Axonius vs Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management comparison

Axonius and Qualys are both solutions in the Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM) category. Axonius is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.4, while Qualys is ranked #3 with an average rating of 9.0. Axonius holds a 28.2% mindshare in CASM, compared to Qualys’s 10.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Axonius users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 97% of Qualys users who would recommend it.

Axonius

Read 8 Axonius reviews

2,627 Views
1,734 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Qualys CyberSecurity Asset ...

Read 35 Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management reviews

3,574 Views
572 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

Axonius

Qualys CyberSecurity Asset ...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 2, 2025

Axonius and Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management are competing in the asset management category. Axonius may have the upper hand due to its ease of deployment and cost-effectiveness, while Qualys offers extensive features that justify its higher price.

Features: Axonius impresses with automation, a broad integration ecosystem, and asset management capabilities that ease data correlation. Its agentless design allows seamless integration, backed by up to 900 connections. Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management excels in vulnerability management and threat detection. It uses dynamic tags for asset management, asset purge rules for effective data handling, and offers deep visibility into asset data through passive sensors.

Room for Improvement: Axonius could enhance its reporting capabilities for more detailed analytical insights. Improved machine-learning features could also provide better customization and precision. Further development in query building for non-technical users could enrich its functionality. Qualys needs to simplify its setup process to accommodate less technical teams, address occasional slow support response times, and reduce false positives in vulnerability scanning.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Axonius leads with a straightforward deployment process and high-quality customer support, easing integration with minimal hassle. Qualys' advanced features necessitate a more complex deployment, potentially requiring more resources, but it delivers effective customer assistance, albeit with potentially longer resolution times due to system complexity.

Pricing and ROI: Axonius attracts budget-conscious organizations with lower initial costs and quick ROI, thanks to its efficient integration and management functions. Qualys requires a higher initial investment but promises substantial ROI through its robust feature set, benefiting organizations seeking comprehensive asset and vulnerability management solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed Axonius vs. Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Axonius vs. Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Axonius

Ranking in Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM)

2nd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

IT Vendor Risk Management (5th)

Qualys CyberSecurity Asset ...

Ranking in Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM)

3rd

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Vulnerability Management (7th), Patch Management (4th), Attack Surface Management (ASM) (2nd), Software Supply Chain Security (4th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM) category, the mindshare of Axonius is 28.2%, down from 36.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management is 10.5%, up from 5.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Axonius	28.2%
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management	10.5%
Other	61.3%

Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM)

Featured Reviews

Sakkemgari Tamagari

Director of cloud security at Nuxeo

Centralized asset tracking has transformed governance and now speeds incident response

I would add that currently, the tool supports some integrations, but we would expect it to support broader integration with other security tools, observability, or any other cloud integrations. One area Axonius can be improved is its integration process, as it is not straightforward; there is a lot involved in cloning the instance and other hard changes that I expect to be fully automated, suggesting an agentless method instead of utilizing agents, which feels somewhat legacy but could be improved. The user interface needs improvement because it is a bit laggy sometimes, making it not straightforward when we want to identify things quickly, leading us to go in different directions which could be better tied together in one place.

Read full review

Arshad N. R.

Cyber Security Specialist at UBS Financial

Customized dashboards and quick deployment support comprehensive asset management

We use the True Risk Score for vulnerability prioritization, though we do not solely rely upon it since some assets may be decommissioned soon or not in use. From Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management, we primarily focus on internet-facing assets. We have created separate tasks for internet-facing assets and track the True Risk dashboard specifically for these assets. If the True Risk Score is higher for any internet-facing assets, then we take action accordingly. The True Risk Score is very helpful for prioritization. The initial setup was straightforward and easy. We needed to create customized tags, group them twice, and validate whether the operating system detection was true positive or false positive. We encountered some false positives, which required coordination with the IT team for verification. In six months, we had approximately 20-25 machines that needed verification on a weekly basis. We coordinated with the IT team to identify the exact operating system specifications.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"With this solution in place, we are now 100% compliant along with security functions or operations area management."

"Axonius provides preconfigured dashboards that can be customized to your needs."

"Overall, I would rate Axonius an eight out of ten."

"The solution's technical support was good...The product's initial setup phase is pretty straightforward."

"he best feature I found in Axonius is that it shows us the duration of eCheck, and it shows us what device is down and in which part of the system life cycle or the checking part the system is down in."

"The automation capabilities in Axonius have streamlined our security operations."

"I like that the tool has a user-friendly interface. It helps organizations and big companies improve business requirements and control processes."

"The support has been excellent; they are responsive and effectively bring in the appropriate resources to help solve problems."

"The comprehensive view that Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management gives us on our assets enables us to go to a single screen and get a good idea of our holistic asset count."

"Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management offers valuable features such as continuous vendor support, rapid response times, dedicated vendor partnerships, and advanced technical capabilities for risk identification."

"Overall, I would give Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management a nine out of ten."

"I would rate Qualys CSAM a ten out of ten."

"Authorized and unauthorized software visibility is the best feature for me. It helps me understand security controls on our network and where we lack visibility. With a single security tool, we are able to get an extensive list."

"We have had zero attacks since we enabled all the features in Qualys CSAM."

"The end-of-life and end-of-service software and hardware are some of my favorite features."

More Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management pros

Cons

"Adding more detailed descriptions or YouTube videos about specific features would help improve the application."

"Regarding the improvement of Axonius, it goes halfway for both the tool and the user. If we set it up quickly from our end, and if the AD groups and all other groups assigned to tag the assets have been tagged correctly, Axonius could not show an error."

"One area Axonius can be improved is its integration process, as it is not straightforward; there is a lot involved in cloning the instance and other hard changes that I expect to be fully automated, suggesting an agentless method instead of utilizing agents, which feels somewhat legacy but could be improved."

"For us, the product's deployment phase was a little challenging because we had to deal with other departments and business units."

"Axonius could improve by increasing their integrations with more technology vendors."

"Axonius can improve on delivering compliance-related features."

"For Axonius, I would suggest supporting more ticketing platforms and enhancing API integration directly into the platform rather than just the connector. This would allow for better integration from different systems, possibly into workflows, which I think is currently lacking."

"We can have fetch cycle issues."

"I think the one thing Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management can do better is the package management and the updating process."

"Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management could be more cost-effective by offering a lower price point or integrating with existing VMDR features."

"We encountered some false positives, which required coordination with the IT team for verification."

"There can be further simplification to reduce the overall noise and provide ESAM-related data."

"It is automatically exporting the vulnerabilities and the assets. However, it would be useful to have the ability to select or to filter which we would like to export."

"The Qualys CAPS service requires further exploration and improvement, particularly in its handling of protocols and reactivity with MAC and IP addresses for CAP agents."

"Sometimes both updates and software types appear together on one list, making it hard to differentiate."

"In our reporting, we faced a challenge syncing with cloud devices."

More Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Axonius is quite a bit cheaper compared to other solutions."

"We are on a subscription model with them."

"Though the solution is considered expensive, if bundled with other services such as VMDR or cloud agents, its value would significantly increase. It is currently a bit costly, but with bundling, it could become attractive to more customers."

"Qualys offers excellent value for money."

"Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management can be expensive, especially if we already have VMDR."

"The pricing is reasonable relative to the features provided, as it collects all module data and operates as a main, centralized inventory, making it a cost-effective solution."

"The cost for Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management is high."

"The pricing is fair. I would love to see the price come down a little bit, but we do get a lot of value out of it. We are squeezing every ounce of value we can out of the tool."

"The pricing for Qualys CSAM is nominal."

"The pricing for Qualys Cybersecurity Asset Management is reasonable, with an annual subscription costing around $1,000 per year or a monthly subscription starting at approximately $72 per month, depending on the specific package and features included."

More Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Computer Software Company

Government

Computer Software Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	4

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	23

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Axonius?

I think I am good so far with the pricing, setup cost, and licensing; I do not see any disturbances there, but it is working well.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Axonius?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Axonius?

My main use case for Axonius is config management and asset inventory. I use Axonius to maintain the asset inventory up to date and also to identify the owners quickly; these are the primary requir...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management?

I'm not entirely sure about the pricing; I don't know.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management?

I think the one thing Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management can do better is the package management and the updating process. Knowing that you can't update any of the packages until you've done the...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management?

I primarily use it for a small, single-site, multi-source setup with multi-WAN inputs. I have a main fiber connection and a couple of failovers while managing different networks across different se...

See all answers

Comparisons

Armis vs Axonius

Compared 27% of the time

ServiceNow vs Axonius

Compared 12% of the time

JupiterOne vs Axonius

Compared 10% of the time

runZero vs Axonius

Compared 6% of the time

Armis Centrix™ for Asset Management and Security vs Axonius

Compared 4% of the time

More Axonius Competitors

Armis vs Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management

Compared 7% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management

Compared 6% of the time

Amazon Inspector vs Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management

Compared 4% of the time

Bitsight vs Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management

Compared 4% of the time

runZero vs Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management

Compared 4% of the time

More Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Axonius

January 2026

Download Axonius product report

Buyer's Guide

Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management

January 2026

Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management report

Download Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management product report

Overview

Axonius offers robust asset management, enhancing network visibility by consolidating data from various devices. It excels in automatic device categorization for up-to-date inventories, crucial for compliance and risk assessments. Key features include automated policy enforcement and comprehensive reporting tools, which streamline workflows and improve organizational productivity and security compliance. Integrations with other IT tools further enhance its efficiency.

Axonius

Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management provides key features including asset inventory management, end-of-life tracking, dynamic tagging, and integration with CMDB, offering extensive visibility and support for proactive threat response.

Qualys offers comprehensive visibility across hardware and software assets, aiding in tracking unauthorized applications and facilitating automated vulnerability remediation. Its user-friendly interface and dynamic risk scoring enhance security posture management. Users leverage it for vulnerability management and compliance, benefiting from real-time risk identification and efficient operations in cloud and on-premises environments.

What are the key features of Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management?

Asset Inventory Management: Provides detailed visibility over hardware and software assets.
End-of-Life Tracking: Helps identify technical debt by pinpointing outdated hardware and software.
Dynamic Tagging: Allows flexible classification and categorization of assets.
Real-Time Risk Identification: Detects risks as they arise, enhancing threat response capabilities.
CMDB Integration: Streamlines data integration for comprehensive asset insights.

What benefits should users look for in Qualys reviews?

Improved Security Posture: Enables proactive threat management and streamlined operations.
Efficient Remediation: Automates vulnerability management and patch deployment.
User-Friendly Operations: Simplifies cybersecurity operations with an intuitive interface.
Comprehensive Asset Visibility: Offers unparalleled insight into organizational assets.
Scalable Solutions: Facilitates asset tracking across cloud and on-premises environments.

Cybersecurity teams in various industries, such as financial services, healthcare, and manufacturing, utilize Qualys to manage technical debt through end-of-life tracking and facilitate robust patch management. It supports compliance and visibility initiatives, essential for maintaining data integrity and operational security in dynamic environments.

Qualys

Sample Customers

Extreme Engineering Solutions, AppsFlyer, Landmark Health, Natera

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Axonius vs. Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management

December 2025

Free Report: Axonius vs. Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management

Find out what your peers are saying about Axonius vs. Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Axonius vs. Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management report.

See our list of best Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM) vendors.

We monitor all Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.