Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Auvik and IDERA are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Auvik is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.6, while IDERA is ranked #82. Auvik holds a 1.2% mindshare in NMS, compared to IDERA’s 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 99% of Auvik users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of IDERA users who would recommend it.

Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Read 221 Auvik Network Management (ANM) reviews

20,095 Views
13,263 Comparison Views

99% willing to recommend

IDERA Uptime Infrastructure...

Read 5 IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor reviews

3,089 Views
2,348 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Auvik Network Management (ANM)

IDERA Uptime Infrastructure...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor and Auvik Network Management compete in network performance analysis. ANM appears to have the upper hand with enhanced features that justify its higher price for some organizations.

Features: IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor provides robust server and application monitoring, comprehensive uptime tracking, and reliable alert systems. Auvik Network Management offers impressive network visualization tools, deep automation capabilities, and proactive infrastructure management. The primary distinction is IDERA's strength in server monitoring, while Auvik provides superior network insights through advanced networking capabilities.

Room for Improvement: IDERA could enhance network visualization tools and improve automation capabilities. It may benefit from advancing cloud deployment options. Aligning its feature set with modern network demands is advisable. Auvik Network Management might improve cost-effectiveness to better appeal to budget-conscious organizations. Enhancing server and application monitoring could broaden its utility. Addressing complexities in its advanced features can boost usability for less complex networks.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Auvik Network Management offers cloud-based deployment that provides flexibility and quick setup with extensive customer support options. IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor, an on-premises solution, is straightforward and earns positive feedback for responsive customer service. Auvik suits dynamic environments, while IDERA caters to traditional needs with reliable assistance.

Pricing and ROI: IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor is seen as more cost-effective, offering solid ROI with a lower initial investment. Though Auvik Network Management has a higher price, it potentially provides substantial returns through its advanced functionalities and reduced operational complexity. IDERA is noted for its budget-friendly approach, whereas Auvik is recognized for the potential in higher efficiency gains.

To learn more, read our detailed Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs. IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor Report (Updated: November 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs. IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor

November 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,769 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

2nd

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

6th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

221

Ranking in other categories

Network Troubleshooting (2nd), Cloud Monitoring Software (6th), Network Traffic Analysis (NTA) (2nd)

IDERA Uptime Infrastructure...

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

82nd

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

70th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Auvik Network Management (ANM) is 1.2%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor is 0.6%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Auvik Network Management (ANM)	1.2%
IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor	0.6%
Other	98.2%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

reviewer2349501

Manager, Technical Services at a computer software company with 11-50 employees

Real-time network visibility has transformed how we pinpoint LAN bottlenecks and resolve issues faster

The only area for improvement is pricing. Otherwise, the tool is great. I think the pricing is acceptable. If you are working with resellers, it makes it a little bit difficult sometimes for the reseller to be able to make too much, as the margin is not all that significant. However, we are not getting rid of Auvik Network Management (ANM). That is the only thing in my opinion that Auvik Network Management (ANM) can do a little bit better on—maybe just the pricing—but it is a great tool. We are not replacing it with anything and we are not removing it at all. It is a great tool, and we are able to monitor our own internal network as well as that of our customers. In most cases, we have not had any complaints about neither from my techs or from myself about its functionality, as it works really.

Read full review

Nafiu Garba

Special Assistant to the Governor ICT COO at a tech services company with 201-500 employees

It offers different licensing types that allow you to extend the services to clients; it lets you look into device performance and optimization and helps apply best practices

What I like best about IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor is that it offers different licensing types. Hence, it allows my organization to extend the services to clients and not just use the solution within the organization. My organization can leverage IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor to learn more about how clients perform because the solution lets you monitor and optimize devices and apply best practices.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It has significantly decreased our mean time to resolution."

"With TrafficInsights, we can view the information and do something with it. In the past, we couldn't easily find that information."

"I love that Auvik can automatically back up the configuration of switches and firewalls."

"Auvik gives us better insights into network device performance, so we can proactively catch issues before they become serious problems."

"The integration between Auvik Network Management and Autotask is particularly valuable for us, along with similar integrations with tools like IT Glue."

"Automated configuration backups and automated network diagrams are the most valuable."

"It's hard to say that one feature is my favorite, but I like Auvik's ability to map networks using SNMP. It maps the network, so I can look at all the devices and set them to provide alerts or automatically create tickets when outages occur. If clients need it, I can export all of the data into an Excel spreadsheet."

"What I appreciate most about Auvik Network Management (ANM) is the alerting system."

More Auvik Network Management (ANM) pros

"Easy to setup and begin monitoring."

"My organization can leverage IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor to learn more about how clients perform because the solution lets you monitor and optimize devices and apply best practices."

"Now with the features given through up.time we have over 300 + monitors constantly checking every environment that we have and also checking databases for errors."

"Customer Service: 5 stars! Excellent. Technical Support: 5 stars! Excellent."

Cons

"Sometimes we get a generic device, then we can't tell what it is quickly from the details. Just having a better knowledge-based integration for determining what devices are, what they're make and models are, would be helpful."

"When it comes to the management side, the navigation is a little bit difficult, going back and forth. It is a little bit cumbersome... If I go to one device and I look at an interface, I can't just go back to the device and that makes it a pain to navigate."

"However, its pricing was a little bit higher."

"Auvik could have better compatibility with more devices."

"Most importantly, Auvik Network Management (ANM) does not have server monitoring and server hardware monitoring, which LogicMonitor has, and these features make me continue to use LogicMonitor."

"The actual adding of networks, systems, and everything like that is fairly easy, but the problem that I have is getting the metrics out. Specifically, if you go to the Auvik webpage, sign in, and go through the alerts and everything else, they don't offer any plasma display with a red light, green light, or stop light indicating this device is in an error state, down, etc. To get around this, we have to use their API. I had to code an entire interface to work around that lack of information."

"I would like to see more extensive syslog capabilities."

"One is the alerting system. While it is very useful, the default alert settings can generate a lot of notifications."

More Auvik Network Management (ANM) cons

"Maintenance windows need to be streamlined."

"While you can restrict particular users to only see subsets of the reports, it isn't as easy as it could be."

"What I want to improve in IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor is the community aspect, where IDERA would provide customers with updates on functionalities, what comes next, what IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor upgrades would be released, etc. I also want the sustainability of IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor to improve."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Compared to other products, Auvik's pricing is more feasible since you get all its features. You pay for licenses on a per network device basis. It monitors hypervisors, but does not bill for that. There are no additional costs, which is something that I like."

"Auvik Network Management's pricing was surprisingly reasonable."

"The pricing is fair; it's just the right price for what the solution provides."

"They're very competitive on the pricing front. They may not be the least expensive, but they're certainly not the most expensive. They're right in a sweet spot. For our organization, at least, it was right within the budget."

"The pricing is reasonable, neither exceptionally cheap nor excessively expensive—it aligns well with what I anticipated."

"It seems that the pricing is a little higher than some of the other solutions, but it also offers more value and data."

"If you're a small company, Auvik is probably quite reasonable. But we've got 500 servers, so pricing suddenly became a lot more of an issue. There needs to be better bulk pricing for it."

"Auvik is a good product for the price. The license is reasonable. We took a chance on it and figured it would work for us. It did even more than we expected."

More Auvik Network Management (ANM) pricing and cost advice

"I'm based in Nigeria, and the conversion rate affects the pricing for IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor, but globally, pricing is reasonable. I'm rating pricing for the solution seven on a scale of one to ten."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

14%

Construction Company

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

32%

Construction Company

23%

Financial Services Firm

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	160
Midsize Enterprise	33
Large Enterprise	27

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Auvik?

The reason I give it an eight, rather than a nine or ten, relates to the premium price of Auvik Network Management (ANM). If the price were lower, my expectations would not be so high, and I would ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Auvik?

Regarding the features of Auvik Network Management (ANM), I believe that the primary improvement needed focuses on ensuring the live topology map is as accurate and easy to understand as possible, ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Auvik?

My main use case for Auvik Network Management (ANM) is to have full visibility, so when I have Auvik Network Management (ANM) deployed with my customer, especially the full license, which includes ...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Kentik vs Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Compared 4% of the time

WhatsUp Gold vs Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Compared 4% of the time

Nagios XI vs Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Compared 3% of the time

Wireshark vs Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Compared 3% of the time

LogicMonitor vs Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Compared 3% of the time

More Auvik Network Management (ANM) Competitors

Nagios XI vs IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor

Compared 11% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor

Compared 8% of the time

Zabbix vs IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor

Compared 8% of the time

NETSCOUT Network & Application Observability vs IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor

Compared 7% of the time

NetFortris LiveWatch vs IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor

Compared 6% of the time

More IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Auvik Network Management (ANM)

October 2026

Download Auvik Network Management (ANM) product report

Buyer's Guide

Network Monitoring Software

October 2026

IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor report

Download IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor product report

Also Known As

No data available

IDERA UIM, uptime software up.time

Overview

Auvik Network Management offers competitive pricing for essential network and infrastructure device management, providing robust features valued by enterprises.

Auvik Network Management delivers comprehensive network visibility and management through intuitive auditing, alerting, and discovery functionalities. It eases troubleshooting, automates configuration backups, and includes a user-friendly interface for effective monitoring and management. With real-time alerts and customizable notifications, IT operations are streamlined, while remote access capabilities enhance time efficiency. ANM supports integration with other platforms, effectively maintaining device inventories and visualizing network topology.

What are the key features of Auvik Network Management?

Auditing: Offers comprehensive network audits, ensuring accuracy and efficiency.
Network Discovery: Simplifies the process of identifying network components.
Alerting Modules: Provides real-time alerts and customizable notifications.
Configuration Backups: Automates backups, safeguarding configurations.
Remote Access: Streamlines network management from any location.

What benefits should users expect when evaluating Auvik Network Management?

Enhanced Network Visibility: Offers detailed insights into network operations.
Time Efficiency: Remote access and automated features save valuable time.
Proactive Issue Identification: Real-time monitoring aids in identifying issues quickly.
Integration Support: Works cohesively with other platforms, easing management.
Operational Efficiency: Automates management tasks for improved productivity.

In industries such as IT management and network administration, Auvik Network Management is predominantly utilized for overseeing and maintaining network infrastructures across multiple locations. It offers capabilities for monitoring network topology, receiving alerts on device downtimes, and managing performance metrics. Users employ its features for proactive issue identification, and auditing, helping maintain oversight of networks containing switches, routers, and firewalls. Auvik provides remote access and automated backups, which contribute to enhanced operational efficiency and network visibility.

Auvik

IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor efficiently monitors and manages IT infrastructure, offering real-time analytics and alerts to optimize performance and prevent downtime.

IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor provides comprehensive monitoring for servers, apps, and networks, ensuring seamless operations. It delivers detailed insights through customizable dashboards, offering full visibility into enterprise IT health. Users benefit from automated alerting, performance metrics, and capacity planning tools that enhance reliability and reduce risks of outages.

What are the key features of IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor?

Real-time monitoring: Continuously tracks system performance to detect issues immediately.
Custom dashboards: Users can configure dashboards to display critical metrics relevant to their infrastructure.
Automated alerts: Delivers instant notifications on performance problems, allowing for swift action.
Capacity planning: Analyzes trends to predict future utilization needs and support decision-making.
Comprehensive reporting: Generates detailed reports for performance analysis and capacity planning.

What benefits and ROI can reviews highlight?

Increased uptime: Continuous monitoring reduces the likelihood of system failures, enhancing operational continuity.
Improved resource management: Efficient capacity planning leads to optimized resource allocation.
Cost savings: Proactive alerts minimize the costs associated with downtime and emergency fixes.
Enhanced decision-making: Accurate data analysis enables informed strategic planning.

IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor is implemented across industries like finance, healthcare, and retail where maintaining high availability is critical. It supports IT teams in proactively managing infrastructure, ensuring systems are responsive, secure, and capable of meeting growth demands.

IDERA

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

TeleComputing; Manitoba Hydro; Blevins Inc.; City of Malmö

Buyer's Guide

Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs. IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor

November 2026

Free Report: Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs. IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor

Find out what your peers are saying about Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs. IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor and other solutions. Updated: November 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs. IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors and best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.