Amazon Route 53 vs Google Cloud DNS comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Google are both solutions in the Managed DNS category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.7, while Google is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.4. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 6.4% mindshare in MDP, compared to Google’s 6.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Google users who would recommend it.

Amazon Route 53

Read 32 Amazon Route 53 reviews

6,660 Views
5,899 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Google Cloud DNS

Read 7 Google Cloud DNS reviews

5,055 Views
4,670 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Amazon Route 53

Google Cloud DNS

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 4, 2024

Google Cloud DNS and Amazon Route 53 are competing DNS management solutions. While Google Cloud DNS impresses with cost-effectiveness and ease of integration, Amazon Route 53 stands out with its extensive feature set and broader range of functionalities.

Features: Google Cloud DNS provides seamless integration with Google Cloud Platform services, automatic scaling, and low-latency resolution. Amazon Route 53 offers advanced features such as traffic flow management, health checks, and a wide range of DNS routing policies, catering to businesses needing detailed control and options.

Room for Improvement: Google Cloud DNS could enhance its feature offerings to match its competitor's range and detail. Additionally, it may benefit from broader support for non-Google environments. Amazon Route 53 could improve ease of use for non-AWS environments, offer more streamlined pricing, and simplify its setup process for users unfamiliar with AWS services.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Google Cloud DNS is known for its straightforward deployment for those already using Google Cloud services, providing efficient and effective support. Amazon Route 53, well-integrated with AWS, offers robust customer service but might require more setup familiarity with AWS services, making its deployment a bit more complex.

Pricing and ROI: Google Cloud DNS is valued for its competitive pricing model, offering low upfront costs and solid ROI for businesses within the Google ecosystem. Amazon Route 53, despite higher initial costs, delivers superior ROI through its comprehensive features, catering to complex enterprise needs willing to invest for enhanced functionality. The cost versus feature balance is a key consideration, with Google favored for budget-centric deployments and Amazon chosen for higher-end requirements.

To learn more, read our detailed Amazon Route 53 vs. Google Cloud DNS Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Amazon Route 53 vs. Google Cloud DNS

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 845,406 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Amazon Route 53

Ranking in Managed DNS

2nd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Google Cloud DNS

Ranking in Managed DNS

6th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Managed DNS category, the mindshare of Amazon Route 53 is 6.4%, down from 9.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Google Cloud DNS is 6.4%, up from 6.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Managed DNS

Featured Reviews

Jithin Scaria

Senior Professional I-Software Engineer Lead at Capgemini

Provides clear documentation, easy to understand, simplifies management and efficiently handles our domain-related configurations and DNS records

For initial setup, we generally use provisioning tools for these kinds of DNS records. The choice often depends on the cloud provider and the Infrastructure as Code (IAC) tools the client prefers. We adapt our approach accordingly rather than focusing on a single method within Route 53. The documentation is very user-friendly. Even someone with no prior experience can easily understand it. It provides step-by-step instructions and explains things in a clear and concise way. You can find everything you need to know about Route 53 and its features in the documentation, including white papers. In addition to manual configuration, you can also use third-party tools like Terraform, Pulumi, or AWS CloudFormation templates to manage your Route 53 configurations.

Read full review

Shikar Singh

Solutions Architect / IT Program Manager at Optum

Constantly improving and adapting to customer needs

The effectiveness of Google Cloud DNS largely depends on where an organization stands in its cloud journey and its overall technology landscape. For those heavily invested in Google Cloud Platform (GCP) and already embracing cloud solutions, Google Cloud DNS can be rated quite high, ranging from seven to nine out of ten.Deployment times for Google Cloud DNS can vary depending on the complexity of the infrastructure and configuration requirements. For straightforward setups and cloud-ready cases, deployment can typically be completed within a few minutes to an hour. However, in more complex infrastructure scenarios involving extensive configuration, deployment may take longer, possibly spanning days or weeks.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution effectively monitors the health of resources and provides good identity access management."

"The most valuable feature is that it works very well."

"The solution is cost-effective."

"The scalability is the most valuable feature."

"The solution is used to manage servers, and its interface is easy to use."

"Host zones and integrated features such as Health Checks and DNS routing are valuable features of Route 53."

"Amazon Route 53 is a DNS resolution service that helps you to map your hostname to another hostname."

"One of the best advantages is managed security."

More Amazon Route 53 pros

"The initial setup process is easy."

"The most significant features are the internal and external endpoints using Google Cloud DNS, which are very beneficial for dependent apps."

"It is a scalable solution."

"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."

"The tool is well integrated. We don’t need the interface of another provider. The product helps me manage my domain and write in Google Cloud."

"Google Cloud DNS continues to evolve based on customer feedback and technological advancements."

"The scalability is good."

Cons

"When we are looking at the model registry, it may be not clear sometimes. For example, if you use a single grid model and group or registry, it has a different SDK in the pilot. And it may be not so comfortable to use both of them because it is two different places for keeping things in order."

"There could be improvements in the configuration process, particularly in the options provided during setup, such as subdomain configurations and certificate management."

"A general area for improvement with AWS services is that while AWS quickly releases new services, sometimes these services are not as mature as expected, which can be frustrating."

"There is room for improvement in restricting access through one website from S3 buckets, as it still seems not very obvious."

"Supporting DNS check is one feature missing in the solution."

"It is difficult to manage the product if the person involved in the setup process doesn't know much about the solution."

"With Amazon Route 53, finding what you want is so much more difficult, making it an area where improvements are required."

"The product should improve its automation."

More Amazon Route 53 cons

"The solution's price could be better."

"Migrating away from Google Cloud DNS can be difficult."

"More features around rules-based configurations would be beneficial."

"It needs to provide better integration."

"The cost of using Google Cloud DNS can be relatively high compared to other options, especially considering the cloud environment."

"The UX of the product is an area with certain shortcomings where improvements are required."

"The UI is tricky to understand for people who have not worked with DNS records. People with little to no experience with DNS records can find it hard to understand. For example, you need to know the hallmarks to input records since they need to be matched in a specific format."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing depends on usage and is moderate."

"The tool is a bit expensive."

"The price of Amazon Route 53 is reasonable."

"The price of the product is perfectly fine in my opinion."

"It can be expensive compared to some other providers."

"The price of the solution could be a little bit lower compared to Google DNS, which has more features than Amazon."

"Amazon Route 53 is not that expensive."

"Amazon Route 53 is an expensive solution."

More Amazon Route 53 pricing and cost advice

"The cost of using Google Cloud DNS can be relatively high compared to other options, especially considering the cloud environment. I would rate it 6 out of 10. Cheaper alternatives might be desirable, but the decision depends on various factors such as vendor lock-in, organizational adaptability, and alignment with other technologies in use."

"I am not sure about the pricing. However, I can give you a rough estimate which is like ten cents per month per zone."

"It is expensive but cost-effective."

"The product is expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Managed DNS solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

21%

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

16%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Educational Organization

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

Azure DNS or Amazon Route 53?

Azure DNS is a hosting service of DNS domains. It has excellent operating time and performance, resulting in fast resolution. We like the ability to view everything in the Azure portal - this makes...

See all answers

What do you like most about Amazon Route 53?

The most valuable features of the solution are the DNS, routing, and traffic features.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Amazon Route 53?

There is a need for technical knowledge to use Amazon Route 53 effectively. If a person without much technical background could use it, I would have rated it a ten out of ten.

See all answers

What do you like most about Google Cloud DNS?

Google Cloud DNS continues to evolve based on customer feedback and technological advancements.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Google Cloud DNS?

Pricing and support are really good. There are no complaints about the pricing.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Google Cloud DNS?

I am not heavily involved with Cloud DNS, but from an end-user perspective, the customization part could be improved. More features around rules-based configurations would be beneficial.

See all answers

Comparisons

Azure DNS vs Amazon Route 53

Compared 63% of the time

Cloudflare vs Amazon Route 53

Compared 19% of the time

IBM NS1 Connect vs Amazon Route 53

Compared 4% of the time

Akamai Edge DNS vs Amazon Route 53

Compared 3% of the time

Cisco Umbrella vs Amazon Route 53

Compared 3% of the time

More Amazon Route 53 Competitors

Quad9 vs Google Cloud DNS

Compared 75% of the time

Cloudflare vs Google Cloud DNS

Compared 13% of the time

Cisco Umbrella vs Google Cloud DNS

Compared 3% of the time

Azure DNS vs Google Cloud DNS

Compared 2% of the time

Verisign Public DNS vs Google Cloud DNS

Compared 1% of the time

More Google Cloud DNS Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Amazon Route 53

March 2025

Download Amazon Route 53 product report

Buyer's Guide

Google Cloud DNS

March 2025

Download Google Cloud DNS product report

Also Known As

Route 53

No data available

Overview

Amazon Route 53 is a highly available and scalable cloud Domain Name System (DNS) web service. It is designed to give developers and businesses an extremely reliable and cost effective way to route end users to Internet applications by translating names like www.example.com into the numeric IP addresses like 192.0.2.1 that computers use to connect to each other. Amazon Route 53 is fully compliant with IPv6 as well.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Google Cloud DNS is a scalable, reliable and managed authoritative Domain Name System (DNS) service running on the same infrastructure as Google. It has low latency, high availability and is a cost-effective way to make your applications and services available to your users. Cloud DNS translates requests for domain names like www.google.com into IP addresses like 74.125.29.101. Cloud DNS is programmable. You can easily publish and manage millions of DNS zones and records using our simple user interface, command-line interface or API.

Google

Sample Customers

Hess, Expedia, Kelloggs, Philips, HyperTrack

MeilleursAgents

Buyer's Guide

Amazon Route 53 vs. Google Cloud DNS

March 2025

Free Report: Amazon Route 53 vs. Google Cloud DNS

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Route 53 vs. Google Cloud DNS and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Amazon Route 53 vs. Google Cloud DNS report.

See our list of best Managed DNS vendors.

We monitor all Managed DNS reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.