AWS Auto Scaling vs OpenText SiteScope comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and OpenText are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #15 with an average rating of 8.6, while OpenText is ranked #34 with an average rating of 8.0. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 0.1% mindshare in APM, compared to OpenText’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 91% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

AWS Auto Scaling

Read 21 AWS Auto Scaling reviews

281 Views
146 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

OpenText SiteScope

Read 26 OpenText SiteScope reviews

1,549 Views
766 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

AWS Auto Scaling

OpenText SiteScope

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 24, 2024

OpenText SiteScope and AWS Auto Scaling are two distinct products used for monitoring and auto-scaling respectively, each with unique strengths. AWS Auto Scaling seems to have the upper hand due to its scalability and automation.

What features are offered by OpenText SiteScope in comparison to AWS Auto Scaling?

OpenText SiteScope users value robust monitoring capabilities, including comprehensive data collection and reporting. AWS Auto Scaling is praised for its seamless integration with other AWS services and automated resource scaling. AWS Auto Scaling also offers automation and integration features.

What areas of improvement can be found in OpenText SiteScope in comparison to AWS Auto Scaling?

OpenText SiteScope users suggest enhancements in mobile support and better integration with cloud platforms. AWS Auto Scaling users highlight the need for more intuitive management tools and improved documentation. Users of OpenText SiteScope focus more on integration needs while AWS Auto Scaling users seek enhanced usability resources.

How is the ease of deployment and customer service of OpenText SiteScope in comparison to AWS Auto Scaling?

OpenText SiteScope deployment is often cited as complex, requiring intensive setup and configuration. AWS Auto Scaling is noted for its straightforward deployment. Users appreciate OpenText SiteScope customer service but note occasional delays, whereas AWS Auto Scaling provides reliable customer support.

What setup costs and ROI can be seen with OpenText SiteScope in comparison to AWS Auto Scaling?

OpenText SiteScope users mention high setup costs but acknowledge substantial ROI due to its detailed monitoring. AWS Auto Scaling users enjoy the pay-as-you-go pricing model, delivering excellent ROI via cost-efficient scaling. AWS Auto Scaling is more favored for its flexible pricing and immediate ROI benefits.

To learn more, read our detailed AWS Auto Scaling vs. OpenText SiteScope Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

AWS Auto Scaling vs. OpenText SiteScope

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 851,604 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AWS Auto Scaling

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

15th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

OpenText SiteScope

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

34th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of AWS Auto Scaling is 0.1%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText SiteScope is 0.5%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Featured Reviews

Mbula Mboma

AWS Cloud Re-Start Program Specialist at Orange RDC (Congo)

Boosts deployment efficiency with seamless automatic scaling capabilities

My primary use case for Auto Scaling is mainly to deploy applications at scale Auto Scaling has made the deployment of applications more efficient, allowing us to manage traffic and maintain performance as user counts increase. Auto Scaling is a cool feature that works well and its automatic…

Read full review

Christopher M Cook

Senior Service Analyst at Exelon

Doesn't require much custom coding and can run on different platforms, but the types of scripting files you can execute on it are limited

In terms of issues with Micro Focus SiteScope, some that we've run into were unintended, for example, extra executions of monitors and some false alerts when there were problems connecting to endpoints or there were issues with the application that sometimes resulted in false positives. We had a few issues with the way time zones were configured when the system time differed from the time indicated during the monitoring, but those were just little things that weren't too bad. As far as the limitations of Micro Focus SiteScope, the types of scripting files that can be executed are rather limited unless you go to some third-party plugins. These are the areas for improvement in the solution.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"AWS Auto Scaling is cost-effective and very useful for businesses."

"The tool's most valuable feature is vertical auto-scaling, which is easy to use. However, most companies now prefer horizontal scaling. I set up the health check integration to monitor CPU usage. When it reaches seventy percent, it sends me an email notification."

"AWS Auto Scaling is very good for managing traffic and creating new instances when necessary."

"The good thing about Autoscaling is that it provides the capacity to minimize downtime. So, it gives you the assurance of stability and robustness within your system."

"It can scale."

"AWS Auto Scaling is very good for managing traffic and creating new instances when necessary."

"The health check integration feature ensures that the instances are healthy and capable of absorbing traffic, thus serving their purpose effectively."

"I would highly recommend Auto Scaling to others because it is a fantastic feature that simplifies scaling processes and makes deployment efficient."

More AWS Auto Scaling pros

"The URL monitoring is excellent."

"It can monitor over a 100 technologies with built-in solution templates."

"It's a very flexible product so you can run a script out of it, even straight out of the box."

"VM monitoring is pretty good showing good visualizations of how VMs are operating within the context of all the VMs running on the same hypervisor."

"I find OpenText SiteScope itself to be uncomplicated and deserving of a ten out of ten due to its simplicity."

"Simple deployment: The deployment uses protocols such as NetBios, SSH, WMI, SNMP, which means that any device with any of these protocols will be monitored."

"Our experiences with Micro Focus SiteScope have been mostly positive as we can easily work with multiple monitors and different types of monitors pretty quickly. There are a lot of out-of-the-box solutions for us through Micro Focus SiteScope, so we don't have to do that much custom coding for the vast majority of requests that we get for monitoring. There are some limitations that we've run into and some problems every once in a while, but they've been relatively minor."

"Instead of executing jobs multiple times, I can configure it once, schedule, and apply it on multiple servers in sequence. It allows me to create scripts and automate several processes, making tasks simpler and more efficient."

More OpenText SiteScope pros

Cons

"The solution is not out-of-the-box and you have to study to use it. It should be more easier to use."

"Setting up the configuration involves too much work for the cloud engineer, like configuring the ALB, the target group, and all the steps."

"It could be cheaper."

"It is sometimes very critical to deploy on AWS since some servers are already running in the background. There are challenges for employees on how to deploy at a given time."

"In comparison to other public clouds, the product is costly."

"The product could add more features for managing instances."

"The setup can be a bit complex in some situations."

"The speed of the solution must be improved."

More AWS Auto Scaling cons

"The graphs and dashboard in the solution are areas that need improvement."

"Sometimes in a huge environment, I think the documentation does not provide the required calculations so you can't know what the required set up should be. You need to test."

"SiteScope isn't productive if you want to monitor RAM or if you want to monitor some URL."

"It may lack some features other products in the category have like more detailed transaction tracking."

"They need to offer better technical support, which, right now, is not helpful or responsive."

"In terms of issues with Micro Focus SiteScope, some that we've run into were unintended, for example, extra executions of monitors and some false alerts when there were problems connecting to endpoints or there were issues with the application that sometimes resulted in false positives. We had a few issues with the way time zones were configured when the system time differed from the time indicated during the monitoring, but those were just little things that weren't too bad. As far as the limitations of Micro Focus SiteScope, the types of scripting files that can be executed are rather limited unless you go to some third-party plugins. These are the areas for improvement in the solution."

"The interface of OpenText SiteScope needs improvement. It has a Java-based interface, which is slow and could be simplified for better usability."

"They should provide more templates for new vendor devices."

More OpenText SiteScope cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"AWS Auto Scaling's price is high."

"AWS Auto Scaling is a pay-per-use and pay-as-you-use service."

"AWS Auto Scaling is a cheap solution."

"The pricing is good. I have not had any customers that have complained about the price."

"The product is expensive."

"AWS Auto Scaling is an expensive solution."

"The product has moderate pricing."

"You have to pay for their "solution templates". Other tools do not charge you for knowledge-based monitoring bundles."

"I rate the solution's pricing a six out of ten on a scale where one is cheap and ten is expensive."

"It is expensive. I don't like its licensing. I don't like anything where you have to license it by individual licenses. I'm not a fan of that, but that's just me."

"The pricing or licensing cost for Micro Focus SiteScope is often bundled with other things, so the cost for each individual would be difficult to calculate. Pricing could be $2,000,000 a year. My company pays for technical support because it's part of the contract with Micro Focus SiteScope. You buy the licenses, but you're also paying for the support. With Nagios, it's much more bare-bones as far as paying for licenses and the software itself, and my company didn't have to use as much Nagios support yet in one or two years because there weren't too many problems using Nagios, and it's much more cost-effective, so that's one of the reasons why my company is migrating to Nagios from Micro Focus SiteScope."

"SiteScope licensing can be node based-or monitor-based. I would recommend for node-based licensing."

"Depending on your requirements, there are two licensing models available. A simple point model, or an endpoint model."

"When Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope has introduced approximately eight years ago and there was not very much competition making the price high. However, when comparing the price of Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope now to other tools, they should reduce the price. It is similar to a legacy tool at this point."

"Licensing is a little steep."

More OpenText SiteScope pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

851,604 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

34%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Computer Software Company

11%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about AWS Auto Scaling?

The tool's most valuable feature is vertical auto-scaling, which is easy to use. However, most companies now prefer horizontal scaling. I set up the health check integration to monitor CPU usage. W...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AWS Auto Scaling?

The pricing of Auto Scaling is medium range, neither high nor low.

See all answers

What needs improvement with AWS Auto Scaling?

It is sometimes very critical to deploy on AWS since some servers are already running in the background. There are challenges for employees on how to deploy at a given time. It requires a downtime ...

See all answers

What do you like most about Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope?

The most valuable feature of SiteScope is its infrastructure monitoring.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope?

The licensing scheme for Micro Focus tools is reasonable, and more affordable. It's seen as medium or de-receivable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope?

While working with OpenText, I noticed sometimes teams refuse intervention due to compliance issues. Overcoming control restrictions for different applications could be improved.

See all answers

Comparisons

VMware Aria Operations for Applications vs AWS Auto Scaling

Compared 44% of the time

More AWS Auto Scaling Competitors

Dynatrace vs OpenText SiteScope

Compared 12% of the time

Splunk AppDynamics vs OpenText SiteScope

Compared 12% of the time

Grafana vs OpenText SiteScope

Compared 11% of the time

Prometheus Group vs OpenText SiteScope

Compared 10% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs OpenText SiteScope

Compared 6% of the time

More OpenText SiteScope Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

May 2025

Download AWS Auto Scaling product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText SiteScope

March 2025

Download OpenText SiteScope product report

Also Known As

AWS Auto-Scaling

Micro Focus SiteScope, HPE SiteScope, SiteScope

Overview

AWS Auto Scaling monitors your applications and automatically adjusts capacity to maintain steady, predictable performance at the lowest possible cost. Using AWS Auto Scaling, it’s easy to setup application scaling for multiple resources across multiple services in minutes. The service provides a simple, powerful user interface that lets you build scaling plans for resources including Amazon EC2 instances and Spot Fleets, Amazon ECS tasks, Amazon DynamoDB tables and indexes, and Amazon Aurora Replicas. AWS Auto Scaling makes scaling simple with recommendations that allow you to optimize performance, costs, or balance between them. If you’re already using Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling to dynamically scale your Amazon EC2 instances, you can now combine it with AWS Auto Scaling to scale additional resources for other AWS services. With AWS Auto Scaling, your applications always have the right resources at the right time.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

OpenText SiteScope is an agentless monitoring program that tracks the availability and performance of distributed IT infrastructures such as servers, network devices and services, applications and application components, virtualization software, operating systems, and other IT enterprise components.

OpenText SiteScope is an autonomous hybrid IT monitoring system that can monitor more than 100 different types of IT components in real time, thanks to a lightweight and highly customizable remote access architecture.

With OpenText SiteScope, IT teams can get the data they need to keep on top of problems and eliminate bottlenecks before they become major concerns.

OpenText SiteScope can reduce total cost of ownership (TCO) by utilizing agentless technology, which eliminates the need to install and monitor agents on each box. Manual activities can be automated, and teams can save time and effort by using pre-packaged solution templates.

OpenText SiteScope Features

OpenText SiteScope has many valuable key features. Some of the most useful ones include:

Broad functionality built on expertise: OpenText SiteScope's architecture is scalable and supports a broad range of functions, including data collecting, alerting, event management, and reporting. Data is collected via remote access, which eliminates the need for agents to be deployed and maintained on monitored nodes. OpenText SiteScope connects to systems as a remote user via the central server, which supports JMX, SNMP, HTTP, SSH, NetBIOS, and WMI.

Monitors legacy and modern environments: OpenText SiteScope comes with more than 100 built-in monitors that track things like utilization, response time, use, and resource availability.
- Cloud: You can monitor virtual servers and applications on Amazon Web Services (AWS). AWS-hosted applications can provide data to Amazon CloudWatch, which can be used for auto-scaling, reporting, and alerting.
- Virtualization: OpenText SiteScope supports VMware, Microsoft, Citrix, and Oracle/Sun virtualization technologies. Monitor Docker clusters, nodes, containers, and workloads.

Flexibility with configuration: By adding or deleting specific monitors, you can adapt to dynamic changes in data center configuration.

Templates for solutions: The template database is based on best practices for monitoring complex application settings with the least amount of time and effort. The templates include built-in domain experience of specialized monitors, default metrics and thresholds, proactive testing, and best practices for a given application or monitoring component.

Notifications, alerts, and reports: Email, SNMP traps, HTTP post, and database alerts are all supported. Administrators receive alerts based on defined thresholds and schedules.

Flexibility in user management: Using LDAP or an internal management solution, define group-level permissions, construct user roles, and assign security groups depending on role. Extensive WS (Web Service)-based API that automates numerous management situations without the need for the SiteScope UI.

Integrations with SiteScope: OpenText SiteScope not only offers a number of benefits on its own, but it can also be linked with a number of OpenText and third-party solutions, giving teams the ability to properly integrate their IT operations center.

OpenText

Sample Customers

Expedia, Intuit, Royal Dutch Shell, Brooks Brothers

Vodafone Ireland, Kuveyt Turk Participation Bank

Buyer's Guide

AWS Auto Scaling vs. OpenText SiteScope

April 2025

Free Report: AWS Auto Scaling vs. OpenText SiteScope

Find out what your peers are saying about AWS Auto Scaling vs. OpenText SiteScope and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

851,604 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our AWS Auto Scaling vs. OpenText SiteScope report.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.