Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

AWS Migration Hub vs OpenText Migrate​ comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 28, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

AWS Migration Hub
Ranking in Migration Tools
6th
Average Rating
7.0
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
OpenText Migrate​
Ranking in Migration Tools
4th
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
5.9
Number of Reviews
4
Ranking in other categories
Cloud Migration (9th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Migration Tools category, the mindshare of AWS Migration Hub is 3.8%, down from 3.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Migrate​ is 4.5%, up from 1.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Migration Tools Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
OpenText Migrate​4.5%
AWS Migration Hub3.8%
Other91.7%
Migration Tools
 

Featured Reviews

Kumar Mahendra - PeerSpot reviewer
IT Software Engineer at Tata Consultancy
Makes it easy to monitor several devices automatically, but needs to improve support
We need to monitor all the services, one by one, for our clients, and every device has different security keys. There is no group to handle all the devices. It would be good if there were one group we could connect 100 devices to to monitor them. The same case. It would be good if security keys were common for all the devices.
Ludovik DOPIERALA - PeerSpot reviewer
Manager, Service Line at ARTEMYS INVEST
Migration projects have become faster and have saved significant time on complex workloads
OpenText Migrate is our primary tool. I know they have a lot of other products like DNS and tools from cybersecurity, but we don't use it at this time. On Demand Recovery, for recovery, we use another tool from OpenText. It's C2C. It's a product to back up the mailbox. I don't know what I can find at this time. So maybe yes, but the last time I used it was a few months ago. It does the job, so I don't have an opinion on this currently. They don't have a lot of marketing actions. We know this product because we are an OpenText partner for the C2C. But it's another division. It's another part of the company. So we don't have a lot of information. So, I think they can improve the communication for the end-user because a lot of customers do not know OpenText, and they don't know they can provide this type of tool. My overall rating for this product is 9.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"AWS Migration Hub gave my company faster access to the web, so this is what I found most valuable in the solution."
"On every device, if something happens, the solution gives a pop-up to notify devices."
"Carbonite Migrate works well in Windows platform migrations and in the case of a VML platform. The migration is smooth in Windows environments."
"OpenText Migrate is a very good product because it is an older product and they have a lot of tools, and they have a lot of experience on the migration tools."
"The solution is user-friendly."
"Carbonite Migrate is helpful on an infrastructure level."
 

Cons

"The most valuable features are the device shadow and S3 bucket."
"An area for improvement in AWS Migration Hub is the configuration because it was a bit difficult, though not entirely bad. If the configuration could be eased, then that would make AWS Migration Hub better."
"Migration in RHEL and Linux environments can be improved. During RHEL migration with multiple data areas, you have to create a similar source environment at the destination. This can be challenging because you have to install it, create the VM, install over it, and mount it at the mount point. Only then can you do the migration."
"Carbonite failed when moving GIS data."
"The pricing for the customer is always too expensive."
"We find it very difficult to use these tools in a multi-cloud environment"
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The company has an annual subscription for AWS services."
"In terms of pricing, I think it's an expensive tool."
"The licensing costs are really high."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Migration Tools solutions are best for your needs.
881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Computer Software Company
17%
Construction Company
9%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Insurance Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What needs improvement with Carbonite Migrate?
Carbonite failed when moving GIS data. Therefore, scalability is an issue as it struggles with migrating heavy data, specifically GIS data.
What is your primary use case for Carbonite Migrate?
We initially used Carbonite for cloud migration, specifically for moving data from one cloud to another. We moved from a RACS-based environment to VMware.
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Expedia, Intuit, Royal Dutch Shell, Brooks Brothers
Computrade Malaysia
Find out what your peers are saying about AWS Migration Hub vs. OpenText Migrate​ and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.
881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.