Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

AWS Auto Scaling vs OpenText SiteScope comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and OpenText are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #15 with an average rating of 8.6, while OpenText is ranked #21 with an average rating of 8.0. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 0.1% mindshare in APM, compared to OpenText’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 91% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of OpenText users who would recommend it.
AWS Auto Scaling
Read 21 AWS Auto Scaling reviews
  • 264 Views
  • 138 Comparison Views
91% willing to recommend
OpenText SiteScope
Read 25 OpenText SiteScope reviews
  • 1,554 Views
  • 754 Comparison Views
92% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 24, 2024

OpenText SiteScope and AWS Auto Scaling are two distinct products used for monitoring and auto-scaling respectively, each with unique strengths. AWS Auto Scaling seems to have the upper hand due to its scalability and automation.

What features are offered by OpenText SiteScope in comparison to AWS Auto Scaling?

OpenText SiteScope users value robust monitoring capabilities, including comprehensive data collection and reporting. AWS Auto Scaling is praised for its seamless integration with other AWS services and automated resource scaling. AWS Auto Scaling also offers automation and integration features.

What areas of improvement can be found in OpenText SiteScope in comparison to AWS Auto Scaling?

OpenText SiteScope users suggest enhancements in mobile support and better integration with cloud platforms. AWS Auto Scaling users highlight the need for more intuitive management tools and improved documentation. Users of OpenText SiteScope focus more on integration needs while AWS Auto Scaling users seek enhanced usability resources.

How is the ease of deployment and customer service of OpenText SiteScope in comparison to AWS Auto Scaling?

OpenText SiteScope deployment is often cited as complex, requiring intensive setup and configuration. AWS Auto Scaling is noted for its straightforward deployment. Users appreciate OpenText SiteScope customer service but note occasional delays, whereas AWS Auto Scaling provides reliable customer support.

What setup costs and ROI can be seen with OpenText SiteScope in comparison to AWS Auto Scaling?

OpenText SiteScope users mention high setup costs but acknowledge substantial ROI due to its detailed monitoring. AWS Auto Scaling users enjoy the pay-as-you-go pricing model, delivering excellent ROI via cost-efficient scaling. AWS Auto Scaling is more favored for its flexible pricing and immediate ROI benefits.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed AWS Auto Scaling vs. OpenText SiteScope Report (Updated: March 2025).
Buyer's Guide
AWS Auto Scaling vs. OpenText SiteScope
March 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 845,406 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

AWS Auto Scaling
Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
15th
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
21
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
OpenText SiteScope
Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
21st
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.9
Number of Reviews
25
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of AWS Auto Scaling is 0.1%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText SiteScope is 0.5%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
 

Featured Reviews

Mbula Mboma - PeerSpot reviewer
Boosts deployment efficiency with seamless automatic scaling capabilities
My primary use case for Auto Scaling is mainly to deploy applications at scale Auto Scaling has made the deployment of applications more efficient, allowing us to manage traffic and maintain performance as user counts increase. Auto Scaling is a cool feature that works well and its automatic…
Read full review
Ahmed Salman - PeerSpot reviewer
Instead of executing jobs multiple times, I can configure it once, schedule, and apply it on multiple servers in sequence
The system is really powerful; instead of executing jobs multiple times, I can configure it once, schedule, and apply it on multiple servers in sequence. It allows me to create scripts and automate several processes, making tasks simpler and more efficient. By using templates for systems or databases, I can monitor various needs easily, which saves time and increases productivity.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It efficiently handles traffic, ensuring we are not running expenses and the infrastructure is strong enough to handle the load."
"I would highly recommend Auto Scaling to others because it is a fantastic feature that simplifies scaling processes and makes deployment efficient."
"AWS Auto Scaling is cost-effective and very useful for businesses."
"AWS Auto Scaling is very good for managing traffic and creating new instances when necessary."
"Our internal business applications are hosted in AWS Auto Scaling."
"I like the graphs provided by the tool."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to select a minimum amount of active servers so that a new server automatically launches if one fails."
"The setup is not very complex."
More AWS Auto Scaling pros
"The most valuable feature of SiteScope is its infrastructure monitoring."
"The product's readymade templates are perfect. It supports us a lot when we don't have much experience with the product. The templates offers us direction to proceed."
"It's a very flexible product so you can run a script out of it, even straight out of the box."
"Instead of executing jobs multiple times, I can configure it once, schedule, and apply it on multiple servers in sequence. It allows me to create scripts and automate several processes, making tasks simpler and more efficient."
"It can monitor over a 100 technologies with built-in solution templates."
"Simplest tool for monitoring servers, web content, databases and other hardware. Its dashboard is really good."
"Being able to create your monitors for monitoring your internal URLs and databases and other things like that is valuable."
"VM monitoring is pretty good showing good visualizations of how VMs are operating within the context of all the VMs running on the same hypervisor."
More OpenText SiteScope pros
 

Cons

"It could be cheaper."
"We can have more auto scaling algorithms implemented in AWS Auto Scaling."
"The product could add more features for managing instances."
"The solution must improve automation."
"It is sometimes very critical to deploy on AWS since some servers are already running in the background. There are challenges for employees on how to deploy at a given time."
"The only area of improvement is the speed at which servers are launched. When cleaning up to six servers at a time, it can take up to 15 to 20 minutes to launch new servers."
"It has latency issues. It depends on the distribution used, whether it's Amazon Linux, Windows Linux, etc. Occasionally, there are latency issues, which might lead to slower performance."
"The solution's infrastructure scalability and elasticity could be improved."
More AWS Auto Scaling cons
"In terms of issues with Micro Focus SiteScope, some that we've run into were unintended, for example, extra executions of monitors and some false alerts when there were problems connecting to endpoints or there were issues with the application that sometimes resulted in false positives. We had a few issues with the way time zones were configured when the system time differed from the time indicated during the monitoring, but those were just little things that weren't too bad. As far as the limitations of Micro Focus SiteScope, the types of scripting files that can be executed are rather limited unless you go to some third-party plugins. These are the areas for improvement in the solution."
"They need to offer better technical support, which, right now, is not helpful or responsive."
"SiteScope isn't productive if you want to monitor RAM or if you want to monitor some URL."
"The tool needs to support new technologies like Kubernetes. It also needs to improve scalability."
"While working with OpenText, I noticed sometimes teams refuse intervention due to compliance issues."
"The graphs and dashboard in the solution are areas that need improvement."
"You can use OpenText SiteScope for small or middle environments. But if you want to monitor a large environment, it is not scalable. If you can monitor a large environment with OpenText SiteScope, it can be a valuable product."
"They should provide more templates for new vendor devices."
More OpenText SiteScope cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"AWS Auto Scaling is a cheap solution."
"AWS Auto Scaling is an expensive solution."
"AWS Auto Scaling's price is high."
"The product is expensive."
"AWS Auto Scaling is a pay-per-use and pay-as-you-use service."
"The pricing is good. I have not had any customers that have complained about the price."
"The product has moderate pricing."
"The product's pricing should be lower since there are many open-source products that can do the same job with better user interfaces. The tool's pricing is yearly and you need to pay for support."
"SiteScope licensing can be node based-or monitor-based. I would recommend for node-based licensing."
"You have to pay for their "solution templates". Other tools do not charge you for knowledge-based monitoring bundles."
"The pricing or licensing cost for Micro Focus SiteScope is often bundled with other things, so the cost for each individual would be difficult to calculate. Pricing could be $2,000,000 a year. My company pays for technical support because it's part of the contract with Micro Focus SiteScope. You buy the licenses, but you're also paying for the support. With Nagios, it's much more bare-bones as far as paying for licenses and the software itself, and my company didn't have to use as much Nagios support yet in one or two years because there weren't too many problems using Nagios, and it's much more cost-effective, so that's one of the reasons why my company is migrating to Nagios from Micro Focus SiteScope."
"Licensing is a little steep."
"I rate the solution's pricing a six out of ten on a scale where one is cheap and ten is expensive."
"It is expensive. I don't like its licensing. I don't like anything where you have to license it by individual licenses. I'm not a fan of that, but that's just me."
"Depending on your requirements, there are two licensing models available. A simple point model, or an endpoint model."
More OpenText SiteScope pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
33%
Manufacturing Company
18%
Computer Software Company
10%
Government
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about AWS Auto Scaling?
The tool's most valuable feature is vertical auto-scaling, which is easy to use. However, most companies now prefer horizontal scaling. I set up the health check integration to monitor CPU usage. W...
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AWS Auto Scaling?
The pricing of Auto Scaling is medium range, neither high nor low.
See all answers
What needs improvement with AWS Auto Scaling?
It is sometimes very critical to deploy on AWS since some servers are already running in the background. There are challenges for employees on how to deploy at a given time. It requires a downtime ...
See all answers
What do you like most about Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope?
The most valuable feature of SiteScope is its infrastructure monitoring.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope?
The licensing scheme for Micro Focus tools is reasonable, and more affordable. It's seen as medium or de-receivable.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope?
While working with OpenText, I noticed sometimes teams refuse intervention due to compliance issues. Overcoming control restrictions for different applications could be improved.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

No data available
Dynatrace vs OpenText SiteScope Logo
Dynatrace vs OpenText SiteScope
Compared 14% of the time
Splunk AppDynamics vs OpenText SiteScope Logo
Splunk AppDynamics vs OpenText SiteScope
Compared 13% of the time
Grafana vs OpenText SiteScope Logo
Grafana vs OpenText SiteScope
Compared 13% of the time
OmniPeek vs OpenText SiteScope Logo
OmniPeek vs OpenText SiteScope
Compared 12% of the time
Splunk Enterprise Security vs OpenText SiteScope Logo
Splunk Enterprise Security vs OpenText SiteScope
Compared 6% of the time
More OpenText SiteScope Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
March 2025
AWS Auto Scaling reportDownload AWS Auto Scaling product report
Buyer's Guide
OpenText SiteScope
March 2025
OpenText SiteScope reportDownload OpenText SiteScope product report
 

Also Known As

AWS Auto-Scaling
Micro Focus SiteScope, HPE SiteScope, SiteScope
 

Overview

AWS Auto Scaling monitors your applications and automatically adjusts capacity to maintain steady, predictable performance at the lowest possible cost. Using AWS Auto Scaling, it’s easy to setup application scaling for multiple resources across multiple services in minutes. The service provides a simple, powerful user interface that lets you build scaling plans for resources including Amazon EC2 instances and Spot Fleets, Amazon ECS tasks, Amazon DynamoDB tables and indexes, and Amazon Aurora Replicas. AWS Auto Scaling makes scaling simple with recommendations that allow you to optimize performance, costs, or balance between them. If you’re already using Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling to dynamically scale your Amazon EC2 instances, you can now combine it with AWS Auto Scaling to scale additional resources for other AWS services. With AWS Auto Scaling, your applications always have the right resources at the right time.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

OpenText SiteScope is an agentless monitoring program that tracks the availability and performance of distributed IT infrastructures such as servers, network devices and services, applications and application components, virtualization software, operating systems, and other IT enterprise components.

OpenText SiteScope is an autonomous hybrid IT monitoring system that can monitor more than 100 different types of IT components in real time, thanks to a lightweight and highly customizable remote access architecture.

With OpenText SiteScope, IT teams can get the data they need to keep on top of problems and eliminate bottlenecks before they become major concerns.

OpenText SiteScope can reduce total cost of ownership (TCO) by utilizing agentless technology, which eliminates the need to install and monitor agents on each box. Manual activities can be automated, and teams can save time and effort by using pre-packaged solution templates.

OpenText SiteScope Features

OpenText SiteScope has many valuable key features. Some of the most useful ones include:

  • Broad functionality built on expertise: OpenText SiteScope's architecture is scalable and supports a broad range of functions, including data collecting, alerting, event management, and reporting. Data is collected via remote access, which eliminates the need for agents to be deployed and maintained on monitored nodes. OpenText SiteScope connects to systems as a remote user via the central server, which supports JMX, SNMP, HTTP, SSH, NetBIOS, and WMI.
  • Monitors legacy and modern environments: OpenText SiteScope comes with more than 100 built-in monitors that track things like utilization, response time, use, and resource availability.

    • Cloud: You can monitor virtual servers and applications on Amazon Web Services (AWS). AWS-hosted applications can provide data to Amazon CloudWatch, which can be used for auto-scaling, reporting, and alerting.

    • Virtualization: OpenText SiteScope supports VMware, Microsoft, Citrix, and Oracle/Sun virtualization technologies. Monitor Docker clusters, nodes, containers, and workloads.
  • Flexibility with configuration: By adding or deleting specific monitors, you can adapt to dynamic changes in data center configuration.
  • Templates for solutions: The template database is based on best practices for monitoring complex application settings with the least amount of time and effort. The templates include built-in domain experience of specialized monitors, default metrics and thresholds, proactive testing, and best practices for a given application or monitoring component.
  • Notifications, alerts, and reports: Email, SNMP traps, HTTP post, and database alerts are all supported. Administrators receive alerts based on defined thresholds and schedules.
  • Flexibility in user management: Using LDAP or an internal management solution, define group-level permissions, construct user roles, and assign security groups depending on role. Extensive WS (Web Service)-based API that automates numerous management situations without the need for the SiteScope UI.
  • Integrations with SiteScope: OpenText SiteScope not only offers a number of benefits on its own, but it can also be linked with a number of OpenText and third-party solutions, giving teams the ability to properly integrate their IT operations center.
OpenText
 

Sample Customers

Expedia, Intuit, Royal Dutch Shell, Brooks Brothers
Vodafone Ireland, Kuveyt Turk Participation Bank
Buyer's Guide
AWS Auto Scaling vs. OpenText SiteScope
March 2025
Free Report: AWS Auto Scaling vs. OpenText SiteScope
Find out what your peers are saying about AWS Auto Scaling vs. OpenText SiteScope and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our AWS Auto Scaling vs. OpenText SiteScope report.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.