Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Zadara Logo

Top 10 Zadara Alternatives

Vendor: Zadara
4.3 out of 5
221 followers
Start review

Top Zadara Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Zadara based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Red Hat Ceph Storage, Pure Storage FlashArray, and MinIO. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

Zadara surpasses its competitors by offering scalable, cost-effective storage solutions with integrated data protection and enterprise-grade infrastructure, ensuring flexibility and security without compromise, all while providing a seamless experience with expert support and innovative technology.

Zadara Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Zadara, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Zadara Logo
Zadara Logo
Red Hat Ceph Storage
4.1 out of 5
Red Hat Ceph Storage attracts tech buyers with its cost-effectiveness, scalability, and open-source flexibility. In comparison, Zadara appeals to those needing enterprise-grade cloud features and robust data protection. Red Hat targets integration-savvy organizations, while Zadara suits businesses seeking comprehensive, managed services.
Download Red Hat Ceph Storage vs. Zadara Report
Red Hat Ceph Storage involves higher setup costs, whereas Zadara offers more cost-effective setup options. This distinction is crucial for budget-conscious enterprises deciding between the two cloud storage solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Red Hat Ceph Storage involves higher setup costs, whereas Zadara offers more cost-effective setup options. This distinction is crucial for budget-conscious enterprises deciding between the two cloud storage solutions.
Zadara Logo
Zadara Logo
Pure Storage FlashArray
4.6 out of 5
Pure Storage FlashArray is favored for high performance and data reduction. In comparison, Zadara is praised for flexibility with its pay-as-you-go model. Tech buyers might choose FlashArray for performance advantages, while Zadara offers adaptable, budget-friendly options suitable for diverse environments.
Download Pure Storage FlashArray vs. Zadara Report
Pure Storage FlashArray has a high initial setup cost, while Zadara offers a flexible pay-as-you-go setup cost model. FlashArray targets enterprises with significant upfront investment, whereas Zadara appeals to businesses seeking cost efficiency and scalability.
View comparison
Pricing
Pure Storage FlashArray has a high initial setup cost, while Zadara offers a flexible pay-as-you-go setup cost model. FlashArray targets enterprises with significant upfront investment, whereas Zadara appeals to businesses seeking cost efficiency and scalability.
Zadara Logo
MinIO
4.0 out of 5
Zadara Logo
MinIO
4.0 out of 5
Zadara appeals to enterprises with its managed services, scalability, and transparent pricing. In comparison, MinIO attracts those seeking a simple, cost-effective storage solution. MinIO offers open-source flexibility, catering to smaller projects needing basic storage with minimal investment.
Download MinIO vs. Zadara Report
Zadara offers a low setup cost, while MinIO requires a moderate initial investment. These pricing differences highlight Zadara's affordability compared to MinIO's higher expenditure.
View comparison
Pricing
Zadara offers a low setup cost, while MinIO requires a moderate initial investment. These pricing differences highlight Zadara's affordability compared to MinIO's higher expenditure.
Zadara Logo
Zadara Logo
Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure (NCI)
4.3 out of 5
Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure offers high performance, ease of management, and competitive pricing, appealing to those focused on integrated disaster recovery and automation. In comparison, Zadara provides flexible storage and multi-cloud integration, ideal for seamless data handling and pay-per-use cost efficiency.
Download Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure (NCI) vs. Zadara Report
Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure (NCI) has a higher initial setup cost compared to Zadara, which offers a more budget-friendly setup pricing option.
View comparison
Pricing
Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure (NCI) has a higher initial setup cost compared to Zadara, which offers a more budget-friendly setup pricing option.
Zadara Logo
Dell ECS
4.1 out of 5
Zadara Logo
Dell ECS
4.1 out of 5
Dell ECS excels in robust data handling with strong support. In comparison, Zadara offers advanced features and real-time scalability. Tech buyers might choose Dell ECS for cost-effectiveness and integration, while others may prefer Zadara's flexible storage and pay-as-you-go model.
Download Dell ECS vs. Zadara Report
Dell ECS offers a competitive setup cost with straightforward implementation, while Zadara presents a flexible pricing structure with potential for lower initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Dell ECS offers a competitive setup cost with straightforward implementation, while Zadara presents a flexible pricing structure with potential for lower initial expenses.
Zadara Logo
Zadara Logo
Amazon EFS (Elastic File System)
4.1 out of 5
Amazon EFS offers scalability and seamless AWS integration, ideal for dynamic storage needs. In comparison, Zadara impresses with customizable options and advanced security, beneficial for businesses prioritizing feature flexibility. Amazon EFS provides cost-effective scaling, while Zadara delivers superior ROI for complex enterprise requirements.
Download Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) vs. Zadara Report
Amazon EFS offers a lower initial setup cost, making it appealing for budget-conscious projects, while Zadara incurs higher upfront costs, which may be justified by its extensive feature set and advanced functionalities.
View comparison
Pricing
Amazon EFS offers a lower initial setup cost, making it appealing for budget-conscious projects, while Zadara incurs higher upfront costs, which may be justified by its extensive feature set and advanced functionalities.
Zadara Logo
Zadara Logo
HPE Alletra Storage
4.6 out of 5
Zadara and HPE Alletra Storage offer competing storage solutions. Users appreciate the pricing and support of Zadara. In comparison, HPE Alletra Storage is preferred for its features and is considered worth the investment. Despite Zadara's strengths in adaptability, HPE Alletra's advanced capabilities give it an edge.
Download HPE Alletra Storage vs. Zadara Report
Zadara has lower setup costs compared to HPE Alletra Storage, making it a more cost-effective option for initial deployment. HPE Alletra Storage offers higher setup costs, reflecting its advanced feature set and comprehensive capabilities.
View comparison
Pricing
Zadara has lower setup costs compared to HPE Alletra Storage, making it a more cost-effective option for initial deployment. HPE Alletra Storage offers higher setup costs, reflecting its advanced feature set and comprehensive capabilities.
Zadara Logo
VAST Data
5.0 out of 5
Zadara Logo
VAST Data
5.0 out of 5
Zadara offers multi-cloud compatibility and ease of use, making it a versatile option for diverse needs. In comparison, VAST Data focuses on advanced performance with exceptional speed and data efficiency. Zadara is budget-friendly, while VAST Data provides significant long-term benefits despite higher initial costs.
Download VAST Data vs. Zadara Report
Zadara offers cost-effective setup options, while VAST Data requires higher initial setup investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Zadara offers cost-effective setup options, while VAST Data requires higher initial setup investment.
Zadara Logo
Zadara Logo
Huawei OceanStor Dorado
4.3 out of 5
Zadara offers flexible pricing and strong customer support, making it ideal for those seeking scalability and robust security protocols. In comparison, Huawei OceanStor Dorado emphasizes high performance, low latency, and advanced data protection, catering to users prioritizing superior performance despite higher costs.
Download Huawei OceanStor Dorado vs. Zadara Report
Zadara offers a more streamlined setup process, while Huawei OceanStor Dorado involves higher initial setup costs.
View comparison
Pricing
Zadara offers a more streamlined setup process, while Huawei OceanStor Dorado involves higher initial setup costs.
Zadara Logo
Zadara Logo
NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP
4.4 out of 5
Zadara offers flexible, fully managed cloud storage with easy customization, ideal for scalability needs. In comparison, NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP provides high performance and comprehensive data management features. Zadara is cost-effective, while NetApp suits those seeking advanced functionality despite higher costs.
Download NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP vs. Zadara Report
Zadara has a straightforward setup cost, while NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP offers a more complex pricing structure. Users may find Zadara's initial costs more predictable compared to the flexibility offered by NetApp's pricing options.
View comparison
Pricing
Zadara has a straightforward setup cost, while NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP offers a more complex pricing structure. Users may find Zadara's initial costs more predictable compared to the flexibility offered by NetApp's pricing options.
Zadara Logo
Zadara Logo
Google Cloud Storage
4.4 out of 5
Google Cloud Storage offers scalability and integration with other Google services. In comparison, Zadara is known for its flexibility and robust security features. Google Cloud Storage provides straightforward deployment, while Zadara's support is superior. Google Cloud Storage is competitively priced; Zadara delivers higher ROI.
Download Google Cloud Storage vs. Zadara Report
Google Cloud Storage has a low initial setup cost, whereas Zadara entails a higher setup expense. The differences in setup fees highlight distinct pricing strategies and initial cost demands for users.
View comparison
Pricing
Google Cloud Storage has a low initial setup cost, whereas Zadara entails a higher setup expense. The differences in setup fees highlight distinct pricing strategies and initial cost demands for users.
Zadara Logo
Amazon S3
4.4 out of 5
Zadara Logo
Amazon S3
4.4 out of 5
Amazon S3 offers straightforward deployment and cost-effective storage, making it ideal for businesses with extensive storage needs. In comparison, Zadara's robust security features and personalized resource control justify its higher price, appealing to those seeking advanced capabilities and enhanced customizability.
Download Amazon S3 vs. Zadara Report
Amazon S3 requires no setup cost, while Zadara involves an initial setup fee.
View comparison
Pricing
Amazon S3 requires no setup cost, while Zadara involves an initial setup fee.
Zadara Logo
Zadara Logo
Nutanix Unified Storage (NUS)
4.4 out of 5
Zadara is praised for its pricing and multi-cloud flexibility. In comparison, Nutanix Unified Storage (NUS) offers superior integrations and robust security. For cost-effectiveness and easy scaling, Zadara stands out, whereas NUS's comprehensive features and long-term ROI make it attractive despite higher costs.
Download Nutanix Unified Storage (NUS) vs. Zadara Report
Zadara offers a competitive setup cost with a pay-as-you-go model, while Nutanix Unified Storage (NUS) requires a higher initial investment but includes more extensive support features.
View comparison
Pricing
Zadara offers a competitive setup cost with a pay-as-you-go model, while Nutanix Unified Storage (NUS) requires a higher initial investment but includes more extensive support features.
Zadara Logo
Zadara Logo
DataCore SANsymphony
4.6 out of 5
DataCore SANsymphony specializes in hardware compatibility and streamlined management through auto-tiering and parallel I/O. In comparison, Zadara focuses on cloud integration with a pay-as-you-go model, offering dynamic scalability. DataCore ensures continuity, while Zadara provides remote management and cost efficiency.
Download DataCore SANsymphony vs. Zadara Report
DataCore SANsymphony features a competitive initial setup cost, while Zadara offers a more transparent pricing model. The distinctions in setup experiences highlight notable differences in the pricing strategies of these storage solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
DataCore SANsymphony features a competitive initial setup cost, while Zadara offers a more transparent pricing model. The distinctions in setup experiences highlight notable differences in the pricing strategies of these storage solutions.
Zadara Logo
Scality RING
4.0 out of 5
Zadara Logo
Scality RING
4.0 out of 5
Scality RING offers robust features with strong multi-tenant support and seamless cloud integration. In comparison, Zadara excels with elastic capacity and deployment flexibility, catering to dynamic workloads. Scality RING appeals to enterprises needing high-performance storage, while Zadara meets versatile business requirements with cost-effective pricing.
Download Scality RING vs. Zadara Report
Scality RING has higher initial setup costs, providing robust scalability, while Zadara offers lower setup costs with flexible cloud-based deployment.
View comparison
Pricing
Scality RING has higher initial setup costs, providing robust scalability, while Zadara offers lower setup costs with flexible cloud-based deployment.
Zadara Logo
Wasabi
4.1 out of 5
Zadara Logo
Wasabi
4.1 out of 5
Zadara excels with multi-cloud support and integrated security, while Wasabi impresses with performance speed and cost-effectiveness. In comparison, Zadara benefits from better integration, whereas Wasabi could enhance its support. Zadara offers flexible pricing, but Wasabi's lower costs and higher ROI are attractive.
Download Wasabi vs. Zadara Report
Zadara offers a cost-efficient setup with flexible billing, while Wasabi provides an ultra-low setup cost but requires longer-term commitments. Zadara is ideal for fluctuating workloads, whereas Wasabi is best for consistently high storage usage.
View comparison
Pricing
Zadara offers a cost-efficient setup with flexible billing, while Wasabi provides an ultra-low setup cost but requires longer-term commitments. Zadara is ideal for fluctuating workloads, whereas Wasabi is best for consistently high storage usage.
Zadara Logo
Zadara Logo
Cloudian HyperStore
4.1 out of 5
Cloudian HyperStore attracts with competitive pricing and robust support, focusing on seamless S3-compatible storage and data protection. In comparison, Zadara offers versatility with block and file storage across environments, appealing to businesses seeking extensive functionality and superior ROI despite higher pricing.
Download Cloudian HyperStore vs. Zadara Report
Cloudian HyperStore has a higher setup cost compared to Zadara, making Cloudian's initial investment more substantial. Zadara offers a more budget-friendly setup cost, appealing to businesses seeking cost-efficient cloud storage deployment.
View comparison
Pricing
Cloudian HyperStore has a higher setup cost compared to Zadara, making Cloudian's initial investment more substantial. Zadara offers a more budget-friendly setup cost, appealing to businesses seeking cost-efficient cloud storage deployment.
Zadara Logo
Amazon EC2
4.3 out of 5
Zadara Logo
Amazon EC2
4.3 out of 5

Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud (Amazon EC2) is a web service that provides secure, resizable compute capacity in the cloud. It is designed to make web-scale cloud computing easier for developers.

Download Amazon EC2 vs. Zadara Report
Pricing appears to be cheap, however, it is extremely difficult in calculating what something will cost.
It has helped to reduce costs with infrastructure.
View comparison
Pricing
Pricing appears to be cheap, however, it is extremely difficult in calculating what something will cost.
It has helped to reduce costs with infrastructure.
Zadara Logo
Zadara Logo
Microsoft Azure Block Storage
4.0 out of 5
Microsoft Azure Block Storage offers seamless integration with Azure services and robust security features. In comparison, Zadara is praised for its flexibility, scalability, and features like on-premises deployment and customizable SLAs. Both have unique attributes that cater to different tech buyer needs.
Download Microsoft Azure Block Storage vs. Zadara Report
Microsoft Azure Block Storage has an upfront setup cost, while Zadara offers a pay-as-you-go model. This difference in initial investment can significantly impact the budget considerations for businesses of varying sizes and requirements.
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft Azure Block Storage has an upfront setup cost, while Zadara offers a pay-as-you-go model. This difference in initial investment can significantly impact the budget considerations for businesses of varying sizes and requirements.
Zadara Logo
Zadara Logo
Microsoft Azure Object Storage
4.0 out of 5
Microsoft Azure Object Storage offers extensive integration and robust security. In comparison, Zadara excels in high performance and customizable storage. Azure’s pricing is complex but offers extensive services, while Zadara provides high ROI despite higher setup costs. Azure ensures smooth deployment; Zadara offers flexible options.
Download Microsoft Azure Object Storage vs. Zadara Report
Microsoft Azure Object Storage has relatively low setup costs compared to Zadara, which tends to have higher setup costs. Zadara offers more customizable setup options, whereas Microsoft Azure provides a more straightforward, cost-effective setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft Azure Object Storage has relatively low setup costs compared to Zadara, which tends to have higher setup costs. Zadara offers more customizable setup options, whereas Microsoft Azure provides a more straightforward, cost-effective setup.

Related categories

All-Flash Storage
Software Defined Storage (SDS)
Public Cloud Storage Services