integration and security features of Azure DNS make it a valuable option for users of the Azure cloud platform."

"It is a scalable solution."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is the simplicity of putting DBs."

"From a security perspective, Microsoft is much better than other cloud providers."

"It is a scalable solution."

More Azure DNS pros

"The initial setup process is easy."

"The most significant features are the internal and external endpoints using Google Cloud DNS, which are very beneficial for dependent apps."

"The tool is well integrated. We don’t need the interface of another provider. The product helps me manage my domain and write in Google Cloud."

"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."

"It is a scalable solution."

"The scalability is good."

"Google Cloud DNS continues to evolve based on customer feedback and technological advancements."

Cons

"The product must be integrated with additional security features."

"The product must provide information on which DNS or application is consuming the most budget."

"Azure DNS sticks mostly with the Azure native solution and doesn't scale well in a multi-cloud or hybrid environment."

"The solution should provide better pricing."

"The solution lacks scalability."

"What needs improvement in Azure DNS is visibility in terms of troubleshooting. It's similar to the area for improvement in Azure Network Watcher, where I can see how the source is going out if I'm troubleshooting a source destination. I can also see the destination. As for seeing how the packet travels, that's what should be improved. It's still lacking in visibility. Suppose I'm looking into backend machines, and if I'm hitting another NPM machine or any machine on the other side, there should be visibility. The tool should tell you that a specific machine is passing through a VPN gateway or route table, routing to a third-party firewall, and then dropping. Azure DNS should show an accurate answer to help the customers, which is its area for improvement."

"While it's stable, there's always room for improvement to ensure it remains reliable."

"Azure DNS does provide enhanced support for applications and includes several security features to protect against threats. One of the security features it offers is the ability to detect and prevent dangling DNS records, which can be used in cyber attacks. Dangling DNS records occur when a website owner creates a domain name but forgets to remove the CNAME record, leaving the domain vulnerable to takeover by malicious actors. Azure DNS includes security measures to identify and prevent such threats, helping to keep your DNS infrastructure secure. However, if Microsoft could add more security capabilities to the DNS, that would be great to detect and identify anomalies that are happening to prevent cyber threats."

More Azure DNS cons

"Migrating away from Google Cloud DNS can be difficult."

"The solution's price could be better."

"More features around rules-based configurations would be beneficial."

"The UI is tricky to understand for people who have not worked with DNS records. People with little to no experience with DNS records can find it hard to understand. For example, you need to know the hallmarks to input records since they need to be matched in a specific format."

"The UX of the product is an area with certain shortcomings where improvements are required."

"The cost of using Google Cloud DNS can be relatively high compared to other options, especially considering the cloud environment."

"It needs to provide better integration."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution's price is reasonable."

"The solution itself is free but you need to pay for the Microsoft Azure infrastructure and host your domains in Azure to use it."

"To use Azure DNS, I need to buy the license meant for Windows Server."

"The solution is free."

"We have an enterprise license agreement with Microsoft. Their pricing is competitive. I would rate it a three and a half out of five."

"The price is low and it's a reasonable price for that product."

"The solution is moderately priced."

"The pricing is expensive."

More Azure DNS pricing and cost advice

"It is expensive but cost-effective."

"I am not sure about the pricing. However, I can give you a rough estimate which is like ten cents per month per zone."

"The product is expensive."

"The cost of using Google Cloud DNS can be relatively high compared to other options, especially considering the cloud environment. I would rate it 6 out of 10. Cheaper alternatives might be desirable, but the decision depends on various factors such as vendor lock-in, organizational adaptability, and alignment with other technologies in use."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Managed DNS solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,707 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Comms Service Provider

18%

Computer Software Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

Educational Organization

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	19

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	4

Questions from the Community

Azure DNS or Amazon Route 53?

Azure DNS is a hosting service of DNS domains. It has excellent operating time and performance, resulting in fast resolution. We like the ability to view everything in the Azure portal - this makes...

See all answers

What do you like most about Azure DNS?

The tool is easy to manage and use.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Azure DNS?

See all answers

What do you like most about Google Cloud DNS?

Google Cloud DNS continues to evolve based on customer feedback and technological advancements.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Google Cloud DNS?

Pricing and support are really good. There are no complaints about the pricing.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Google Cloud DNS?

I am not heavily involved with Cloud DNS, but from an end-user perspective, the customization part could be improved. More features around rules-based configurations would be beneficial.

See all answers

Comparisons

Amazon Route 53 vs Azure DNS

Compared 80% of the time

Cloudflare vs Azure DNS

Compared 7% of the time

Infoblox DDI vs Azure DNS

Compared 5% of the time

Akamai Edge DNS vs Azure DNS

Compared 2% of the time

Cisco Umbrella vs Azure DNS

Compared 1% of the time

More Azure DNS Competitors

Quad9 vs Google Cloud DNS

Compared 66% of the time

Cloudflare vs Google Cloud DNS

Compared 10% of the time

Amazon Route 53 vs Google Cloud DNS

Compared 7% of the time

Cisco Umbrella vs Google Cloud DNS

Compared 5% of the time

Infoblox DDI vs Google Cloud DNS

Compared 2% of the time

More Google Cloud DNS Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Azure DNS

January 2026

Download Azure DNS product report

Buyer's Guide

Google Cloud DNS

January 2026

Download Google Cloud DNS product report

Overview

Azure DNS is a hosting service for DNS domains, providing name resolution using Microsoft Azure infrastructure. By hosting your domains in Azure, you can manage your DNS records using the same credentials, APIs, tools, and billing as your other Azure services.

Microsoft

Google Cloud DNS is a scalable, reliable and managed authoritative Domain Name System (DNS) service running on the same infrastructure as Google. It has low latency, high availability and is a cost-effective way to make your applications and services available to your users. Cloud DNS translates requests for domain names like www.google.com into IP addresses like 74.125.29.101. Cloud DNS is programmable. You can easily publish and manage millions of DNS zones and records using our simple user interface, command-line interface or API.

Google

Sample Customers

M-Files

MeilleursAgents

Buyer's Guide

Azure DNS vs. Google Cloud DNS

December 2025

Free Report: Azure DNS vs. Google Cloud DNS

Find out what your peers are saying about Azure DNS vs. Google Cloud DNS and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,707 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Azure DNS vs. Google Cloud DNS report.

See our list of best Managed DNS vendors.

We monitor all Managed DNS reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.