Discover the top alternatives and competitors to AWS Shield based on the interviews we conducted with its users.
The top alternative solutions include Cloudflare, Cloudflare One, and Imperva Application Security Platform.
The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.
Amazon Web Services (AWS) Alternatives Report
Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Amazon Web Services (AWS), and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Cloudflare excels with its ease of use, broad feature set, and cost-effectiveness. In comparison, AWS Shield provides advanced protection and seamless integration for those deeply invested in AWS. Cloudflare appeals to those seeking comprehensive solutions, while AWS Shield attracts enterprises needing specialized AWS integration.
Cloudflare generally offers a more straightforward and typically lower setup cost, whereas AWS Shield can have a higher initial expense. The setup cost difference emphasizes Cloudflare's positioning as a cost-effective solution compared to AWS Shield's more premium approach.
Cloudflare generally offers a more straightforward and typically lower setup cost, whereas AWS Shield can have a higher initial expense. The setup cost difference emphasizes Cloudflare's positioning as a cost-effective solution compared to AWS Shield's more premium approach.
Cloudflare One simplifies deployment and offers adaptable pricing, appealing to those seeking ease and affordability. In comparison, AWS Shield attracts buyers needing comprehensive protection with advanced threat intelligence but requires more technical proficiency and potentially higher upfront costs.
Cloudflare One typically offers lower setup costs compared to AWS Shield, making it a more cost-effective choice for budget-conscious users, while AWS Shield may justify its higher setup expense with enhanced security features.
Cloudflare One typically offers lower setup costs compared to AWS Shield, making it a more cost-effective choice for budget-conscious users, while AWS Shield may justify its higher setup expense with enhanced security features.
Imperva excels in threat analytics and comprehensive security control with a strong focus on management ease and pricing satisfaction. In comparison, AWS Shield is preferred for its extensive features, offering automatic DDoS protection and seamless integration within the broader AWS ecosystem, albeit at higher costs.
Imperva Application Security Platform has a straightforward setup cost, while AWS Shield offers more budget-friendly initial pricing. These pricing variations highlight distinct approaches in balancing simplicity versus cost-effectiveness.
Imperva Application Security Platform has a straightforward setup cost, while AWS Shield offers more budget-friendly initial pricing. These pricing variations highlight distinct approaches in balancing simplicity versus cost-effectiveness.
Arbor DDoS suits organizations seeking granular on-premises control with strong customer support. In comparison, AWS Shield appeals to businesses favoring seamless AWS integration and cloud-native features. Each solution targets different operational needs, influencing a tech buyer's decision-making process.
AWS Shield provides economical, seamless DDoS protection within AWS services. In comparison, Akamai App and API Protector enhances security with comprehensive threat detection and API protection for diverse applications, making it ideal for buyers seeking advanced security despite potentially higher costs.
AWS Shield has a higher setup cost compared to Akamai App and API Protector which offers a more budget-friendly option. AWS Shield targets larger enterprises, while Akamai is ideal for businesses looking for cost-effective security.
AWS Shield has a higher setup cost compared to Akamai App and API Protector which offers a more budget-friendly option. AWS Shield targets larger enterprises, while Akamai is ideal for businesses looking for cost-effective security.
AWS Shield integrates seamlessly with AWS services, offering straightforward deployment while appealing with cost-effective pricing. In comparison, Radware DDoS provides advanced threat mitigation features and customizable protection, suitable for complex networks seeking a stronger, though higher-investment, security solution.
Fastly excels in performance optimization and content control, attracting tech buyers with its real-time delivery features and cost-effectiveness. In comparison, AWS Shield appeals to those prioritizing protection through its advanced DDoS security, justifying higher costs for extensive coverage.
Fastly's setup cost is considered lower compared to AWS Shield, which often entails higher initial expenses. Users highlight this key difference, emphasizing Fastly's affordability while noting AWS Shield's robustness and comprehensive features.
Fastly's setup cost is considered lower compared to AWS Shield, which often entails higher initial expenses. Users highlight this key difference, emphasizing Fastly's affordability while noting AWS Shield's robustness and comprehensive features.
Prolexic offers advanced threat intelligence and is valued for support and cost-effectiveness. In comparison, AWS Shield provides seamless AWS integration, enhancing its appeal for AWS environments. Prolexic suits cost-sensitive scenarios, while AWS Shield's advanced features justify its investment for comprehensive AWS solutions.
Fortinet FortiDDoS offers advanced threat detection and granular control, ideal for on-premises deployment with proactive support. In comparison, AWS Shield provides seamless AWS integration and flexible cloud protection with a pay-as-you-go model suitable for cloud-native operations seeking cost efficiency.
Fortinet FortiDDoS has a higher setup cost while AWS Shield is more budget-friendly for setup expenses; these cost differences highlight Fortinet's enterprise focus compared to AWS Shield's more accessible pricing for businesses of various sizes.
Fortinet FortiDDoS has a higher setup cost while AWS Shield is more budget-friendly for setup expenses; these cost differences highlight Fortinet's enterprise focus compared to AWS Shield's more accessible pricing for businesses of various sizes.
Link11 offers cost-effective DDoS protection with automated response and flexible integration, appealing to budget-conscious buyers. In comparison, AWS Shield provides advanced threat detection and real-time alerts, making it ideal for organizations needing comprehensive security within AWS's ecosystem despite its higher pricing.
Link11 offers a straightforward setup process with no initial costs, while AWS Shield involves a more complex setup with potential setup fees. This highlights Link11's cost-effective simplicity compared to AWS Shield's more resource-intensive approach.
Link11 offers a straightforward setup process with no initial costs, while AWS Shield involves a more complex setup with potential setup fees. This highlights Link11's cost-effective simplicity compared to AWS Shield's more resource-intensive approach.
A10 Thunder TPS effectively prevents DDoS attacks with advanced threat intelligence, making it suitable for users seeking tailored security. In comparison, AWS Shield offers seamless integration within AWS services, ideal for those prioritizing scalability and ease of deployment.
The setup cost for F5 BIG-IP Advanced Firewall Manager (AFM) tends to be higher due to its robust features, whereas AWS Shield offers a more cost-effective setup, differing in initial investment requirements.
The setup cost for F5 BIG-IP Advanced Firewall Manager (AFM) tends to be higher due to its robust features, whereas AWS Shield offers a more cost-effective setup, differing in initial investment requirements.
