Google Cloud Storage and Zadara are two powerful storage solutions available today, each with unique strengths and areas requiring improvement. Based on user reviews, Zadara's feature set makes it seem like a superior product overall, despite Google Cloud Storage being highly appreciated for pricing, support, and ease of use.
Features: Google Cloud Storage users appreciate its scalability, reliability, and integration with other Google services. Zadara is praised for its flexibility, customizable infrastructure, and seamless data migration capabilities. Zadara stands out in terms of customizability, giving users more control compared to Google Cloud Storage.
Room for Improvement: Users mention Google Cloud Storage could benefit from improved documentation and support resources. Zadara users see room for improvement in its price model complexity and occasional performance issues. Despite the need for better documentation, Google Cloud Storage has fewer complaints about performance than Zadara.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Users find Google Cloud Storage easy to deploy, thanks to comprehensive integration capabilities and user-friendly setup. Zadara also has a relatively smooth deployment process but requires more technical expertise. Google Cloud Storage's customer service is often rated higher, with users noting more accessible support compared to Zadara.
Pricing and ROI: Google Cloud Storage is often praised for its competitive pricing and clear cost structure, contributing to a favorable ROI. Zadara, while offering advanced features, is considered more expensive and deemed complex in its pricing model. Although Zadara's features can justify the higher cost, Google Cloud Storage is perceived as providing better value for money overall.
The cost is not cheaper compared to AWS, and we have not seen the expected return on investment.
I think the technical support by Google is good; the articles and troubleshooting are adequate.
We have self-studied to learn the services.
For SAP loads, Google provided a specific team, which resulted in good support.
I rate the technical support from Zadara as nine out of ten.
We lack adequate response times and a 24/7 service level agreement.
Google Cloud Storage is scalable, but there are limitations.
Zadara is a fully-fledged platform, and our customers are happy with its use.
There was no direct experience with any instability during my involvement.
In the future, I would like to see additional features in Google Cloud Storage such as integrating Gemini to function as a chat for finding information, or OCR, or reading the content in my files for searching purposes.
They cover a broad range of products, which might affect their ability to compete well in certain niches.
Maintenance can also be complicated, especially when deeper troubleshooting requires navigating the CLI and searching for logs.
Adding AI capabilities could enhance the offering as well.
AWS was the most expensive.
Depending on your setup, Google Cloud Storage is economical, especially if you do not need high stability and scalability.
The pricing is considered expensive.
The user interface of Google Cloud Storage is easy and consistent across all their products.
It has helped optimize costs because I store it in free tiers, resulting in no charge.
We do not experience any disruptions, and the service meets our needs and requirements.
The most valuable feature is its storage management capability.
Zadara's troubleshooting feature is very valuable for me.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Google Cloud Storage | 7.1% |
| Zadara | 2.2% |
| Other | 90.7% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 31 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 17 |
| Large Enterprise | 35 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 12 |
| Large Enterprise | 4 |
Google Cloud Storage is praised for its fast performance, seamless integration, high security, and scalability. Users store and access large amounts of data easily, backup files, host websites, and collaborate on projects. The platform's reliability and cost-effectiveness make it a top choice for data storage and management.
Zadara is a powerful enterprise-level storage solution whose design enables it to handle every aspect of a user’s data storage needs. It can be deployed in any location, using any protocol, and storing any data type that an organization requires. With Zadara, organizations can do everything that they were able to do with more traditional systems in a cheaper and more efficient way.
Zadara Benefits
Some of the ways that organizations can benefit by choosing to deploy Zadara include:
Zadara Features
File analytics. Organizations can leverage a powerful analytics package that can provide them with critical insights. These tools can help users sort through their data and make more informed data management decisions.
Reviews from Real Users
Zadara is a highly effective solution that stands out when compared to many of its competitors. Two major advantages it offers are its extensive suite of cloud solution integrations and its object storage capability.
Steve H., the chief technology officer at Pratum, writes, “One of the most valuable features is its integration with other cloud solutions. We have a presence within Amazon EC2 and we leverage computer instances there. Being able to integrate with computing, both locally within Zadara, as well as with other cloud vendors such as Amazon, is very helpful, while also being able to maintain extremely low latency between those connections.”
Mauro R., the CEO of Momit SRL, says, “The object storage feature is wonderful. With traditional storage, you have a cost per gigabyte that is extremely high or related to the number of disks. With Zadara Storage Cloud, you have a cost per gigabyte that you can cut and tailor to your needs independent of the number or size of the disks.”
We monitor all Public Cloud Storage Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
