Axonius vs Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Axonius and Qualys are both solutions in the Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM) category. Axonius is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.8, while Qualys is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.9. Axonius holds a 27.3% mindshare in CASM, compared to Qualys’s 10.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Axonius users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 97% of Qualys users who would recommend it.

Axonius

Read 11 Axonius reviews

6,681 Views
4,677 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Qualys CyberSecurity Asset ...

Read 35 Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management reviews

9,529 Views
1,334 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

Axonius

Qualys CyberSecurity Asset ...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 8, 2026

Axonius and Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management are competitors in the asset management sector, each excelling in distinct areas. Axonius holds an advantage in ease of integration and automation, while Qualys stands out with superior security features.

Features: Axonius offers integration capabilities with APIs for effortless connectivity across platforms, enabling streamlined data management and automation. It supports over 900 integrations, assists in deduplication and asset management, and features customizable dashboards for comprehensive insights. Qualys provides comprehensive security features like vulnerability management, external attack surface management, and a robust inventory system that manages assets through cloud agents. It enhances asset discovery, compliance, and vulnerability assessment with integrated tagging and dynamic updates.

Room for Improvement: Axonius could improve by expanding machine-learning functionalities and simplifying complex query building. It might also enhance its real-time analytics and integration stability with newer platforms. Qualys can work on reducing false positives and making its interface more intuitive. Streamlining the initial setup and tagging processes could improve user engagement. Better training resources could also aid in smoother platform utilization.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Axonius provides quick deployment processes with strong customer support, focusing on ease of onboarding and user satisfaction. Its agentless solution simplifies network integration. Qualys offers a thorough deployment model with detailed documentation and technical assistance, though it may be more time-consuming. The comprehensive support compensates for the complexity, offering dedicated technical help to users.

Pricing and ROI: Axonius presents competitive pricing with efficient integrations reducing operational costs and delivering a quick ROI. Its automation capabilities provide cost advantages to users. Qualys, though potentially more expensive initially, offers significant ROI through its extensive security features, improving organizational security posture over time. Its comprehensive asset management delivers lasting value for businesses focused on enhanced security standards.

To learn more, read our detailed Axonius vs. Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Axonius vs. Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 913,924 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Axonius

Ranking in Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM)

3rd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

IT Vendor Risk Management (7th)

Qualys CyberSecurity Asset ...

Ranking in Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM)

2nd

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Vulnerability Management (8th), Patch Management (5th), Attack Surface Management (ASM) (2nd), Software Supply Chain Security (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM) category, the mindshare of Axonius is 27.3%, down from 32.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management is 10.0%, down from 10.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management	10.0%
Axonius	27.3%
Other	62.7%

Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM)

Featured Reviews

Zhtay Zhtay

senior security engineer at a educational organization with 5,001-10,000 employees

Asset discovery has transformed how we find unprotected devices and deploy endpoint defenses

The best features Axonius offers, in my opinion, are asset discovery, finding rogue devices, and vulnerability management. When I mention device discovery and management, the speed of discovery, the level of detail, and network-level discovery stand out to me. Axonius has positively impacted my organization significantly, as we discover thousands upon thousands of devices that don't have EDR tools, which means they are not protected. With Axonius, we were able to find them and deploy the EDR tool that they needed. I can share that we found about the Linux servers and Windows servers, hundreds of them, that were deployed. They were re-imaged and didn't have an EDR tool, and the integration with other tools proved that these devices are live on our network, and they just don't have a specific tool that we need to deploy to them.

Read full review

Christopher Mateski

SENIOR MANAGER, CYBERSECURITY THREAT, RISK & ARCHITECTURE at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees

Has accelerated vulnerability remediation by syncing with asset ownership data

Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management has Qualys Query Language that works within itself. However, when switching to other modules the QQL either doesn't work or requires a different query to access the information, including in dashboards. They need to make their query language universal across the entire product so when using one module and making a query, it doesn't require changing the query to work in another module.The stability has decreased significantly on the product in the last couple of months. It takes considerable time to log into the product, and sometimes access is denied. Screens take long to load and occasionally crash. The product stability has notably declined over the last two months, and the performance to fulfill a page request is very slow compared to its previous performance.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"In comparing Axonius to other products, I believe its main competitors on the market offer similar functionalities, but my experience with other solutions has shown me that Axonius stands out."

"he best feature I found in Axonius is that it shows us the duration of eCheck, and it shows us what device is down and in which part of the system life cycle or the checking part the system is down in."

"The solution's technical support was good...The product's initial setup phase is pretty straightforward."

"Axonius has positively impacted my organization significantly, as we discover thousands upon thousands of devices that don't have EDR tools, which means they are not protected."

"I like that the tool has a user-friendly interface. It helps organizations and big companies improve business requirements and control processes."

"Overall, I would rate Axonius an eight out of ten."

"Axonius provides preconfigured dashboards that can be customized to your needs."

"Axonius offers excellent features including ease of use, the ability to ingest all assets at one central display, creating multiple visualization dashboards, the ability to create an enforcement center to complete tasks and support the program, and support for government operations."

More Axonius pros

"ESAM covers the entire attack surface, discovers more, and provides complete details about the assets, such as the external interface and internal interface, correlating them so we get the complete details of the assets, which were not given by the other solution."

"When you implement a dynamic tag using a query, you do not need to manually tag all the servers. It categorizes all the servers that come under that query. The tagging part is automatically done within a few minutes. It reduces the effort."

"I really enjoy the flexibility of the interface setup configuration for my network VLANs, which makes it very easy to configure."

"I would rate Qualys CSAM a ten out of ten."

"Overall, I would give Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management a nine out of ten."

"With Qualys CSAM, we can see which assets have critical application vulnerabilities. This feature helps us prioritize and address these vulnerabilities more efficiently."

"Our favorite features are the tagging and the ability to quickly find assets in the portal."

"The dashboards are my favorite feature; I can pull up information and create my own dashboards specifically for what I'm looking for."

More Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management pros

Cons

"Adding more detailed descriptions or YouTube videos about specific features would help improve the application."

"Axonius can improve on delivering compliance-related features."

"We can have fetch cycle issues."

"Axonius needs to improve by having the ability to ingest IoT data, as customers are requesting IoT data which we are currently unable to provide."

"Axonius could improve by increasing their integrations with more technology vendors."

"I think Axonius can be improved with more integration with different third-party tools, so we can identify which tools are missing and what more we can do with these endpoint devices floating around on our network."

"One area Axonius can be improved is its integration process, as it is not straightforward; there is a lot involved in cloning the instance and other hard changes that I expect to be fully automated, suggesting an agentless method instead of utilizing agents, which feels somewhat legacy but could be improved."

"Regarding the improvement of Axonius, it goes halfway for both the tool and the user. If we set it up quickly from our end, and if the AD groups and all other groups assigned to tag the assets have been tagged correctly, Axonius could not show an error."

More Axonius cons

"We encountered some false positives, which required coordination with the IT team for verification."

"In the best practice for categorizing assets with the C-SAM module in Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management, I see potential for improvement with integration of other CMDB systems in creating a relationship with Qualys and other solutions."

"Currently, whenever the agent is running, it consumes over ten percent of my CPU, indicating that CPU consumption is another area Qualys needs to address."

"There have been a couple of times where Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management wasn't accessible and I'd reach out to our TAM and they'd say, 'Qualys is down.' They say, 'We'll let you know when it's back up.' Of course, they never let you know when it's back up."

"Qualys CSAM is not super responsive, and there can be delays sometimes, especially with the network passive sensor. You might see duplicate objects which eventually disappear but it takes time. If that can be done faster, it will be great."

"One downside of Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management is that I would prefer to see a more interactive dashboard."

"The activity log is terrible."

"The product stability has notably declined over the last two months, and the performance to fulfill a page request is very slow compared to its previous performance."

More Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Axonius is quite a bit cheaper compared to other solutions."

"We are on a subscription model with them."

"Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management can be expensive, especially if we already have VMDR."

"Qualys is competitively priced for its features. Its pricing is suitable for large organizations with more than 4,000 assets, but for smaller organizations with few assets, such as banks, the costs might be high. They should come up with packages that are suitable for small organizations."

"The pricing for Qualys Cybersecurity Asset Management is reasonable, with an annual subscription costing around $1,000 per year or a monthly subscription starting at approximately $72 per month, depending on the specific package and features included."

"The Qualys Cybersecurity Asset Management pricing is well-aligned with our usage."

"The pricing is market-competitive."

"The pricing is fair. I would love to see the price come down a little bit, but we do get a lot of value out of it. We are squeezing every ounce of value we can out of the tool."

"The pricing is reasonable relative to the features provided, as it collects all module data and operates as a main, centralized inventory, making it a cost-effective solution."

"It is cost-effective because, in a single tool, we are getting everything. All the solutions come in a single license or price."

More Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

913,924 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

11%

Outsourcing Company

Financial Services Firm

Government

Financial Services Firm

14%

Comms Service Provider

Outsourcing Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	9

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	23

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Axonius?

For pricing, I would rate it as a 7, where one represents a high price and ten represents a low price.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Axonius?

I am generally satisfied with Axonius's reporting features. The reporting part could be simplified for the end user, and it might be beneficial to have tutorials or drafts from the vendor. I want t...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Axonius?

My use case for Axonius is extensive as I utilize it in multiple processes, and I would describe the use case for Axonius as great.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management?

I'm not entirely sure about the pricing; I don't know.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management?

I think the one thing Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management can do better is the package management and the updating process. Knowing that you can't update any of the packages until you've done the...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management?

I primarily use it for a small, single-site, multi-source setup with multi-WAN inputs. I have a main fiber connection and a couple of failovers while managing different networks across different se...

See all answers

Comparisons

Armis vs Axonius

Compared 14% of the time

JupiterOne vs Axonius

Compared 9% of the time

OctoXLabs vs Axonius

Compared 7% of the time

Armis Centrix for Asset Management and Security vs Axonius

Compared 6% of the time

runZero vs Axonius

Compared 6% of the time

More Axonius Competitors

Rapid7 Metasploit vs Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management

Compared 4% of the time

Docker vs Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management

Compared 4% of the time

Armis vs Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management

Compared 4% of the time

Amazon Inspector vs Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management

Compared 3% of the time

Runecast vs Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management

Compared 3% of the time

More Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Axonius

September 2026

Download Axonius product report

Buyer's Guide

Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management

September 2026

Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management report

Download Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management product report

Overview

Axonius offers robust asset management, enhancing network visibility by consolidating data from various devices. It excels in automatic device categorization for up-to-date inventories, crucial for compliance and risk assessments. Key features include automated policy enforcement and comprehensive reporting tools, which streamline workflows and improve organizational productivity and security compliance. Integrations with other IT tools further enhance its efficiency.

Axonius

Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management provides key features including asset inventory management, end-of-life tracking, dynamic tagging, and integration with CMDB, offering extensive visibility and support for proactive threat response.

Qualys offers comprehensive visibility across hardware and software assets, aiding in tracking unauthorized applications and facilitating automated vulnerability remediation. Its user-friendly interface and dynamic risk scoring enhance security posture management. Users leverage it for vulnerability management and compliance, benefiting from real-time risk identification and efficient operations in cloud and on-premises environments.

What are the key features of Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management?

Asset Inventory Management: Provides detailed visibility over hardware and software assets.
End-of-Life Tracking: Helps identify technical debt by pinpointing outdated hardware and software.
Dynamic Tagging: Allows flexible classification and categorization of assets.
Real-Time Risk Identification: Detects risks as they arise, enhancing threat response capabilities.
CMDB Integration: Streamlines data integration for comprehensive asset insights.

What benefits should users look for in Qualys reviews?

Improved Security Posture: Enables proactive threat management and streamlined operations.
Efficient Remediation: Automates vulnerability management and patch deployment.
User-Friendly Operations: Simplifies cybersecurity operations with an intuitive interface.
Comprehensive Asset Visibility: Offers unparalleled insight into organizational assets.
Scalable Solutions: Facilitates asset tracking across cloud and on-premises environments.

Cybersecurity teams in various industries, such as financial services, healthcare, and manufacturing, utilize Qualys to manage technical debt through end-of-life tracking and facilitate robust patch management. It supports compliance and visibility initiatives, essential for maintaining data integrity and operational security in dynamic environments.

Qualys

Sample Customers

Extreme Engineering Solutions, AppsFlyer, Landmark Health, Natera

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Axonius vs. Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management

August 2026

Free Report: Axonius vs. Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management

Find out what your peers are saying about Axonius vs. Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

913,924 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Axonius vs. Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management report.

See our list of best Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM) vendors.

We monitor all Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.