Top 10 AWS CloudFormation Alternatives

4.2 out of 5

37 reviews
97% willing to recommend

Top AWS CloudFormation Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to AWS CloudFormation based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Microsoft Configuration Manager, Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, and VMware Aria Automation. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. AWS CloudFormation surpasses its competitors by automating resource management, supporting infrastructure as code, and offering seamless integration with other AWS services, enabling efficient infrastructure deployment and consistent environments across multiple regions and accounts.

Amazon Web Services (AWS) Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Amazon Web Services (AWS), and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

Microsoft Configuration Manager

4.1 out of 5

Microsoft Configuration Manager

4.1 out of 5

Microsoft Configuration Manager manages on-premises devices with extensive reporting and centralized control. In comparison, AWS CloudFormation automates AWS resource management using infrastructure-as-code. A tech buyer might choose Configuration Manager for comprehensive management or CloudFormation for scalable cloud-native deployment in AWS.

Download AWS CloudFormation vs. Microsoft Configuration Manager Report

Pricing

Microsoft Configuration Manager entails a more considerable setup cost compared to the flexible AWS CloudFormation, which offers a cost-efficient alternative with lower initial expenses.

View comparison

Pricing

Microsoft Configuration Manager entails a more considerable setup cost compared to the flexible AWS CloudFormation, which offers a cost-efficient alternative with lower initial expenses.

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform

4.3 out of 5

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform

4.3 out of 5

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, with its agentless architecture and broad multi-cloud adaptability, is ideal for diverse environments. In comparison, AWS CloudFormation excels within AWS, offering infrastructure as code with strong integration. Both solutions cater to specific automation needs and deployment preferences.

Download AWS CloudFormation vs. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Report

Pricing

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform often incurs lower setup costs, making it attractive for budget-conscious users, while AWS CloudFormation users report higher initial investment due to its extensive feature set, reflecting a difference in upfront financial commitment.

View comparison

Pricing

VMware Aria Automation

4.0 out of 5

VMware Aria Automation

4.0 out of 5

VMware Aria Automation enables customizable blueprints and advanced orchestration, ideal for hybrid environments. In comparison, AWS CloudFormation excels with Infrastructure as Code and simplified cloud-native integration, appealing to those focused on AWS ecosystems.

Download AWS CloudFormation vs. VMware Aria Automation Report

Pricing

VMware Aria Automation involves higher setup costs, focusing on robust features, while AWS CloudFormation offers a more economical setup, appealing to cost-sensitive users. This contrast highlights VMware's comprehensive capabilities against AWS's budget-friendly entry.

View comparison

Pricing

Red Hat Satellite

4.1 out of 5

Red Hat Satellite

4.1 out of 5

Red Hat Satellite excels in automation and integration with Ansible for on-premises ecosystems. In comparison, AWS CloudFormation provides strong infrastructure as code in cloud environments. A tech buyer may choose Satellite for secure management, while CloudFormation may appeal for cost-effective resource orchestration.

Download AWS CloudFormation vs. Red Hat Satellite Report

Pricing

Red Hat Satellite offers straightforward setup costs, while AWS CloudFormation involves a complex pricing structure, highlighting significant differences in initial deployment expenses.

View comparison

Pricing

Red Hat Satellite offers straightforward setup costs, while AWS CloudFormation involves a complex pricing structure, highlighting significant differences in initial deployment expenses.

HashiCorp Terraform

4.3 out of 5

HashiCorp Terraform

4.3 out of 5

HashiCorp Terraform offers cross-cloud capabilities, making it ideal for multi-cloud strategies. In comparison, AWS CloudFormation excels in AWS-centric deployments with seamless AWS integration. Terraform's flexibility attracts hybrid users, while CloudFormation suits those focused solely on AWS environments.

Download AWS CloudFormation vs. HashiCorp Terraform Report

Pricing

HashiCorp Terraform involves a competitive setup cost, whereas AWS CloudFormation offers a simpler pricing structure, highlighting ease of initial budgeting.

View comparison

Pricing

HashiCorp Terraform involves a competitive setup cost, whereas AWS CloudFormation offers a simpler pricing structure, highlighting ease of initial budgeting.

Chef

4.0 out of 5

Chef

4.0 out of 5

Chef focuses on flexible multi-cloud compatibility for diverse environments and technologies. In comparison, AWS CloudFormation offers cost-effective, seamless AWS service integration. Chef provides robust automation, while AWS CloudFormation appeals to those heavily invested in AWS for efficient resource management.

Download AWS CloudFormation vs. Chef Report

Pricing

Chef's setup cost is typically lower, offering a more budget-friendly option, whereas AWS CloudFormation has higher setup costs, reflecting its extensive capabilities.

View comparison

Pricing

Chef's setup cost is typically lower, offering a more budget-friendly option, whereas AWS CloudFormation has higher setup costs, reflecting its extensive capabilities.

Spring Cloud

3.3 out of 5

Spring Cloud

3.3 out of 5

Spring Cloud is praised for microservices and cost-effectiveness. In comparison, AWS CloudFormation's infrastructure as code and automation provide scalability. Spring Cloud's seamless Java integration attracts budget-conscious users, while AWS CloudFormation's robust feature set appeals to those seeking comprehensive AWS service integration.

Download AWS CloudFormation vs. Spring Cloud Report

Pricing

Spring Cloud offers a low upfront setup cost, making it cost-effective for small-scale operations, while AWS CloudFormation has a higher initial setup expense, reflecting its comprehensive feature set suitable for extensive enterprise environments.

View comparison

Pricing

Related categories

Configuration Management

Software Distribution

Server Monitoring