Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Apica vs Mezmo comparison

Apica and Mezmo are both solutions in the Observability Pipeline Software category. Apica is ranked #2 with an average rating of 7.7, while Mezmo is ranked #7. Apica holds a 2.4% mindshare in OPS, compared to Mezmo’s 1.4% mindshare. Additionally, 81% of Apica users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Mezmo users who would recommend it.
Apica
Read 11 Apica reviews
  • 1,227 Views
  • 98 Comparison Views
81% willing to recommend
Mezmo
Read 2 Mezmo reviews
  • 673 Views
  • 94 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024
```html

Apica and Mezmo are two prominent solutions in the monitoring and analytics field. Apica has the upper hand in cost-effectiveness and customer support, while Mezmo leads with its comprehensive features and advanced analytics capabilities.

Features: Apica provides robust monitoring, real-time alerts, and efficient support. Mezmo offers powerful data visualization, complex data stream handling, and extensive analytics integration.

Room for Improvement: Apica needs deeper analytics, more customization options, and enhanced user training materials. Mezmo could improve by reducing the learning curve, addressing performance slowdowns during large data processing, and refining user training materials.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Apica is straightforward in deployment and offers responsive customer service. Mezmo takes more time to deploy due to its feature-rich nature and has mixed reviews on support effectiveness.

Pricing and ROI: Apica is noted for lower setup costs and satisfactory ROI in routine environments. Mezmo requires higher upfront costs but delivers significant ROI for complex data needs, making its pricing justified when its full feature set is utilized.

```
DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Apica vs. Mezmo Report (Updated: September 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Apica vs. Mezmo
September 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 868,787 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Apica
Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
16th
Ranking in Log Management
18th
Ranking in Observability Pipeline Software
2nd
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
11
Ranking in other categories
IT Operations Analytics (6th)
Mezmo
Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
74th
Ranking in Log Management
50th
Ranking in Observability Pipeline Software
7th
Average Rating
9.0
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Observability Pipeline Software category, the mindshare of Apica is 2.4%, down from 8.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Mezmo is 1.4%, down from 23.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Observability Pipeline Software Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Apica2.4%
Mezmo1.4%
Other96.2%
Observability Pipeline Software
 

Featured Reviews

Punith H K - PeerSpot reviewer
Enables users to create scripts easily and provides excellent real-time monitoring features
It is easy to create scripts. We don't have to write any script. Ready-made options are available. We can select, drag, and drop the options, and the script is ready. The solution’s real-time monitoring features have had a huge impact on our service delivery. If we have an application and the script for it, we keep monitoring it. When the script goes red, it indicates that something is not working. So, we check and analyze the applications. We keep track of applications and monitor whether they are live or not. The tool is also useful for monitoring cloud services.
Read full review
TO
It consolidates all logs into one place and provides required features and functionalities
Every once in a while, our IBM cloud operational implementation gets behind. Sometimes, when we have a customer event, we do not get access to the latest logs for about 30 minutes, particularly for the sites that are heavily utilized. This is clearly not good. It is impossible to do RCA when you can't look at the logs that pertain to the time period in which the event occurred. It could be more of an operational problem than a feature problem. I don't have visibility about whether it is a LogDNA issue or just an operational issue.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It is easy to set up and configure."
"It helps with releases because we monitor them in staging. We can tell if something is critically wrong before it gets into production, e.g., if it was load related or function related and also what was different in the dev stage. It then alerts us straightaway inside of our production monitors once it has been released. Therefore, it has improved how we run our systems since we monitor multiple environments."
"It is easy for beginners to learn and use Apica."
"It uses a basic scripting language, which is easy to learn and customize as needed. Compared to LoadRunner, I found writing and customizing code much easier in Apica."
"As always, within the IT industry, everybody's always looking to upgrade and update everything else like that. Apica has been one of those things but it's really hard to replace because it offers us the unique capability to see what the customer is seeing. A lot of other ones can do Selenium script and things like that, but there's a lot in Apica that we use right now. We utilize a lot of the scenario options in Apica right now, and there's a lot of other ones that do parts of it, but it doesn't do everything that Apica does."
"What I like the most is that Apica can simulate different browsers and different versions of desktop or mobile browsers."
"The GUI is powerful and doesn't require scripting or regular expressions. It has a vast finder for correlation, which is easier than other tools like JMeter and LoadRunner. It's also easy to integrate with other tools with a separate execution environment. The tool is also easy to use."
"Apica allows me to record APIs easily and enhances scripts through options like auto-correlation, enabling me to access dynamic fields."
More Apica pros
"The solution aggregates all event streams, so that if there are any issues, it's all in the same interface."
"LogDNA consolidates all logs into one place, which is super valuable."
 

Cons

"There are some components of the user interface that are not up to date. Just to give you an idea, today we have web applications that are called single-page applications that are much faster than the old style of web application. If we can move faster into the flow of the graphic user interface, and in a more effective way, it will save us a lot of time."
"Alerting needs improvement. It's a little noisy. It needs some better options. Currently, they have an issue, when you set up a synthetic monitor, you can set up where it's monitoring from, a data center that Apica owns."
"We have been focused on reducing polling times for synthetic checks. We have gone from 10 minutes down to five minutes for a pretty broad swath, but there is some appetite to reduce that further, which could be an improvement."
"Apica is costly, and there's no way to test mobile applications through Apica."
"If you are adding any input file, the tool fails to capture the path."
"Apica should add more features and integrations with different tools and certain ticketing systems, like ServiceNow."
"The having to install an application on your desktop to utilize something like ZebraTester is a little cumbersome. It would be nice to see that become a web-based application. Having the documentation a little more accessible, and easier to digest by people who are just learning how to use the framework, especially when it comes to more complex or more edge-based cases would be really helpful to have."
"The customer service and support were a little slow to respond. The browser sometimes checks alerts on unknown issues like latency from Apica's side."
More Apica cons
"Every once in a while, our IBM cloud operational implementation gets behind. Sometimes, when we have a customer event, we do not get access to the latest logs for about 30 minutes, particularly for the sites that are heavily utilized. This is clearly not good. It is impossible to RCA when you can't look at the logs that pertain to the time period in which the event occurred. It could be more of an operational problem than a feature problem. I don't have visibility about whether it is a LogDNA issue or just an operational issue."
"No ability to encapsulate a query or a filter, and communicate or share that among the team."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"License management is another area that Apica could do better. We have already had these conversations with our account teams. This is something that they are looking at largely improving in upcoming releases. I believe that this is already on their roadmap."
"The pricing is very reasonable, but it is not cheap."
"I know Apica is an expensive solution, but it is worth the money for the service it provides."
"The level of alerting accuracy has saved us time and money in operational costs. Overall, it has automated a lot of the manual efforts which have been more complex with some of our other scripting tools or monitors. So, it brings things together by doing things faster and saves us money."
"The pricing is fair. It is neither too cheap nor too expensive."
"The solution's pricing is not cheap, but it is in the midrange."
"The product is less expensive compared to LoadRunner."
"Another main difference between Apica and the other products was the cost. We really thought that the balance in Apica between the features and costs was the best among all the products on which we did a PoC."
More Apica pricing and cost advice
Information not available
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Observability Pipeline Software solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
868,787 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
24%
Media Company
11%
Insurance Company
7%
Comms Service Provider
7%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business4
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise17
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Apica Synthetic?
The GUI is powerful and doesn't require scripting or regular expressions. It has a vast finder for correlation, which is easier than other tools like JMeter and LoadRunner. It's also easy to integr...
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Apica Synthetic?
I know Apica is an expensive solution, but it is worth the money for the service it provides.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Apica Synthetic?
Apica cannot perform endurance or scale-up tests independently. It requires other tools like ALM. When editing scripts, only one can be accessed at a time, risking changes affecting other folders. ...
See all answers
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

Dynatrace vs Apica Logo
Dynatrace vs Apica
Compared 30% of the time
Cribl vs Apica Logo
Cribl vs Apica
Compared 28% of the time
Datadog vs Apica Logo
Datadog vs Apica
Compared 16% of the time
Splunk Enterprise Security vs Apica Logo
Splunk Enterprise Security vs Apica
Compared 13% of the time
Grafana vs Apica Logo
Grafana vs Apica
Compared 13% of the time
More Apica Competitors
Datadog vs Mezmo Logo
Datadog vs Mezmo
Compared 56% of the time
Cribl vs Mezmo Logo
Cribl vs Mezmo
Compared 44% of the time
More Mezmo Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Apica
October 2025
Apica reportDownload Apica product report
Buyer's Guide
Apica vs. Mezmo
September 2025
Mezmo reportDownload Mezmo product report
 

Also Known As

Apica LoadTest, Apica Synthetic
LogDNA
 

Overview

Apica leads in observability cost optimization, empowering IT teams to manage telemetry data economics efficiently. It supports various data types, reducing costs by 40% with flexible deployment options and eliminating tool sprawl through modular solutions.

Apica Ascent optimizes observability costs across metrics, logs, traces, and events and provides adaptability beyond proprietary formats. Its patented InstaStore™ technology ensures maximum storage efficiency and advanced root cause analysis. Organizations leverage Apica for comprehensive control over observability investments, reducing runaway costs. With solutions for mitigating high-cardinality data challenges, Apica supports any data lake preference and offers cloud or on-premises deployments. Its modular solutions eliminate unnecessary tool redundancies, enhancing economic efficiency in telemetry data management.

What features define Apica's capabilities?
  • Global Presence: Extensive points of presence worldwide
  • Advanced Alerting: Accurate system notifications
  • Robust Scripting: Supports multiple protocols easily
  • Flexible Integration: Effortless system connections
  • Environment Simulation: Adapts various test scenarios globally
Which benefits should users expect from Apica?
  • Cost Efficiency: Reduces observability costs by 40%
  • Data Flexibility: Supports any data source
  • Modular Approach: Eliminates tool redundancies
  • Advanced Analysis: Enhanced root cause capabilities
  • Deployment Variety: Cloud and on-premises options available

Apica addresses industry needs in monitoring and testing applications, enhancing user experience across sectors. It is instrumental in synthetic checks, load testing, API monitoring, and validating functionalities for stability in gaming, finance, eCommerce, and banking platforms. Apica's versatility supports both on-premises and cloud environments, ensuring accurate insights into service availability and network performance.

Apica

Today’s enterprises must manage a massive amount of machine data. They require a platform that enables engineering teams to deliberately route and store structured and unstructured data for different teams with unique use cases. Legacy platforms weren’t made for this moment.
‍
Mezmo, formerly LogDNA, lets organizations ingest, process, route, analyze, and store all of their log data. Purpose-built for modern engineering teams—including developers, SREs, IT Operations, and Security Engineers—the Mezmo platform is trusted by thousands of companies for SaaS, cloud, and hybrid applications.

Mezmo
 

Sample Customers

HBO, JPMC, Morgan Stanley, Xander, EA Sports, Volvo
Instacart, Asics, Lime, Salesforce
Buyer's Guide
Apica vs. Mezmo
September 2025
Free Report: Apica vs. Mezmo
Find out what your peers are saying about Apica vs. Mezmo and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
868,787 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Apica vs. Mezmo report.

We monitor all Observability Pipeline Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.