Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs Netdata comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Auvik and Netdata are both solutions in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category. Auvik is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.6, while Netdata is ranked #32 with an average rating of 10.0. Auvik holds a 1.2% mindshare in IM, compared to Netdata’s 1.0% mindshare. Additionally, 99% of Auvik users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Netdata users who would recommend it.

Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Read 221 Auvik Network Management (ANM) reviews

18,973 Views
8,917 Comparison Views

99% willing to recommend

Netdata

Read 3 Netdata reviews

3,891 Views
3,035 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Netdata

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Auvik Network Management (ANM) and Netdata based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Zabbix, Splunk and others in IT Infrastructure Monitoring.

To learn more, read our detailed IT Infrastructure Monitoring Report (Updated: October 2026).

Buyer's Guide

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

October 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 919,894 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

6th

Ranking in Cloud Monitoring Software

6th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

221

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (5th), Network Troubleshooting (1st), Network Traffic Analysis (NTA) (2nd)

Netdata

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

32nd

Ranking in Cloud Monitoring Software

22nd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Server Monitoring (13th)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category, the mindshare of Auvik Network Management (ANM) is 1.2%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Netdata is 1.0%, down from 1.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Infrastructure Monitoring Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Auvik Network Management (ANM)	1.2%
Netdata	1.0%
Other	97.8%

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

Featured Reviews

AmanThakkar

Software Engineer at Titanslab Inc.

Network automation has reduced troubleshooting time and supports faster issue resolution

The biggest and best feature I have experienced with Auvik Network Management (ANM) is automatic network discovery, along with features such as topology map, instant alerts, real-time monitoring, easy remote access, and simple dashboards. Among those features, I find automatic network discovery to be the most useful because it gives a clear picture of the entire network without having to create manual diagrams. It is very easy to use Auvik Network Management (ANM), so even a new team member can quickly understand the network because everything is displayed in a very clear way. Auvik Network Management (ANM) has positively impacted our organization by reducing troubleshooting time, improving network visibility, providing a very clear picture, and helping us support multiple client networks and environments very efficiently. We have noticed a 35 to 40% improvement in troubleshooting speed, less manual work in documenting any network system, faster responses to network issues, and better uptime with the client networks.

Read full review

Peter Kitonga

Mid Software Engineer at Jumia Kenya

Real-time monitoring has improved AWS visibility and reduces downtime for critical services

Netdata's best features that I find outstanding are the real-time monitoring, interactive dashboards, automated alerts, and detailed performance analytics. I find these features very valuable because they provide immediate visibility into CPU, memory, network, and server performance, helping us identify bottlenecks quickly, troubleshoot issues efficiently, and reduce downtime. The features I value most include excellent visibility, faster troubleshooting, and practical issue detection, which make Netdata infrastructure monitoring more efficient and reliable. AI governance and security capabilities are important for maintaining data privacy, access control, and transparency. I also value its focus on secure monitoring, controlled access, and protecting sensitive infrastructure data. Netdata has met my expectations through the AI-driven insights, which are generally useful and reliable for identifying performance anomalies and highlighting potential issues. They help us improve monitoring and speed up troubleshooting. Netdata integrates well with our AWS environment, providing useful visibility into server performance, resource utilization, and infrastructure health. It helps us monitor workloads, identify issues quickly, and maintain reliable operations.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"As a cloud-based solution, Auvik is reliable and easy to use."

"And the visibility into remote and distributed networks globally was one of the reasons we moved to Auvik."

"The stability is rock solid."

"Auvik Network Management (ANM) has positively impacted my organization by giving us one place to look to get a full picture of a customer's network environment without having to jump to multiple dashboards."

"All the aspects it helps us with make it phenomenal."

"The traffic insights and the configuration management are the most valuable features."

"The ability to have visibility on a network to see the traffic and the ability to see if devices are misconfigured and if something changes in that configuration, are most valuable."

"Overall, compared to everything else out there, it's a solid 10 out of 10."

More Auvik Network Management (ANM) pros

"Netdata works better for me compared to tools like Prometheus or Grafana by providing real-time metrics and a clear view of system performance in one place with less manual setup than a typical Prometheus and Grafana stack."

"Real-time monitoring and alerts have helped us reduce troubleshooting effort by approximately twenty to thirty percent, saving engineering time and helping maintain a reliable AWS infrastructure."

"Netdata has positively impacted my organization by improving downtime and incident response workflows through real-time visibility into infrastructure and application performance."

Cons

"Implementing a configurable dashboard for the network map would enhance user experience in this regard."

"The network map and dashboard of Auvik Network Management (ANM) are a little bit tricky at the beginning, so people aren't trying to just steal a copy."

"A feature I'd like to see is a stat breakdown of our networks at the end of every month, showing package drop rates for each network and so on. For example, this data delivered in an email would be a good feature."

"The network maps can be confusing due to the wide scope of the network, making it difficult to find specific details."

"Recently, the map performance has become incredibly slow, even for small maps. For example, simply changing a device type can take up to five or ten minutes to reflect the change."

"While Auvik Network Management (ANM) is useful for network visibility and troubleshooting, there are several areas where it could be improved."

"One area of Auvik Network Management (ANM) that could be improved is that once it discovers network devices, the naming at times is confusing."

"More capabilities in terms of default OIDs, so we can leverage more of the information from SNMP would be good to see."

More Auvik Network Management (ANM) cons

"Netdata could improve by offering more advanced customizable dashboards, simpler configuration for complex AWS environments, and better integration with third-party tools."

"One area that Netdata could improve is with more customizable dashboards and deeper integration with incident management and alerting tools."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price that Auvik is offering us is a little bit steep."

"The value is there. It's not that expensive per device and it's licensed per device. Unlike some of the other tools that I use, it's not real expensive. It's a good value for the price."

"I'm not on the procurement side, but I understand that the license is based on devices, not sensors. If you have 10 switches and one firewall, you count per device. You'll have 100 devices if there are 10 sites with the same setup. I think it's a lot more expensive to monitor 100 sensors in PRTG."

"For small businesses with many devices, the tool is potentially unaffordable. Auvik Networks Inc. is competing with other companies offering very expensive products. Still, there's a gap in the market and potentially a lot of lost revenue for smaller customers, especially those with complex IT environments."

"The tool's pricing is reasonable."

"Given the types of alerts and the different aspects of Auvik, I think it's worth the cost that is associated with it. I don't think the cost is terribly high. The infrastructure is the core or the backbone of a business. If it goes down, then the business stops. You have to decide how much money you're going to lose if you're network is down and you can't figure out why for hours or days versus what Auvik would cost you a month."

"I believe we have a special arrangement with them because we, as an MSP, take care of some of their technical services."

"It's great for small businesses, but when you start reviewing the pricing model, depending on how many devices, and what sub-devices you decide to pull in, it can get tricky as far as the pricing goes."

More Auvik Network Management (ANM) pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

919,894 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

13%

Construction Company

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Transportation Company

63%

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	160
Midsize Enterprise	33
Large Enterprise	26

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	5

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Auvik?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is average. The cost is typically higher for these kinds of tools, so it is moderate.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Auvik?

Auvik Network Management (ANM) can be improved with better reporting options. While there are options for reporting, having more clarity would be helpful, along with more advanced analytics and mor...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Auvik?

Our main use case for Auvik Network Management (ANM) is to monitor and manage the client networks, helping us to track the network devices and identify issues quickly to monitor the performance and...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Netdata?

As I am going with the subscription-based model in the SaaS, the pricing and setup cost are very nice, and the setup is very easy since I am running the server inside GCP.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Netdata?

Netdata can be improved by incorporating AI-driven anomaly detection and predictive monitoring capabilities to forecast potential bottlenecks. Additionally, broader native integrations with enterpr...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Netdata?

Netdata serves as my real-time monitoring and observability platform for infrastructure and application performance monitoring, providing highly detailed real-time metrics with minimal setup and lo...

See all answers

Comparisons

Kentik vs Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Compared 4% of the time

WhatsUp Gold vs Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Compared 4% of the time

Nagios XI vs Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Compared 3% of the time

Wireshark vs Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Compared 3% of the time

LogicMonitor vs Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Compared 3% of the time

More Auvik Network Management (ANM) Competitors

Zabbix vs Netdata

Compared 9% of the time

SolarWinds ipMonitor vs Netdata

Compared 8% of the time

Checkmk vs Netdata

Compared 7% of the time

LogicMonitor vs Netdata

Compared 6% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs Netdata

Compared 6% of the time

More Netdata Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Auvik Network Management (ANM)

October 2026

Download Auvik Network Management (ANM) product report

Buyer's Guide

Server Monitoring

October 2026

Download Netdata product report

Overview

Auvik Network Management offers competitive pricing for essential network and infrastructure device management, providing robust features valued by enterprises.

Auvik Network Management delivers comprehensive network visibility and management through intuitive auditing, alerting, and discovery functionalities. It eases troubleshooting, automates configuration backups, and includes a user-friendly interface for effective monitoring and management. With real-time alerts and customizable notifications, IT operations are streamlined, while remote access capabilities enhance time efficiency. ANM supports integration with other platforms, effectively maintaining device inventories and visualizing network topology.

What are the key features of Auvik Network Management?

Auditing: Offers comprehensive network audits, ensuring accuracy and efficiency.
Network Discovery: Simplifies the process of identifying network components.
Alerting Modules: Provides real-time alerts and customizable notifications.
Configuration Backups: Automates backups, safeguarding configurations.
Remote Access: Streamlines network management from any location.

What benefits should users expect when evaluating Auvik Network Management?

Enhanced Network Visibility: Offers detailed insights into network operations.
Time Efficiency: Remote access and automated features save valuable time.
Proactive Issue Identification: Real-time monitoring aids in identifying issues quickly.
Integration Support: Works cohesively with other platforms, easing management.
Operational Efficiency: Automates management tasks for improved productivity.

In industries such as IT management and network administration, Auvik Network Management is predominantly utilized for overseeing and maintaining network infrastructures across multiple locations. It offers capabilities for monitoring network topology, receiving alerts on device downtimes, and managing performance metrics. Users employ its features for proactive issue identification, and auditing, helping maintain oversight of networks containing switches, routers, and firewalls. Auvik provides remote access and automated backups, which contribute to enhanced operational efficiency and network visibility.

Auvik

Netdata offers real-time performance monitoring and troubleshooting across infrastructures. It provides deep insights and metrics visualization, ensuring seamless operation and efficiency for IT systems.

Netdata is widely regarded in IT environments for its comprehensive monitoring capabilities utilizing a highly adaptive data collection approach. It supports a large array of metrics enabling users to maintain peak performance. Users can visualize data with clarity, allowing for quick identification of issues and efficient resource management. Netdata employs an open-source approach, ensuring flexibility and community-driven enhancements.

What are Netdata's key features?

Real-time Monitoring: Provides immediate insights into system performance.
Scalability: Handles complex environments, monitoring thousands of nodes.
Extensive Integrations: Compatible with multiple data sources and platforms.
Customizable Dashboards: Tailors visualizations to specific needs.
Low Resource Usage: Minimizes system impact while monitoring.

What benefits can be expected from Netdata reviews?

Accelerated Issue Resolution: Quickly identifies anomalies and reduces downtime.
Enhanced System Performance: Continuous monitoring boosts efficiency.
Cost-Effectiveness: Open-source model lowers overheads while providing robust features.
Community Support: Benefits from a wide array of contributions and shared expertise.
Increased Scalability: Grows alongside your infrastructure needs without redundancy.

Netdata finds application in industries such as finance, healthcare, and technology where uptime and performance are critical. Its flexible architecture adapts easily to these sectors, ensuring reliable monitoring for cloud operations and on-premise systems alike.

Netdata

Buyer's Guide

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

October 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Zabbix, Splunk and others in IT Infrastructure Monitoring. Updated: October 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

919,894 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors and best Cloud Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.