Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs Instana Infrastructure Monitoring comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Auvik and Instana are both solutions in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category. Auvik is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.6, while Instana is ranked #67. Auvik holds a 1.2% mindshare in IM, compared to Instana’s 0.7% mindshare. Additionally, 99% of Auvik users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Instana users who would recommend it.

Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Read 216 Auvik Network Management (ANM) reviews

18,634 Views
8,572 Comparison Views

99% willing to recommend

Instana Infrastructure Moni...

Read 2 Instana Infrastructure Monitoring reviews

2,479 Views
1,958 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Instana Infrastructure Moni...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

Instana Infrastructure Monitoring and Auvik Network Management compete in the IT environment monitoring category. Instana holds an advantage in application performance monitoring, while Auvik excels in network device management.

Features: Instana offers advanced automation, real-time observability, and AI-driven insights. These features are tailored for dynamic application environments. Auvik focuses on network mapping, bandwidth analysis, and simplified troubleshooting, aiming to optimize network performance.

Room for Improvement: Instana could improve in network-specific monitoring, expand its ease of use for smaller businesses, and enhance integration with non-application-focused tools. Auvik might develop more comprehensive application monitoring, enhance scalability for large enterprises, and refine its bandwidth analysis tools.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Instana's cloud-based deployment model provides automated configuration, making integration into existing systems easier. Its automated diagnostics adds value to complex environments. Auvik offers a streamlined cloud-based platform that ensures network device management efficiency and intuitive service, supporting rapid deployment.

Pricing and ROI: Instana's pricing reflects its robust enterprise-level capabilities, with higher initial costs but substantial ROI through improved application performance. Auvik's pricing is scalable, offering cost-effectiveness for mid-sized businesses with a focus on comprehensive network management.

To learn more, read our detailed Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs. Instana Infrastructure Monitoring Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs. Instana Infrastructure Monitoring

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 913,683 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

7th

Ranking in Cloud Monitoring Software

6th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

216

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (4th), Network Troubleshooting (1st), Network Traffic Analysis (NTA) (2nd)

Instana Infrastructure Moni...

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

67th

Ranking in Cloud Monitoring Software

40th

Average Rating

9.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category, the mindshare of Auvik Network Management (ANM) is 1.2%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Instana Infrastructure Monitoring is 0.7%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Infrastructure Monitoring Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Auvik Network Management (ANM)	1.2%
Instana Infrastructure Monitoring	0.7%
Other	98.1%

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

Featured Reviews

AmanThakkar

Software Engineer at Titanslab Inc.

Network automation has reduced troubleshooting time and supports faster issue resolution

The biggest and best feature I have experienced with Auvik Network Management (ANM) is automatic network discovery, along with features such as topology map, instant alerts, real-time monitoring, easy remote access, and simple dashboards. Among those features, I find automatic network discovery to be the most useful because it gives a clear picture of the entire network without having to create manual diagrams. It is very easy to use Auvik Network Management (ANM), so even a new team member can quickly understand the network because everything is displayed in a very clear way. Auvik Network Management (ANM) has positively impacted our organization by reducing troubleshooting time, improving network visibility, providing a very clear picture, and helping us support multiple client networks and environments very efficiently. We have noticed a 35 to 40% improvement in troubleshooting speed, less manual work in documenting any network system, faster responses to network issues, and better uptime with the client networks.

Read full review

Hakimuddin Ronaque

Assistant Manager at Lauren Information Technologies Pvt Ltd

Has the capability to automatically integrate with a large number of products

Scalability-wise, I rate the solution an eight out of ten. I have not worked much on other technologies, like SAP or VMware's virtualization part, on-prem infrastructure, or cloud infrastructure. Instana Infrastructure Monitoring is so fast and easy to adapt that it works fine. I have not explored other operating systems or infrastructure solutions because my company doesn't have that customer scale. Most of our customers are on-prem or on AWS or Azure, but Instana Infrastructure Monitoring adapts to their infrastructure very well. My company came to know how well Instana Infrastructure Monitoring adapts to our customers' infrastructures when we take care of the PoC phase. Around 12 to 15 people in my company use the product.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The configuration management is the most valuable feature. I worked at an MSP before where they didn't have something collecting network device configurations. It was basically up to the technician who did it last, and you never knew if they saved a copy or not. Auvik makes that a lot more automated so we don't have to worry, if a device dies, that we don't know how it was configured."

"Auvik improved our organization by allowing us to stay on top of issues with our clients, alerting us in a timely manner so we can react proactively, often before the client realizes something is going on."

"There are many things I like about the product. It's cloud-based and automatically refreshes the network container. We like the automatic backups and the comparison between backups. It's straightforward to set up, and it integrates with many protocols."

"The most valuable feature is device discovery through SNMP."

"And the visibility into remote and distributed networks globally was one of the reasons we moved to Auvik."

"The network monitoring and backups of specific devices are really impressive. We've seen very good responses from our staff regarding the backup functionality. You can add a product, such as a switch and, once the product is added, it backs it up for you."

"The most valuable features of Auvik are the alerting and monitoring; those functions mean it easily more than pays for itself."

"Auvik has decreased our mean time to resolution. It's easier to find the devices on the network and pull out the information. Of course, the SNMP is also good to get the logs. It helps in the network debugging or if we have to find any problems."

More Auvik Network Management (ANM) pros

"The product's initial setup is easy."

"The product is easy to deploy."

Cons

"Auvik Network Management (ANM) can be improved with real-time troubleshooting and logs alerts, as it should provide real-time monitoring and logs alerts to help me perform actions immediately, along with the feature of automatic configuration backup, so I do not have to take backups of firmware and policies manually."

"We schedule backups in the middle of the night, and a high volume of data passes through our networks during those backups because it backs up everything for a couple of hours. That generates alerts in Auvik's monitoring systems saying that these network ports are at 99 percent utilization because they're being maxed out. I'd like to have a way to mute alerts during these hours. There's no way to whitelist this activity within a set period. I want to be able to tell Auvik not to send me alerts about high utilization on these ports between 1 a.m. and 4 a.m."

"The Auvik network map and dashboard are not reliable enough to provide a real-time view of our network."

"The global dashboard needs work, and I'm not the only one saying this."

"I'd like better integration with Meraki and a history feature for network diagrams. If a device fails on Saturday, we can't find it by Monday. A history or PDF export of diagrams would be great to see how devices should be connected."

"The reporting needs a little bit of improvement. Sometimes, I get too many reports. Or, I don't get reports when I should be getting reports. I don't know if this is Auvik's fault or the devices that the reporting is coming from, but I have noticed there have been some discrepancies."

"I would like Auvik to offer an alternative method for backing up devices that don't support or have SNMP disabled, since currently, SNMP seems to be a prerequisite for any functionality in Auvik."

"It would be cool if they came out with an app, but running the browser isn't bad."

More Auvik Network Management (ANM) cons

"The product’s scalability is an area with certain limitations, making it an area where improvements are required."

"Instana Infrastructure Monitoring needs to support monitoring of the .NET framework since it is one of the areas where the solution currently has shortcomings."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Its pricing is very reasonable. We had looked at other solutions where you pay based on the amount of traffic that was filtered through and analyzed. With Auvik, we pay by a billable device. We're not paying based on every single device we have. For one of the locations I have, one network element would likely be a billable device. So, every billable device has a network element, but not every network element is a billable device. If I have a location that has 50 network elements, then maybe 30 of them are billable devices. PCs, VoIP phones, and access points are monitored at no charge."

"Auvik is a good product and worth the premium price tag for a lot of people."

"The price for Auvik is affordable."

"The pricing is pretty reasonable for what we get. It's billed by certain, core network devices that it monitors, but I'm not billed for all the devices it monitors. For example, wireless access points and small things like that, throughout the network, are not billed."

"Auvik's pricing is fair overall, but some advanced stuff is a little expensive. I like that the licensing model is based on switches instead of endpoints. We don't use some of the more advanced features because they're a little beyond our price range. We're using the tool internally, but the expense is passed on to the customer, and the advanced features aren't something that most customers are willing to pay for."

"The pricing is good, but I haven't looked at the pricing in a while. So, I don't know if it has changed or not. As far as I know, the pricing is still where it should be. I have no issues with it."

"Its licensing is very fair. The devices that stand to gain the most benefit from this product are the ones that are billed. In the case of routers, switches, and firewalls, I won't necessarily have the ability to put a management agent on them to gather errors and activity logs. This type of solution is a requirement for me to properly monitor and manage these devices. The devices that aren't being billed are workstation servers, etc. For those devices, I can put agents on them to monitor their health. It has a fair billing structure."

"The billing is excellent. The way they bill it, in most environments, it's not that expensive. The billing is very cost-effective."

More Auvik Network Management (ANM) pricing and cost advice

"The cost of the tool is around 130 USD per month."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

913,683 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

14%

Construction Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

15%

Construction Company

12%

Outsourcing Company

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	156
Midsize Enterprise	32
Large Enterprise	25

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Auvik?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is average. The cost is typically higher for these kinds of tools, so it is moderate.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Auvik?

Auvik Network Management (ANM) can be improved with better reporting options. While there are options for reporting, having more clarity would be helpful, along with more advanced analytics and mor...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Auvik?

Our main use case for Auvik Network Management (ANM) is to monitor and manage the client networks, helping us to track the network devices and identify issues quickly to monitor the performance and...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Kentik vs Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Compared 5% of the time

WhatsUp Gold vs Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Compared 4% of the time

Nagios XI vs Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Compared 4% of the time

Wireshark vs Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Compared 4% of the time

LogicMonitor vs Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Compared 3% of the time

More Auvik Network Management (ANM) Competitors

NetApp Data Infrastructure Insights vs Instana Infrastructure Monitoring

Compared 10% of the time

Zabbix vs Instana Infrastructure Monitoring

Compared 10% of the time

IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) vs Instana Infrastructure Monitoring

Compared 7% of the time

Splunk Observability Cloud vs Instana Infrastructure Monitoring

Compared 6% of the time

Virtana Platform vs Instana Infrastructure Monitoring

Compared 6% of the time

More Instana Infrastructure Monitoring Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Auvik Network Management (ANM)

September 2026

Download Auvik Network Management (ANM) product report

Buyer's Guide

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

August 2026

Instana Infrastructure Monitoring report

Download Instana Infrastructure Monitoring product report

Overview

Auvik Network Management offers competitive pricing for essential network and infrastructure device management, providing robust features valued by enterprises.

Auvik Network Management delivers comprehensive network visibility and management through intuitive auditing, alerting, and discovery functionalities. It eases troubleshooting, automates configuration backups, and includes a user-friendly interface for effective monitoring and management. With real-time alerts and customizable notifications, IT operations are streamlined, while remote access capabilities enhance time efficiency. ANM supports integration with other platforms, effectively maintaining device inventories and visualizing network topology.

What are the key features of Auvik Network Management?

Auditing: Offers comprehensive network audits, ensuring accuracy and efficiency.
Network Discovery: Simplifies the process of identifying network components.
Alerting Modules: Provides real-time alerts and customizable notifications.
Configuration Backups: Automates backups, safeguarding configurations.
Remote Access: Streamlines network management from any location.

What benefits should users expect when evaluating Auvik Network Management?

Enhanced Network Visibility: Offers detailed insights into network operations.
Time Efficiency: Remote access and automated features save valuable time.
Proactive Issue Identification: Real-time monitoring aids in identifying issues quickly.
Integration Support: Works cohesively with other platforms, easing management.
Operational Efficiency: Automates management tasks for improved productivity.

In industries such as IT management and network administration, Auvik Network Management is predominantly utilized for overseeing and maintaining network infrastructures across multiple locations. It offers capabilities for monitoring network topology, receiving alerts on device downtimes, and managing performance metrics. Users employ its features for proactive issue identification, and auditing, helping maintain oversight of networks containing switches, routers, and firewalls. Auvik provides remote access and automated backups, which contribute to enhanced operational efficiency and network visibility.

Auvik

Instana Infrastructure Monitoring offers a robust solution designed to monitor the performance and health of complex IT environments. Its automated capabilities allow for real-time insights, helping users optimize their infrastructure systems efficiently, maintaining uptime and reliability.

The platform provides comprehensive visibility across distributed systems, facilitating data-driven decisions through its seamless integration and easy deployment. Instana Infrastructure Monitoring supports hybrid and cloud infrastructures, giving teams the control they need to ensure service availability and performance through sophisticated analytics and diagnostics tools. Its real-time alert capabilities and root cause analysis enable users to address issues proactively, minimizing downtime.

What features stand out in Instana Infrastructure Monitoring?

Automated Discovery: Identifies and maps applications within IT infrastructure automatically.
Real-Time Monitoring: Provides instant insight into application performance and health.
AI-Driven Analytics: Delivers actionable insights based on intelligent data analysis.
Root Cause Analysis: Quickly identifies and pinpoints issues impacting system performance.

What benefits or ROI should users look for in reviews?

Increased Efficiency: Streamlines monitoring processes, reducing manual efforts.
Improved Uptime: Helps maintain high service availability and fast issue resolution.
Enhanced Insights: Leverages data to offer deep learning about system behaviors.
Cost Optimizations: Identifies performance bottlenecks, optimizing resource utilization.

Instana Infrastructure Monitoring is implemented across various sectors, including finance, healthcare, and manufacturing. Its ability to adapt to specific industry requirements makes it a valuable tool for operations needing consistent system performance and real-time visibility into their infrastructure health, fostering innovation and operational excellence.

Instana

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

booxware, drivenow, scopevisio, enevo, TimoCom, mobitech

Buyer's Guide

Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs. Instana Infrastructure Monitoring

September 2026

Free Report: Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs. Instana Infrastructure Monitoring

Find out what your peers are saying about Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs. Instana Infrastructure Monitoring and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

913,683 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs. Instana Infrastructure Monitoring report.

See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors and best Cloud Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.