Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Avanan vs Check Point Anti-Spam and Email Security Software Blade comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 3, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
8.4
Avanan improved email security, reduced phishing, increased user trust, enhanced mobile protection, and boosted ROI and revenue growth.
Sentiment score
7.1
Organizations see over 70% ROI using Check Point, noting increased security, reduced spam, and time savings.
Since deploying Check Point Anti-Spam and Email Security Software Blade, we are blocking around 70 to 80% of spam and phishing attempts at the gateway.
I have seen a return on investment with Check Point Anti-Spam and Email Security Software Blade, as I have saved money and time.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
8.1
Avanan's customer service is highly responsive, professional, and proactive, with excellent communication and extensive support staff knowledge.
Sentiment score
6.1
Check Point support is responsive and proficient, praised for effective 24/7 service despite occasional delays and improvement areas.
Sometimes the Check Point support has issues as they do not respond immediately when I log a ticket and sometimes they lag.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
8.2
Avanan integrates with Office 365 and Google, praised for scalability, admin capabilities, and efficient email protection across diverse organizations.
Sentiment score
7.7
Check Point Anti-Spam scales seamlessly, integrating easily with systems, though some users find expansion costs higher than expected.
The scalability of Check Point Anti-Spam and Email Security Software Blade is superb, deserving 10 out of 10.
The scalability is excellent because it provides real-time licenses for the mailboxes I want to scan.
As our traffic has grown, the solution scales smoothly by simply adjusting the gateway resources and license.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.5
Avanan is highly praised for its stability, efficiency, security, minimal maintenance, seamless Microsoft 365 integration, and reliable AI-based scanning.
Sentiment score
8.2
Check Point Anti-Spam ensures stable performance, seamless integration, and high availability, with minimal disruptions in various environments.
Check Point Anti-Spam and Email Security Software Blade is very stable and reliable for me.
 

Room For Improvement

Users feel Avanan needs improvements in Active Directory dependency, email quarantining, AI logic, training, UI, performance, pricing, mobile app, and integrations.
Check Point software needs better UI, integration, support, performance, and AI features, with expanded compatibility and language support.
The interface is a bit overwhelming with information overload for someone new to it.
Without configuring the MTA or transfer agent, it cannot work fully.
A more real-time dashboard would make it easier, and while the detection is strong, false positive tuning is sometimes needed as occasional legitimate emails get flagged as spam and phishing.
 

Setup Cost

Avanan provides flexible pricing for Office 365, with straightforward setup and costs between $4 to $8 per user.
Check Point offers competitive pricing with scalable options, though setup and additional licensing costs may increase expenses.
The setup cost was minimal beyond the gateway itself.
The setup cost is a little expensive.
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Check Point Anti-Spam and Email Security Software Blade is that it is somewhat costlier, but we are getting the expected output for what we paid.
 

Valuable Features

Avanan provides advanced malware and phishing detection, 24/7 cloud protection, easy integration with Microsoft 365, and ensures secure communications.
Check Point software offers comprehensive email security with advanced AI, customizable options, and seamless integration for enhanced protection.
Real-time detection and remediation with spam and phishing emails significantly benefits my work by reinforcing security posture.
This solution helps us stop spams, phishing, malicious attachments, email-based threats, and attacks on mail infrastructure.
The real-time threat intelligence and advanced phishing detection make a big difference in our day-to-day work because since deploying them, we have seen a noticeable drop in the phishing emails reaching end-user inboxes, which reduces the number of security incidents that we need to investigate and saves time for the SOC team.
 

Categories and Ranking

Avanan
Ranking in Email Security
14th
Average Rating
9.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.8
Number of Reviews
19
Ranking in other categories
Data Loss Prevention (DLP) (26th)
Check Point Anti-Spam and E...
Ranking in Email Security
11th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
43
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Email Security category, the mindshare of Avanan is 3.4%, down from 3.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Check Point Anti-Spam and Email Security Software Blade is 0.8%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Email Security Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Check Point Anti-Spam and Email Security Software Blade0.8%
Avanan3.4%
Other95.8%
Email Security
 

Featured Reviews

Robert Melendez - PeerSpot reviewer
Enhances email security and has a very simple and easy-to-use UI
Spam protection is the most valuable feature. We have implemented the tool to enhance our email security. It helps prevent phishing attacks. The anomaly detection capabilities are baked into the security platform. The product integrates wonderfully with Microsoft 365. It's built right on a cloud platform and works almost natively. The solution has a very simple and easy-to-use UI. The tool appears extremely powerful and has a good solid feature set. It catches things that are bad for my environment. The user interface is good the way it is. If the solution continues down that path, I see no problems with the way it is going. It feels like a mature product.
Abnet Tsegaye Belay - PeerSpot reviewer
Has reduced phishing threats and provided better visibility through detailed dashboards and logging
One thing I noticed with Check Point Anti-Spam and Email Security Software Blade is that without configuring the MTA or transfer agent, it cannot work fully. The MTA feature has significant resource needs, and without it, we cannot use the full-fledged features of Anti-Spam and Email Security Blades. Its dependency on MTA is substantial. I chose 8 out of 10 for Check Point Anti-Spam and Email Security Software Blade because of the MTA dependency feature. Disabling MTA is problematic as it is very important for deploying this solution. If you want full content scanning or threat extraction and emulation, you have to enable MTA to work effectively.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Email Security solutions are best for your needs.
868,787 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
15%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Construction Company
7%
Financial Services Firm
6%
Security Firm
23%
Computer Software Company
11%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Educational Organization
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business8
Midsize Enterprise8
Large Enterprise6
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business24
Midsize Enterprise12
Large Enterprise18
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Avanan?
Spam protection is the most valuable feature.
What needs improvement with Avanan?
Avanan doesn't cover certain tool segments. Barracuda provides backup and retention of emails and Microsoft 365’s backup and retention services. I've brought this up with the vendor. They told me t...
What needs improvement with Check Point Anti-Spam and Email Security Software Blade?
There is room for improvement with Check Point Anti-Spam and Email Security Software Blade, particularly with the interface, which is not new people friendly; however, users will learn it, and it's...
What is your primary use case for Check Point Anti-Spam and Email Security Software Blade?
My main use case for Check Point Anti-Spam and Email Security Software Blade includes phishing protection, ransomware protection, and spam protection. The solution helps with compliance and integra...
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Bethel School District, ServiceSource, Capital Caring
SF Police Credit Union (SFPCU)
Find out what your peers are saying about Avanan vs. Check Point Anti-Spam and Email Security Software Blade and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.
868,787 professionals have used our research since 2012.