AWS Shield vs Radware DDoS comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Radware are both solutions in the Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.7, while Radware is ranked #2 with an average rating of 9.4. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 4.9% mindshare in DDOS, compared to Radware’s 8.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of Radware users who would recommend it.

AWS Shield

Read 11 AWS Shield reviews

1,995 Views
1,995 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Radware DDoS

Read 45 Radware DDoS reviews

4,934 Views
4,885 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

AWS Shield

Radware DDoS

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 30, 2025

AWS Shield and Radware DDoS are competing solutions in the DDoS protection domain. While AWS Shield integrates seamlessly with AWS cloud environments, Radware DDoS is often regarded as more comprehensive due to its advanced threat detection features and adaptability.

Features: AWS Shield provides real-time visibility, automated protection against common DDoS attacks, and is an ideal choice for AWS users, as it integrates with Elastic Load Balancer, CloudFront, and Route 53. Radware DDoS offers advanced threat detection features, including behavioral analysis, machine learning, and the ability to mitigate volumetric and application layer attacks. It also provides flexible deployment models, catering to diverse infrastructure requirements.

Room for Improvement: AWS Shield could enhance its threat response mechanisms beyond the AWS ecosystem and increase its pricing transparency. Furthermore, improvements in offering more advanced mitigation capabilities in its standard tier are desirable. Radware DDoS can work on streamlining its initial setup process and reducing management complexities. Additionally, optimizing costs and simplifying configuration for small enterprises would make it more accessible.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: AWS Shield offers straightforward deployment with its integration into AWS services, requiring minimal configuration. It provides customer support through available AWS support tiers. Radware DDoS, although requiring more complex setup, supports various deployment models, including cloud and on-premises environments, offering personalized support to cater to specific infrastructure needs.

Pricing and ROI: AWS Shield offers a cost-effective solution with pricing that scales with usage in AWS environments, contributing to a lower total cost of ownership. Radware DDoS can have a higher initial setup cost but offers an enhanced ROI by providing superior protection that minimizes potential downtime in high-risk environments. Although exact pricing for Radware is not specified, the investment often justifies its comprehensive protection capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed AWS Shield vs. Radware DDoS Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

AWS Shield vs. Radware DDoS

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AWS Shield

Ranking in Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection

5th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Radware DDoS

Ranking in Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection

2nd

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection category, the mindshare of AWS Shield is 4.9%, down from 6.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Radware DDoS is 8.2%, up from 7.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Radware DDoS	8.2%
AWS Shield	4.9%
Other	86.9%

Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection

Featured Reviews

PranavTelang

Lead Architect at a comms service provider with 1,001-5,000 employees

Has enabled multi-layered threat mitigation but still lacks deeper visibility for advanced application attacks

AWS Shield has limited coverage as it only protects against common and high-volume network and transport layer attacks, such as SYN floods. It does not provide inherent protection against more sophisticated layer 7 attacks such as HTTP floods. In such cases, integration with WAF is necessary, which results in additional costs for customers. To protect layer 7, layer 4, and layer 3, customers must implement both solutions. The service also has difficulties with static detection thresholds, which may not be sensitive enough to detect smaller application-specific attacks. While AWS Shield is a key security service, AWS should enhance their expert support with 24/7 response for complex attacks, which is currently limited.

Read full review

Nishant Kandpal

Information Security Manager at Dalmia Bharat Ltd

Behavioral analytics and AI automation enhance security and performance

It provides protection for network applications and infrastructure level, and the best part is the behavioral-based detection that Radware provides us, along with real-time signature creation. We also have some applications where we have botnets running, and it provides protection against them. Web DDoS targets the application layer, which is layer seven of the OSI model. For that, we focus on the Web DDoS technique for bot-based attacks because we have many applications where bots are running. We also face many random URL attacks every day, and it protects against malicious or suspicious random URL attacks. It ensures both security and performance. It achieves this by learning behavior patterns and providing protection without blocking normal traffic. These are some of the features I am particularly satisfied with in this product.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is quite scalable, and we have not faced any issues with its scalability."

"We have integrated the tool with Active Directory. The most important feature is that it's transparent and doesn't degrade the performance of our solution. Additionally, it's easy to configure, which is crucial for us. It's easy to use and set up and stops attacks on our servers. We haven't encountered any attack problems because the solution stops them in real-time. AWS Shield specifically focuses on defending against denial-of-service attacks, making it a great solution for that type of threat."

"I am impressed with the product's multiple features like security."

"AWS Shield is aligned with the web application firewall (WAF), and they work seamlessly together, primarily working with Elastic Load Balancer, CloudFront, and Route 53 for CDN and DNS services protection."

"AWS Shield offers numerous protection features that are crucial at the application layer, safeguarding users from distributed denial of service attacks, man-in-the-middle assaults, and hacker orchestrations."

"It is integrated with AWS. So, it gives you a good first step."

"I recommend AWS Shield because it has proven helpful in tracking DDoS attacks within both my past and present environments, and without AWS Shield, a business could face potential losses, as this tool helps in identifying and mitigating fake traffic that disrupts applications, ultimately supporting business continuity."

"The product is easy to use."

More AWS Shield pros

"It has not gone down for a quite long time. It's working fine."

"The product integrates well with Cisco."

"The intuitive user interface makes the entire process seamless and efficient."

"The most valuable feature is the controller that determines when and how traffic can be moved to the cloud."

"Radware Cloud DDoS Protection Service goes beyond the essential Layer Three and Layer Four protection, which are practically mandatory these days."

"A flexible affordable solution for defense against DDos attacks."

"The reporting is very good and provides us with a comprehensive description of where attacks are emanating from."

"Radware DDoS Protection Service has positively impacted my organization because we are more protected against attacks from the internet."

More Radware DDoS pros

Cons

"The network has been experiencing frustrating performance issues today, which is not typical for Nigeria."

"We end up having to pay extra for features that AWS adds that we don't need."

"Perhaps the time required to detect anomalies can be reduced."

"AWS Shield Standard requires improvement, particularly regarding its dashboard since it currently provides limited coverage against comprehensive DDoS attacks."

"AWS Shield has limited coverage as it only protects against common and high-volume network and transport layer attacks, such as SYN floods."

"The time taken to detect anomalies must be reduced."

"There is an area for improvement regarding health checks. AWS Shield does not come with its own health check functionality."

"The product should give users more flexibility to customize their security policies according to their requirements."

More AWS Shield cons

"In terms of specific features missing in Radware DDoS, I would appreciate seeing an API Protector or similar capabilities that Akamai has."

"I would like to see more graphics within the dashboard. Right now, you are required to buy tools in order to have graphical representation for your monitoring."

"Radware DefensePro requires a continuous learning process. Using this technology, we can improve our network. Based on the different attack mechanisms, we use Radware DefensePro to provide security for our clients' networks very effectively."

"I want to improve the blocking time; it should be within 10 seconds because 18 seconds allows multiple transactions in the financial industry."

"Customization could be improved."

"Radware's management is very proactive, but Radware's lower-level staff is not proactive. You need to do a lot of follow-ups."

"It currently takes about 15 to 20 minutes for the process to complete, which should be minimized."

"They need to increase the limit of devices that we can manage."

More Radware DDoS cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It depends on your subscription level and the volume that you're spending with AWS. So, it is very relative to the consumption alignment in your subscription level. It is a well-constructed, scalable pricing option, but it is relative to how much you're spending on AWS. Because the more you spend, typically, the more you get off on services like this. I find it to be comparable to other solutions."

"We pay $3000 per month for the solution."

"The cost depends on traffic each month, so on average, it costs us between US$200 and US$300 per month."

"The tool is cheap."

"The tool's pricing is good."

"The NetFlow security could be improved too."

"Radware's switch to a pay-as-you-go model last year provides great flexibility."

"Radware DefensePro is expensive when considering the issue we have and its limitations."

"When compared with other solutions, my end user is satisfied with the costs and believes that Radware Cloud DDoS Protection Service is worth the price paid."

"Licensing of Radware is quite simple and straightforward, while Arbor DDos is a bit complicated."

"The initial cost is over $100,000 for one appliance."

"Radware DefensePro is a bit on the expensive side."

"The pricing is okay, and I do not have any concerns about the price."

More Radware DDoS pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Comms Service Provider

12%

Computer Software Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

Insurance Company

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Non Profit

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	7

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	19
Midsize Enterprise	10
Large Enterprise	21

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about AWS Shield?

We have integrated the tool with Active Directory. The most important feature is that it's transparent and doesn't degrade the performance of our solution. Additionally, it's easy to configure, whi...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AWS Shield?

The pricing structure for AWS Shield is fair, yet it depends on the specific protections chosen. Enabling Shield Advanced on multiple services such as CloudFront, network load balancer, or Route 53...

See all answers

What needs improvement with AWS Shield?

Services always benefit from improvements, including AWS Shield. With respect to the Web Application Firewall, current rule-based setups may not be adequately defined or classified. Enhancement of ...

See all answers

What do you like most about Radware Cloud DDoS Protection Service?

The most important part is that Radware DDoS integrates seamlessly and provides anomaly identification, real-time notifications, and security against DDoS attacks. It also helps us with multi-layer...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Radware Cloud DDoS Protection Service?

For Radware Cloud DDoS Protection, the pricing model can vary based on a number of factors such as the scale of the business, the specific level of protection required, the geographical regions cov...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Radware Cloud DDoS Protection Service?

The time it takes to upload a site to the cloud is critical when under attack. If a site is down, a quick response to migrate the site to the cloud is essential. It currently takes about 15 to 20 m...

See all answers

Comparisons

Cloudflare vs AWS Shield

Compared 24% of the time

Azure DDoS Protection vs AWS Shield

Compared 20% of the time

Cloudflare One vs AWS Shield

Compared 16% of the time

Prolexic vs AWS Shield

Compared 6% of the time

Imperva Application Security Platform vs AWS Shield

Compared 5% of the time

More AWS Shield Competitors

Arbor DDoS vs Radware DDoS

Compared 24% of the time

Cloudflare vs Radware DDoS

Compared 17% of the time

Imperva Application Security Platform vs Radware DDoS

Compared 8% of the time

Corero vs Radware DDoS

Compared 4% of the time

Fortinet FortiDDoS vs Radware DDoS

Compared 4% of the time

More Radware DDoS Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

AWS Shield

January 2026

Download AWS Shield product report

Buyer's Guide

Radware DDoS

January 2026

Download Radware DDoS product report

Also Known As

No data available

Radware DDoS Protection Service, Radware DefensePro, Radware DefenseFlow

Overview

AWS Shield is a managed Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) protection service that safeguards applications running on AWS. AWS Shield provides always-on detection and automatic inline mitigations that minimize application downtime and latency, so there is no need to engage AWS Support to benefit from DDoS protection.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Radware DDoS provides robust multi-layer protection against distributed denial of service attacks, featuring real-time monitoring and anomaly detection. Its scalable cloud-based and on-site deployment options ensure effective safeguarding of critical infrastructure.

Offering comprehensive defense, Radware DDoS includes features like data scrubbing, signature updates, and SSL-based mitigation. Integrated platforms and a user-friendly interface streamline its deployment. With advanced reporting, analytics, and behavioral analysis powered by machine learning, users experience fewer false positives. Despite these strengths, users highlight the need for improved scalability, seamless deployment, and enhanced machine learning capabilities. Better documentation, pricing, and customer service remain areas of improvement.

What features does Radware DDoS offer?

Data Scrubbing: Filters malicious data from incoming traffic.
Signature Updates: Keeps threat signatures current.
SSL-Based Mitigation: Protects against SSL attacks.
Auto Mitigation: Quickly responds to detected threats.
Multi-Layer Protection: Defends across several attack vectors.

What benefits should users expect?

Scalable Protection: Adaptable to increasing demands.
Proactive Notifications: Alerts in real-time to threats.
Live Attack Insights: Provides real-time analytics.
Enhanced Security: Shields diverse sectors.
Reduced False Positives: Enabled by machine learning.

In industries like banking, telecom, and government, organizations employ Radware DDoS to protect networks from DDoS attacks. It ensures server, web service, and mail security while enabling traffic monitoring and unauthorized access blocking. Its cloud-based options serve entities seeking infrastructure security and network traffic analysis.

Radware

Sample Customers

netflix, dow jones, mapbox, pearson, rovio, youview, moviestar planet, asurion, payplug, hour of code

Myntex, APAC retailers

Buyer's Guide

AWS Shield vs. Radware DDoS

December 2025

Free Report: AWS Shield vs. Radware DDoS

Find out what your peers are saying about AWS Shield vs. Radware DDoS and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our AWS Shield vs. Radware DDoS report.

See our list of best Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection vendors.

We monitor all Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.