AWS CloudFormation vs Spring Cloud comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Broadcom are both solutions in the Configuration Management category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.8, while Broadcom is ranked #22. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 4.8% mindshare in CM, compared to Broadcom’s 2.1% mindshare. Additionally, 97% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 75% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 25, 2026

Spring Cloud and AWS CloudFormation are competing in the cloud management solutions category. AWS CloudFormation has the upper hand with its superior integration capabilities and feature set despite its higher pricing.

Features: Spring Cloud provides robust support for microservices architecture, allowing seamless scaling and efficient load balancing. It also offers easy service registration and discovery, along with centralized configuration management. AWS CloudFormation delivers powerful infrastructure as code capabilities, automated resource management, and extensive integration with other AWS services. Its comprehensive templates facilitate complex deployments and enhance operational efficiency.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Spring Cloud offers a straightforward setup process supported by extensive documentation and a strong community, making it ideal for businesses adopting microservices. AWS CloudFormation presents a more complex deployment model but compensates with thorough AWS service integration and 24/7 customer support. This support enhances its appeal for large-scale operations with critical uptime requirements, offering advanced deployment features.

Pricing and ROI: Spring Cloud's lower initial setup costs make it attractive for startups with budget constraints, and its open-source nature offers potential long-term savings. AWS CloudFormation, although more expensive initially, promises a higher long-term ROI through its extensive automation and resource management, justifying its cost for enterprises seeking efficient cloud orchestration solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed AWS CloudFormation vs. Spring Cloud Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

AWS CloudFormation vs. Spring Cloud

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 900,644 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Intune

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Configuration Management category, the mindshare of Microsoft Intune is 4.9%, down from 10.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of AWS CloudFormation is 4.8%, up from 1.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Spring Cloud is 2.1%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Configuration Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Microsoft Intune	4.9%
AWS CloudFormation	4.8%
Spring Cloud	2.1%
Other	88.2%

Configuration Management

Featured Reviews

OluwashileAdeniyi

Senior Infrastructure Security Engineer at a outsourcing company with 51-200 employees

Centralized endpoint security has improved and supports hybrid work and BYOD policies

Regarding what I dislike about Microsoft Intune and its downsides, I would say that more Mac controls are needed because we have limited Mac and Linux control. When comparing controls and policies between Windows, Mac, and Linux, Windows has almost everything you can think of, while Mac and Linux have limited types of control. You cannot implement certain things on Mac and Linux that you can on Windows. The limited controls are a major issue. Additionally, if Microsoft could find a way to embed servers into Microsoft Intune, that would be beneficial. Microsoft Intune is not really designed for servers or Windows servers. It is more tailored towards Windows 11 and Windows 10 operating systems. Windows servers are not fully supported. Enterprise organizations usually have both servers and endpoints, which are users' workstations. For servers, most people look for other solutions such as SCCM, which is Configuration Manager. However, SCCM is what Microsoft Intune is trying to replace. Both SCCM and Microsoft Intune belong to Microsoft. Microsoft is trying to transition organizations into Microsoft Intune, the native cloud solution. However, because this update is still in process, servers are not fully compatible with Microsoft Intune and cannot be managed by it. The current policy that has emerged from issues with clients is what they call co-management, which is relatively new, and I do not know if adoption is significant. Many legacy or older customers who have been using these products for decades still have SCCM. When it is time for them to manage their Windows devices, they use what is called cloud attach. Cloud attach is a term whereby your SCCM is connected to your Microsoft Intune. Most people do not know about it, but I have deployed it for several organizations. Cloud attach and co-management work together so that your device is in SCCM, but some policies are pushed from Microsoft Intune. It is like two different solutions working hand in hand. That is what they call co-management. Microsoft Intune does not bring all of your endpoint and security management tools into one place, which is the goal and how it should be. However, as I mentioned, servers are not included. If we talk about end users, Microsoft Intune does bring all your devices together. In a typical enterprise environment, you have end users with workstations, laptops, company-issued phones, and bring your own devices. You can create policies for all of these. However, for the backend, your servers do not have much coverage. Servers are not really covered by Microsoft Intune in that way.

Read full review

Sridivya Chillappa

application security engineer at Hyperspace IT India

Automation and consistency in infrastructure deployment provide a robust foundation

When it comes to the challenges with AWS CloudFormation, I faced a few challenges. One challenge is associated with large infrastructures; the template can become very long and hard to manage. Sometimes, the error messages during stack creation or update can be very hard to troubleshoot. Managing the correct order of resource creation and some updates can be tricky, especially with interdependent resources. If a stack update fails halfway and rolls back, it sometimes leaves the resources in an inconsistent state. AWS imposes a limit on stack size and the number of resources per stack, which can be quite constrained for large deployments. Despite all this, once we have experience, we can overcome these challenges very easily. Stack creation or updates can be slower than expected, especially with large and complex resources, and certain resource types or dependencies can add to the wait time. Nevertheless, AWS offers a way to optimize performance by breaking large templates into nested stacks. It's very capable, but there is room for improvement in speed.

Read full review

Erick Karanja

Technical Lead at Cellulant Kenya

Highly scalable development of cloud-native applications that offers an extensive range of tools and features, with significant learning curve and complex configurations

We use it for building cloud-native applications and APIs and it helps us effectively manage various aspects of our application It enables you to create applications that can start up more quickly than a standard Spring Boot application. It would be beneficial for the framework to become more…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"My favorite feature of Microsoft Intune is the dashboard; the dashboard is very simple and user-friendly, and any person, even without prior knowledge, can understand it easily by seeing the interface dashboard."

"Microsoft's cloud comes with a lot of extra features that are free of charge."

"Microsoft Intune has positively impacted our organization by covering processes, improving security, and saving time."

"The cloud base is perfect for me."

"Microsoft Intune is a good solution and it is purely based on Azure cloud, so I can use all the benefits of Azure cloud in Microsoft Intune and several good features in Microsoft Intune to manage devices."

"The conditional access policies that we set up are very useful."

"The features of Microsoft Intune that I appreciate the most are its user-friendly interface and robust security options."

"Microsoft Intune not only saves costs by reducing the number of personnel needed but also offers a comprehensive solution for managing laptops, applications, security, individual access, and enrollment."

More Microsoft Intune pros

"AWS CloudFormation makes infrastructure deployment easy."

"The integration of the solution is very good."

"The CloudFormation template can be reused to create multiple stacks, reducing duplications and improving our infrastructure."

"The ability to quickly run up CloudFormation in AWS and the template validation function are the most valuable features."

"I would rate the scalability a nine out of ten. We use it every day."

"I appreciate the flexibility of infrastructure as code. With CloudFormation, we can define ground rules, control usage limits, and scale our infrastructure up or down programmatically. Having this level of control through code on infra is a major benefit. That's the beauty of CloudFormation."

"The reusability of the solution is valuable."

"I love CloudFormation as it's a great tool for infrastructure as code. This makes my job very easy."

More AWS CloudFormation pros

"Spring Cloud integrates well."

"The solution's initial setup is straightforward. The deployment process took me around ten minutes to fifteen minutes."

"Spring Cloud integrates well, and as it's code-based, you can do more customization, so with the way you configure or code, you can have your custom implementations, making it the best integration option if you have Java Spring Web Services."

"It offers excellent scalability."

Cons

"The reporting functionality of Microsoft Intune is limited compared to Microsoft System Center, which offers many more reporting options."

"I rate Microsoft customer service six out of 10. While some technicians go above and beyond, there is inconsistency, and connecting with the most helpful representatives is occasionally challenging."

"Enrollment into the Microsoft Intune service can still get easier, especially for legacy-managed systems, such as how we get it from a GPO or an SCCM configuration into Intune."

"Could benefit from user having more control over devices."

"Intune could be enhanced by automating application upgrades, similar to how it automates operating system upgrades."

"Most of the customers in the business do not use Intune because it doesn't support that much policy for Android."

"Onboarding of endpoint devices is not straightforward. The onboarding process was a little heavier than I thought it would be. That's the key improvement area. Obviously, the more control you have over the devices, the better it is."

"For additional functionality, I suggest that Microsoft could expand on asset management. Since the platform is there, they could develop it into a full-fledged asset management system."

More Microsoft Intune cons

"The speed of the replication process could improve. It can take some time to replicate that could use a speed increase."

"The solution needs to offer better support to other cloud vendors."

"The product should be made cloud-agnostic, allowing users to deploy the same environment with minimal tweaks across different cloud platforms, similar to Terraform. Additionally, it would be beneficial to have the ability to manage templates outside of the AWS environment."

"The conditions that can be added in AWS CloudFormation are not as powerful as any programming language."

"There are some limitations with JSON, as the code is written in JSON, which doesn't support commands, looping, or conditionals. This can make the code difficult to read and share across teams. Moreover, the tool only supports AWS."

"Error-handling features can be improved."

"For a beginner, it's kind of difficult to set up. So, the user does need some knowledge in order to do it."

"The one bit of a drawback is that CloudFormation is only available in AWS."

More AWS CloudFormation cons

"If there's a dashboard like the ones provided by Apigee or Kong, that will be useful."

"Stability is one area in the solution that needs to improve."

"It would be beneficial for the framework to become more lightweight and efficient when transitioning to the cloud."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It's reasonable. They're not giving it away, but it's reasonable."

"The price for Intune is fair."

"It's bundled with Business Premium and an E3 license, which is beneficial. If you have to pay extra, it's pricey, but with the bundled package, it's acceptable. They recently increased the Business Premium pricing, which we don't appreciate. The price increase and yearly commitment are causing some problems for us."

"It's affordable. In comparison to the competitors, the price depends on what features you need from Intune, but it's affordable. There are no hidden costs, but there are some features that go for a premium price. Those are the add-ons for which you have to pay extra."

"Microsoft Intune is included in the E5 license at no additional cost."

"The pricing is good because customers are not complaining about it."

"The licensing is on a yearly basis."

"There is a license required to use the solution. If you're core users in Office 365, for example, you have Outlook email and E3 license, this is only email. You have to buy an EMS license to have Microsoft Intune. It is expensive."

More Microsoft Intune pricing and cost advice

"The price of the solution is good because it is scalable."

"In general, pricing within AWS is relatively affordable."

"If you compared serverless and container-based, serverless is less expensive. If you use certain instances the price can increase and become too expensive."

"The tool's pricing depends on the page model."

"The tool is free for the AWS environment."

"The product is free."

"There's no cost for launching any template using CloudFormation."

"The solution's cost is normal, neither cheap nor expensive."

More AWS CloudFormation pricing and cost advice

"It is an open-source or free version solution. It also has a paid version, but we have used the open-source version for now."

"Spring Cloud is an open-source solution."

"Currently, we are not required to pay for licenses."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Configuration Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Government

Financial Services Firm

15%

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

Outsourcing Company

Financial Services Firm

24%

Outsourcing Company

14%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Computer Software Company

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	192
Midsize Enterprise	62
Large Enterprise	185

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	15
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	17

No data available

Questions from the Community

How does Microsoft Intune compare with VMware Workspace One?

Microsoft Intune is a great tool for managing a mobile device fleet while keeping access control. The solution makes ...

See all answers

What are the pros and cons of Microsoft Intune?

Microsoft Intune is a great configuration management tool and has a lot of good things going for it. Here are some of...

See all answers

How does Google Cloud Identity compare with Microsoft Intune?

Microsoft Intune offers not only an easy-to-deploy data protection and productivity management solution, but also ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AWS CloudFormation?

AWS CloudFormation is free. However, there may be unexpected costs if developers deploy services incorrectly without ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with AWS CloudFormation?

When it comes to the challenges with AWS CloudFormation, I faced a few challenges. One challenge is associated with l...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for AWS CloudFormation?

I have experience with AWS CloudFormation. I use it to automate the provisioning of the entire environment by spinnin...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Jamf Pro vs Microsoft Intune

Compared 10% of the time

IBM MaaS360 vs Microsoft Intune

Compared 10% of the time

Workspace ONE UEM vs Microsoft Intune

Compared 6% of the time

Microsoft Entra ID vs Microsoft Intune

Compared 4% of the time

ManageEngine Endpoint Central vs Microsoft Intune

Compared 4% of the time

More Microsoft Intune Competitors

HashiCorp Terraform vs AWS CloudFormation

Compared 9% of the time

AWS Systems Manager vs AWS CloudFormation

Compared 9% of the time

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform vs AWS CloudFormation

Compared 8% of the time

Chef vs AWS CloudFormation

Compared 7% of the time

BMC TrueSight Server Automation vs AWS CloudFormation

Compared 5% of the time

More AWS CloudFormation Competitors

BMC TrueSight Server Automation vs Spring Cloud

Compared 13% of the time

HashiCorp Terraform vs Spring Cloud

Compared 12% of the time

Microsoft Configuration Manager vs Spring Cloud

Compared 12% of the time

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform vs Spring Cloud

Compared 8% of the time

More Spring Cloud Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Intune

June 2026

Download Microsoft Intune product report

Buyer's Guide

AWS CloudFormation

June 2026

Download AWS CloudFormation product report

Buyer's Guide

Configuration Management

June 2026

Download Spring Cloud product report

Also Known As

Intune, MS Intune, Microsoft Endpoint Manager

CloudFormation

No data available

Overview

Microsoft Intune is a cloud-based service designed for device management, security, and compliance. It supports automation and facilitates endpoint management for Windows, iOS, and Android devices, ensuring data protection and efficient policy enforcement.

Microsoft Intune offers seamless integration with tools like Windows Autopilot to automate device setup and deployment. Integrated with Azure Active Directory, it enhances policy management while providing robust reporting and analytics tools for compliance tracking. Despite its intuitive interface aimed at simplifying navigation and device security management, there are challenges such as compatibility issues with Linux and Mac, limited policy support for Android, and demands for better third-party integration. It's widely used for both corporate-owned devices and BYOD scenarios in dynamic IT environments.

What are the key features of Microsoft Intune?

Windows Autopilot: Automates device setup for rapid deployment.
Azure Active Directory Integration: Enhances user policy management.
Reporting and Analytics: Improves compliance visibility.
Mobile Application Management: Ensures app security without compromising personal data.
Cloud-Based Management: Allows management from any location.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Time Efficiency: Automation reduces time in policy enforcement and configuration updates.
Enhanced Security: Ensures data protection across corporate-owned and BYOD devices.
Improved Compliance: Advanced reporting tools enhance compliance visibility.
Flexible Management: Cloud-based nature supports management from any location.

In industries such as finance and healthcare, Microsoft Intune is implemented to ensure data protection and compliance with regulatory standards. Manufacturing sectors utilize Intune for managing a distributed workforce across global locations, while educational institutions employ it to secure and manage devices in learning environments supporting both students and faculty.

Microsoft

AWS CloudFormation provides scalable automation for infrastructure management using infrastructure as code principles while supporting JSON/YAML templates, empowering teams to efficiently manage resources across multiple AWS regions.

Designed to enhance efficiency, AWS CloudFormation simplifies resource management through automation, versioning, and template creation. Its integration within AWS accelerates setup and management of infrastructure by facilitating modular design and parameter management. DevOps teams benefit from these capabilities, easing deployment across complex environments. Despite its strengths, it could improve by enhancing speed, better error handling, user interface improvements, documentation, and integrating new AWS services while addressing licensing costs. Multi-cloud compatibility remains absent, which has some opting for alternatives like Terraform for broader deployment scenarios.

What are the key features of AWS CloudFormation?

Infrastructure as Code: Streamlines deployment using descriptive formats.
Nested Stacks: Allows modular and organized deployment.
Versioning: Facilitates tracking changes and rollback implementation.
Scalability: Supports large-scale operations effectively.
Template Creation: Ensures consistent and repeatable environment setups.
YAML/JSON Support: Simplifies code management across regions.

What benefits or ROI can users expect?

Enhanced Deployment Reliability: Minimizes errors through change tracking and rollbacks.
Automation Efficiency: Reduces manual interventions and speeds setup.
Resource Management Across Regions: Simplifies global deployment processes.
Cost Optimization: Efficient infrastructure usage cuts operational costs.

In industries like finance and healthcare, AWS CloudFormation automates infrastructure deployment, managing resources such as VPCs and EC2 efficiently. DevOps teams use it to ensure consistency through templates, facilitating quick, reliable service deployments while reducing manual error risks and enhancing scalability.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Spring Cloud provides tools for developers to quickly build some common patterns in distributed systems. With features supporting configuration, service discovery, and circuit breakers, Spring Cloud simplifies complex systems enabling faster development and deployment.

Spring Cloud stands at the forefront of microservices architecture by offering comprehensive solutions for enterprise applications. By addressing distributed system challenges, it aids developers in building robust applications that can easily adapt to rapidly changing environments. Spring Cloud integrates seamlessly with popular cloud platforms, providing flexibility and scalability, fostering an agile development process. The microservices-focused approach allows for modular applications that promote reliable and maintainable codebases.

What are the key features of Spring Cloud?

Service Discovery: Efficiently identifies and connects microservices in distributed environments.
Config Server: Centralized external configuration management for distributed systems.
API Gateway: Manages requests and routes them to the appropriate microservices.
Load Balancing: Distributes network traffic evenly across multiple servers.
Circuit Breakers: Enhance system resilience by managing failures effectively.

What benefits can organizations expect from Spring Cloud?

Scalability: Easily handle growing amounts of work seamlessly as demand increases.
Reliability: Reduces downtime with built-in tools for managing service failures.
Efficiency: Improves application performance and resource utilization.
Flexibility: Adapts easily to business changes with modular infrastructure.

Industries such as e-commerce, finance, and telecommunications are implementing Spring Cloud to streamline their backend operations. E-commerce platforms leverage its scalability for handling seasonal traffic spikes. Financial institutions use its reliability and security features to manage transactions securely. Telecommunications rely on its flexibility to enhance service offerings rapidly. Spring Cloud's robust infrastructure and modern architecture make it ideal for industries aiming to improve service delivery and customer satisfaction.

Broadcom

Sample Customers

Mitchells and Buzzers, Callaway

Nextdoor, Coinbase, Expedia

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

AWS CloudFormation vs. Spring Cloud

June 2026

Free Report: AWS CloudFormation vs. Spring Cloud

Find out what your peers are saying about AWS CloudFormation vs. Spring Cloud and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our AWS CloudFormation vs. Spring Cloud report.

See our list of best Configuration Management vendors.

We monitor all Configuration Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.