Appium vs Eggplant Performance comparison

Why PeerSpot?

The compared Appium and Keysight Technologies solutions aren't in the same category. Appium is ranked #10 in MDP , with an average rating of 7.3, and holds a 2.9% mindshare in the category. Keysight Technologies is ranked #16 in PTT , and holds a 2.2% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of Appium users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Keysight Technologies users who would recommend it.

Appium

Read 30 Appium reviews

3,511 Views
843 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Eggplant Performance

Read 4 Eggplant Performance reviews

1,144 Views
778 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Appium

Eggplant Performance

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Appium and Eggplant Performance based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Mendix, OutSystems, Salesforce and others in Mobile Development Platforms.

To learn more, read our detailed Mobile Development Platforms Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Mobile Development Platforms

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 913,924 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Appium

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Mobile Development Platforms (10th), Regression Testing Tools (8th)

Eggplant Performance

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Performance Testing Tools (16th)

Mindshare comparison

Appium and Eggplant Performance aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. Appium is designed for Mobile Development Platforms and holds a mindshare of 2.9%, down 3.9% compared to last year.
Eggplant Performance, on the other hand, focuses on Performance Testing Tools, holds 2.2% mindshare, up 1.8% since last year.

Mobile Development Platforms Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Appium	2.9%
OutSystems	9.3%
Mendix	8.4%
Other	79.4%

Mobile Development Platforms

Performance Testing Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Eggplant Performance	2.2%
OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional)	15.6%
Tricentis NeoLoad	13.0%
Other	69.2%

Performance Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

APARNA SAHA

Independent consultant, at OpenText

Efficient mobile testing with intuitive emulation capabilities and a user-friendly interface

Initial setup for Appium (especially for iOS) is not beginner-friendly.Consumes too much of your host machine's resources, potentially slowing down the machine.Appium Inspector often lacks deep insight or crashes with certain app builds. Improve test flakiness by intelligently selecting robust self-healing locators,simplified installers, better documentation, GUI-based config management,smart wait mechanisms and better failure logs.

Read full review

Shyam_Prasad

AVP - Testing & QA at Laminaar Aviation

Offers unique object identification, ideal for UI layer regression automation but limited scalability

Performance is one key area for improvement. It can be slower compared to other tools I've used. Secondly, we have a very limited resource pool that uses this tool in India. So, finding resources familiar with Eggplant in India is challenging due to lack of affiliation programs and so on.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"This is the best test automation tool for any mobile test automation engineer."

"When it comes to mobile automation, I recommend this solution because of its performance, and scalability over the competition."

"The best feature of Appium is that it allows you to inspect the element. With the Appium Inspector, you don't have to install another application to do the inspection. I also like that Appium has Android device connectivity. Currently, most people use Appium as automation software, and I haven't found any other tool that's more powerful than Appium."

"It is an indispensable tool for mobile automation helps much in converting manual test cases to automated scripts."

"Within a single command, we can easily connect to the device."

"I like that Appium is an opensource tool, I also like its cross-platform flexibility, and Appium provides a record-and-play option with commands that are the same as those that Selenium uses so a person who has some exposure to Selenium will be able to write a piece of code in Appium."

"The way Appium server interacts with mobile apps is fantastic. It provides all the information about the elements inside the app, Android as well as iOS. I can interact with the element quickly, just type some text or get some text values from the element - whether it's a drop-down, or web text, or a native element."

"The solution is stable."

More Appium pros

"We've been really fortunate in that we've had virtually zero downtime in all the time we've been using Eggplant."

"We don't have a big team of people that can watch the dials and check that everything is okay. We're doing a lot of the monitoring of our website and our product at the side of the desk. We need a solution that does a lot for us, and that's what Eggplant does."

"We find the solution stable and scalable."

"Customer Service: Excellent and very personal."

"It's been a revelation to us in terms of its ability to assist us in exploratory testing and to integrate with our current model-driven architecture."

"It is not a conventional test automation tool. It uses optical character recognition (OCR) to identify objects. It makes it the best in the class."

Cons

"The deployment process and configuration are quite complex and require improvement."

"The initial setup is straightforward if you have previous experience with the solution, but it can be complicated for a novice user."

"Configuration-wise, there is a lot of room for improvement."

"We haven't been able to fully leverage Appium for multiple reasons. I think number one is just that the tests take a long time to run. We have had some issues around just the results themselves and how predictable they are, but those are not issues with Appium directly."

"It needs to accommodate applications that use React.js and AngularJS."

"I rarely use Appium nowadays because I'm now at the managerial level, but the last time I used it, whenever I selected and clicked on an element, Appium was very slow. I tried to debug it, but I still couldn't find the problem, so this is an area for improvement in the solution. Another area for improvement lies with the connector and server. For example, the effort to get into the local machine sometimes causes the emulator to become slow, which then leads to failure in testing, and this is the usual issue I've encountered from Appium. An additional feature I'd like added to Appium in its next release is being able to do automation in iOS without using XPath and the name of the element. In Xcode, you can use previous UI tests for detecting elements, but in Appium, you have to use Xpath and the element name instead of being able to directly put the X-UiPath, which is what you can do in Xcode. In iOS as well, sometimes the element doesn't have a name or a path. Sometimes, there's also no element."

"Stability is an area that needs some improvement."

"An application developed on the Unity platform, such as a gaming application, objects are moving in that case. Interacting with those elements is still lacking in Appium. Appium doesn't have the internal library to play with the Unity platform. That is a huge lack right now."

More Appium cons

"Performance is one key area for improvement. It can be slower compared to other tools I've used."

"Bugs occur fairly frequently, but they are very responsive in identifying them and scheduling them for fixes in future releases."

"One area I can think of to improve is the usability of the reports that we get."

"I'd like to see the ability to integrate the user experience through device forms like AWS device forms or source labs."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is open source."

"Appian is open-source, which is not licensed."

"It's completely 100% free, and there are no hidden fees."

"The solution is open source so it is free."

"There is no license for this solution because it is open-source."

"The solution is open-source."

"The pricing of Appium is fine."

"I'm unsure if there's any cost associated with Appium. I got the free package which includes the server GUI application and the inspector application, and it was free to download, and that's all I need to get my work done. I'm not aware of any additional costs associated with the tool."

More Appium pricing and cost advice

"Eggplant came out as the most competitive in terms of commercials (terms and conditions) which was positive. When we did the initial negotiations, Eggplant started at a price but they were open to negotiations and we did negotiate a discount. That was really important to us because it showed a level of commitment to us."

"The pricing is competitive in India."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Mobile Development Platforms solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

913,924 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Outsourcing Company

10%

Construction Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

15%

Construction Company

Energy/Utilities Company

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	19

No data available

Questions from the Community

Do you recommend Appium?

I do recommend Appium. It is an open-source solution and completely free of charge. We use Appium and Appium Studio as our base for any type of mobile automation for testing. It has a great interfa...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Appium?

My experience with Appium from a pricing perspective is favorable due to it being open source, making it a cost-effective option.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Appium?

The deployment process and configuration are quite complex and require improvement. Additionally, the wait time functionality could be enhanced as I experienced failures with longer wait times.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Tricentis Tosca vs Appium

Compared 9% of the time

Perfecto vs Appium

Compared 7% of the time

Katalon Studio vs Appium

Compared 6% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs Appium

Compared 6% of the time

More Appium Competitors

Apache JMeter vs Eggplant Performance

Compared 12% of the time

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) vs Eggplant Performance

Compared 11% of the time

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) vs Eggplant Performance

Compared 10% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs Eggplant Performance

Compared 9% of the time

OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) vs Eggplant Performance

Compared 7% of the time

More Eggplant Performance Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Appium

September 2026

Download Appium product report

Buyer's Guide

Performance Testing Tools

September 2026

Download Eggplant Performance product report

Also Known As

No data available

TestPlant eggPlant Performance

Overview

Appium facilitates seamless automation of iOS and Android mobile applications, interfacing smoothly with CI/CD pipelines and enabling cross-platform development. Its open-source framework supports diverse coding languages, enhancing test automation.

Appium stands out for its ability to automate mobile apps across multiple platforms, backed by a strong community and extensive language compatibility. It integrates with continuous integration and delivery workflows, with robust tools like Appium Inspector enhancing element identification. It offers an interface familiar to Selenium users and supports versatile scripting, easing the mobile app testing process for developers. While it provides scalability and simple connectivity, users seek enhancements in stability, speed, and platform integration, specifically with iOS and cloud solutions.

What are Appium's Key Features?

Cross-Platform Support: Enables seamless interaction with mobile apps on Android and iOS.
Programming Language Compatibility: Extensive support for multiple programming languages.
CI/CD Integration: Robust integration with CI/CD pipelines for continuous testing.
Appium Inspector: Tool for effective element identification in apps.
Open Source: Offers scalable and flexible testing solutions without licensing costs.

What Benefits Do Users Look for in Reviews?

Ease of Use: Simple setup and connectivity for streamlined testing.
Familiar Interface: Supports seasoned Selenium users with a common interface.
Comprehensive Automation: Provides functionality for end-to-end regression testing.
Community Support: Strong community offering resources and troubleshooting.
Scalability: Easily handles testing of apps at various scales.

Appium is widely utilized in industries such as healthcare, logistics, and construction for the automation of iOS and Android apps. Companies integrate it into their DevOps practices for continuous testing, using it in hybrid deployments and linking with tools like GitHub Actions and Jira for efficient test management.

Appium

Eggplant Performance is a powerful tool for load testing and monitoring, enabling businesses to ensure their applications perform optimally under stress. It focuses on providing comprehensive insights into application performance to help optimize user experience and productivity.

Eggplant Performance offers a robust platform designed to test applications under simulated real-world conditions. It provides in-depth analysis and reporting capabilities, which allow teams to understand how their applications behave under load. This testing solution focuses on facilitating a thorough evaluation of network performance, resource utilization, and user interactions. It is known for its capacity to scale tests across various protocols and platforms, ensuring compatibility and reliability.

What are the key features of Eggplant Performance?

Protocol Support: Offers extensive support for multiple protocols, ensuring diverse testing environments.
Scalable Load Testing: Allows for testing under large loads to replicate real-world scenarios.
Comprehensive Reporting: Delivers detailed reports with actionable insights for optimal performance tuning.
Integration Capabilities: Seamlessly integrates with CI/CD tools to streamline testing workflows.

What benefits and ROI should users look for in Eggplant Performance reviews?

Improved Application Reliability: Leads to more stable applications by identifying weak points early.
Enhanced User Satisfaction: Delivers better user experiences by ensuring smooth application functionality.
Time Efficiency: Reduces time spent on manual testing through automation and integration.

Eggplant Performance is widely used in industries such as finance, healthcare, and retail, where it ensures critical applications perform effectively without interruptions. Its ability to integrate with multiple systems makes it a versatile option for businesses in fast-paced and critical environments.

Keysight Technologies

Sample Customers

Nuvizz, Coupa Software, Eventbrite, Evernote

Cisco

Buyer's Guide

Mobile Development Platforms

September 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Mendix, OutSystems, Salesforce and others in Mobile Development Platforms. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

913,924 professionals have used our research since 2012.

We monitor all Mobile Development Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.