AWS Shield vs Fortinet FortiDDoS comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Fortinet are both solutions in the Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.7, while Fortinet is ranked #12 with an average rating of 8.0. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 4.9% mindshare in DDOS, compared to Fortinet’s 2.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of Fortinet users who would recommend it.

AWS Shield

Read 11 AWS Shield reviews

1,995 Views
1,995 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Fortinet FortiDDoS

Read 15 Fortinet FortiDDoS reviews

1,366 Views
1,065 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

AWS Shield

Fortinet FortiDDoS

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 5, 2024

Fortinet FortiDDoS and AWS Shield compete in the cybersecurity landscape, focusing on DDoS protection. AWS Shield appears to have the upper hand due to its advanced features and perceived value for investment.

Features: Fortinet FortiDDoS is known for real-time attack mitigation, comprehensive reporting tools, and detailed threat analysis. AWS Shield provides scalability, seamless AWS Cloud integration, and robust automated mitigation features.

Room for Improvement: Fortinet FortiDDoS could improve with enhanced cloud integration, better scalability options, and more automated processes. AWS Shield could benefit from simplified onboarding for non-AWS users, reduced cost variability, and improved user interface navigation.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Fortinet FortiDDoS is praised for straightforward deployment and consistent support. AWS Shield is easier for AWS users due to integration but may be challenging for others due to a learning curve.

Pricing and ROI: Fortinet FortiDDoS offers predictable costs appealing to budget-conscious businesses, while AWS Shield's pay-as-you-go model is tied to usage, offering scalability but with potential cost variability.

To learn more, read our detailed AWS Shield vs. Fortinet FortiDDoS Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

AWS Shield vs. Fortinet FortiDDoS

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AWS Shield

Ranking in Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection

5th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Fortinet FortiDDoS

Ranking in Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection

12th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection category, the mindshare of AWS Shield is 4.9%, down from 6.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Fortinet FortiDDoS is 2.4%, down from 2.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
AWS Shield	4.9%
Fortinet FortiDDoS	2.4%
Other	92.7%

Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection

Featured Reviews

PranavTelang

Lead Architect at a comms service provider with 1,001-5,000 employees

Has enabled multi-layered threat mitigation but still lacks deeper visibility for advanced application attacks

AWS Shield has limited coverage as it only protects against common and high-volume network and transport layer attacks, such as SYN floods. It does not provide inherent protection against more sophisticated layer 7 attacks such as HTTP floods. In such cases, integration with WAF is necessary, which results in additional costs for customers. To protect layer 7, layer 4, and layer 3, customers must implement both solutions. The service also has difficulties with static detection thresholds, which may not be sensitive enough to detect smaller application-specific attacks. While AWS Shield is a key security service, AWS should enhance their expert support with 24/7 response for complex attacks, which is currently limited.

Read full review

Marcos AntonioOliveira

IT Analyst at Evapco, Inc.

Reliable protection and smooth setup enhance company security

Currently, I have two firewalls, with one located in Sorocaba, model 90D, and the other in São Paulo, model 30D. They are connected by VPN. I use the firewalls for VPN and final protection for my company, and my equipment is maintained by an internet company called Multiprox The equipment works…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is integrated with AWS. So, it gives you a good first step."

"The product has a good mechanism to analyze trends and trigger events."

"AWS Shield is aligned with the web application firewall (WAF), and they work seamlessly together, primarily working with Elastic Load Balancer, CloudFront, and Route 53 for CDN and DNS services protection."

"The automatic detection and mitigation of DDoS attacks in the product operates in real-time and provides satisfactory results."

"AWS Shield offers numerous protection features that are crucial at the application layer, safeguarding users from distributed denial of service attacks, man-in-the-middle assaults, and hacker orchestrations."

"It is quite scalable, and we have not faced any issues with its scalability."

"I am impressed with the product's multiple features like security."

"The product is easy to use."

More AWS Shield pros

"I find the interface easy to use."

"The most valuable feature is the cloud DDoS scrubbing capability."

"We have researched them all, and it's a good solution all around."

"It is a user-friendly product in terms of monitoring and updating policies."

"The solution is very user-friendly and very easy to use."

"The protection resources and the support are valuable features of the solution."

"The equipment works very well, and I have not encountered any issues with it."

"Packet inspection has been effective for mitigating DDoS attacks."

More Fortinet FortiDDoS pros

Cons

"Perhaps the time required to detect anomalies can be reduced."

"Perhaps the time required to detect anomalies can be reduced. Presently, it takes some time to determine whether a situation is normal or abnormal."

"The product needs to improve its logs and reports to make it read better."

"AWS Shield Standard requires improvement, particularly regarding its dashboard since it currently provides limited coverage against comprehensive DDoS attacks."

"AWS Shield has limited coverage as it only protects against common and high-volume network and transport layer attacks, such as SYN floods."

"There is an area for improvement regarding health checks. AWS Shield does not come with its own health check functionality."

"The product is expensive."

"The management of it is a bit hard. If you don't engineer it on the front side, it is hard to go back in and change it. It could be improved in terms of architecture requirements and then ongoing support requirements as a secondary component to it. People tend to set up things like this, and they just expect it to work without the care and feeding that needs to go back into it either from an application team or a network environment team."

More AWS Shield cons

"The challenge lies within the customer environment, particularly in Brazil, where companies have stringent security requirements for implementing solutions."

"I would like to see analytics, big data."

"The tool needs to focus more on the area of application traffic management, where it currently has some shortcomings."

"I find that there have been issues in the past year with the solution hanging. It freezes often."

"The product’s pricing needs improvement."

"The main improvement would be to change the firewall model, however, currently, everything is fixed and working well."

"All the thresholds that need to be configured should be included in the default so that user will not forget or misconfigure."

"The primary area for improvement is the on-premises capacity limit, currently fixed at 10 GB."

More Fortinet FortiDDoS cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The cost depends on traffic each month, so on average, it costs us between US$200 and US$300 per month."

"The tool's pricing is good."

"It depends on your subscription level and the volume that you're spending with AWS. So, it is very relative to the consumption alignment in your subscription level. It is a well-constructed, scalable pricing option, but it is relative to how much you're spending on AWS. Because the more you spend, typically, the more you get off on services like this. I find it to be comparable to other solutions."

"We pay $3000 per month for the solution."

"The tool is cheap."

"It's quite pricey."

"The product’s pricing needs improvement."

"The solution is reasonably priced."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Comms Service Provider

12%

Computer Software Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

Insurance Company

Manufacturing Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	7

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Large Enterprise	6

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about AWS Shield?

We have integrated the tool with Active Directory. The most important feature is that it's transparent and doesn't degrade the performance of our solution. Additionally, it's easy to configure, whi...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AWS Shield?

The pricing structure for AWS Shield is fair, yet it depends on the specific protections chosen. Enabling Shield Advanced on multiple services such as CloudFront, network load balancer, or Route 53...

See all answers

What needs improvement with AWS Shield?

Services always benefit from improvements, including AWS Shield. With respect to the Web Application Firewall, current rule-based setups may not be adequately defined or classified. Enhancement of ...

See all answers

Which is the best DDoS protection solution for a big ISP for monitoring and mitigating?

Arbor would be the best bid, apart from Arbor, Palo Alto and Fortinet have good solutions. As this is an ISP, I would prefer Arbor.

See all answers

What do you like most about Fortinet FortiDDoS?

The product's initial setup phase was really easy.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Fortinet FortiDDoS?

Fortinet FortiDDoS offers lower costs compared to other solutions. The licensing costs are annually renewed.

See all answers

Comparisons

Cloudflare vs AWS Shield

Compared 24% of the time

Azure DDoS Protection vs AWS Shield

Compared 20% of the time

Cloudflare One vs AWS Shield

Compared 16% of the time

Radware DDoS vs AWS Shield

Compared 8% of the time

Link11 vs AWS Shield

Compared 3% of the time

More AWS Shield Competitors

Arbor DDoS vs Fortinet FortiDDoS

Compared 21% of the time

Radware DDoS vs Fortinet FortiDDoS

Compared 10% of the time

Cloudflare vs Fortinet FortiDDoS

Compared 9% of the time

VMware NSX vs Fortinet FortiDDoS

Compared 8% of the time

A10 Thunder TPS vs Fortinet FortiDDoS

Compared 4% of the time

More Fortinet FortiDDoS Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

AWS Shield

January 2026

Download AWS Shield product report

Buyer's Guide

Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection

January 2026

Download Fortinet FortiDDoS product report

Also Known As

No data available

Fortinet DDoS, FortiDDos

Overview

AWS Shield is a managed Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) protection service that safeguards applications running on AWS. AWS Shield provides always-on detection and automatic inline mitigations that minimize application downtime and latency, so there is no need to engage AWS Support to benefit from DDoS protection.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attacks are ever-evolving and use a variety of technologies. To successfully combat these attacks, you need a dynamic, multi-layered security solution. FortiDDoS protects from both known and zero day attacks with very low latency. It’s easy to deploy and manage, and includes comprehensive reporting and analysis tools.

Fortinet

Sample Customers

netflix, dow jones, mapbox, pearson, rovio, youview, moviestar planet, asurion, payplug, hour of code

Black Gold Regional Schools, Amadeus Hospitality, Jefferson County, Chunghwa Telecom, City of Boroondara, Dimension Data

Buyer's Guide

AWS Shield vs. Fortinet FortiDDoS

December 2025

Free Report: AWS Shield vs. Fortinet FortiDDoS

Find out what your peers are saying about AWS Shield vs. Fortinet FortiDDoS and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our AWS Shield vs. Fortinet FortiDDoS report.

See our list of best Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection vendors.

We monitor all Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.