AWS Auto Scaling vs OpenText SiteScope comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and OpenText are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #14 with an average rating of 8.7, while OpenText is ranked #17 with an average rating of 9.2. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 0.4% mindshare in APM, compared to OpenText’s 0.7% mindshare. Additionally, 91% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

AWS Auto Scaling

Read 22 AWS Auto Scaling reviews

802 Views
754 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

OpenText SiteScope

Read 29 OpenText SiteScope reviews

1,881 Views
1,655 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

AWS Auto Scaling

OpenText SiteScope

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 24, 2024

OpenText SiteScope and AWS Auto Scaling are two distinct products used for monitoring and auto-scaling respectively, each with unique strengths. AWS Auto Scaling seems to have the upper hand due to its scalability and automation.

What features are offered by OpenText SiteScope in comparison to AWS Auto Scaling?

OpenText SiteScope users value robust monitoring capabilities, including comprehensive data collection and reporting. AWS Auto Scaling is praised for its seamless integration with other AWS services and automated resource scaling. AWS Auto Scaling also offers automation and integration features.

What areas of improvement can be found in OpenText SiteScope in comparison to AWS Auto Scaling?

OpenText SiteScope users suggest enhancements in mobile support and better integration with cloud platforms. AWS Auto Scaling users highlight the need for more intuitive management tools and improved documentation. Users of OpenText SiteScope focus more on integration needs while AWS Auto Scaling users seek enhanced usability resources.

How is the ease of deployment and customer service of OpenText SiteScope in comparison to AWS Auto Scaling?

OpenText SiteScope deployment is often cited as complex, requiring intensive setup and configuration. AWS Auto Scaling is noted for its straightforward deployment. Users appreciate OpenText SiteScope customer service but note occasional delays, whereas AWS Auto Scaling provides reliable customer support.

What setup costs and ROI can be seen with OpenText SiteScope in comparison to AWS Auto Scaling?

OpenText SiteScope users mention high setup costs but acknowledge substantial ROI due to its detailed monitoring. AWS Auto Scaling users enjoy the pay-as-you-go pricing model, delivering excellent ROI via cost-efficient scaling. AWS Auto Scaling is more favored for its flexible pricing and immediate ROI benefits.

To learn more, read our detailed AWS Auto Scaling vs. OpenText SiteScope Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

AWS Auto Scaling vs. OpenText SiteScope

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AWS Auto Scaling

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

14th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

OpenText SiteScope

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

17th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of AWS Auto Scaling is 0.4%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText SiteScope is 0.7%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
AWS Auto Scaling	0.4%
OpenText SiteScope	0.7%
Other	98.9%

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Featured Reviews

Ishaka Michael Efe

DevOps Engineer Intern at HNG Tech

Automation has simplified traffic management and improved workload efficiency

I'm not really sure what improvements I would want to see in AWS Auto Scaling because I haven't really used it extensively or explored most of it. To the extent that I've used it so far, I think it is very good. I can't really say for certain what should be improved because I haven't really explored it a lot. However, what I've been using it for has been very good. If there could be training for AWS Auto Scaling, that would be fine. If you could add more training on how to use it correctly and on the functions that I haven't used before or some people have not really used before, that would help. If there could be more documentation and training on it, that would be beneficial.

Read full review

Gyanesh Rahatekar

Back office at Reliance Industries Ltd

Achieve seamless incident response with valuable monitoring capabilities and reliable alerts

There are multiple features related to OpenText SiteScope monitoring that I have found to be very useful, such as SSL monitoring. If SSL is present as a file in a server, then OpenText SiteScope is a very effective tool to monitor when that certificate expires. It provides comprehensive information related to SSL certificates and log monitoring. If any kind of required keyword monitoring is present in the log file, OpenText SiteScope has excellent functionality for monitoring. It is very easy to configure and obtain the correct information related to end-user requirements. The agentless monitoring feature of OpenText SiteScope is particularly impressive and easy to configure and gather information from. According to the operations team perspective, there is no impact related to resource management from the agentless monitoring. It demonstrates very low resource consumption related to its functionality.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The setup is not very complex."

"I would highly recommend Auto Scaling to others because it is a fantastic feature that simplifies scaling processes and makes deployment efficient."

"The product provides self-healing features."

"The solution's monitoring effectively monitors our application and CPU utilization."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is that it scales automatically without manual intervention based on the metrics we provide."

"The solution helps optimize the cost of the AWS environment."

"The various scaling options available, such as step scaling, are particularly useful."

"The automation aspect where you can automate it to whatever you want is what I value the most about Auto Scaling."

More AWS Auto Scaling pros

"I find OpenText SiteScope itself to be uncomplicated and deserving of a ten out of ten due to its simplicity."

"Being able to create your monitors for monitoring your internal URLs and databases and other things like that is valuable."

"It's a very flexible product so you can run a script out of it, even straight out of the box."

"For the system environment, SiteScope can be useful."

"There's no agent you need installed on the servers. In our environment, we have some servers out of our control so we cannot manage them. We use SiteScope to monitor the availability, the resources on the servers, etc. This allows us to do this job without installing agents so there's no need to take care of anything on the server."

"VM monitoring is pretty good showing good visualizations of how VMs are operating within the context of all the VMs running on the same hypervisor."

"The stability of the Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope is good."

"The Monitor Templates functionality allowed us to spin up monitoring with .csv files pretty easily."

More OpenText SiteScope pros

Cons

"The tool's stability could be improved."

"Setting up the configuration involves too much work for the cloud engineer, like configuring the ALB, the target group, and all the steps."

"There hasn't been a need for improvements."

"Flexibility in configuring the workload is missing in AWS Auto Scaling."

"The setup can be a bit complex in some situations."

"The only area of improvement is the speed at which servers are launched. When cleaning up to six servers at a time, it can take up to 15 to 20 minutes to launch new servers."

"The product could add more features for managing instances."

"It has latency issues. It depends on the distribution used, whether it's Amazon Linux, Windows Linux, etc. Occasionally, there are latency issues, which might lead to slower performance."

More AWS Auto Scaling cons

"OpenText SiteScope has some limitations, especially with integration between OpenText SiteScope and Remedy, which must be done through middle software."

"Full application functionality available via the API. There are some functions you can perform managing monitors, that are only available through the UI."

"We have four or five data centers around North America where we have it deployed into a single or a two-server primary backup type of deployment. All those are made available under a single GUI provided by Micro Focus that allows you to put them all together. A room for improvement would be an appliance or a server that would manage all of our other servers so that I don't have to remember to log on to all different servers and data centers. I could manage them from a single location."

"Sometimes in a huge environment, I think the documentation does not provide the required calculations so you can't know what the required set up should be. You need to test."

"SiteScope isn't productive if you want to monitor RAM or if you want to monitor some URL."

"You can use OpenText SiteScope for small or middle environments. But if you want to monitor a large environment, it is not scalable. If you can monitor a large environment with OpenText SiteScope, it can be a valuable product."

"They should provide more templates for new vendor devices."

"They have not kept up with browser security requirements or advances in GUIs, they switched to a corruptible database architecture instead of text config files."

More OpenText SiteScope cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product is expensive."

"AWS Auto Scaling is a pay-per-use and pay-as-you-use service."

"The product has moderate pricing."

"AWS Auto Scaling is a cheap solution."

"AWS Auto Scaling is an expensive solution."

"The pricing is good. I have not had any customers that have complained about the price."

"AWS Auto Scaling's price is high."

"When Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope has introduced approximately eight years ago and there was not very much competition making the price high. However, when comparing the price of Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope now to other tools, they should reduce the price. It is similar to a legacy tool at this point."

"Licensing is a little steep."

"SiteScope licensing can be node based-or monitor-based. I would recommend for node-based licensing."

"The pricing or licensing cost for Micro Focus SiteScope is often bundled with other things, so the cost for each individual would be difficult to calculate. Pricing could be $2,000,000 a year. My company pays for technical support because it's part of the contract with Micro Focus SiteScope. You buy the licenses, but you're also paying for the support. With Nagios, it's much more bare-bones as far as paying for licenses and the software itself, and my company didn't have to use as much Nagios support yet in one or two years because there weren't too many problems using Nagios, and it's much more cost-effective, so that's one of the reasons why my company is migrating to Nagios from Micro Focus SiteScope."

"Depending on your requirements, there are two licensing models available. A simple point model, or an endpoint model."

"The product's pricing should be lower since there are many open-source products that can do the same job with better user interfaces. The tool's pricing is yearly and you need to pay for support."

"It is expensive. I don't like its licensing. I don't like anything where you have to license it by individual licenses. I'm not a fan of that, but that's just me."

"You have to pay for their "solution templates". Other tools do not charge you for knowledge-based monitoring bundles."

More OpenText SiteScope pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Manufacturing Company

18%

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	12
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	11

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	21

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about AWS Auto Scaling?

The tool's most valuable feature is vertical auto-scaling, which is easy to use. However, most companies now prefer horizontal scaling. I set up the health check integration to monitor CPU usage. W...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AWS Auto Scaling?

I'm not sure about the pricing aspect of AWS Auto Scaling or the cost of it.

See all answers

What needs improvement with AWS Auto Scaling?

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope?

The licensing scheme for Micro Focus tools is reasonable, and more affordable. It's seen as medium or de-receivable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope?

Regarding areas for improvement, there may be minor issues, but I have not faced any significant issues with OpenText SiteScope because I have a team that uses this product daily. As a monitoring d...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope?

OpenText SiteScope has a lot of use cases including monitoring websites, monitoring URLs, monitoring infrastructure resources like CPU, hard disk, and memory usage, and customized monitoring script...

See all answers

Comparisons

Akamai mPulse vs AWS Auto Scaling

Compared 30% of the time

VMware Aria Operations for Applications vs AWS Auto Scaling

Compared 30% of the time

Splunk ITSI (IT Service Intelligence) vs AWS Auto Scaling

Compared 22% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs AWS Auto Scaling

Compared 18% of the time

More AWS Auto Scaling Competitors

Dynatrace vs OpenText SiteScope

Compared 11% of the time

OpenText Real User Monitoring vs OpenText SiteScope

Compared 7% of the time

SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor vs OpenText SiteScope

Compared 7% of the time

Broadcom DX Application Performance Management vs OpenText SiteScope

Compared 6% of the time

CA App Synthetic Monitor vs OpenText SiteScope

Compared 5% of the time

More OpenText SiteScope Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

January 2026

Download AWS Auto Scaling product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText SiteScope

January 2026

Download OpenText SiteScope product report

Also Known As

AWS Auto-Scaling

Micro Focus SiteScope, HPE SiteScope, SiteScope

Overview

AWS Auto Scaling monitors your applications and automatically adjusts capacity to maintain steady, predictable performance at the lowest possible cost. Using AWS Auto Scaling, it’s easy to setup application scaling for multiple resources across multiple services in minutes. The service provides a simple, powerful user interface that lets you build scaling plans for resources including Amazon EC2 instances and Spot Fleets, Amazon ECS tasks, Amazon DynamoDB tables and indexes, and Amazon Aurora Replicas. AWS Auto Scaling makes scaling simple with recommendations that allow you to optimize performance, costs, or balance between them. If you’re already using Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling to dynamically scale your Amazon EC2 instances, you can now combine it with AWS Auto Scaling to scale additional resources for other AWS services. With AWS Auto Scaling, your applications always have the right resources at the right time.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

OpenText SiteScope is an agentless monitoring program that tracks the availability and performance of distributed IT infrastructures such as servers, network devices and services, applications and application components, virtualization software, operating systems, and other IT enterprise components.

OpenText SiteScope is an autonomous hybrid IT monitoring system that can monitor more than 100 different types of IT components in real time, thanks to a lightweight and highly customizable remote access architecture.

With OpenText SiteScope, IT teams can get the data they need to keep on top of problems and eliminate bottlenecks before they become major concerns.

OpenText SiteScope can reduce total cost of ownership (TCO) by utilizing agentless technology, which eliminates the need to install and monitor agents on each box. Manual activities can be automated, and teams can save time and effort by using pre-packaged solution templates.

OpenText SiteScope Features

OpenText SiteScope has many valuable key features. Some of the most useful ones include:

Broad functionality built on expertise: OpenText SiteScope's architecture is scalable and supports a broad range of functions, including data collecting, alerting, event management, and reporting. Data is collected via remote access, which eliminates the need for agents to be deployed and maintained on monitored nodes. OpenText SiteScope connects to systems as a remote user via the central server, which supports JMX, SNMP, HTTP, SSH, NetBIOS, and WMI.

Monitors legacy and modern environments: OpenText SiteScope comes with more than 100 built-in monitors that track things like utilization, response time, use, and resource availability.
- Cloud: You can monitor virtual servers and applications on Amazon Web Services (AWS). AWS-hosted applications can provide data to Amazon CloudWatch, which can be used for auto-scaling, reporting, and alerting.
- Virtualization: OpenText SiteScope supports VMware, Microsoft, Citrix, and Oracle/Sun virtualization technologies. Monitor Docker clusters, nodes, containers, and workloads.

Flexibility with configuration: By adding or deleting specific monitors, you can adapt to dynamic changes in data center configuration.

Templates for solutions: The template database is based on best practices for monitoring complex application settings with the least amount of time and effort. The templates include built-in domain experience of specialized monitors, default metrics and thresholds, proactive testing, and best practices for a given application or monitoring component.

Notifications, alerts, and reports: Email, SNMP traps, HTTP post, and database alerts are all supported. Administrators receive alerts based on defined thresholds and schedules.

Flexibility in user management: Using LDAP or an internal management solution, define group-level permissions, construct user roles, and assign security groups depending on role. Extensive WS (Web Service)-based API that automates numerous management situations without the need for the SiteScope UI.

Integrations with SiteScope: OpenText SiteScope not only offers a number of benefits on its own, but it can also be linked with a number of OpenText and third-party solutions, giving teams the ability to properly integrate their IT operations center.

OpenText

Sample Customers

Expedia, Intuit, Royal Dutch Shell, Brooks Brothers

Vodafone Ireland, Kuveyt Turk Participation Bank

Buyer's Guide

AWS Auto Scaling vs. OpenText SiteScope

December 2025

Free Report: AWS Auto Scaling vs. OpenText SiteScope

Find out what your peers are saying about AWS Auto Scaling vs. OpenText SiteScope and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our AWS Auto Scaling vs. OpenText SiteScope report.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.