Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs Nagios Fusion comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Auvik and Nagios are both solutions in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category. Auvik is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.6, while Nagios is ranked #74. Auvik holds a 1.2% mindshare in IM, compared to Nagios’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 99% of Auvik users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Nagios users who would recommend it.

Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Read 221 Auvik Network Management (ANM) reviews

20,095 Views
9,445 Comparison Views

99% willing to recommend

Nagios Fusion

Read 4 Nagios Fusion reviews

1,694 Views
1,677 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Nagios Fusion

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

Nagios Fusion and Auvik Network Management are competing in the network management category. Auvik Network Management might have the upper hand due to its robust feature set and perceived value.

Features: Nagios Fusion offers comprehensive network monitoring, customizable tools, and seamless integration with other Nagios software, appealing to enterprises needing detailed visibility. Auvik Network Management delivers automatic network mapping, detailed performance monitoring, and extensive alerting capabilities, providing an intuitive approach to network oversight.

Room for Improvement: Nagios Fusion could enhance its cloud capabilities, modernize its user interface, and improve integration simplicity. Auvik Network Management might benefit from more flexible pricing options, expanded compatibility with legacy systems, and enhanced reporting features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Nagios Fusion's deployment is more traditional, often requiring on-premises installation and is supported by a dedicated support portal. Auvik Network Management offers a cloud-based deployment, allowing quick setup and seamless updates, with proactive customer support.

Pricing and ROI: Nagios Fusion typically presents a more cost-effective solution, minimizing initial setup expenses, which may benefit organizations with budget constraints. Auvik Network Management provides a transparent pricing model designed to deliver high ROI through its advanced features and time-saving functionalities, appealing to those looking for efficient long-term investment.

To learn more, read our detailed Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs. Nagios Fusion Report (Updated: November 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs. Nagios Fusion

November 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,929 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

6th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

221

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (2nd), Network Troubleshooting (2nd), Cloud Monitoring Software (6th), Network Traffic Analysis (NTA) (2nd)

Nagios Fusion

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

74th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category, the mindshare of Auvik Network Management (ANM) is 1.2%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Nagios Fusion is 0.5%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Infrastructure Monitoring Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Auvik Network Management (ANM)	1.2%
Nagios Fusion	0.5%
Other	98.3%

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

Featured Reviews

reviewer2349501

Manager, Technical Services at a computer software company with 11-50 employees

Real-time network visibility has transformed how we pinpoint LAN bottlenecks and resolve issues faster

The only area for improvement is pricing. Otherwise, the tool is great. I think the pricing is acceptable. If you are working with resellers, it makes it a little bit difficult sometimes for the reseller to be able to make too much, as the margin is not all that significant. However, we are not getting rid of Auvik Network Management (ANM). That is the only thing in my opinion that Auvik Network Management (ANM) can do a little bit better on—maybe just the pricing—but it is a great tool. We are not replacing it with anything and we are not removing it at all. It is a great tool, and we are able to monitor our own internal network as well as that of our customers. In most cases, we have not had any complaints about neither from my techs or from myself about its functionality, as it works really.

Read full review

SyarulIdzuddin Adzmi

Operation Director at Digital Pulse Sdn Bhd

A suitable choice for unified and efficient infrastructure monitoring across diverse environments providing user-friendly GUI, cost-effectiveness, and versatility

We use it for this specific client, they've deployed multiple instances of it across various locations to facilitate monitoring. To effectively monitor their infrastructure, it seems necessary to implement additional monitoring solutions for all three types of devices they have Nagios Fusion…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The automated mapping or alerting has impacted our daily operations since now we receive alerts directly to email. We don't have to wait to to get a notice from the clients."

"I have noticed specific outcomes indicating the positive impact of Auvik Network Management (ANM), as we've had clients say this is the reason we stick with you and the reason we went with you in the first place, as we heard about how proactive you are."

"We gain a real-time image of the network."

"Among the most valuable features are the hardware life cycle and configuration backups, when applicable... When it does show you the hardware life cycle for, say, a Cisco device and the configuration backup, that's the most useful aspect for me as a network engineer."

"I like Auvik's configuration backups. When a configuration change occurs, it automatically updates the configuration in Auvik. If something stops working, we can roll back to the previous configuration. That's very helpful."

"Monitoring is probably the most active thing Auvik does for us. If a particular device on the network goes down, we have that granularity to see which network element is causing the problem."

"The most valuable features of Auvik are the alerting and monitoring; those functions mean it easily more than pays for itself."

"Overall, I appreciate that Auvik Network Management (ANM) brings monitoring, mapping, alerts, traffic analysis, and configuration management into a single and easy-to-use dashboard, which saves time and simplifies day-to-day network administration."

More Auvik Network Management (ANM) pros

"It is easier for client installation, and the configurations are doable even for a newcomer in the field."

"Being open source lets us customize it for our monitoring needs, saving us money."

"Nagios Fusion version 12.8 excels in user-friendly GUI design, cost-effectiveness, and ease of deployment."

"It's very easy to manage and monitor it."

Cons

"I believe Auvik Network Management could improve by providing more support for firewall devices, as this would greatly enhance its capability."

"We had some issues with the licensing. You need to pay for premium to use NetFlow, and we had a problem with them counting the same device multiple times for licensing purposes. It was a little frustrating because the Auvik database in the background didn't see it as a single device even though it came from the same critical hardware and only had one serial number. However, it was in different groups, so it was counted two or three times. It took a while to work with the accounting team to get that sorted."

"I'd like to see an improvement in how we target individual devices."

"We have some clients that are rather large and the topology display can be a little bit of a mess. For smaller organizations, Auvik is perfect... But for some of our larger clients, the topology view is almost unusable."

"If they could expand the products they support, that would be ideal."

"The global dashboard needs work, and I'm not the only one saying this."

"The user interface is not intuitive."

"The tutorial could be a little bit more comprehensive."

More Auvik Network Management (ANM) cons

"Adding application performance monitoring to the product alongside infrastructure monitoring would make it a more complete and useful solution."

"Nagios Fusion should include a 'remember me' option when logging in, so we don't need to enter a username and password every time."

"In future iterations of this solution, there is a desire for more seamless integration with other monitoring software."

"There are some bugs, although not that many. There are some situations where the solution is not stable but the number of problems is not very high."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It turns out they only charge for routers and switches!"

"Given the types of alerts and the different aspects of Auvik, I think it's worth the cost that is associated with it. I don't think the cost is terribly high. The infrastructure is the core or the backbone of a business. If it goes down, then the business stops. You have to decide how much money you're going to lose if you're network is down and you can't figure out why for hours or days versus what Auvik would cost you a month."

"The pricing is by device. We have 75 devices, which is a little more than we really need. With school and volume discounts, it is still a little over $16,000 annually. Our WiFi access points are not being billed, but all our switches and routers are."

"Auvik is a cost-efficient solution for the applications we use it for."

"Its licensing is very fair. The devices that stand to gain the most benefit from this product are the ones that are billed. In the case of routers, switches, and firewalls, I won't necessarily have the ability to put a management agent on them to gather errors and activity logs. This type of solution is a requirement for me to properly monitor and manage these devices. The devices that aren't being billed are workstation servers, etc. For those devices, I can put agents on them to monitor their health. It has a fair billing structure."

"We have a lot of problems with licensing in many other solutions, but I've never run into a problem with Auvik licensing. That's a pretty good vote of confidence."

"It's absolutely worth the money. I would probably charge more if I were them. They don't charge you for anything that's not a router, switch, or firewall controller, or a network device. So, you can throw anything like servers and ESX hosts."

"I love the pricing. It makes a lot of sense. It allows you to use your own metal, which is great because it enables us to go higher-end for some clients and lower-end for others... Even having the flexibility to switch clients between the Performance (expert) and the Essentials (simple) version of Auvik, on the fly, is really unheard of."

More Auvik Network Management (ANM) pricing and cost advice

"The pricing is quite reasonable, especially when compared to the broader market."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,929 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

14%

Construction Company

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

13%

Outsourcing Company

University

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	160
Midsize Enterprise	33
Large Enterprise	27

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Auvik?

The reason I give it an eight, rather than a nine or ten, relates to the premium price of Auvik Network Management (ANM). If the price were lower, my expectations would not be so high, and I would ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Auvik?

Regarding the features of Auvik Network Management (ANM), I believe that the primary improvement needed focuses on ensuring the live topology map is as accurate and easy to understand as possible, ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Auvik?

My main use case for Auvik Network Management (ANM) is to have full visibility, so when I have Auvik Network Management (ANM) deployed with my customer, especially the full license, which includes ...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Kentik vs Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Compared 4% of the time

WhatsUp Gold vs Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Compared 4% of the time

Nagios XI vs Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Compared 3% of the time

Wireshark vs Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Compared 3% of the time

LogicMonitor vs Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Compared 3% of the time

More Auvik Network Management (ANM) Competitors

Zenoss Cloud vs Nagios Fusion

Compared 16% of the time

Nagios XI vs Nagios Fusion

Compared 13% of the time

Icinga vs Nagios Fusion

Compared 7% of the time

vRealize Network Insight vs Nagios Fusion

Compared 5% of the time

Splunk Observability Cloud vs Nagios Fusion

Compared 5% of the time

More Nagios Fusion Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Auvik Network Management (ANM)

November 2026

Download Auvik Network Management (ANM) product report

Buyer's Guide

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

November 2026

Download Nagios Fusion product report

Overview

Auvik Network Management offers competitive pricing for essential network and infrastructure device management, providing robust features valued by enterprises.

Auvik Network Management delivers comprehensive network visibility and management through intuitive auditing, alerting, and discovery functionalities. It eases troubleshooting, automates configuration backups, and includes a user-friendly interface for effective monitoring and management. With real-time alerts and customizable notifications, IT operations are streamlined, while remote access capabilities enhance time efficiency. ANM supports integration with other platforms, effectively maintaining device inventories and visualizing network topology.

What are the key features of Auvik Network Management?

Auditing: Offers comprehensive network audits, ensuring accuracy and efficiency.
Network Discovery: Simplifies the process of identifying network components.
Alerting Modules: Provides real-time alerts and customizable notifications.
Configuration Backups: Automates backups, safeguarding configurations.
Remote Access: Streamlines network management from any location.

What benefits should users expect when evaluating Auvik Network Management?

Enhanced Network Visibility: Offers detailed insights into network operations.
Time Efficiency: Remote access and automated features save valuable time.
Proactive Issue Identification: Real-time monitoring aids in identifying issues quickly.
Integration Support: Works cohesively with other platforms, easing management.
Operational Efficiency: Automates management tasks for improved productivity.

In industries such as IT management and network administration, Auvik Network Management is predominantly utilized for overseeing and maintaining network infrastructures across multiple locations. It offers capabilities for monitoring network topology, receiving alerts on device downtimes, and managing performance metrics. Users employ its features for proactive issue identification, and auditing, helping maintain oversight of networks containing switches, routers, and firewalls. Auvik provides remote access and automated backups, which contribute to enhanced operational efficiency and network visibility.

Auvik

Nagios Fusion provides centralized monitoring, delivering real-time status updates and comprehensive visualizations, ideal for comprehensive IT environments.

Designed to aggregate data from multiple Nagios instances, Nagios Fusion simplifies monitoring by offering a unified view. It enhances IT operations management through quick access to crucial metrics and alerts. Organizations can efficiently monitor network performance, ensuring errors are promptly identified and rectified. Its integration with Nagios Core and XI streamlines information management, offering comprehensive visibility.

What are the valuable features of Nagios Fusion?

Centralized Monitoring: Integrates multiple Nagios instances for a single-pane-of-glass overview.
Real-Time Status Updates: Provides immediate insights on network and server status.
Customizable Dashboards: Tailors monitoring views to meet specific requirements.

What benefits do users look for in Nagios Fusion reviews?

Enhanced Monitoring Capabilities: Improved visibility and control over IT systems.
Scalability: Adapts to growing infrastructure needs without compromising performance.
Time Savings: Reduces the time spent on manual monitoring processes.

Nagios Fusion is used across industries like healthcare, finance, and manufacturing to ensure seamless operations. In finance, it monitors transaction processes, offering reliable system checks, while in healthcare, it supports critical system uptime, contributing to uninterrupted patient care.

Nagios

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

NuBlue, St.Elisabeth Hospital, Akamit Systems, National Radio Astronomy Observatory, ValueClick, Sunrise Banks

Buyer's Guide

Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs. Nagios Fusion

November 2026

Free Report: Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs. Nagios Fusion

Find out what your peers are saying about Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs. Nagios Fusion and other solutions. Updated: November 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

920,929 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs. Nagios Fusion report.

See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.