Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Apple iOS SDK vs Temenos Quantum comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Apple iOS SDK
Ranking in Mobile App Platforms
2nd
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
7
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Temenos Quantum
Ranking in Mobile App Platforms
3rd
Average Rating
7.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
15
Ranking in other categories
Mobile Development Platforms (8th), Rapid Application Development Software (20th), Low-Code Development Platforms (15th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Mobile App Platforms category, the mindshare of Apple iOS SDK is 28.2%, up from 22.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Temenos Quantum is 3.9%, up from 2.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Mobile App Platforms
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer2132481 - PeerSpot reviewer
A stable and easy-to-use product that provides seamless integration
The best thing about the product is that it provides seamless integration. I can use my Microsoft product on my iPhone, so it's good for work and personal use. I can use it across devices since it's synced up. AirDrop and iCloud are the most valuable features of the solution. The solution is easy to use.
Zain Omer - PeerSpot reviewer
Though a secure tool for building applications, there is a need to improve its stability
There is a lot of room for improvement in Temenos Quantum. Temenos Quantum is not quite stable yet. Improvements can be made to make Temenos Quantum stable. Improvements are needed in the solution, considering how my company needs to raise a lot of tickets with the technical support team of Temenos for some basic issues every time. There are some features in Temenos Quantum that I want to be stabilized by Temenos, just like in Android Studio and Xcode. Building an application using Temenos Quantum is not difficult, but my company needs to seek some support for the solution all the time.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"This solution is a really easy and straightforward to use for development, and provides a lot of opportunities to test applications on a simulator before being released."
"The best thing about the product is that it provides seamless integration."
"The visualizer and API manager are super useful. It's easy to create applications for the agent. Automations and other complex tasks can be hard, but it's mostly straightforward. You can create forms and populate tables."
"We can use a single channel to create an interface for iOS, Android, and other channels."
"The best feature is the Kony Studio, which is the product that is used to develop interfaces."
"It is an important solution for reducing the development efforts by developing a mobile application efficiently, in a shorter period of time, across multiple platforms, such as Android and iOS."
"The most valuable features of Temenos Quantum are user-friendliness and customizability."
"With the new VM releases, it is a faster product with more abilities that benefit the user."
"Its greatest advantage lies in its exceptional security and robustness."
"The best thing about Temenos Quantum is how it smoothly connects with Temenos Fabric. This simplifies our quantum application by handling identity, authentication, and security tasks seamlessly, saving us from extra coding."
 

Cons

"We would like to see more development and support for the AI features of this solution."
"The share password menu doesn’t come up easily when I want to share passwords between my devices."
"It would be highly beneficial if future iterations of Temenos could incorporate support for QR-based payment methods, as it would enhance the platform's capabilities and align it more closely with modern payment trends"
"The technology of the solution needs an update. It is deficient in terms of connectivity."
"Temenos Quantum needs to improve its usability. It lacks information on the network. We have to contact the support when we are stuck with something."
"When developing our application, we also encountered certain issues related to delays and time-consuming builds."
"Some features are only enabled for paid users. It would be much better if they enabled those features without having to pay. I would also like to see them publish information about future technologies on the Home screen under a separate tab. That would be an improvement."
"We would like to have widgets for graphs and analytics, as well as the integration of machine learning."
"The UI lacks flexibility, especially regarding customizations. There are numerous issues at the fabric end, and working with the visualizer is extremely challenging. Basic development tasks require a high-end machine, and even clicking on an icon initiates a thirty-second processing time. The challenges mainly revolve around fabric and content."
"Using the API manager can be complicated when you're dealing with multiple teams, projects, and APIs. Quantum doesn't have user-based access, so I can't restrict parts of the project to specific users."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The hardware is quite expensive."
"This is an open-source solution, so there are no licensing costs involved in its use."
"It is expensive solution."
"This is an expensive solution, and it is the biggest challenge that we face when we present this platform to customers."
"The product is expensive. First, they must purchase the product, and then pay an annual renewal fee. The renewal fee depends on the product details and the license term’s length. Clients can buy licenses for five or ten years and pay for them upfront, or they can set up a yearly renewal cycle."
"​The price is too high. The annual cost for the Kony license is very high. Every year you have to renew it in order to maintain it​"
"Temenos Quantum is an expensive tool. Taking into consideration my company's use of Temenos Quantum for a bank, the costs attached to the solution ranged from 3,00,000 to 5,00,000 USD for building one application for the bank."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Mobile App Platforms solutions are best for your needs.
845,040 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
19%
Computer Software Company
10%
Legal Firm
8%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
41%
Computer Software Company
16%
Government
5%
Healthcare Company
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Apple iOS SDK?
The best thing about the product is that it provides seamless integration.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Apple iOS SDK?
The software updates are cheap, but we would need the hardware to do it. The hardware is quite expensive. I rate the pricing an eight or a nine out of ten.
What needs improvement with Apple iOS SDK?
The share password menu doesn’t come up easily when I want to share passwords between my devices. Other than that, it's a really well-designed product.
What do you like most about Temenos Quantum?
Comparing other solutions with Temenos Quantum, the later is less mature and presents several issues. Implementing Temenos Quantum has been challenging, resembling a nightmare compared to the smoot...
What needs improvement with Temenos Quantum?
The UI lacks flexibility, especially regarding customizations. There are numerous issues at the fabric end, and working with the visualizer is extremely challenging. Basic development tasks require...
 

Also Known As

iOS SDK
KonyOne, Kony, Kony Quantum
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Partners FCU, Banco Bolivariano, PSECU, CFG Bank, Commerce Bank
Find out what your peers are saying about Apple iOS SDK vs. Temenos Quantum and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.
845,040 professionals have used our research since 2012.