No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Apollo GraphOS vs IBM API Connect comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Apollo GraphOS
Ranking in API Management
29th
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
3.7
Number of Reviews
4
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
IBM API Connect
Ranking in API Management
7th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.4
Number of Reviews
80
Ranking in other categories
Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (13th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the API Management category, the mindshare of Apollo GraphOS is 0.7%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM API Connect is 4.4%, down from 6.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
API Management Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
IBM API Connect4.4%
Apollo GraphOS0.7%
Other94.9%
API Management
 

Featured Reviews

KajalSharma - PeerSpot reviewer
Software Development Engineering Testing at HighLevel
Centralized schema governance has improved API visibility and now reduces release risks
Apollo GraphOS is a strong platform, but there are a few areas where it could improve. The onboarding experience could be simpler for teams that are new to GraphQL. There are many powerful capabilities available, but it can take some time for new users to understand how everything fits together. I would also appreciate even more customizable dashboards and reporting options. Different teams often care about different metrics, so having greater flexibility in how insights are presented would be useful. From a larger organization perspective, additional guidance around governance and best practices could help teams adopt the platform more consistently across multiple services.
ME
DB A Sysadmin Devops Software Ag Adabas/Natural/Ibm Entire X Webmethods at Bundesamt für Informatik und Telekommunikation BIT
API management has strengthened security and monitoring but still needs better support and tooling
There are areas of IBM API Connect that need to be improved. I want what Gravitee made, which is much better. Gravitee made many samples for different use cases. First of all, they made examples of use cases, codes, and what the module expects and what the module returns for multiple examples and use cases inside the development. I do not even have to go to the documentation website because everything is included inside the tool when I work on it. This is great, in fact. IBM API Connect should show examples. One other thing is the support. The support of IBM is in India. Every time I want to ask something, they say they need logs, they want this, they want that. Gravitee API asks me to explain the problem without asking a thousand times as if it is a request for a green card in the USA. Then they really explain quickly. IBM is a big company, so everything is standardized with the approach of "You do that, you do that, you request that. If you do not have that, you do not reply to the client." Clients want flexibility today, even if it is a huge company. A stressed client is a client that will want to change to other flexible solutions. When everything is fine, we do not care, but when there is stress and problems, that is when the customer of IBM evaluates the tool really. It is when there are problems. IBM makes a lot of efforts on sales and technical sales, and then that is it.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Apollo GraphOS has positively impacted our organization by reducing unwanted code and helping us combine multiple services."
"Apollo GraphOS has significantly enhanced both the developer experience and product delivery timelines by offering a centralized approach to managing GraphQL schemas and services, helping reduce overhead and improve collaboration between frontend and backend teams."
"Apollo GraphOS positively impacts my organization by increasing confidence in API releases."
"The most valuable features of Apollo GraphOS OS for me are its security and authentication processes."
"It's quite flexible and easy to deploy, especially for beginners. It has almost all the features that an API gateway should have."
"The statistics component is easy to use."
"In-built policies and security functions."
"The technical support and the user interface are good."
"The solution's technical support team is good."
"I'd recommend the solution to other users and organizations due to the fact that it is very, very easy to use."
"The product gathers data to measure API performance."
"The technical support is good. Whenever we need anything, we have our IT team work with IBM to change whatever requirement is needed."
 

Cons

"There’s room for improvement in schema collaboration tools, especially in large teams where multiple developers are working on overlapping parts of the API."
"Apollo GraphOS is a strong platform, but there are a few areas where it could improve."
"Apollo GraphOS OS is using a detailed project, and it can be time-consuming because it has a lot of data to manage. It sometimes takes longer than three seconds, which can affect loading times and lead to user dissatisfaction. I would like to see improved performance."
"It would be nice to have a SaaS solution that can be deployed into the cloud."
"Due to bugs in integration, we have to look for workaround on fixing and using DataPower as gateway."
"It should be cheaper."
"It still does not support open API 3. Another problem is the designer; I want the whole solution to be on the cloud, but for the installation, I have to install locally."
"The installation process could use improvement. I hope that in the next release, the installation process is easier."
"It needs to be less taxing on compute resources."
"The only downside where improvements are needed is probably on the licensing side."
"In terms of stability, we are still prototyping the product. We have the older version, which is now stable, but the current version or the new version, that we are still prototyping, is still not 100% stable."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"IBM API Connect could be cheaper."
"API Connect was highly expensive for us, but the decision to switch was made before I joined the company. It seems like the company bought it, but they didn't know how to use it. After two years, they decided to reevaluate and conduct some cost estimates."
"It is quite an expensive product."
"Pricing for IBM API Connect varies, e.g. it could be subscription-based. Deploying it on private cloud also means you have to own most of the software licensing."
"It's an expensive product."
"It is expensive when compared to other products in this class. There were no extra fees for add-ons or technical support."
"It can be quite expensive. It's okay for large-scale usage but quite expensive for smaller-scale implementations."
"It would be a good idea to bring down the pricing by at least 20 to 30 percent."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Management solutions are best for your needs.
900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
17%
University
13%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Construction Company
6%
Financial Services Firm
17%
Insurance Company
10%
Computer Software Company
7%
Manufacturing Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business19
Midsize Enterprise10
Large Enterprise62
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Apollo GraphOS?
I am not sensitive to nor very knowledgeable about the pricing and setup cost.
What needs improvement with Apollo GraphOS?
Apollo GraphOS is a strong platform, but there are a few areas where it could improve. The onboarding experience could be simpler for teams that are new to GraphQL. There are many powerful capabili...
What is your primary use case for Apollo GraphOS?
My main use case for Apollo GraphOS is managing and monitoring GraphQL APIs across multiple services. From a quality engineering perspective, I use it to understand schema changes, identify potenti...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM API Connect?
I do not handle the pricing, setup cost, and licensing details.
What needs improvement with IBM API Connect?
There are areas of IBM API Connect that need to be improved. I want what Gravitee made, which is much better. Gravitee made many samples for different use cases. First of all, they made examples of...
What is your primary use case for IBM API Connect?
The usual use cases for IBM API Connect that I worked with mostly involved three things: security, monitoring, and message control. The purpose was to address these areas, though there was one feat...
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Heineken, Tine, Finologee, Axis Bank
Find out what your peers are saying about Apollo GraphOS vs. IBM API Connect and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.
900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.