AWS CloudFormation vs Spring Cloud comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Broadcom are both solutions in the Configuration Management category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.8, while Broadcom is ranked #22. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 4.8% mindshare in CM, compared to Broadcom’s 2.1% mindshare. Additionally, 97% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 75% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 25, 2026

Spring Cloud and AWS CloudFormation are competing in the cloud management solutions category. AWS CloudFormation has the upper hand with its superior integration capabilities and feature set despite its higher pricing.

Features: Spring Cloud provides robust support for microservices architecture, allowing seamless scaling and efficient load balancing. It also offers easy service registration and discovery, along with centralized configuration management. AWS CloudFormation delivers powerful infrastructure as code capabilities, automated resource management, and extensive integration with other AWS services. Its comprehensive templates facilitate complex deployments and enhance operational efficiency.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Spring Cloud offers a straightforward setup process supported by extensive documentation and a strong community, making it ideal for businesses adopting microservices. AWS CloudFormation presents a more complex deployment model but compensates with thorough AWS service integration and 24/7 customer support. This support enhances its appeal for large-scale operations with critical uptime requirements, offering advanced deployment features.

Pricing and ROI: Spring Cloud's lower initial setup costs make it attractive for startups with budget constraints, and its open-source nature offers potential long-term savings. AWS CloudFormation, although more expensive initially, promises a higher long-term ROI through its extensive automation and resource management, justifying its cost for enterprises seeking efficient cloud orchestration solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed AWS CloudFormation vs. Spring Cloud Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

AWS CloudFormation vs. Spring Cloud

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 900,644 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Intune

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Configuration Management category, the mindshare of Microsoft Intune is 4.9%, down from 10.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of AWS CloudFormation is 4.8%, up from 1.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Spring Cloud is 2.1%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Configuration Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Microsoft Intune	4.9%
AWS CloudFormation	4.8%
Spring Cloud	2.1%
Other	88.2%

Configuration Management

Featured Reviews

OluwashileAdeniyi

Senior Infrastructure Security Engineer at a outsourcing company with 51-200 employees

Centralized endpoint security has improved and supports hybrid work and BYOD policies

Regarding what I dislike about Microsoft Intune and its downsides, I would say that more Mac controls are needed because we have limited Mac and Linux control. When comparing controls and policies between Windows, Mac, and Linux, Windows has almost everything you can think of, while Mac and Linux have limited types of control. You cannot implement certain things on Mac and Linux that you can on Windows. The limited controls are a major issue. Additionally, if Microsoft could find a way to embed servers into Microsoft Intune, that would be beneficial. Microsoft Intune is not really designed for servers or Windows servers. It is more tailored towards Windows 11 and Windows 10 operating systems. Windows servers are not fully supported. Enterprise organizations usually have both servers and endpoints, which are users' workstations. For servers, most people look for other solutions such as SCCM, which is Configuration Manager. However, SCCM is what Microsoft Intune is trying to replace. Both SCCM and Microsoft Intune belong to Microsoft. Microsoft is trying to transition organizations into Microsoft Intune, the native cloud solution. However, because this update is still in process, servers are not fully compatible with Microsoft Intune and cannot be managed by it. The current policy that has emerged from issues with clients is what they call co-management, which is relatively new, and I do not know if adoption is significant. Many legacy or older customers who have been using these products for decades still have SCCM. When it is time for them to manage their Windows devices, they use what is called cloud attach. Cloud attach is a term whereby your SCCM is connected to your Microsoft Intune. Most people do not know about it, but I have deployed it for several organizations. Cloud attach and co-management work together so that your device is in SCCM, but some policies are pushed from Microsoft Intune. It is like two different solutions working hand in hand. That is what they call co-management. Microsoft Intune does not bring all of your endpoint and security management tools into one place, which is the goal and how it should be. However, as I mentioned, servers are not included. If we talk about end users, Microsoft Intune does bring all your devices together. In a typical enterprise environment, you have end users with workstations, laptops, company-issued phones, and bring your own devices. You can create policies for all of these. However, for the backend, your servers do not have much coverage. Servers are not really covered by Microsoft Intune in that way.

Read full review

Sridivya Chillappa

application security engineer at Hyperspace IT India

Automation and consistency in infrastructure deployment provide a robust foundation

When it comes to the challenges with AWS CloudFormation, I faced a few challenges. One challenge is associated with large infrastructures; the template can become very long and hard to manage. Sometimes, the error messages during stack creation or update can be very hard to troubleshoot. Managing the correct order of resource creation and some updates can be tricky, especially with interdependent resources. If a stack update fails halfway and rolls back, it sometimes leaves the resources in an inconsistent state. AWS imposes a limit on stack size and the number of resources per stack, which can be quite constrained for large deployments. Despite all this, once we have experience, we can overcome these challenges very easily. Stack creation or updates can be slower than expected, especially with large and complex resources, and certain resource types or dependencies can add to the wait time. Nevertheless, AWS offers a way to optimize performance by breaking large templates into nested stacks. It's very capable, but there is room for improvement in speed.

Read full review

Erick Karanja

Technical Lead at Cellulant Kenya

Highly scalable development of cloud-native applications that offers an extensive range of tools and features, with significant learning curve and complex configurations

We use it for building cloud-native applications and APIs and it helps us effectively manage various aspects of our application It enables you to create applications that can start up more quickly than a standard Spring Boot application. It would be beneficial for the framework to become more…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature is the UEM capabilities."

"Microsoft Intune has had a very positive impact on our organization, especially in terms of security and efficiency."

"Microsoft Intune saves eight hours per day, and during my work hours, I use my time to study and run tests on configurations I'm curious about and try them out in my environment."

"If a client is using a lot of Microsoft, it's a great product to have."

"This product allows us to restrict users who have access to the system, or to Office 365."

"Among the most valuable features are the Company Portal that is built into Intune, and the update rings so that we can manage what types of future updates the devices get."

"For our customer, it meant no on-premise systems configuration infrastructure or identity management services were required."

"Their price is really good, which is the reason customers move here, because as part of the Office 365 package, they always get the E365 as well, which makes it easy for them to manage their devices without having additional licenses for Intune."

More Microsoft Intune pros

"The most beneficial aspect lies in its capability to handle input acquisition and assessment."

"There is a cost-benefit to using CloudFormation that comes about because of the automation that it provides."

"Automations make it pretty easy to provision AWS, development, or deployment environments."

"The time to market is really good, I would say, because you can quickly set up a blueprint and deploy it, and the initial setup is simple."

"AWS Cloud automation reduces the time needed to create AWS resources."

"For the cost point of this solution, the customer service and support is quite good."

"The integration of the solution is very good."

"CloudFormation gives us control of AWS and any Cloud infrastructure. It creates the whole stack for Cloud services technologies so it's easy to manage the whole system."

More AWS CloudFormation pros

"It offers excellent scalability."

"Spring Cloud integrates well, and as it's code-based, you can do more customization, so with the way you configure or code, you can have your custom implementations, making it the best integration option if you have Java Spring Web Services."

"The solution's initial setup is straightforward. The deployment process took me around ten minutes to fifteen minutes."

"Spring Cloud integrates well."

Cons

"It would be beneficial to have a more straightforward understanding of Intune's capabilities, presented in a simplified manner."

"Microsoft Intune could be improved in several areas."

"Reporting needs to be better. Sometimes, it is way too slow, and it is not even accurate."

"Deploying an app can be a complex process due to dependencies."

"Microsoft documentation is a bit hard to get around, so having more control over devices would be good."

"The solution requires Mac support."

"The main differences between Intune and other products are, like I mentioned, in terms of the Mac. If the customers are majorly moving and adopting Mac laptops while they are using the Intune, they are leaving for other platforms, like Workspace ONE and vMOX."

"We need the capabilities of the Cloud Management Gateway (CMG) to be enhanced through Intune instead of Azure."

More Microsoft Intune cons

"There could be better error handling. It would be a good way to improve the solution."

"The solution needs to offer better support to other cloud vendors."

"There are some limitations with JSON, as the code is written in JSON, which doesn't support commands, looping, or conditionals. This can make the code difficult to read and share across teams. Moreover, the tool only supports AWS."

"If Amazon could extend CloudFormation to other cloud platforms, that would be good. Currently, it is only limited to AWS."

"The conditions that can be added in AWS CloudFormation are not as powerful as any programming language."

"CloudFormation is not particularly good at handling cross-account dynamic references. If you try to refer to an object that CloudFormation has created in a separate AWS account, it tends to fall apart. That's because it is a byproduct of the multi-tenant configuration. This is the most glaring shortcoming in my perspective because you can't dynamically reference objects in other accounts that CloudFormation has created, but it is not a shortcoming that you can't overcome. This is the only pain point that I've come across that didn't have a workaround natively. Sometimes the confirmation is slow, and it could be faster. The downside to CloudFormation when you're fully embracing it is that the AWS services do not get released immediately fully CloudFormation enabled. If you need to use the latest AWS service that just got announced or reinvented, you're not going to be able to continue with CloudFormation for the first X number of months. This is because they develop the products separately, and then they hand it to the CloudFormation team, which later on develops a CloudFormation integration. So, if you need to be on the newest thing AWS has, CloudFormation is often going to be a constraint that prevents you from doing that."

"There is less support for on-premise environments."

"Improving the quality of support would be helpful."

More AWS CloudFormation cons

"If there's a dashboard like the ones provided by Apigee or Kong, that will be useful."

"It would be beneficial for the framework to become more lightweight and efficient when transitioning to the cloud."

"Stability is one area in the solution that needs to improve."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I don't have any problem as far as cost is concerned. It is bundled with our license."

"Intune is linked with Microsoft. We can deploy the Microsoft E365 license to users by Intune. There are different types of licenses, such as device administrator licenses, E5 licenses for device enrollment manually, and P1 and p2 licenses for device enrollment automatically. These are the licenses required for the administration."

"It's affordable for the protection it gives. There are no additional costs."

"We are partners, so we receive some discount. However, from the customer's perspective, Microsoft Intune's pricing is competitive with non-Microsoft technology, and the price is good compared to other market competitors."

"While Microsoft charges for actual usage, it lacks discount options."

"Pricing can be improved."

"We spend a lot of money on Intune licensing, and some of our users have to be double licensed just because of how our dev and corporate environments are segmented."

"I recently got to know that the AD P1 license is compulsory to use Intune Autopilot, which was surprising for me. Earlier, this was not the case. It is the wrong thing to do. We now need to purchase AD P1 licenses for us and for our customers. I would rate it a seven out of ten for pricing."

More Microsoft Intune pricing and cost advice

"The price of the solution is good because it is scalable."

"The solution's cost is normal, neither cheap nor expensive."

"AWS CloudFormation's pricing is cheaper than that of other cloud providers."

"The product is free."

"This solution is free to use and does not require a license."

"AWS CloudFormation doesn't have any cost because it's only the resources that you deploy with the solution that'll incur costs."

"The tool's pricing depends on the page model."

"The pricing is not notably high."

More AWS CloudFormation pricing and cost advice

"Spring Cloud is an open-source solution."

"Currently, we are not required to pay for licenses."

"It is an open-source or free version solution. It also has a paid version, but we have used the open-source version for now."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Configuration Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Government

Financial Services Firm

15%

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

Outsourcing Company

Financial Services Firm

24%

Outsourcing Company

14%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Computer Software Company

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	192
Midsize Enterprise	62
Large Enterprise	185

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	15
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	17

No data available

Questions from the Community

How does Microsoft Intune compare with VMware Workspace One?

Microsoft Intune is a great tool for managing a mobile device fleet while keeping access control. The solution makes ...

See all answers

What are the pros and cons of Microsoft Intune?

Microsoft Intune is a great configuration management tool and has a lot of good things going for it. Here are some of...

See all answers

How does Google Cloud Identity compare with Microsoft Intune?

Microsoft Intune offers not only an easy-to-deploy data protection and productivity management solution, but also ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AWS CloudFormation?

AWS CloudFormation is free. However, there may be unexpected costs if developers deploy services incorrectly without ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with AWS CloudFormation?

When it comes to the challenges with AWS CloudFormation, I faced a few challenges. One challenge is associated with l...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for AWS CloudFormation?

I have experience with AWS CloudFormation. I use it to automate the provisioning of the entire environment by spinnin...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Jamf Pro vs Microsoft Intune

Compared 10% of the time

IBM MaaS360 vs Microsoft Intune

Compared 10% of the time

Workspace ONE UEM vs Microsoft Intune

Compared 6% of the time

Microsoft Entra ID vs Microsoft Intune

Compared 4% of the time

ManageEngine Endpoint Central vs Microsoft Intune

Compared 4% of the time

More Microsoft Intune Competitors

HashiCorp Terraform vs AWS CloudFormation

Compared 9% of the time

AWS Systems Manager vs AWS CloudFormation

Compared 9% of the time

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform vs AWS CloudFormation

Compared 8% of the time

Chef vs AWS CloudFormation

Compared 7% of the time

BMC TrueSight Server Automation vs AWS CloudFormation

Compared 5% of the time

More AWS CloudFormation Competitors

BMC TrueSight Server Automation vs Spring Cloud

Compared 13% of the time

HashiCorp Terraform vs Spring Cloud

Compared 12% of the time

Microsoft Configuration Manager vs Spring Cloud

Compared 12% of the time

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform vs Spring Cloud

Compared 8% of the time

More Spring Cloud Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Intune

June 2026

Download Microsoft Intune product report

Buyer's Guide

AWS CloudFormation

June 2026

Download AWS CloudFormation product report

Buyer's Guide

Configuration Management

June 2026

Download Spring Cloud product report

Also Known As

Intune, MS Intune, Microsoft Endpoint Manager

CloudFormation

No data available

Overview

Microsoft Intune is a cloud-based service designed for device management, security, and compliance. It supports automation and facilitates endpoint management for Windows, iOS, and Android devices, ensuring data protection and efficient policy enforcement.

Microsoft Intune offers seamless integration with tools like Windows Autopilot to automate device setup and deployment. Integrated with Azure Active Directory, it enhances policy management while providing robust reporting and analytics tools for compliance tracking. Despite its intuitive interface aimed at simplifying navigation and device security management, there are challenges such as compatibility issues with Linux and Mac, limited policy support for Android, and demands for better third-party integration. It's widely used for both corporate-owned devices and BYOD scenarios in dynamic IT environments.

What are the key features of Microsoft Intune?

Windows Autopilot: Automates device setup for rapid deployment.
Azure Active Directory Integration: Enhances user policy management.
Reporting and Analytics: Improves compliance visibility.
Mobile Application Management: Ensures app security without compromising personal data.
Cloud-Based Management: Allows management from any location.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Time Efficiency: Automation reduces time in policy enforcement and configuration updates.
Enhanced Security: Ensures data protection across corporate-owned and BYOD devices.
Improved Compliance: Advanced reporting tools enhance compliance visibility.
Flexible Management: Cloud-based nature supports management from any location.

In industries such as finance and healthcare, Microsoft Intune is implemented to ensure data protection and compliance with regulatory standards. Manufacturing sectors utilize Intune for managing a distributed workforce across global locations, while educational institutions employ it to secure and manage devices in learning environments supporting both students and faculty.

Microsoft

AWS CloudFormation provides scalable automation for infrastructure management using infrastructure as code principles while supporting JSON/YAML templates, empowering teams to efficiently manage resources across multiple AWS regions.

Designed to enhance efficiency, AWS CloudFormation simplifies resource management through automation, versioning, and template creation. Its integration within AWS accelerates setup and management of infrastructure by facilitating modular design and parameter management. DevOps teams benefit from these capabilities, easing deployment across complex environments. Despite its strengths, it could improve by enhancing speed, better error handling, user interface improvements, documentation, and integrating new AWS services while addressing licensing costs. Multi-cloud compatibility remains absent, which has some opting for alternatives like Terraform for broader deployment scenarios.

What are the key features of AWS CloudFormation?

Infrastructure as Code: Streamlines deployment using descriptive formats.
Nested Stacks: Allows modular and organized deployment.
Versioning: Facilitates tracking changes and rollback implementation.
Scalability: Supports large-scale operations effectively.
Template Creation: Ensures consistent and repeatable environment setups.
YAML/JSON Support: Simplifies code management across regions.

What benefits or ROI can users expect?

Enhanced Deployment Reliability: Minimizes errors through change tracking and rollbacks.
Automation Efficiency: Reduces manual interventions and speeds setup.
Resource Management Across Regions: Simplifies global deployment processes.
Cost Optimization: Efficient infrastructure usage cuts operational costs.

In industries like finance and healthcare, AWS CloudFormation automates infrastructure deployment, managing resources such as VPCs and EC2 efficiently. DevOps teams use it to ensure consistency through templates, facilitating quick, reliable service deployments while reducing manual error risks and enhancing scalability.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Spring Cloud provides tools for developers to quickly build some common patterns in distributed systems. With features supporting configuration, service discovery, and circuit breakers, Spring Cloud simplifies complex systems enabling faster development and deployment.

Spring Cloud stands at the forefront of microservices architecture by offering comprehensive solutions for enterprise applications. By addressing distributed system challenges, it aids developers in building robust applications that can easily adapt to rapidly changing environments. Spring Cloud integrates seamlessly with popular cloud platforms, providing flexibility and scalability, fostering an agile development process. The microservices-focused approach allows for modular applications that promote reliable and maintainable codebases.

What are the key features of Spring Cloud?

Service Discovery: Efficiently identifies and connects microservices in distributed environments.
Config Server: Centralized external configuration management for distributed systems.
API Gateway: Manages requests and routes them to the appropriate microservices.
Load Balancing: Distributes network traffic evenly across multiple servers.
Circuit Breakers: Enhance system resilience by managing failures effectively.

What benefits can organizations expect from Spring Cloud?

Scalability: Easily handle growing amounts of work seamlessly as demand increases.
Reliability: Reduces downtime with built-in tools for managing service failures.
Efficiency: Improves application performance and resource utilization.
Flexibility: Adapts easily to business changes with modular infrastructure.

Industries such as e-commerce, finance, and telecommunications are implementing Spring Cloud to streamline their backend operations. E-commerce platforms leverage its scalability for handling seasonal traffic spikes. Financial institutions use its reliability and security features to manage transactions securely. Telecommunications rely on its flexibility to enhance service offerings rapidly. Spring Cloud's robust infrastructure and modern architecture make it ideal for industries aiming to improve service delivery and customer satisfaction.

Broadcom

Sample Customers

Mitchells and Buzzers, Callaway

Nextdoor, Coinbase, Expedia

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

AWS CloudFormation vs. Spring Cloud

June 2026

Free Report: AWS CloudFormation vs. Spring Cloud

Find out what your peers are saying about AWS CloudFormation vs. Spring Cloud and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our AWS CloudFormation vs. Spring Cloud report.

See our list of best Configuration Management vendors.

We monitor all Configuration Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.