Sencha Complete vs Temenos Quantum comparison

"I would highly recommend sencha mobile application frameworks for either cross platform or standalone web apps."

"With the new VM releases, it is a faster product with more abilities that benefit the user."

"We can use a single channel to create an interface for iOS, Android, and other channels."

"You can build your own customized, native, mobile applications in an efficient matter."

"The best thing about Temenos Quantum is how it smoothly connects with Temenos Fabric. This simplifies our quantum application by handling identity, authentication, and security tasks seamlessly, saving us from extra coding."

"The most valuable feature is usability. You can develop components inside it and reuse them in different parts of your application, wherever needed. You can replicate them. There's also a Quantum Fabric on the back end, which provides a middle layer between your database and the third-party systems you need to integrate. It also provides the integration to handle all sorts of exceptions and timeouts on the Fabric. This makes it easy to troubleshoot errors coming from third-party APIs."

"The visualizer and API manager are super useful. It's easy to create applications for the agent. Automations and other complex tasks can be hard, but it's mostly straightforward. You can create forms and populate tables."

"The best feature is the Kony Studio, which is the product that is used to develop interfaces."

"Comparing other solutions with Temenos Quantum, the later is less mature and presents several issues. Implementing Temenos Quantum has been challenging, resembling a nightmare compared to the smoother experience with the other."

"Scrolling needs some serious tweaking, specifically for android. There is a huge time lag while scrolling through a list."

"They need to improve their tech support's abilities. They do have a good tech support, but it still requires improvement."

"It would be highly beneficial if future iterations of Temenos could incorporate support for QR-based payment methods, as it would enhance the platform's capabilities and align it more closely with modern payment trends"

"The UI lacks flexibility, especially regarding customizations. There are numerous issues at the fabric end, and working with the visualizer is extremely challenging. Basic development tasks require a high-end machine, and even clicking on an icon initiates a thirty-second processing time. The challenges mainly revolve around fabric and content."

"Using the API manager can be complicated when you're dealing with multiple teams, projects, and APIs. Quantum doesn't have user-based access, so I can't restrict parts of the project to specific users."

"Temenos Quantum needs to improve its usability. It lacks information on the network. We have to contact the support when we are stuck with something."

"Temenos Quantum is not quite stable yet."

"When developing our application, we also encountered certain issues related to delays and time-consuming builds."

"The technology of the solution needs an update. It is deficient in terms of connectivity."

"Temenos Quantum is an expensive tool. Taking into consideration my company's use of Temenos Quantum for a bank, the costs attached to the solution ranged from 3,00,000 to 5,00,000 USD for building one application for the bank."

"The product is expensive. First, they must purchase the product, and then pay an annual renewal fee. The renewal fee depends on the product details and the license term’s length. Clients can buy licenses for five or ten years and pay for them upfront, or they can set up a yearly renewal cycle."

"This is an expensive solution, and it is the biggest challenge that we face when we present this platform to customers."

"​The price is too high. The annual cost for the Kony license is very high. Every year you have to renew it in order to maintain it​"

"It is expensive solution."