


HashiCorp Terraform and AWS CloudFormation are leading tools in infrastructure-as-code solutions. Terraform seems to have the upper hand due to its cross-platform support and flexibility across multiple cloud providers.
Features: Terraform stands out for its cross-platform ability, enabling deployments across various cloud providers with minimal modifications. Its automation, modularity, and robust disaster recovery capabilities add significant value. CloudFormation, on the other hand, excels in AWS environments, offering ease of template creation and management without complex coding, making it ideal for efficient AWS resource deployments.
Room for Improvement: Terraform could enhance its offering by integrating common programming capabilities and improving support for third-party plugins. Increasing ease of code conversion between cloud environments may broaden its applicability. CloudFormation would benefit from enhanced multi-cloud capabilities, better error handling, and increased support for AWS services, addressing the verbosity of templates and lack of external support.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both Terraform and CloudFormation are prominent in public cloud environments. Terraform relies heavily on community support, resulting in variable customer service experiences. In contrast, CloudFormation benefits from AWS's robust support ecosystem, providing responsive service for AWS users, although sharing similar deployment environments with Terraform.
Pricing and ROI: Both HashiCorp Terraform and AWS CloudFormation are free to deploy, with costs mainly from the resources used. Terraform's enterprise features can complicate pricing but offer good ROI through decreased infrastructure management costs. CloudFormation's cost structure is entirely resource-based, enhancing its appeal for AWS-focused operations, with both demonstrating ROI through increased efficiency and reduced overhead.
Everything we've gained from it makes my job easier day after day, and I see value in it as an engineer.
Microsoft Intune not only saves costs by reducing the number of personnel needed but also offers a comprehensive solution for managing laptops, applications, security, individual access, and enrollment.
With Microsoft Intune, tasks such as device provisioning, policy deployment, application delivery, and compliance enforcement require less manual effort than in more traditional management models.
It saved us a lot of time.
When a support ticket is submitted, it directly reaches someone with Intune support expertise.
When I contacted Microsoft, they had the same expertise, if not more, which is phenomenal because I felt heard and my problem was solved.
Sometimes, the support provided is excellent, and the representative is knowledgeable, while other times, the service needs improvement.
While this might be acceptable for some, it can be lengthy depending on the urgency of the issue.
Free support for AWS CloudFormation is not provided, and while some support is understandable due to its complexity, assistance for service-related issues should be accessible without a cost.
I would rate the HashiCorp technical support an eight on a scale of one to ten, where ten is the best.
They provide mail IDs, a portal, and contact numbers for assistance.
The scalability of Microsoft Intune is ten out of ten.
Ideally, we want to automatically segregate devices based on user properties like primary use, but currently, dynamic groups seem limited to device properties.
It supports organizations with 200 endpoints and those with more than 15,000 endpoints.
Splitting CloudFormation into multiple formations results in changes to resources like API gateway URLs and Cognito pools, which causes issues, especially when trying to maintain consistency across resources.
Adjusting capacity and functionality is a fundamental use.
Terraform runs when changes occur.
I would rate HashiCorp Terraform's scalability positively because it covers most of the resources that I use daily in my work, specifically on AWS cloud.
Scalability is effective, and I would rate it a ten out of ten.
We have not experienced downtime, bugs, or glitches.
It appears Microsoft Intune undergoes changes without informing customers.
In my experience, Microsoft Intune is a stable platform as it is a cloud-based service, and updates are regularly delivered by Microsoft.
It has been reliable and efficient in all my deployments.
Data loss can occur when splitting or scaling applications due to changes in resources.
It's a service that has been around for years, and it handles large complex deployments and updates with very good consistency.
I can choose a stable version and decide whether to upgrade based on its performance.
HashiCorp Terraform is extremely stable.
Stability has been a concern, particularly around backside stability with unexpected terminations.
Features like unlocking devices sometimes fail, and the support offered for other operating systems is insufficient.
There are communication issues, so you might start working with a feature without knowing if it will be deprecated six months from now.
Many third-party companies offer single-pane-of-glass reporting that shows you what your update environment looks like, how your patch is doing, application status, etc., but Intune's reporting is not intuitive.
It presents challenges for users unfamiliar with coding, posing as a barrier to fully utilizing CloudFormation.
Creating microservices and connecting multiple APIs into a single API gateway can be challenging; documentation should address specific needs.
Managing the correct order of resource creation and some updates can be tricky, especially with interdependent resources.
HashiCorp Terraform should implement better security measures to keep sensitive information hidden from unauthorized users.
In those critical places, there should be a special prompt that informs the user so that the user can double-check what they are going to do with Terraform plan.
There are potential improvements in the backend stability of HashiCorp Terraform.
Introductory professional services, like a fast-track service, were included with our E5 membership, and there have been no additional costs.
The Intune suite and add-ons, such as batch management and remote help, are costly.
It costs approximately forty euros per user per month.
AWS CloudFormation is free.
I use the open-source version of Terraform, so there is no cost for me.
I used the free version of HashiCorp Terraform with no setup cost or licensing needed.
Intune excels in configuration and compliance management for Windows 10, ensuring devices receive timely updates and adhere to organizational standards.
Dynamic groups allow us to set conditions for automatic membership, eliminating the need for user intervention or manual review and ensuring a seamless workflow.
Windows Autopatch is the most valuable because it removes the burden of patch management.
I can see the entire infrastructure and its connections through code.
Managing, maintaining, and deploying become easier as it allows the creation of the same resources on multiple accounts, making it efficient for infrastructure management.
Terraform modules make it easier to manage complex infrastructure and code within an organization.
Terraform's infrastructure as a code tool facilitates deploying code on tools, and once configured with AWS and local Terraform systems, it can be reused multiple times without much issue.
If changes are needed, I track who did what because my Terraform scripts are version-controlled.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Microsoft Intune | 5.4% |
| HashiCorp Terraform | 7.0% |
| AWS CloudFormation | 4.4% |
| Other | 83.2% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 151 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 60 |
| Large Enterprise | 177 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 15 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 8 |
| Large Enterprise | 17 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 26 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 8 |
| Large Enterprise | 24 |
Microsoft Intune is a cloud-based service designed for device management, security, and compliance. It supports automation and facilitates endpoint management for Windows, iOS, and Android devices, ensuring data protection and efficient policy enforcement.
Microsoft Intune offers seamless integration with tools like Windows Autopilot to automate device setup and deployment. Integrated with Azure Active Directory, it enhances policy management while providing robust reporting and analytics tools for compliance tracking. Despite its intuitive interface aimed at simplifying navigation and device security management, there are challenges such as compatibility issues with Linux and Mac, limited policy support for Android, and demands for better third-party integration. It's widely used for both corporate-owned devices and BYOD scenarios in dynamic IT environments.
What are the key features of Microsoft Intune?In industries such as finance and healthcare, Microsoft Intune is implemented to ensure data protection and compliance with regulatory standards. Manufacturing sectors utilize Intune for managing a distributed workforce across global locations, while educational institutions employ it to secure and manage devices in learning environments supporting both students and faculty.
AWS CloudFormation provides scalable automation for infrastructure management using infrastructure as code principles while supporting JSON/YAML templates, empowering teams to efficiently manage resources across multiple AWS regions.
Designed to enhance efficiency, AWS CloudFormation simplifies resource management through automation, versioning, and template creation. Its integration within AWS accelerates setup and management of infrastructure by facilitating modular design and parameter management. DevOps teams benefit from these capabilities, easing deployment across complex environments. Despite its strengths, it could improve by enhancing speed, better error handling, user interface improvements, documentation, and integrating new AWS services while addressing licensing costs. Multi-cloud compatibility remains absent, which has some opting for alternatives like Terraform for broader deployment scenarios.
What are the key features of AWS CloudFormation?In industries like finance and healthcare, AWS CloudFormation automates infrastructure deployment, managing resources such as VPCs and EC2 efficiently. DevOps teams use it to ensure consistency through templates, facilitating quick, reliable service deployments while reducing manual error risks and enhancing scalability.
HashiCorp Terraform is a versatile tool for managing and provisioning infrastructure across multi-cloud environments using infrastructure as code, ensuring efficient and secure deployment through modular structures and integration with numerous providers.
HashiCorp Terraform allows users to automate and manage infrastructure seamlessly across platforms such as Azure, AWS, and GCP. The platform supports the creation and adjustment of infrastructure components with modularity and state management at its core. Its state file allows for automation and version control while enhancing predictability in deployments. Reusable modules and the HCL language contribute to ease of use, while the open-source community and third-party integrations offer flexible solutions across diverse environments. Despite its robust capabilities, there are areas for improvement, such as backend monitoring, enhanced YAML support, faster resource integration, and improved security protocols.
What are the key features of HashiCorp Terraform?HashiCorp Terraform finds application in varied industries primarily for automated infrastructure deployment. It streamlines processes on major cloud platforms and is effective in developing and maintaining pipelines for continuous integration and deployment. The tool offers infrastructure consistency and rapid provisioning beneficial to projects in sectors ranging from finance to healthcare.
We monitor all Configuration Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.