Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

IBM MobileFirst vs Temenos Quantum comparison

IBM and Temenos are both solutions in the Mobile App Platforms category. IBM is ranked #8, while Temenos is ranked #3 with an average rating of 6.9. IBM holds a 2.3% mindshare in MAP, compared to Temenos’s 3.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 81% of Temenos users who would recommend it.
IBM MobileFirst
Read 3 IBM MobileFirst reviews
  • 109 Views
  • 49 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
Temenos Quantum
Read 15 Temenos Quantum reviews
  • 96 Views
  • 59 Comparison Views
81% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 4, 2025

IBM MobileFirst and Temenos Quantum are products in the enterprise mobile application development category. Temenos Quantum seems to have the upper hand due to its versatile toolkit and easier deployment.

Features: IBM MobileFirst provides strong security protocols, an analytics platform, and a robust coding environment. Temenos Quantum offers seamless cross-platform development, a no-code option, and a user-friendly experience with a broader toolkit for diverse platforms.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM MobileFirst requires a complex deployment process and higher technical expertise but provides comprehensive support. Temenos Quantum features swift deployment, intuitive interfaces, and reliable customer support, making it more accessible for quick market entry.

Pricing and ROI: IBM MobileFirst involves a higher upfront investment with long-term value through extensive capabilities and customization. Temenos Quantum has a more approachable pricing model, with manageable setup costs and a quicker return on investment due to its efficient deployment and scalable solutions.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed IBM MobileFirst vs. Temenos Quantum Report (Updated: March 2025).
Buyer's Guide
IBM MobileFirst vs. Temenos Quantum
March 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 845,040 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

IBM MobileFirst
Ranking in Mobile App Platforms
8th
Ranking in Mobile Development Platforms
13th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Temenos Quantum
Ranking in Mobile App Platforms
3rd
Ranking in Mobile Development Platforms
8th
Average Rating
7.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
15
Ranking in other categories
Rapid Application Development Software (20th), Low-Code Development Platforms (15th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Mobile App Platforms category, the mindshare of IBM MobileFirst is 2.3%. The mindshare of Temenos Quantum is 3.9%, up from 2.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Mobile App Platforms
 

Featured Reviews

MT
Streamlines development of hybrid applications, and has ability to integrate device-native code
It was a cakewalk for us to develop mobile apps for three different platforms using IBM MobileFirst. Since it was a consumer application built for large-scale events, it was very crucial for us to manage application compatibility with all sort of devices. With MobielFirst, we could actually achieve this with very little trouble. With help of this product, we have been able to develop mobile applications without having complete knowledge of each mobile OS's native programming. App development, delivery, and code management have been very efficient using this product.
Read full review
Zain Omer - PeerSpot reviewer
Though a secure tool for building applications, there is a need to improve its stability
There is a lot of room for improvement in Temenos Quantum. Temenos Quantum is not quite stable yet. Improvements can be made to make Temenos Quantum stable. Improvements are needed in the solution, considering how my company needs to raise a lot of tickets with the technical support team of Temenos for some basic issues every time. There are some features in Temenos Quantum that I want to be stabilized by Temenos, just like in Android Studio and Xcode. Building an application using Temenos Quantum is not difficult, but my company needs to seek some support for the solution all the time.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"With help of this product, we have been able to develop mobile applications without having complete knowledge of each mobile OS's native programming technology. App development, delivery, and code management have been very efficient using this product."
"IBM MobileFirst has one of the most feature-rich admin panels."
"I like Its capability for developing hybrid applications, with an ability to integrate device-native code as well"
"You can build your own customized, native, mobile applications in an efficient matter."
"The most valuable features of Temenos Quantum are user-friendliness and customizability."
"The best thing about Temenos Quantum is how it smoothly connects with Temenos Fabric. This simplifies our quantum application by handling identity, authentication, and security tasks seamlessly, saving us from extra coding."
"We can use a single channel to create an interface for iOS, Android, and other channels."
"You can do rapid development across multiple platforms.​"
"With the new VM releases, it is a faster product with more abilities that benefit the user."
"It is an important solution for reducing the development efforts by developing a mobile application efficiently, in a shorter period of time, across multiple platforms, such as Android and iOS."
"The main benefit lies in its exceptional speed of implementation."
More Temenos Quantum pros
 

Cons

"I would like to see improved support for native device functions."
"There are issues with push notifications, especially for Windows mobile apps. JSONStore also crashes abruptly at times."
"The security and the interface technology could be better in Temenos Quantum. Additionally, a module that can display all the activities that have been done in the system would be helpful."
"Using the API manager can be complicated when you're dealing with multiple teams, projects, and APIs. Quantum doesn't have user-based access, so I can't restrict parts of the project to specific users."
"They need to improve their tech support's abilities. They do have a good tech support, but it still requires improvement."
"When developing our application, we also encountered certain issues related to delays and time-consuming builds."
"It would be highly beneficial if future iterations of Temenos could incorporate support for QR-based payment methods, as it would enhance the platform's capabilities and align it more closely with modern payment trends"
"There are many issues when integrating with native sides when building an Android application of the retail accelerator or an iOS application of the retail actuator. We have to incorporate on the native side of things, which creates a lot of issues. Temenos Quantum is a proprietary product and not open source. There is not much information available on the internet for developers to reference when solving issues. You have to contact the help desk, who will then give you an appointment and work to resolve the issue. In terms of what Temenos can do better, they can make the product more mature so that we do not encounter as many black holes when encountering an issue."
"Temenos Quantum is not quite stable yet."
"We would like to have widgets for graphs and analytics, as well as the integration of machine learning."
More Temenos Quantum cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Cost depends upon various factors. Size of the overall application and product usage matter a lot. For an enterprise-grade application, this certainly comes out as an economical solution. However, for small-scale applications, it can turn out to be on the higher side."
"​The price is too high. The annual cost for the Kony license is very high. Every year you have to renew it in order to maintain it​"
"It is expensive solution."
"Temenos Quantum is an expensive tool. Taking into consideration my company's use of Temenos Quantum for a bank, the costs attached to the solution ranged from 3,00,000 to 5,00,000 USD for building one application for the bank."
"This is an expensive solution, and it is the biggest challenge that we face when we present this platform to customers."
"The product is expensive. First, they must purchase the product, and then pay an annual renewal fee. The renewal fee depends on the product details and the license term’s length. Clients can buy licenses for five or ten years and pay for them upfront, or they can set up a yearly renewal cycle."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Mobile App Platforms solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
845,040 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
41%
Computer Software Company
16%
Government
5%
Healthcare Company
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about Temenos Quantum?
Comparing other solutions with Temenos Quantum, the later is less mature and presents several issues. Implementing Temenos Quantum has been challenging, resembling a nightmare compared to the smoot...
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Temenos Quantum?
It is expensive solution.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Temenos Quantum?
The UI lacks flexibility, especially regarding customizations. There are numerous issues at the fabric end, and working with the visualizer is extremely challenging. Basic development tasks require...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

No data available
OutSystems vs Temenos Quantum Logo
OutSystems vs Temenos Quantum
Compared 38% of the time
Mendix vs Temenos Quantum Logo
Mendix vs Temenos Quantum
Compared 31% of the time
Microsoft Azure App Service vs Temenos Quantum Logo
Microsoft Azure App Service vs Temenos Quantum
Compared 31% of the time
More Temenos Quantum Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Mobile App Platforms
March 2025
IBM MobileFirst reportDownload IBM MobileFirst product report
Buyer's Guide
Temenos Quantum
March 2025
Temenos Quantum reportDownload Temenos Quantum product report
 

Also Known As

MobileFirst, Worklight
KonyOne, Kony, Kony Quantum
 

Overview

IBM Worklight helps organizations extend their business to mobile devices.
IBM

Temenos Quantum is a Multiexperience Development Platform (MXDP) that combines ease-of-use and speed of low-code productivity with deep enterprise capabilities for both consumer grade digital experiences across multiple touchpoints and robust backend services for identity, integration, orchestration, business process automation, and business rules management.

Temenos
 

Sample Customers

UniCredit Business Integrated Solutions, Gruppo Unipol, Raymond James Financial, Toshiba GCS, CST, ABK-Systeme GmbH, BNP Paribas
Partners FCU, Banco Bolivariano, PSECU, CFG Bank, Commerce Bank
Buyer's Guide
IBM MobileFirst vs. Temenos Quantum
March 2025
Free Report: IBM MobileFirst vs. Temenos Quantum
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM MobileFirst vs. Temenos Quantum and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
845,040 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our IBM MobileFirst vs. Temenos Quantum report.
See our list of best Mobile App Platforms vendors and best Mobile Development Platforms vendors.

We monitor all Mobile App Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.