AWS Security Hub vs Google Chronicle Suite comparison

The compared Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Google solutions aren't in the same category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #16 in CSPM , with an average rating of 7.6, and holds a 3.9% mindshare in the category. Google is ranked #10 in SIEM , with an average rating of 7.5, and holds a 2.0% mindshare. Additionally, 89% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 87% of Google users who would recommend it.

AWS Security Hub

Read 26 AWS Security Hub reviews

7,113 Views
3,130 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

Google Chronicle Suite

Read 16 Google Chronicle Suite reviews

4,123 Views
3,793 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

AWS Security Hub

Google Chronicle Suite

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 18, 2024

AWS Security Hub and Google Chronicle Suite are both prominent tools in cybersecurity management, with Google Chronicle Suite regarded as superior due to its advanced threat intelligence and higher user satisfaction in support and deployment.

Features: AWS Security Hub offers comprehensive threat detection, seamless integration with AWS services, and centralized security management. Google Chronicle Suite provides advanced threat intelligence, sophisticated detection mechanisms, and deep analytics capabilities.

Room for Improvement: AWS Security Hub has limitations in customizability, advanced threat detection, and user interface. Google Chronicle Suite needs better user accessibility, more comprehensive data source support, and enhanced reporting tools.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: AWS Security Hub is straightforward to deploy within the AWS ecosystem but has mixed reviews regarding customer service. Google Chronicle Suite offers a smooth deployment experience and higher user satisfaction in support and assistance.

Pricing and ROI: AWS Security Hub is considered more cost-effective, providing better ROI for small to medium-sized businesses. Google Chronicle Suite has a higher upfront cost, but its advanced features are seen as justifying the price, especially for larger enterprises looking for superior analytical capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed AWS Security Hub vs. Google Chronicle Suite Report (Updated: October 2024).

Buyer's Guide

AWS Security Hub vs. Google Chronicle Suite

October 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AWS Security Hub

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) (6th), Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) (16th)

Google Chronicle Suite

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (10th)

Mindshare comparison

While both are Security Software solutions, they serve different purposes. AWS Security Hub is designed for Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) and holds a mindshare of 3.9%, down 4.6% compared to last year.
Google Chronicle Suite, on the other hand, focuses on Security Information and Event Management (SIEM), holds 2.0% mindshare, down 3.4% since last year.

Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
AWS Security Hub	3.9%
Wiz	16.6%
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks	9.6%
Other	69.9%

Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM)

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Google Chronicle Suite	2.0%
Splunk Enterprise Security	7.4%
Wazuh	7.3%
Other	83.3%

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

Featured Reviews

Karthik Ekambaram

Director at Scybers

Has helped identify misconfigurations and prioritize risks but lacks multi-cloud support and deeper integration features

AWS Security Hub cannot scale up to multiple different cloud environments; it only works for AWS. There are other products in the market for CSPM that can give you multi-cloud environment misconfigurations, even Microsoft for that matter. Regarding the integration of AWS Security Hub with third-party tools, I am not certain whether we can integrate them, but there is no need to do so. However, AWS Security Hub cannot integrate with other cloud providers, so it only supports the AWS environment. The compliance checks within AWS Security Hub are good, but we don't use them much. We utilize compliance frameworks such as CIS compliance frameworks and ISO 27017 framework, which are beneficial, but it can improve in other areas too, such as including NIST and other frameworks beyond just ISO and CIS. Improvements can be applicable for scalability, particularly on integration with multi-cloud environments, and compliance frameworks can be added for more variety as well. The unified dashboard in AWS Security Hub is adequate; I cannot say it is exceptional, but the content available in the dashboards is satisfactory for now.

Read full review

Viney Bhardwaj

Director at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees

Has required significant customization but has supported threat pattern discovery and AI-driven analytics

The integration of Google Chronicle Suite with existing SIEM systems needs to be more mature, so some customization is required. With custom applications, it's quite difficult, and they need to work on this. The automated threat detection features in Google Chronicle Suite come with a lot of false positives and noise. They are new to the market and need to improve significantly. Customization is vital where users can customize the alerts, dashboard, or content as per their needs. This is more required in Google Chronicle Suite, allowing analysts or engineers to create according to the organization. They need to provide cheaper options for online versus offline log storage and improve retention and compression of the logs. Especially searching offline logs is a feature missing from most SIEM solutions nowadays.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The advantage is that it is cloud-native, and we do not need to install agents or sensors to find findings."

"It's a security posture management tool from AWS. Basically, it identifies misconfigurations, similar to Trusted Advisor but on a larger scale."

"Easily integrates with third-party tools"

"Within AWS Security Hub, there is a feature for aggregating and prioritizing security findings which allows for better risk prioritization based on misconfiguration, as they know AWS thoroughly."

"AWS Security Hub's unified dashboard does help streamline my process of identifying vulnerabilities, but we don't use Inspector."

"One of the most effective features of AWS Security Hub is the easy access to a dashboard with a ready-to-use security score."

"The platform has valuable features for security."

"Cloudposse is a valuable feature as it guarantees my security."

More AWS Security Hub pros

"The dashboards are clean and clearly written, making it easy to use and understand."

"The tool's most valuable feature is the search option, allowing easy navigation."

"The platform's most valuable features are multiple connectors and data output flexibility regarding dashboards and user experience."

"Google Chronicle Suite is a highly scalable solution with good search capabilities."

"The automated response feature allows for immediate actions like isolating infected machines or blocking malicious IP addresses."

"The support team is responsive."

"The product is near perfect, with only minor enhancements needed."

"What sets Chronicle apart from other solutions is its emphasis on threat hunting rather than solely serving as a monitoring tool."

More Google Chronicle Suite pros

Cons

"Adding SIEM features would be beneficial because of the limited customization of AWS Security Hub."

"One aspect that could be improved in the solution is its adaptability to different markets and geopolitical restrictions. In certain regions like Thailand, specific services from certain countries or providers, such as AWS or Azure, might be limited or blocked. It also needs improvement in would require configuring the solution more adaptable to AWS infrastructure and function."

"AWS Security Hub should improve the time it takes to update. It takes a long period of time when updating. It can take 24 hours sometimes to update. Additionally, when integrating this solution with more security tools, takes time."

"AWS Security Hub's configuration and integration are areas where it lacks and needs to improve."

"Shortening the response time for support tickets, particularly in production issues, could make the service more efficient."

"Security Hub is currently not worth investing in, as it requires more configurations and integration with other services to work effectively."

"Security needs to be measured based on their own criteria. We can't add custom criteria specific to our organization. For example, having an S3 bucket publicly available might be flagged as a critical alert, but it might not be critical in a sandbox environment. So, it gets flagged as critical, which becomes a false positive. So, customization options and creating custom dashboards would be areas for improvement."

"I would like a more fine-grained capability for creating custom rules and a more user-friendly experience programmatically in writing queries and configuring custom security rules, making it quicker and easier."

More AWS Security Hub cons

"The tool is perfectly fine, and I have not faced any challenges while using it."

"It is still not mature enough."

"The graphical user interface could be improved to enhance user experience."

"The solution's graphical user interface (GUI) should be more user-friendly."

"The configuration is not optimal."

"It is still not mature enough. If I create some content, there might be roadblocks, although this could change in the future."

"The product's default dashboard feature has a few limitations regarding availability."

"The functionalities for parsing and including feeds need improvement."

More Google Chronicle Suite cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of AWS Security Hub is average compared to other solutions."

"AWS Security Hub is not an expensive tool. I would consider it to be a cheap solution. AWS Security Hub follows the PAYG pricing model, meaning you will have to pay for whatever you use."

"The cost is based on the number of compliances, core checks, and services required, and for more than 10,000 recommendations, the charge is just one dollar."

"The pricing is fine. It is not an expensive tool."

"There are multiple subscription models, like yearly, monthly, and packaged."

"The price of the solution is not very competitive but it is reasonable."

"AWS Security Hub's pricing is pretty reasonable."

"Security Hub is not an expensive solution."

"The tool is cheaper than Microsoft Sentinel."

"We have to pay extra charges for the amount of data transfer and technical support services."

"Compared to other solutions, Google Chronicle Suite's pricing is fine."

"The solution's pricing is dependent on the data amount."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user186927

Director of Operations at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees

Feb 16, 2015

Cybereason vs. Interset vs. SQRRL

Capture DB - they all use NoSQL db and hence solve the ad hoc query and 'go back in time' problem with current best of breed SIEM and DLP solutions that rely on real time analysis of incoming logs (and don't store them). This means deeper and quicker iterative threat analysis and assessment…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Government

Financial Services Firm

13%

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	12

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	6

Questions from the Community

Which is better - Azure Sentinel or AWS Security Hub?

We like that Azure Sentinel does not require as much maintenance as legacy SIEMs that are on-premises. Azure Sentinel is auto-scaling - you will not have to worry about performance impact, you will...

See all answers

What do you like most about AWS Security Hub?

The most valuable features of the solution are the scanning of all the cloud environments and most of the compliances available in the cloud.

See all answers

What needs improvement with AWS Security Hub?

See all answers

What do you like most about Google Chronicle Suite?

Google Chronicle Suite is a highly scalable solution with good search capabilities.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Google Chronicle Suite?

Our license is based on the size of the company with an all-you-can-eat model, considering storage capabilities per day. It's a flexible pay method.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Google Chronicle Suite?

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Sentinel vs AWS Security Hub

Compared 35% of the time

Wiz vs AWS Security Hub

Compared 8% of the time

Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs AWS Security Hub

Compared 8% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Cloud vs AWS Security Hub

Compared 5% of the time

Qualys TotalCloud vs AWS Security Hub

Compared 2% of the time

More AWS Security Hub Competitors

Microsoft Sentinel vs Google Chronicle Suite

Compared 16% of the time

Google Security Operations vs Google Chronicle Suite

Compared 13% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Google Chronicle Suite

Compared 10% of the time

Sentinel vs Google Chronicle Suite

Compared 10% of the time

Panther vs Google Chronicle Suite

Compared 3% of the time

More Google Chronicle Suite Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

AWS Security Hub

January 2026

Download AWS Security Hub product report

Buyer's Guide

Google Chronicle Suite

January 2026

Download Google Chronicle Suite product report

Also Known As

SQRRL

No data available

Overview

AWS Security Hub is a comprehensive security service that provides a centralized view of security alerts and compliance status across an AWS environment. It collects data from various AWS services, partner solutions, and AWS Marketplace products to provide a holistic view of security posture. With Security Hub, users can quickly identify and prioritize security issues, automate compliance checks, and streamline remediation efforts.

The service offers a range of features including continuous monitoring, threat intelligence integration, and customizable dashboards. It also provides automated insights and recommendations to help users improve their security posture. Security Hub integrates with other AWS services like Amazon GuardDuty, AWS Config, and AWS Macie to provide a unified security experience. Additionally, it supports integration with third-party security tools through its API, allowing users to leverage their existing security investments.

With its user-friendly interface and powerful capabilities, AWS Security Hub is a valuable tool for organizations looking to enhance their security and compliance posture in the cloud.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Organizations primarily leverage Google Chronicle Suite for centralized log management, threat intelligence, and endpoint security, addressing MDR requirements with continuous monitoring.

Google Chronicle Suite supports storage, security, and alert checking. Utilizing log information to generate alerts and integration with search engines, it monitors network and login issues. It is a choice for consultants on client projects, and partners handle its global resale and implementation.

What are the key features of Google Chronicle Suite?

Threat Hunting: Enables proactive searches for potential threats.
Fast Information Retrieval: Swiftly accesses necessary data.
Efficient Search: Provides easy-to-use searching capabilities.
Premade Dashboards: Ready-to-use dashboards for quick insights.
Simple Log Management: Streamlines the logging process.
Multiple Connectors: Broad connectivity support.
Flexible Data Outputs: Versatile data handling.
Top Threat Intelligence: High-quality intelligence capabilities.
Speed Handling Real-Time Cyber Threats: Rapid threat response.
Proactive Threat Identification: Detects threats before they occur.

What are the benefits and ROI of Google Chronicle Suite?

Centralization: Unified log management boosts efficiency.
Enhanced Security: Advanced threat intelligence improves protection.
Global Implementation: Available worldwide through partners.
Consultant Benefit: Useful for client-specific challenges.
Continuous Monitoring: Non-stop network and login issue tracking.

Industries employ Google Chronicle Suite for its robust security measures and log management. It is especially vital for IT, finance, healthcare, and any sector needing stringent security and compliance. Consultants find it essential for tailoring security protocols in client projects, while partners ensure seamless implementation across regions.

Google

Sample Customers

Edmunds, Frame.io, GoDaddy, Realtor.com

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

AWS Security Hub vs. Google Chronicle Suite

October 2024

Free Report: AWS Security Hub vs. Google Chronicle Suite

Find out what your peers are saying about AWS Security Hub vs. Google Chronicle Suite and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our AWS Security Hub vs. Google Chronicle Suite report.

We monitor all Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.