Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Apache NiFi vs Zadara comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on May 21, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
4.8
Apache NiFi users experience significant time savings and improved efficiency, although exact cost benefits aren't always quantifiable.
Sentiment score
8.2
Zadara offers cost-effective scalability, eliminating upfront investments with flexible, nearly limitless capacity, potentially saving 50% in time and money.
Thanks to improvements on both our side in how we run processes and enhancements to Apache NiFi, we have reduced the time commitment to almost not needing to interact with Apache NiFi except for minor queue-clearance tasks, allowing it to run smoothly.
Data Engineer at The Kudelski Group
It supports not just ETL but also ELT, allowing us to save significant time.
Team Lead Technical Specialist (Production Support) at a recreational facilities/services company with 11-50 employees
There may be return on investment based on the technology and easily moving our workloads onto Apache NiFi from our previous system.
Senior Consultant - Data Analytics at a comms service provider with 201-500 employees
The cost is not cheaper compared to AWS, and we have not seen the expected return on investment.
Cloud System Engineer at cloud251
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
5.7
Apache NiFi users find support adequate, using documentation and forums, with mixed reviews on official support and positive Cloudera experiences.
Sentiment score
8.2
Zadara's exceptional, 24/7 global customer service and technical expertise reduce user workload, earning high satisfaction ratings.
The customer support is really good, and they are helpful whenever concerns are posted, responding immediately.
Cloud Data Architect at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees
Customer support for Apache NiFi has been excellent, with minimal response times whenever we raise cases that cannot be directly addressed by logs.
Team Lead Technical Specialist (Production Support) at a recreational facilities/services company with 11-50 employees
I would rate the customer support of Apache NiFi a 10 on a scale of 1 to 10.
Partner at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
We lack adequate response times and a 24/7 service level agreement.
Cloud System Engineer at cloud251
I rate the technical support from Zadara as nine out of ten.
IT Technical Architect at AVALIS
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
6.7
Apache NiFi's scalability varies; some users succeed with clusters, while others struggle without Kubernetes, impacting implementation.
Sentiment score
7.6
Zadara provides scalable, flexible workload management, supporting business growth with adjustable tiers and high performance for various needs.
Depending on the workload we process, it remains stable since at the end of the day, it is just used as an orchestration tool that triggers the job while the heavy lifting is done on Spark servers.
Manager at a tech company with 10,001+ employees
Scaling up is fairly straightforward, provided you manage configurations effectively.
Data Engineer at The Kudelski Group
Based on the workload, more nodes can be added to make a bigger cluster, which enhances the cluster whenever needed.
Cloud Data Architect at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees
Zadara is a fully-fledged platform, and our customers are happy with its use.
Cloud System Engineer at cloud251
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.4
Apache NiFi is generally stable but may face occasional crashes and reliability challenges, especially in distributed environments.
Sentiment score
7.5
Users appreciate Zadara for its stability, high-availability, and reliability, noting minimal downtime and dependable performance in demanding environments.
I have seen Apache NiFi crashing at times, which is one of the issues we have faced in production.
Manager at a tech company with 10,001+ employees
Apache NiFi is stable in most cases.
Senior Consultant - Data Analytics at a comms service provider with 201-500 employees
 

Room For Improvement

Apache NiFi needs improved integration, UI, scalability, security features, and seamless CI/CD processes for enhanced usability and efficiency.
Zadara needs better communication, advanced features, broader support, improved infrastructure, and user-friendly upgrades to enhance market competitiveness.
Apache NiFi should have APIs or connectors that can connect seamlessly to other external entities, whether in the cloud or on-premises, creating a plug-and-play mechanism.
Manager at a tech company with 10,001+ employees
The history of processed files should be more readable so that not only the centralized teams managing Apache NiFi but also application folks who are new to the platform can read how a specific document is traversing through Apache NiFi.
Team Lead Technical Specialist (Production Support) at a recreational facilities/services company with 11-50 employees
The initial error did not indicate it was related to memory or size limitations but appeared as a parsing error or something similar.
Data Engineer at The Kudelski Group
Adding AI capabilities could enhance the offering as well.
Cloud System Engineer at cloud251
Maintenance can also be complicated, especially when deeper troubleshooting requires navigating the CLI and searching for logs.
IT Technical Architect at AVALIS
 

Setup Cost

Apache NiFi is an open-source solution with no setup costs, offering time-saving efficiencies despite potential integration expenses.
Zadara offers predictable pay-per-use pricing, with all-inclusive features and support, appealing to cost-conscious enterprise buyers.
The pricing in Italy is considered a little bit high, but the product is worth it.
Partner at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
The pricing is considered expensive.
Cloud System Engineer at cloud251
 

Valuable Features

Apache NiFi simplifies data flow orchestration with drag-and-drop features, scalability, and integration, enhancing productivity and reliability.
Zadara offers flexible cloud integration, scalable storage solutions, and predictable costs with high performance, reliability, and user-friendly support.
Apache NiFi has positively impacted my organization by definitely bridging the gap between the on-premises and cloud interaction until we find a solution to open the firewall for cloud components to directly interact with on-premises services.
Manager at a tech company with 10,001+ employees
Development has improved with a reduction in time spent being the main benefit; before we needed a matter of days to create the ingestion flows, but now it only takes a couple of hours to configure.
Senior Data Engineer at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
The ease of use in Apache NiFi has helped my team because anyone can learn how to use it in a short amount of time, so we were able to get a lot of work done.
Senior Consultant - Data Analytics at a comms service provider with 201-500 employees
The most valuable feature is its storage management capability.
Cloud System Engineer at cloud251
Zadara's troubleshooting feature is very valuable for me.
IT Technical Architect at AVALIS
 

Categories and Ranking

Apache NiFi
Ranking in Compute Service
7th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
5.3
Number of Reviews
22
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Zadara
Ranking in Compute Service
10th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.6
Number of Reviews
12
Ranking in other categories
All-Flash Storage (32nd), Software Defined Storage (SDS) (17th), Public Cloud Storage Services (15th), File and Object Storage (20th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Compute Service category, the mindshare of Apache NiFi is 9.5%, up from 7.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Zadara is 3.0%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Compute Service Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Apache NiFi9.5%
Zadara3.0%
Other87.5%
Compute Service
 

Featured Reviews

YV
architect with 51-200 employees
Unified data flows have simplified large-scale ingestion and have improved SLA reliability
Improvements can be made in the way of the UI. From the deployment perspective, Git configurations are available in 2.6 versions and 2.0 and later versions of Apache NiFi. Before 2.0, templates had to be created and stored in Apache NiFi Registry, which is available. However, templates still need to be imported and exported manually if moving from one environment to another environment. Even in 2.0 versions, although GitHub configurations are available, how it will function needs to be evaluated. Seamless CI/CD deployments are somewhat tricky and challenging when it comes to Apache NiFi with the proper approvals, moving that flow to another environment, and giving the proper RBAC controls. These are areas that could be improved. Documentation is adequate, but the only pain point is the deployment aspect.
KK
IT Technical Architect at AVALIS
Troubleshooting becomes more accessible and management improves over time
I use this product as storage. Specifically, I use it as big storage. That's the main use case for Zadara Zadara's troubleshooting feature is very valuable for me. After the last update, managing the product became easier. Management is more straightforward and useful. These improvements are…
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Compute Service solutions are best for your needs.
881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
15%
Computer Software Company
11%
Financial Services Firm
9%
University
8%
Computer Software Company
19%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Comms Service Provider
7%
Government
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business5
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise18
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business12
Large Enterprise4
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Apache NiFi?
The experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing was fine, as the integration with the AWS Marketplace was very good. The pricing in Italy is considered a little bit high, but the product is ...
What needs improvement with Apache NiFi?
Improvements can be made in the way of the UI. From the deployment perspective, Git configurations are available in 2.6 versions and 2.0 and later versions of Apache NiFi. Before 2.0, templates had...
What is your primary use case for Apache NiFi?
Apache NiFi is used to fetch data from different sources and ingest it into different destinations. The entire platform depends on Apache NiFi for data transformation and data movement. Multiple so...
What needs improvement with Zadara?
The initial installation was difficult because many steps required the command line interface (CLI). Maintenance can also be complicated, especially when deeper troubleshooting requires navigating ...
What is your primary use case for Zadara?
I use this product as storage. Specifically, I use it as big storage. That's the main use case for Zadara ( /products/zadara-reviews ).
What advice do you have for others considering Zadara?
As for the pros and cons, the main concerns are the complexity of the initial installation and the complicated maintenance due to the CLI usage. Overall, I do not have other complaints. My overall ...
 

Comparisons

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Macquarie Telecom Group, Dovestech, Slovak Telekom, Looker, Hastings Group
Time, Inc. A&E Network, The Washington Post, News UK, McGraw Hill, Gilt, Toshiba, Deloitte, VMware
Find out what your peers are saying about Apache NiFi vs. Zadara and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.
881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.