Avolution ABACUS vs BiZZdesign HoriZZon comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Avolution and BiZZdesign are both solutions in the Enterprise Architecture Management category. Avolution is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.0, while BiZZdesign is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.1. Avolution holds a 3.0% mindshare in AM, compared to BiZZdesign’s 3.9% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of Avolution users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 87% of BiZZdesign users who would recommend it.

Avolution ABACUS

Read 15 Avolution ABACUS reviews

2,987 Views
2,808 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

BiZZdesign HoriZZon

Read 31 BiZZdesign HoriZZon reviews

5,007 Views
3,555 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

Avolution ABACUS

BiZZdesign HoriZZon

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 3, 2024

Avolution ABACUS and BiZZdesign HoriZZon compete in the enterprise architecture tools category. BiZZdesign HoriZZon holds the upper hand with its robust feature set and positive organizational impact, despite Avolution ABACUS's favorable pricing and support.

Features: Avolution ABACUS offers dynamic modeling, customization, and real-time collaboration, making it suitable for adaptable architectural needs. BiZZdesign HoriZZon provides advanced integration capabilities, strategic analytics, and visualization tools, excelling in strategic planning and holistic enterprise strategy.

Room for Improvement: Avolution ABACUS could enhance integration capabilities, expand its visualization toolkit, and improve strategic insights. BiZZdesign HoriZZon might benefit from simplifying its deployment process, reducing costs, and expanding customization options.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Avolution ABACUS offers straightforward deployment and reliable support, easing onboarding for users. In contrast, BiZZdesign HoriZZon provides flexible, cloud-based deployment and proactive customer service, catering to organizations seeking agility and responsiveness.

Pricing and ROI: Avolution ABACUS presents a cost-effective solution with competitive pricing and lower initial setup costs, ideal for budget-conscious organizations. BiZZdesign HoriZZon, though priced higher, offers a greater ROI through enhanced strategic insights and long-term value for enterprises seeking comprehensive strategic benefits.

To learn more, read our detailed Avolution ABACUS vs. BiZZdesign HoriZZon Report (Updated: November 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Avolution ABACUS vs. BiZZdesign HoriZZon

November 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,769 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Avolution ABACUS

Ranking in Enterprise Architecture Management

10th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

BiZZdesign HoriZZon

Ranking in Enterprise Architecture Management

4th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

5.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Design (5th)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Enterprise Architecture Management category, the mindshare of Avolution ABACUS is 3.0%, down from 3.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of BiZZdesign HoriZZon is 3.9%, down from 4.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Enterprise Architecture Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
BiZZdesign HoriZZon	3.9%
Avolution ABACUS	3.0%
Other	93.1%

Enterprise Architecture Management

Featured Reviews

JoseCamacho

Freelancer at a consultancy with 1-10 employees

Supports evaluating architecture through corporate objectives

I conducted an evaluation of enterprise architecture at the European Court in Luxembourg, reviewing and analyzing existing implementations to identify potential improvements and providing recommendations I conduct evaluations to identify potential improvements and make recommendations, forming a…

Read full review

reviewer2022765

Sr Consultant BI Z Zdesign Center Of Excellence at a energy/utilities company with 10,001+ employees

Targeted stakeholder views have improved decision making and reduced architecture costs

BiZZdesign HoriZZon offers various valuable features. The best ones, besides those I have mentioned, include the AI space with the Diagram Describer and the Explorer functionality. I understand that BiZZdesign HoriZZon is also working on the Diagram Importer, which complements the Diagram Describer feature, providing full import and export functionality. Together with the contributor role and targeted stakeholder management, these features are essential. BiZZdesign HoriZZon introduced the Dynamic Solution Intent, enhancing the solution architecture by engaging diverse stakeholders with architectural artifacts. It supports the development of holistic solutions using reusable repository components. The deployment is hybrid cloud-based, specifically using Amazon Web Services as the cloud provider. I have also seen the implementation of return on investment features that contribute significantly to the organization’s overall effectiveness.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Scalable and stable tool for roadmapping and modeling, with a good dashboard, end-to-end impact analysis, and portfolio management."

"I would recommend it very strongly."

"It is a great tool for helping you understand what you really want to develop in an immature EA practice, providing a lot of flexibility in meeting a client stage and serving as an excellent early development tool."

"It is a very stable solution...The initial setup of Avolution ABACUS is very easy."

"Avolution ABACUS allows for flexible enterprise architecture analysis."

"This product is very strong in terms of the meta-model because you can customize a lot according to the business plan."

"The ease of modeling and the ease of showing interconnectivity and relationships is the most valuable. It is fairly simple and out of the box. It is customizable in many ways. It is a pretty good tool."

"There are plenty of features available such as the ability to test applications for issues and a user-friendly dashboard."

More Avolution ABACUS pros

"Everything being in one place really benefits me from an architectural perspective and also benefits the architectural, enterprise architecture team and the business."

"Return on investment is definitely there because we never had a single view of everything."

"BiZZdesign helps us look at everything in our enterprise architecture through a business capability lens, rather than in EA language."

"After that implementation, the way the architecture and inventory got streamlined, we did not need a really big architecture team, which helped the company overall save costs by repurposing the architects in different other departments where they were needed and helped streamline resourcing and save costs in enterprise architecture itself."

"The most valuable features of BiZZdesign HoriZZon include the diagrammatic representation of BPMN models, which I find good for modeling, and things such as capability maps."

"The feature I find most valuable is that the start times and loading times are short. It takes only a few seconds to load the repository and whenever I want to open diagrams, they are there almost immediately."

"The enterprise studio where the modelling happens is valuable."

"The powerful editing function in teamwork project-based, common or shared modeling, based on a powerful repository and knowledge sharing in a portal are the most valuable features. These are the most important features for me. I can add the integration of individual modeling notations like Archimate plus BPMN and DMN, and so on. We travel from one location to another and the tool allows us to keep track."

More BiZZdesign HoriZZon pros

Cons

"Avolution ABACUS has the drawback of needing data filtering at the development level, unlike some tools that offer filtering at deployment. Two areas where Avolution ABACUS could be improved are regional support and flexibility in model selection. Sometimes, it's challenging to access support or updates in certain regions, which can slow down progress. Additionally, it would be beneficial if the tool allowed more flexibility in selecting multiple models within a single unit."

"The tool doesn't have any intelligence built in. We have to design the dashboards ourselves, which is a challenge because we have to depend on the vendor for customizations."

"In the future, there could be improvements in integration and enhancements."

"It is vastly scalable but you can't run it on a Mac or Linux so it has limitations."

"Based on my experience, this is not a product that I recommend at the moment."

"Their local presence in the Middle East could be scaled more, particularly in customer service. It would be good if they'd also have mobile dashboards for executive management out of the box."

"I use reference models, which are taxonomies, in my EA work. It is a reference model/taxonomy of things with capabilities, sub capabilities, and sub-sub capabilities, so you're working it down. I haven't yet found a simple way to implement that in Abacus. It could be that it is there, but I don't know how to do it."

"It needs more flexible analysis parameters and more capability as a BPM tool and doing BPM simulation, compared with Bonita BPM or Bizagi."

More Avolution ABACUS cons

"I have seen table charts where, if the chart is a little too big, it does not fit in HoriZZon and it is not at all visible... There have been several times where we could not publish a chart properly and we had to break the chart into small tables and create multiple artifacts, creating a complete mess. This should be seriously taken up by BiZZdesign because there is a lot of scope for improvement in terms of usability. It's not at all good, unfortunately."

"The visibility of things and the user experience in HoriZZon are horrible."

"It lacks capabilities with regard to infrastructure modeling."

"There is room for improvement in making it more seamless between the modeling and the analysis pieces. Sometimes you have to do some work in the backend to ensure that the HoriZZon portal really gets all of the information the way you want it. They are working on the seamlessness between what they call Enterprise Studio and HoriZZon."

"While it is not the fastest in terms of performance, it is workable and requires reasonable patience."

"I noticed that there were times when the cloud version would get stuck or was not able to load."

"It should be more open to integrating with other existing tools. Although there has been progress in the past."

"I haven't observed a significant positive impact of BiZZdesign HoriZZon on my organization, and it's difficult to point that out."

More BiZZdesign HoriZZon cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"My company makes annual payments toward the licensing costs of the solution. Considering the product's capabilities, its prices are very reasonable."

"I'm paying on a yearly basis. I don't know whether it's a highly expensive tool or not. I'm getting a single version of it, and I don't have the enterprise part on it because I don't need the server component, and I don't need a web browser component. My estimate would be that it's a very reasonably priced tool given that you don't need to have licenses with everyone in order to get the information and the decision support capabilities out of the tool. You use the enterprise edition on top of the studio, which is the heart of the tool. I am not aware of any additional costs."

"The cost of Avolution ABACUS is reasonable, given the features they offer in comparison to other tools."

"It is expensive."

"It is competitive. It is not chump change. I am just using the studio version. I am not using the full enterprise version, which would probably cost me three times more for single-use, but it gives a lot more capability and analysis. It is server-based as well, and it is reasonably priced compared to a lot of the other tools. There are other tools that have other sorts of capabilities, but in order to use them, you'd really have to have like 50 users for the price to become justifiable."

"There is a subscription for this solution. We are on an annual subscription because you sometimes receive special offers the longer you subscribe."

"This solution is expensive for some people's budgets and they need to offer a Lite version at a cheaper price"

"The solution's pricing is not an issue."

More Avolution ABACUS pricing and cost advice

"First and foremost within the scope of improvement for the solution would be the cost. It's very costly..."

"In terms of this particular product usage, my clients currently only use per-user licenses."

"The pricing model is slightly on the high side and could be more competitive for long-term partnerships."

"I haven't found any issues with the scalability and licensing parts that are access-related."

"The price is reasonable."

"[The] Orbus... pricing model was based on every single functionality having a price. The pricing was comparable but if we wanted to scale, it would have ended up being a lot more expensive. BiZZdesign gave us one price with all of the functionality, and we could scale as much as we needed."

"We were customers and bought licenses from them. We used their remote instance initially but upgraded to the on-device version due to lag. For pricing, we paid about 2200 pounds a year per seat for the client installation at an educational rate. I'm not sure about commercial rates. I managed to get a free copy at BBC since it was for evaluation purposes."

"If one is very cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the product price as a seven out of ten."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Architecture Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Government

13%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

18%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Outsourcing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	9

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	20

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Avolution ABACUS?

While Avolution ABACUS is flexible, it can be complex to work with as it requires knowledge of specific configurations to customize the product. It would be beneficial to have seminars or other met...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Avolution ABACUS?

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Avolution ABACUS?

I rate Avolution ABACUS eight out of ten. The focus should be on implementing and understanding enterprise architecture concepts rather than the specific tool.

See all answers

What needs improvement with BiZZdesign HoriZZon?

I noticed that there were times when the cloud version would get stuck or was not able to load. There were issues with the login capability, and that was some time ago, a few months ago. I am not s...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for BiZZdesign HoriZZon?

There was a merger that the client entered into, and following that merger, we inherited a large technology inventory from the acquired organization. The acquired inventory from the organization ha...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering BiZZdesign HoriZZon?

The real experience I have had and seeing the result of using it in a large team where a large scale enterprise architecture and merger is happening is a very unique experience I have had with BiZZ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect vs Avolution ABACUS

Compared 21% of the time

LeanIX vs Avolution ABACUS

Compared 11% of the time

MEGA HOPEX vs Avolution ABACUS

Compared 9% of the time

Alfabet Enterprise Architecture Management vs Avolution ABACUS

Compared 7% of the time

SAP PowerDesigner vs Avolution ABACUS

Compared 5% of the time

More Avolution ABACUS Competitors

iServer vs BiZZdesign HoriZZon

Compared 11% of the time

MEGA HOPEX vs BiZZdesign HoriZZon

Compared 9% of the time

Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect vs BiZZdesign HoriZZon

Compared 7% of the time

OrbusInfinity vs BiZZdesign HoriZZon

Compared 7% of the time

ARIS Cloud vs BiZZdesign HoriZZon

Compared 3% of the time

More BiZZdesign HoriZZon Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Avolution ABACUS

October 2026

Download Avolution ABACUS product report

Buyer's Guide

BiZZdesign HoriZZon

October 2026

Download BiZZdesign HoriZZon product report

Also Known As

No data available

HoriZZon

Overview

Avolution ABACUS provides comprehensive enterprise architecture modeling with customizable features, facilitating effective planning and analysis for businesses seeking advanced integration and analytical capabilities.

Avolution ABACUS stands out in enterprise architecture with its rich feature set including customizable meta-models and 3D modeling. It offers role-based permissions, robust integration capabilities, and is well-regarded for its traceability and dynamic customization. Users benefit from impact analysis, support for multiple frameworks, and its capacity to support corporate objectives and IT infrastructure. A user-friendly dashboard, application testing, and extensive modeling capabilities enable professionals to create strategic roadmaps, although improvements are needed in UI complexity and flexible reporting.

What are the main features of Avolution ABACUS?

Customizable Meta-Models: Allows users to tailor features to specific business requirements.
3D Modeling: Enhances visualization of architectures.
Role-Based Permissions: Facilitates secure collaboration.
Integration Capabilities: Supports seamless interaction with various frameworks.
Impact Analysis: Aids in understanding changes and their potential effects.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Improved Traceability: Facilitates tracking of architectural components.
Effective Cataloging: Organizes data comprehensively for easy access.
Dynamic Customization: Adapts features to specific needs effortlessly.
Analytical and Simulation Tools: Provides insights for effective decision-making.
Predefined Components: Accelerates the modeling process.

Industries such as banking utilize Avolution ABACUS for application domain architecture, benefiting from its comprehensive diagram and model designing abilities. Consultants demonstrate this to clients, showcasing potentials like identifying capability overlaps and standards. On-premises deployments allow organizations to access, evaluate, and develop within established environments, aiding in effective architectural planning and analysis.

Avolution

BiZZdesign HoriZZon offers robust enterprise architecture modeling, seamless collaboration, and supports ArchiMate standards, benefiting organizations with efficient integration capabilities, intuitive features, and stakeholder accessibility.

BiZZdesign HoriZZon facilitates enterprise architecture through its strong modeling features in Enterprise Studio, providing collaborative dashboards and integration with systems like ServiceNow and SQL databases. Known for quick loading times and diagrammatic representation, it supports multiple modeling languages while maintaining an intuitive web interface. Despite its strengths, organizations find challenges with interface complexity, high costs, a steep learning curve, and scalability in large datasets.

What are the key features of BiZZdesign HoriZZon?

Modeling in Enterprise Studio: Enables comprehensive architecture and process modeling.
Collaborative Dashboards: Promotes teamwork with shared perspectives.
ArchiMate Standards: Ensures compliance and consistency in modeling frameworks.
Integration Options: Seamlessly connects with ServiceNow and SQL databases.
Repository Management: Centralizes data for efficient governance.

What benefits and ROI should users expect?

Improved Decision Making: Facilitates informed choices through clear architecture representation.
Process Optimization: Streamlines operations leveraging capability mapping.
Accessibility for Stakeholders: Simplifies architectural insights for all involved parties.
Enhanced Governance: Supports enterprise-wide oversight and documentation management.

BiZZdesign HoriZZon serves industries focused on enterprise architecture, aiding in project governance and application portfolio management. Organizations in sectors like finance, manufacturing, and IT leverage it to align architectural elements with business goals, centralize architecture data, and optimize processes for better decision-making and oversight.

BiZZdesign

Sample Customers

Barclays

T-Mobile, Shell, HSBC, Erasmus University, VIVAT Insurance

Buyer's Guide

Avolution ABACUS vs. BiZZdesign HoriZZon

November 2026

Free Report: Avolution ABACUS vs. BiZZdesign HoriZZon

Find out what your peers are saying about Avolution ABACUS vs. BiZZdesign HoriZZon and other solutions. Updated: November 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Avolution ABACUS vs. BiZZdesign HoriZZon report.

See our list of best Enterprise Architecture Management vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise Architecture Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.