AWS Auto Scaling vs SolarWinds Pingdom comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and SolarWinds are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #15 with an average rating of 8.8, while SolarWinds is ranked #64. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 0.4% mindshare in APM, compared to SolarWinds’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 91% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 75% of SolarWinds users who would recommend it.

AWS Auto Scaling

Read 22 AWS Auto Scaling reviews

1,113 Views
1,046 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

SolarWinds Pingdom

Read 4 SolarWinds Pingdom reviews

984 Views
886 Comparison Views

75% willing to recommend

AWS Auto Scaling

SolarWinds Pingdom

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 24, 2024

SolarWinds Pingdom and AWS Auto Scaling compete in the monitoring and performance management category. AWS Auto Scaling seems to have an edge in overall functionality due to better integration and automation capabilities, although SolarWinds Pingdom is favored for affordability and support.

Features: Users highlight SolarWinds Pingdom for reliable monitoring, uptime tracking, and easy customization. On the other hand, AWS Auto Scaling is recognized for its scalability, integration with other AWS services, and automation capabilities.

Room for Improvement: SolarWinds Pingdom needs improvements in reporting and better integration with third-party tools. Users of AWS Auto Scaling recommend better documentation and simplified configuration processes.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SolarWinds Pingdom is praised for its straightforward deployment and responsive customer service. AWS Auto Scaling benefits from the extensive AWS ecosystem support but has a steeper learning curve during setup.

Pricing and ROI: SolarWinds Pingdom is appreciated for its competitive pricing and clear ROI. AWS Auto Scaling, despite its higher setup cost, delivers significant ROI through its features and efficient resource management.

To learn more, read our detailed AWS Auto Scaling vs. SolarWinds Pingdom Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

AWS Auto Scaling vs. SolarWinds Pingdom

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 884,873 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AWS Auto Scaling

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

15th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

SolarWinds Pingdom

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

64th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of AWS Auto Scaling is 0.4%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SolarWinds Pingdom is 0.5%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
AWS Auto Scaling	0.4%
SolarWinds Pingdom	0.5%
Other	99.1%

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Featured Reviews

Ishaka Michael Efe

DevOps Engineer Intern at HNG Tech

Automation has simplified traffic management and improved workload efficiency

I'm not really sure what improvements I would want to see in AWS Auto Scaling because I haven't really used it extensively or explored most of it. To the extent that I've used it so far, I think it is very good. I can't really say for certain what should be improved because I haven't really explored it a lot. However, what I've been using it for has been very good. If there could be training for AWS Auto Scaling, that would be fine. If you could add more training on how to use it correctly and on the functions that I haven't used before or some people have not really used before, that would help. If there could be more documentation and training on it, that would be beneficial.

Read full review

Jay Vekaria

Linux System Administrator at Ergode

High performance, quick setup, but lacking ease of use

Some of the functions could improve by making them easier. There is room for improvement when it comes to the graphs provided by the software. Additionally, there seems to be an issue with the ping status, as it sometimes indicates that a website is down even when it is functioning properly. It appears that there are certain aspects related to cache management or other backend functionalities that are unclear. The time range graph and overall user interface could be more user-friendly. For example, when selecting a custom graph for a specific time period, clicking on it should open the corresponding website in a new tab, but instead, it displays the current graph. This lack of consistency can be frustrating when trying to navigate the interface. Furthermore, the reports shared on a weekly basis arrive one week late, reducing their usefulness. Overall, some extra efforts are required to make the user experience smoother and more efficient.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It helps us to reduce the cost."

"The solution's monitoring effectively monitors our application and CPU utilization."

"Auto Scaling is a cool feature that works well and its automatic scaling capabilities are very useful."

"AWS Auto Scaling is very good for managing traffic and creating new instances when necessary."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is that it scales automatically without manual intervention based on the metrics we provide."

"The health check integration feature ensures that the instances are healthy and capable of absorbing traffic, thus serving their purpose effectively."

"The most valuable feature is the ability to select a minimum amount of active servers so that a new server automatically launches if one fails."

"When a lot of traffic comes into our organization, the product scales our instances based on our environment’s requirements."

More AWS Auto Scaling pros

"One notable feature of this software is its page speed setup, which is highly commendable. Additionally, the metrics it provides are also impressive."

"The most valuable features are monitoring and reporting."

"There are alerting mechanisms in place to let us know, for example, if a device is not responding to a ping test and is probably not going to work."

"Once you set the threshold on your environment, it feels very real-time"

Cons

"The tool's stability could be improved."

"The solution's infrastructure scalability and elasticity could be improved."

"In comparison to other public clouds, the product is costly."

"The speed of the solution must be improved."

"If there could be training for AWS Auto Scaling, that would be fine. If you could add more training on how to use it correctly and on the functions that I haven't used before or some people have not really used before, that would help."

"The tool must include AI features."

"Setting up the configuration involves too much work for the cloud engineer, like configuring the ALB, the target group, and all the steps."

"AWS Auto Scaling's documentation could be better."

More AWS Auto Scaling cons

"Technical support could use some improvement."

"Pingdom is always improving everything in its product. So, they should work on the GUI."

"I would like to see better integration with other products."

"Some of the functions could improve by making them easier."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product has moderate pricing."

"The product is expensive."

"AWS Auto Scaling is an expensive solution."

"AWS Auto Scaling is a cheap solution."

"AWS Auto Scaling is a pay-per-use and pay-as-you-use service."

"AWS Auto Scaling's price is high."

"The pricing is good. I have not had any customers that have complained about the price."

"While I wouldn't describe it as excessively expensive, if you require specific and reliable monitoring, SolarWinds can be a suitable option. The advantage is that SolarWinds offers a free version as well. If you don't heavily rely on its monitoring capabilities and are content with its basic features, the free version could suffice for your needs."

"This price of this solution is reasonable."

"The license was paid yearly and included technical support."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

11%

Educational Organization

11%

Comms Service Provider

Performing Arts

Financial Services Firm

14%

Educational Organization

10%

Government

10%

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	12
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	11

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about AWS Auto Scaling?

The tool's most valuable feature is vertical auto-scaling, which is easy to use. However, most companies now prefer horizontal scaling. I set up the health check integration to monitor CPU usage. W...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AWS Auto Scaling?

I'm not sure about the pricing aspect of AWS Auto Scaling or the cost of it.

See all answers

What needs improvement with AWS Auto Scaling?

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

VMware Aria Operations for Applications vs AWS Auto Scaling

Compared 27% of the time

Akamai mPulse vs AWS Auto Scaling

Compared 24% of the time

Splunk ITSI (IT Service Intelligence) vs AWS Auto Scaling

Compared 21% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs AWS Auto Scaling

Compared 15% of the time

OpenText SiteScope vs AWS Auto Scaling

Compared 13% of the time

More AWS Auto Scaling Competitors

Solarwinds Web Performance Monitor vs SolarWinds Pingdom

Compared 14% of the time

Azure Monitor vs SolarWinds Pingdom

Compared 13% of the time

Prometheus-AI Platform vs SolarWinds Pingdom

Compared 12% of the time

Catchpoint vs SolarWinds Pingdom

Compared 9% of the time

Zabbix vs SolarWinds Pingdom

Compared 8% of the time

More SolarWinds Pingdom Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

March 2026

Download AWS Auto Scaling product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

March 2026

Download SolarWinds Pingdom product report

Also Known As

AWS Auto-Scaling

No data available

Overview

AWS Auto Scaling monitors your applications and automatically adjusts capacity to maintain steady, predictable performance at the lowest possible cost. Using AWS Auto Scaling, it’s easy to setup application scaling for multiple resources across multiple services in minutes. The service provides a simple, powerful user interface that lets you build scaling plans for resources including Amazon EC2 instances and Spot Fleets, Amazon ECS tasks, Amazon DynamoDB tables and indexes, and Amazon Aurora Replicas. AWS Auto Scaling makes scaling simple with recommendations that allow you to optimize performance, costs, or balance between them. If you’re already using Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling to dynamically scale your Amazon EC2 instances, you can now combine it with AWS Auto Scaling to scale additional resources for other AWS services. With AWS Auto Scaling, your applications always have the right resources at the right time.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

SolarWinds® Pingdom® is a powerful and affordable SaaS-based web app performance monitoring solution. It’s one product providing comprehensive web app performance and user experience monitoring consisting of four major capabilities:

1. Uptime monitoring for webpages and other critical components like APIs, CDNs, DNS, networks, email, and more.

2. Page speed performance monitoring and page rankings.

3. Synthetic transaction monitoring from the simplest to the most complex transactions.

4. Real user monitoring (RUM), enabling a deeper and wider understanding of the user’s digital experience, and web application availability and performance.

SolarWinds

Sample Customers

Expedia, Intuit, Royal Dutch Shell, Brooks Brothers

Spotify, MailChimp, Slack, Twitter

Buyer's Guide

AWS Auto Scaling vs. SolarWinds Pingdom

March 2026

Free Report: AWS Auto Scaling vs. SolarWinds Pingdom

Find out what your peers are saying about AWS Auto Scaling vs. SolarWinds Pingdom and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our AWS Auto Scaling vs. SolarWinds Pingdom report.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.