Arista Campus LAN Switches vs Juniper QFabric comparison

Arista and Juniper are both solutions in the LAN Switching category. Arista is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.3, while Juniper is ranked #10 with an average rating of 7.5. Arista holds a 4.4% mindshare in LS, compared to Juniper’s 4.8% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Arista users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Juniper users who would recommend it.

Arista Campus LAN Switches

Read 8 Arista Campus LAN Switches reviews

395 Views
395 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Juniper QFabric

Read 10 Juniper QFabric reviews

356 Views
356 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Arista Campus LAN Switches

Juniper QFabric

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 6, 2025

Juniper QFabric and Arista Campus LAN Switches compete in network infrastructure. Arista Campus LAN Switches may have the upper hand for campus networks due to their adaptability and lower initial costs, while Juniper QFabric excels in data centers with superior performance and long-term ROI benefits.

Features: Juniper QFabric includes scalable architecture, streamlined operations, and high-performance agility. It integrates with automation tools like Chef and Puppet and offers a robust solution with spine-leaf topology, ensuring one-hop connectivity, which enhances scalability. Arista Campus LAN Switches provide excellent programmability, traffic visibility, and security. Their open architecture supports interoperability and efficiency with a 2-tier network design, reducing costs. They also offer CloudVision Portal for centralized management and up to 256x10Gbe ports for scalability.

Room for Improvement: Juniper QFabric could enhance user-friendliness in setup and expand feature sets for more versatile use. It might also improve integration capabilities with newer technologies and offer more competitive pricing for smaller deployments. Arista Campus LAN Switches could benefit from additional enhancements in traffic management, provide more varied product choices, and improve the simplicity of the system for less advanced users, especially in understanding their network setup and deployment processes.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Arista Campus LAN Switches offer a straightforward deployment experience, supported by comprehensive customer service, ensuring ease for users. Juniper QFabric deployment is more complex initially but gains from a responsive customer service team, which can assist through the setup complexities and ongoing usage issues.

Pricing and ROI: Juniper QFabric involves a higher upfront investment but offers significant ROI in high-performance data center environments. This makes it more suitable for organizations prioritizing long-term efficiency over initial costs. In contrast, Arista Campus LAN Switches present a more budget-friendly initial cost, providing steady ROI through efficient campus network solutions, making them appealing for organizations looking for cost-effective initial deployment.

To learn more, read our detailed Arista Campus LAN Switches vs. Juniper QFabric Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Arista Campus LAN Switches vs. Juniper QFabric

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Arista Campus LAN Switches

Ranking in LAN Switching

8th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Juniper QFabric

Ranking in LAN Switching

10th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the LAN Switching category, the mindshare of Arista Campus LAN Switches is 4.4%, up from 1.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Juniper QFabric is 4.8%, up from 1.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

LAN Switching Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Arista Campus LAN Switches	4.4%
Juniper QFabric	4.8%
Other	90.8%

LAN Switching

Featured Reviews

Denis Malinovtsev

Chief Technology Officer at ictbit

Unified monitoring has transformed campus deployments and provides rapid EVPN-VXLAN rollouts

Regarding improvements to Arista Campus LAN Switches, nothing comes to mind about the switches themselves; they are really fast and have all the technologies and protocols that exist in the market. However, on the management system, I would improve it because as a network engineer, I want a chatbot that can communicate in a native language with the monitoring system to get answers regarding my network faults. There are no problems particularly with the product, but there is room for improvement regarding licensing and the chatbot for all Arista products.

Read full review

Suresh Pathipatti

Senior Information Technology Administrator at Aighospital

Performs well, is easy to set up, and the vendor maintains the product well

QFabric is the core switch. We also have two Brocade switches for the Fibre level The product works fine. It is an excellent product. There are different element systems and different options for each generation of the tool. We maintain the data center and analyze issues. I have no negative…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The technology is scalable as much as you want."

"The most winning feature of Arista Campus LAN Switches is their management, specifically CloudVision, along with features like comparing changes and diagnosing problems quickly with telemetry and network visualization."

"I use the solution for connectivity in data centers and LANs, providing Layer 2 and Layer 3 connectivity based on network needs."

"The CloudVision Portal allows us to centrally manage all of our Arista products."

"QoS is the most valuable feature because our clients work with VOIP and Critical applications."

"The solution's most valuable feature is its stability because Arista falls in an industry that is very similar to Cisco."

"The feature sets are pretty cool. They've got almost everything that the competition offers."

"The most valuable feature of QFabric for network performance is its stability."

"The solution is stable."

"It is known for being agile, flexible, and cost-effective when working with various vendors."

"The most valuable features of this solution are the fabric backplane having upwards of 160 GB of communication. It is a top-of-the-rack solution where you have your directors sitting in the main area and then you have your nodes expanded out to your multiple cabinets. It has a very good design and could be your server backbone."

"QFabric supports redundancy and includes all of the enterprise and service provider features that customers would want in data center or service provider network."

"It's user-friendly."

"The 40 gig backbone InterConneX was valuable for our use case. It is even faster now. QFabric has spine-leaf technology or topology, which basically makes every single hop only one hop away in terms of connecting from one device to another. It is a pretty good and robust solution. It works pretty well in terms of scalability, and their technical support is amazing."

"The solution is easy to use and has good performance."

More Juniper QFabric pros

Cons

"I would like to see a version available with eight or sixteen ports."

"It would be ideal if the solution was less expensive."

"I think there's still room for improvement. Arista Campus LAN Switches are not highly scalable as they are hardware-based. If hardware requirements exceed capacity, the product needs to be changed, which can impact service."

"I do think they could improve their licensing model. Today, I need to pay for a license, for a switch, for support, and it costs money; it is not cheap."

"The complex setup phase is an area of concern where improvements are required."

"One of the issues that we have been faced with here in Brazil is that we don't have any list times for delivery."

"We have to renew the license every three years, which can be a challenge for customers. Arista, like other vendors, now follows a license-based system."

"It works too much on rebooting and there is some memory leakage."

"It would be nice if Juniper provided the system integrator with training, similar to that of Cisco."

"The stability needs to be improved."

"The pricing structure could be more budget-friendly."

"I do not use GUI's very much for switch stacks. I am always in the CLI. However, I do know that Juniper in the past has lacked on their GUI's, but they have been working on it."

"Having support for all OpenFlow versions would be beneficial."

"They are working on the virtualization of the actual fabric layer. They are moving away from the original spine-leaf design to a different infrastructure. Instead of having three tiers, which was the director of the interconnected nodes, they cut them back, and they still have that kind of structure."

"Improvements could be made to QFabric's life cycle management, particularly in maintaining stable versions and extending product support."

More Juniper QFabric cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The only licensing costs are for CloudVision, although the upfront price of the device is not cheap."

"The price is not that good, but our clients value the solution despite the price."

"The pricing is high."

"Juniper QFabric is a high-level solution but it could be less expensive."

"The price is relatively high, but it offers an advantage over its competitors by providing better performance and functionality."

"The price for Juniper QFabric could improve. There are subscription, maintenance, and add-on feature fees."

"In terms of price, the QFabric solution is going to be probably in the middle of the road for a fabric solution."

"The pricing is high and it is possible to find better pricing option solutions on the market, but the licensing model is quite flexible."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which LAN Switching solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	1

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	5

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Arista Campus LAN Switches?

Regarding pricing, it is not cheap. While it is an enterprise solution, comparing it to low-level switches like Fortinet and Netgear, it is much more expensive. However, comparing it to Cisco and J...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Arista Campus LAN Switches?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Arista Campus LAN Switches?

I work as a consultant and integrator, using Arista Networks platform in my customers' networks. I deal with switches by Arista, which is mostly what we use Arista for. I am familiar with Arista Ca...

See all answers

What do you like most about Juniper QFabric?

The most valuable feature of QFabric for network performance is its stability.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Juniper QFabric?

Juniper QFabric is not overly expensive. Licensing is required for certain features like vRRP, but setting up a virtual chassis does not necessitate a separate license.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Juniper QFabric?

Improvements could be made to QFabric's lifecycle management, particularly in maintaining stable versions and extending product support. The rapid release cycle and short life span compared to comp...

See all answers

Comparisons

Cisco Catalyst Switches vs Arista Campus LAN Switches

Compared 27% of the time

Cisco Nexus vs Arista Campus LAN Switches

Compared 26% of the time

Cisco FabricPath vs Arista Campus LAN Switches

Compared 13% of the time

HPE ProCurve vs Arista Campus LAN Switches

Compared 12% of the time

More Arista Campus LAN Switches Competitors

Cisco Nexus vs Juniper QFabric

Compared 28% of the time

Cisco FabricPath vs Juniper QFabric

Compared 23% of the time

Cisco Catalyst Switches vs Juniper QFabric

Compared 17% of the time

Dell PowerSwitch N-Series vs Juniper QFabric

Compared 12% of the time

More Juniper QFabric Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

LAN Switching

January 2026

Download Arista Campus LAN Switches product report

Buyer's Guide

LAN Switching

January 2026

Download Juniper QFabric product report

Also Known As

No data available

QFabric

Overview

Arista Campus LAN Switches are the perfect network solution for your most demanding workloads.With native support for VMware Virtualization and hundreds of Linux applications integrated into hardware platforms designed to meet the stringent power and cooling requirements of today's most demanding data centers, Arista delivers the most efficient and best performing 10Gb Ethernet platforms.

Arista

Juniper QFabric System is composed of multiple components working together as a single switch to provide high-performance, any-to-any connectivity and management simplicity in the data center. The QFabric System flattens the entire data center network to a single tier where all access points are equal, eliminating the effects of network locality and making it the ideal network foundation for cloud-ready, virtualized data centers.The highly scalable QFabric System improves application performance with low latency and converged services in a nonblocking, lossless architecture that supports Layer 2, Layer 3, and Fibre Channel over Ethernet (FCoE) capabilities.

Juniper

Sample Customers

University of Winchester, AWE, picturemaxx, Medical Mutual, Leonix, CloudEra, National Physical Laboratory, Tri-State G&T, AIS, Morph, SingTel, SDSC, BBC

MCB Bank

Buyer's Guide

Arista Campus LAN Switches vs. Juniper QFabric

December 2025

Free Report: Arista Campus LAN Switches vs. Juniper QFabric

Find out what your peers are saying about Arista Campus LAN Switches vs. Juniper QFabric and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Arista Campus LAN Switches vs. Juniper QFabric report.

See our list of best LAN Switching vendors.

We monitor all LAN Switching reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.