AWS Application Migration Service vs IBM Turbonomic comparison

AWS Application Migration Service vs. IBM Turbonomic

Download the complete report

Helped 908,858 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AWS Application Migration S...

Ranking in Cloud Migration

7th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

5.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

IBM Turbonomic

Ranking in Cloud Migration

2nd

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

205

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Management (4th), Virtualization Management Tools (3rd), IT Financial Management (1st), IT Operations Analytics (10th), Cloud Analytics (1st), Cloud Cost Management (2nd), AIOps (17th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Cloud Migration category, the mindshare of AWS Application Migration Service is 4.1%, down from 4.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM Turbonomic is 6.5%, up from 3.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Migration Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
IBM Turbonomic	6.5%
AWS Application Migration Service	4.1%
Other	89.4%

Cloud Migration

Featured Reviews

Terence Dube

AWS Cloud Engineer at Standard Telephones and Cables

Automation has simplified migrations and now needs to address complex legacy compatibility

The features I like the most about AWS Application Migration Service is its ease of use. That's the main thing. It's ease of use, and they have a detailed walkthrough, especially depending on different operating systems. The automation capabilities of AWS actually eliminate the long time and input that I have to put into migration. These days, I just run the agent, and then the agent does the job. All I have to do is actually look at the current migration status on the AWS dashboard. When it's done, I then do a quick switch over to the cloud. The key thing I really love is the simple moving of files from on-prem to the cloud.

Read full review

reviewer1446966

Senior Systems Engineer at a university with 1,001-5,000 employees

The solution reduced our operational expenditures and is able to identify points before we even noticed them

The management interface seems to be designed for high-resolution screens. Somebody with a smaller-resolution screen might not like the web interface. I run a 4K monitor on it, so everything fits on the screen. With a lower resolution like 1080, you need to scroll a lot. Everything is in smaller windows. It doesn't seem to be designed for smaller screens. When I change the resolution to 1080, I only see half of what I would on my big 4K monitor. It would be annoying to have to scroll to see the flow chart. They have a flow chart that goes top to bottom like a tree. On a lower resolution, it might be nice if that scrolls horizontally because it's long, narrow, and tall. It's only three icons wide, but it's 15 icons tall. I think it would be helpful to have the ability to change that for a smaller screen and customize the widget.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"AWS Application Migration Service allows us to perform migrations with minimal downtime, which is crucial for our operations."

"The installation process and configuration processes are very straightforward, and in terms of maintenance, it's pretty easy as one person can handle it."

"I rate AWS Application Migration Service a nine out of ten overall."

"The most valuable feature is the live, block-to-block replication."

"CloudEndure is a product that I recommend to my customers because it's very easy to implement, configure, and use."

"Live Migration's best feature is that it's free."

"The CloudEndure feature is most valuable because it is user friendly and very simple."

"The product is reasonably priced."

More AWS Application Migration Service pros

"We can manage multiple environments using a single pane of glass, which is something that I really like."

"Customer Service: Excellent. They've always been quick to support any issues/queries we have."

"Immediate ROI was seen due to the reduced IT infrastructure CapEx."

"Turbonomic stepped in and helped manage all the things that we needed to do to increase responsiveness and lower costs."

"Right sizing our environment saves us money by not having to purchase additional hardware."

"The automation piece is one of the most valuable features."

"The VM rightsizing tools and the intelligent placing of workloads have helped us to not only streamline what we have but, in conjunction with the sizing tools, has allowed us to look at future scenarios and potentially reduce our spend on physical kit in the DC."

"I have the ability to automate things similar to the Orchestrator stuff. I do have the ability to have it do some balancing, and if it sees some different performance metrics that I've set not being met, it'll actually move some of my virtual machines from, let's say, one host to another. It is sort of an automation tool that helps me. Basically, I specify the metric, and if I get a certain host or something being over-utilized, it'll automatically move the virtual machines around for me. It basically has to snap into my vCenter and then it can make adjustments and move my virtual machines around. It also has some very nice reporting tools built around virtual machines. It tells you how much storage, memory, or CPU is being used monthly, and then it gives you a very nice way to be able to send out billing structure to your end users who use servers within your environment."

More IBM Turbonomic pros

Cons

"I think it is important to have more logs, and more details would be great because we have just logged on the client's side, but there weren't many details on the cloud."

"Live Migration has some issues with target setups."

"We would like to have a disaster recovery feature included in this solution."

"However, I give it a six mainly due to the compatibility issues with legacy systems, which is an individual problem I am currently facing."

"I do not see any improvements required for the CloudEndure."

"There are some features in the Migration Factory that could be integrated directly into AWS Application Migration Service."

"One drawback to using CloudEndure is that the default is to give one small, lightweight server, which is created in the cloud."

"The schema conversion is not included in the document management services itself. Complex formations require additional steps."

"The dashboard is too basic, could use more details."

"The management interface seems to be designed for high-resolution screens. Somebody with a smaller-resolution screen might not like the web interface. I run a 4K monitor on it, so everything fits on the screen. With a lower resolution like 1080, you need to scroll a lot. Everything is in smaller windows. It doesn't seem to be designed for smaller screens."

"VM level granularity on some of the automation actions such as adding memory/CPU. That would allow an admin to schedule the exact time for the specific action for any given VM."

"Occasionally after changes in our environment, we often needed to restart the Tomcat service on the instance."

"GUI can be more user friendly."

"Waiting for the HTML5 GUI since flash has refresh issues."

"I like the detail I get in the old user interface and will miss some of that in the new interface when we perform our planned upgrade soon."

"Reports take time to custom tweak."

More IBM Turbonomic cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"For me, the price of the tool is cheap and very good. It is flexible pricing since you pay just for what you use."

"Live Migration's price is good."

"Contact the Turbonomic sales team, explain your needs and what you're looking to monitor. They will get a pre-sales SE on the phone and together work up a very accurate quote."

"In the last year, Turbonomic has reduced our cloud costs by $94,000."

"I know there have been some issues with the billing, when the numbers were first proposed, as to how much we would save. There was a huge miscommunication on our part. Turbonomic was led to believe that we could optimize our AWS footprint, because we didn't know we couldn't. So, we were promised savings of $750,000. Then, when we came to implement Turbonomic, the developers in AWS said, "Absolutely not. You're not putting that in our environment. We can't scale down anything because they coded it." Our AWS environment is a legacy environment. It has all these old applications, where all the developers who have made it are no longer with the company. Those applications generate a ton of money for us. So, if one breaks, we are really in trouble and they didn't want to have to deal with an environment that was changing and couldn't be supported. That number went from $750,000 to about $450,000. However, that wasn't Turbonomic's fault."

"Price is a big one. VMTurbo was very competitively priced."

"If you're a super-small business, it may be a little bit pricey for you... But in large, enterprise companies where money is, maybe, less of an issue, Turbonomic is not that expensive. I can't imagine why any big company would not buy it, for what it does."

"The product is fairly priced right now. Given its capabilities, it is excellently priced. We think that the product will become self-funding because we will be able to maximize our resources, which will help us from a capacity perspective. That should save us money in the long run."

"Licensing is per socket, so load up on the cores rather than a lot of lower core CPUs."

"The pricing is in line with the other solutions that we have. It's not a bargain software, nor is it overly expensive."

More IBM Turbonomic pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Migration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

908,858 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

Marketing Services Firm

Healthcare Company

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	4

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	41
Midsize Enterprise	57
Large Enterprise	147

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with CloudEndure Live Migration?

I've never really looked at AWS Application Migration Service in a way of improving. There's always room for improvement, but I think we can improve the automation. It's already automated, but some...

What is your primary use case for CloudEndure Live Migration?

I use AWS Application Migration Service to install application servers.

What advice do you have for others considering CloudEndure Live Migration?

The main challenge I faced during migration was actually doing the migration itself. At first, I had to find a way to move or replicate the information to the cloud, which was way too manual. I thi...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Turbonomic?

It offers different scenarios. It provides more capabilities than many other tools available. Typically, its price is set as a percentage of the consumption of some of our customers' services. The ...

What needs improvement with Turbonomic?

The implementation could be enhanced.

What is your primary use case for Turbonomic?

We use IBM Turbonomic to automate our cloud operations, including monitoring, consolidating dashboards, and reporting. This helps us get a consolidated view of all customer spending into a single d...

HPE Zerto Software vs AWS Application Migration Service

Comparisons

Compared 24% of the time

Hexaware Amaze vs AWS Application Migration Service

Compared 17% of the time

Racemi Cloud Path vs AWS Application Migration Service

Compared 16% of the time

Velostrata vs AWS Application Migration Service

Compared 12% of the time

OpenText Migrate vs AWS Application Migration Service

Compared 10% of the time

More AWS Application Migration Service Competitors

Densify vs IBM Turbonomic

Compared 5% of the time

VMware Aria Operations vs IBM Turbonomic

Compared 4% of the time

VMware Aria Automation vs IBM Turbonomic

Compared 3% of the time

VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth vs IBM Turbonomic

Compared 3% of the time

Spot by Flexera vs IBM Turbonomic

Compared 3% of the time

More IBM Turbonomic Competitors

Product Reports

AWS Application Migration Service

Download AWS Application Migration Service product report

AWS Application Migration Service report

IBM Turbonomic

Download IBM Turbonomic product report

Also Known As

CloudEndure Live Migration

Turbonomic, VMTurbo Operations Manager

Interactive Demo

Demo not available

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

IBM

Overview

AWS Application Migration Service offers a streamlined approach for moving workloads to the cloud by providing live migration capabilities with minimal downtime. Its user-friendly design and seamless integration with AWS services enable efficient transitions while supporting diverse workloads and database migrations.

AWS Application Migration Service is valued for its simplicity and cost-effectiveness, offering live block-to-block replication to ensure data reliability. It assists in converting schemas to support database migrations and allows phased migrations with ease. Users benefit from its scalability and the ability to handle large-scale server transfers and application migrations, such as SAP and Salesforce, alongside supporting multi-region replication for distributed architectures and analytics. The service integrates well with AWS tools, simplifying cloud transitions and providing robust support for disaster recovery and cloud-to-cloud migrations.

What are the most important features of AWS Application Migration Service?

Live Migration: Enables continuous data replication with minimal downtime.
Database Migration Support: Converts schemas for smooth database transitions.
Scalability: Handles a wide range of applications and large-scale transfers.
Integration with AWS: Seamless connection with AWS services for streamlined operations.

What benefits do reviews highlight?

User-Friendliness: Simplified processes helpful for all users.
Cost-Effectiveness: Reasonable pricing structure with optimized usage cases.
Data Reliability: Block-to-block replication ensures high data integrity.
Scalability: Supports diverse workloads and large-scale migrations.

Industries utilizing AWS Application Migration Service benefit from its ability to migrate data from on-premises setups to the cloud, facilitating the movement of heavy-duty applications like SAP and Salesforce. Its support for multi-region replication aids businesses in setting up distributed architectures, while its compatibility with analytics platforms like Redshift and S3 ensures efficient data handling and integration for broader business intelligence needs.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

IBM Turbonomic enhances IT efficiency with automation, capacity planning, and reporting features, enabling organizations to optimize resource utilization and improve performance through advanced workload management and scenario analysis.

IBM Turbonomic equips organizations with robust capabilities for dynamic resource allocation and informed decision-making. Its planning module provides scenario analysis, right-sizing recommendations, and a customizable dashboard for tailored insights. Automation features improve workload placements and resource efficiency, while forecasting capabilities enhance performance. Simulation of environments helps in decision-making, leading to significant savings in cloud and hardware management. There is a need for a more intuitive interface, enhanced navigation, and improved customization in reporting with integration potential with third-party applications. Transition to the HTML5 interface and stronger training resources are among anticipated improvements.

What are the key features of IBM Turbonomic?

Automation: Automates workload placement and dynamic resource allocation to boost efficiency.
Capacity Planning: Provides scenario analysis and right-sizing for optimal resource use.
Customizable Dashboard: Offers tailored insights for organization needs.
Forecasting: Enhances decision-making through resource-use predictions.
Simulation Capabilities: Aids in assessing savings and performance gains.

What benefits and ROI should be evaluated?

Cost Optimization: Reduces spending on cloud and hardware resources.
Enhanced Performance: Promotes consistent application performance and resource efficiency.
Improved Decision-Making: Supports informed choices with scenario simulation.
Flexibility and Scalability: Assists with workload migrations and resource management across environments.

IBMTurbonomic is implemented across industries such as cloud management and virtualization, helping organizations balance clusters, optimize virtual machine performance, and manage Azure configurations. In resource-monitored environments like VMware and XenServer, its features facilitate load balancing, VM rightsizing, and automation shutoffs. Industries can rely on its insights for cost-saving measures, ensuring efficient resource allocation for hybrid and cloud environments.

IBM

Sample Customers

Agio, Cloud Nation, Limelight Networks

IBM, J.B. Hunt, BBC, The Capita Group, SulAmérica, Rabobank, PROS, ThinkON, O.C. Tanner Co.

AWS Application Migration Service vs. IBM Turbonomic