Apache Web Server vs IBM WebSphere Application Server comparison

Apache Web Server vs. IBM WebSphere Application Server

Download the complete report

Helped 913,806 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Apache Web Server

Ranking in Application Infrastructure

4th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

IBM WebSphere Application S...

Ranking in Application Infrastructure

6th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

5.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Server (5th)

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Application Infrastructure category, the mindshare of Apache Web Server is 7.0%, down from 11.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM WebSphere Application Server is 4.7%, down from 10.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Infrastructure Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Apache Web Server	7.0%
IBM WebSphere Application Server	4.7%
Other	88.3%

Application Infrastructure

Featured Reviews

Dimitrios Zigkos

Enterprise Architect at Smals vzw

Faced limitations with integration and long-term adaptability but benefited from a lightweight architecture for standalone applications

I find valuable and beneficial the independence that comes with Apache Web Server. You can build a small project using a simple application server without bothering too much about how to manage it. The compatibility with multiple operating systems has helped my operations since most of the time we use Linux. Some systems rely on Windows, but they are few; in the past, Windows was the dominant operating system for mainstream PCs and infrastructure, but not for business. All the companies I worked for had 90% Linux and maybe up to 10% Windows. The initial setup of Apache Web Server was straightforward and okay.

Read full review

Costica Florea

Senior Manager, MW & DB Automation at a computer software company with 11-50 employees

Has worked seamlessly in complex clustered environments and supports long-term development efforts

IBM WebSphere Application Server is currently at version 9.0.5.23. In recent months, they released fix 23, as they periodically release fixes. Previously, they frequently increased versions, but now they maintain 9.0.5 with different releases. It's based on Java J2EE 7 and Java SDK 1.8. Oracle announced that 2030 will be the last year when Java SDK 1.8 will be supported. Oracle currently deploys Java 2.x in parallel, with the latest being version 25. The future of IBM WebSphere Application Server remains uncertain since it's based on Java 1.8 and Java 7. I haven't found any white papers or official documentation from IBM outlining their trajectory post-2030.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Apache Web Server is free of cost."

"The product is very cheap and stable."

"Apache Web Server can be used as a proxy server"

"The best thing about Apache is that it is open-source, so implementing my platform on-premises is less expansive than other solutions."

"I find valuable and beneficial the independence that comes with Apache Web Server; you can build a small project using a simple application server without bothering too much about how to manage it."

"It's very stable, and it hosts one of the biggest of many biggest web applications in the world."

"Apache Web Server effectively runs any web application, including Java-based applications, and includes Apache Tomcat server, which is crucial."

"It is scalable."

More Apache Web Server pros

"It does integrate well with the Tivoli Federated Identity Management system."

"I would say that the clustering, achieved by using the deployment manager, is valuable, as there is a load balancing feature that uses different nodes, handled by the deployment manager, and this functionality helps with the load balancing of applications."

"The only reason why we're currently using WebSphere is that the integration of the authentication with Azure is very quick. WebSphere has something that can immediately connect with Azure Active Directory."

"It is very stable, safe, and secure."

"IBM WebSphere Application Server is one of the best servers due to its stability and paid license."

"Security: It is compatible with the latest Java 8 security features, supports FIPS 140-2 and NIST SP 800-53 with strong ciphers and cryptography keys, and supports TLS 1.2 completely. Also, configuring client and server certificates is relatively easy."

"The integration between IBM tools and applications is very well executed, and the support from IBM is quite good, providing a solid support structure."

"The solution's data consistency is great and very reliable, which is critical for us in a transitional scenario and the most important feature that we count on."

More IBM WebSphere Application Server pros

Cons

"Regarding advice, there is a security-related problem that depends on the web server's configuration."

"No support is available from Apache software foundation."

"By optimizing the infrastructure to allow the webserver to directly handle queries from memory—particularly by prioritizing the storage of queries in memory and processing them through the web server interface—I could potentially cut down the required instances from five hundred to two hundred."

"So far, for us, everything is okay."

"If Apache master the ability of hosting websites/web apps that use Microsoft's .Net framework then it will definitely be the best web server to use."

"The interface has room for improvement."

"I would like to see improvements in the functionality and core of Apache Web Server, focusing on building an infrastructure that can be resilient and robust enough to handle resource shortages, and fast enough in edge cases without crashing under too much traffic during spikes."

"Its stability could be better."

More Apache Web Server cons

"I find the server okay, however, using the Maker instance, the Moving instance, and the Change instance is a little bit complicated without WebSphere knowledge."

"The main issue we faced was its limited compatibility with non-Java technologies, which can result in difficulty detecting potential bugs and requiring additional integration efforts."

"While WebSphere mostly supports IBM HTTP Server (IHS) as the web server plugin, I think it would be beneficial if it also supported Apache and NGINX web servers. That would give customers more flexibility in their choices."

"Room for improvement would only be in the licensing. As with all IBM products the licensing can be complex and expensive."

"The main problem is the licensing cost of the product. The product can scale but the budget cannot."

"The solution is very expensive compared to an open-source stack."

"Initial setup is very simple. Just use the IBM Installation Manager and add the packages. The install wizard takes care of the rest. The only thing that can be difficult is to find the right packages on the IBM website, because of all the changes that IBM does on its website(s)."

"What could be improved in IBM WebSphere Application Server is its interconnection with other products, for example, Kafka. What I'd like to see in the next release of the solution is a better graphical user interface."

More IBM WebSphere Application Server cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There is no licensing cost for the product."

"It is an open-source solution."

"It is a free-of-cost solution."

"The apache software is free, open-source."

"It is very expensive."

"It costs more than some of the others, but, you get what you pay for."

"The price of IBM WebSphere Application Server could be less expensive and there is an annual license required for this solution."

"IBM WAS base is part of the deal when you purchase IBM FileNet P8 Content Engine."

"The licensing policy is based on the PVU base."

"The price of this product is higher than that of competitors."

"My company is on a perpetual or permanent license agreement with IBM WebSphere Application Server. There's also a pay-per-use option, but customers rarely choose that option. Most of the customers are on the perpetual license deal that's all-inclusive. As the license cost is quite expensive, I'm rating it two out of five."

"We pay around $200,000 annually."

More IBM WebSphere Application Server pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Infrastructure solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

913,806 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Outsourcing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

28%

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	11

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	23

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Apache Web Server?

There are no fees associated with the usage of Apache Web Server in my projects. If you want to have support, then there is some cost, but today I do not know how many companies pay for that servic...

What needs improvement with Apache Web Server?

I would like to see improvements in the functionality and core of Apache Web Server, focusing on building an infrastructure that can be resilient and robust enough to handle resource shortages, and...

What is your primary use case for Apache Web Server?

I am currently working with Apache Web Server in my projects because I'm an architect. Some years ago, it was the application server and the web server; it was Apache Daemon and Apache, the web ser...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM WebSphere Application Server?

At Royal Bank, which is a major IBM customer with mainframes and numerous IBM products, they have a specific agreement regarding pricing. The pricing structure for large enterprise customers differ...

What needs improvement with IBM WebSphere Application Server?

What is your primary use case for IBM WebSphere Application Server?

I was part of an application where I integrated IBM WebSphere Application Server with Node.js and Blue Prism. I did a lot of REST applications because at my core, I'm a developer. Currently, I'm an...

NGINX Plus vs Apache Web Server

Comparisons

IIS vs Apache Web Server

Compared 16% of the time

Compared 13% of the time

JBoss Enterprise Application Platform vs Apache Web Server

Compared 6% of the time

Magic xpa Application Platform vs Apache Web Server

Compared 6% of the time

More Apache Web Server Competitors

NGINX Plus vs IBM WebSphere Application Server

Compared 12% of the time

Tomcat vs IBM WebSphere Application Server

Compared 11% of the time

JBoss Enterprise Application Platform vs IBM WebSphere Application Server

Compared 7% of the time

Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) vs IBM WebSphere Application Server

Compared 7% of the time

WebLogic Suite vs IBM WebSphere Application Server

Compared 2% of the time

More IBM WebSphere Application Server Competitors

Product Reports

Apache Web Server

Download Apache Web Server product report

IBM WebSphere Application Server

Download IBM WebSphere Application Server product report

Also Known As

Apache HTTP Server

WebSphere Application Server

Overview

Apache Web Server is a stable, open-source platform known for its cost-effectiveness, multi-platform compatibility, ease of setup, and high security. It supports various web scripting languages and enables HTTPS services, making it a popular choice for many organizations.

Apache Web Server offers extensive features including HTTP server capabilities and modularity. It efficiently handles client requests and is highly flexible, which is why many companies utilize it for hosting applications, developing websites, and more. Community support further enhances its reliability, though improvements like integration with cloud systems such as Kubernetes, a simplified port management, and support for Microsoft's .Net framework are desired. Initial setup challenges exist, and enhanced security features and GUI updates would benefit less experienced users. Apache needs optimization for resource efficiency and compatibility with modern application architectures.

What are the most important features of Apache Web Server?

Open-Source: Apache is free and community-driven.
Cross-Platform Compatibility: Works on multiple operating systems.
Modular Architecture: Allows scalability and customization.
Secure: Supports HTTPS services and has WAF capabilities.
Performance: Efficiently handles client requests.

What benefits can users expect from using Apache Web Server?

Cost-Effective: No licensing fees associated.
High Reliability: Community support ensures stability.
Flexibility: Easily integrates with numerous frameworks.
Scalability: Modular design aids in scaling operations.
Community Support: Continuous updates and enhancements.

Apache Web Server is widely used across different industries such as financial sectors for hosting applications and core banking systems. Integrated with tools like JMeter and Tomcat, it is pivotal in deploying web servers and acting as a proxy for application servers. In cloud migrations, its open-source WAF features using ModSecurity are invaluable, and companies rely on its capabilities for managing threats and attacks through HTTP/HTTPS connections.

Apache

IBM WebSphere Application Server guarantees robustness and scalability, offering excellent integration with systems like CICS and supporting high-performance Java-based applications across diverse industries.

IBM WebSphere Application Server is designed for robustness and scalability, providing seamless integration with enterprise systems such as CICS. Known for its stability and security features, including SSL certificates, it ensures reliable application performance. With an intuitive GUI and Admin Console, it facilitates integration and operation even in complex deployments. However, there are user demands for improvements in areas like cost, complexity, and compatibility with non-Java technologies. Enhanced support for modern web servers and cloud services is also sought.

What are the most important features of IBM WebSphere Application Server?

Scalability: Efficiently handles large application loads and complex deployments.
Security: Offers reliable SSL certificates and robust security protocols.
Integration: Seamlessly connects with systems like CICS and supports Java-based applications.
Usability: Features an intuitive GUI and comprehensive Admin Console.
Performance: High stability and strong performance even under heavy loads.

What benefits should users look for in IBM WebSphere Application Server reviews?

Enterprise Capabilities: Known for comprehensive enterprise capabilities.
Support: Offers excellent support across diverse technology platforms.
Flexibility: Adaptability in managing applications in diverse environments.
Ease of Deployment: Facilitates deployment through command-line tools and console interfaces.

IBM WebSphere Application Server plays a significant role in industries such as banking and retail, where it supports enterprise application deployment, e-commerce sites, and financial transactions. It is used in both on-premise and cloud environments, catering to sectors like insurance and public administration.

IBM

Sample Customers

Cisco, Intuit, General Electric, Adobe, VMware, PayPal, HP, EMC, eBay, Apple, SAP, Qualcomm, SanDisk, Allstate, FedEx

TalkTalk, Property management group, E.SUN Bank, Ohio National Financial Services, Aviarc, Cincom Systems, FJA-US, D+H, Staples, Michigan Municipal League

Apache Web Server vs. IBM WebSphere Application Server