

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) and Eggplant Performance compete in the performance testing category. OpenText is preferred for its robust integration capabilities, while Eggplant is highlighted for user-friendly features and strong automation capabilities.
Features: OpenText supports a wide range of protocols and offers comprehensive test management functionalities. Its features include detailed analytics, tight integration with other systems, and a programmable scripting interface. Eggplant Performance provides automation and scriptless testing capabilities, a user-friendly interface, and fast execution times.
Room for Improvement: OpenText can improve by simplifying its user interface, offering a more user-friendly scripting environment, and enhancing support for emerging technologies. Eggplant could benefit from expanding its protocol support, improving its reporting capabilities, and reducing its dependence on third-party tools for certain functionalities.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Eggplant offers simplified deployment with quick installation and efficient execution. Its customer service is responsive and reliable. OpenText's deployment requires more configuration, involving a steeper learning curve, but offers extensive customization options. Its customer service supports comprehensive problem-solving.
Pricing and ROI: OpenText involves higher initial costs but offers a strong ROI through detailed analytics and insights. Eggplant provides a cost-effective solution with quicker ROI due to ease of use and efficiency. Eggplant’s pricing structure is suitable for businesses needing rapid results.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) | 12.1% |
| Eggplant Performance | 2.2% |
| Other | 85.7% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 17 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 14 |
| Large Enterprise | 66 |
OpenText Professional Performance Engineering, known as LoadRunner Professional, stands out with its powerful scripting tool, flexible capabilities, and extensive analytics, supporting numerous concurrent users for impactful load testing.
This performance engineering tool offers integration across systems and strong community support, paired with user-friendly interfaces. It excels in features like multi-protocol support, auto-correlation, and detailed reporting. However, improvements are needed in user-friendliness and cost-effectiveness, as scripting remains complex and pricing is a hurdle. Enhancing mobile and SPA testing capabilities, modern protocol support, and compatibility with non-Windows platforms would greatly benefit users while expanding monitoring and technical support responsiveness.
What are the key features of OpenText LoadRunner Professional?LoadRunner Professional is employed for performance and load testing across sectors such as banking, hospitality, and telecommunications. Users simulate business transactions and test applications under different user loads, focusing on API testing, web applications, and benchmarking to achieve optimal performance in complex scenarios.
We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.