Axonius vs Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management comparison

Axonius and Qualys are both solutions in the Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM) category. Axonius is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.5, while Qualys is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.9. Axonius holds a 28.4% mindshare in CASM, compared to Qualys’s 10.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Axonius users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 97% of Qualys users who would recommend it.

Axonius

Read 9 Axonius reviews

5,868 Views
4,108 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Qualys CyberSecurity Asset ...

Read 35 Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management reviews

7,601 Views
1,216 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

Axonius

Qualys CyberSecurity Asset ...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 8, 2026

Axonius and Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management are competitors in the asset management sector, each excelling in distinct areas. Axonius holds an advantage in ease of integration and automation, while Qualys stands out with superior security features.

Features: Axonius offers integration capabilities with APIs for effortless connectivity across platforms, enabling streamlined data management and automation. It supports over 900 integrations, assists in deduplication and asset management, and features customizable dashboards for comprehensive insights. Qualys provides comprehensive security features like vulnerability management, external attack surface management, and a robust inventory system that manages assets through cloud agents. It enhances asset discovery, compliance, and vulnerability assessment with integrated tagging and dynamic updates.

Room for Improvement: Axonius could improve by expanding machine-learning functionalities and simplifying complex query building. It might also enhance its real-time analytics and integration stability with newer platforms. Qualys can work on reducing false positives and making its interface more intuitive. Streamlining the initial setup and tagging processes could improve user engagement. Better training resources could also aid in smoother platform utilization.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Axonius provides quick deployment processes with strong customer support, focusing on ease of onboarding and user satisfaction. Its agentless solution simplifies network integration. Qualys offers a thorough deployment model with detailed documentation and technical assistance, though it may be more time-consuming. The comprehensive support compensates for the complexity, offering dedicated technical help to users.

Pricing and ROI: Axonius presents competitive pricing with efficient integrations reducing operational costs and delivering a quick ROI. Its automation capabilities provide cost advantages to users. Qualys, though potentially more expensive initially, offers significant ROI through its extensive security features, improving organizational security posture over time. Its comprehensive asset management delivers lasting value for businesses focused on enhanced security standards.

To learn more, read our detailed Axonius vs. Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Axonius vs. Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 900,747 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Axonius

Ranking in Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM)

1st

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

IT Vendor Risk Management (4th)

Qualys CyberSecurity Asset ...

Ranking in Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM)

3rd

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Vulnerability Management (6th), Patch Management (5th), Attack Surface Management (ASM) (3rd), Software Supply Chain Security (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM) category, the mindshare of Axonius is 28.4%, down from 35.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management is 10.3%, up from 7.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Axonius	28.4%
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management	10.3%
Other	61.3%

Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM)

Featured Reviews

Sakkemgari Tamagari

Director of cloud security at Nuxeo

Centralized asset tracking has transformed governance and now speeds incident response

I would add that currently, the tool supports some integrations, but we would expect it to support broader integration with other security tools, observability, or any other cloud integrations. One area Axonius can be improved is its integration process, as it is not straightforward; there is a lot involved in cloning the instance and other hard changes that I expect to be fully automated, suggesting an agentless method instead of utilizing agents, which feels somewhat legacy but could be improved. The user interface needs improvement because it is a bit laggy sometimes, making it not straightforward when we want to identify things quickly, leading us to go in different directions which could be better tied together in one place.

Read full review

Nicki Møller

Information Security Engineer at a manufacturing company with 5,001-10,000 employees

Enables automation and quick access to necessary information

One of the significant challenges Qualys is discovery, which I know Microsoft excels at. I can't recall how well Qualys performs this function; it seems I might be missing some details. However, if there's one key aspect to focus on, it's discovery—the ability to identify assets that you are not aware of, even when you can see they are present. Understanding what those assets are is crucial. With Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management, it was very difficult to extract detections from the system. The features within Qualys are limited to what they have developed. Sometimes a complete overview is needed to push to a Power BI dashboard, Splunk, ServiceNow, or other platforms. The export process is incredibly challenging. We needed a developer to write a hundred-line Python script that would loop over certain assets due to export limitations. Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management could improve its integration capabilities. While it generates substantial data, correlating it with other data sources can be challenging. The export process is difficult, and pre-built integrations with other tools could be enhanced for better process implementation.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution's technical support was good...The product's initial setup phase is pretty straightforward."

"he best feature I found in Axonius is that it shows us the duration of eCheck, and it shows us what device is down and in which part of the system life cycle or the checking part the system is down in."

"In comparing Axonius to other products, I believe its main competitors on the market offer similar functionalities, but my experience with other solutions has shown me that Axonius stands out."

"Overall, I would rate Axonius an eight out of ten."

"With this solution in place, we are now 100% compliant along with security functions or operations area management."

"Axonius provides preconfigured dashboards that can be customized to your needs."

"I like that the tool has a user-friendly interface. It helps organizations and big companies improve business requirements and control processes."

"The automation capabilities in Axonius have streamlined our security operations."

"The most valuable feature is the real-time visibility Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management provides into all assets across our development and operational environments."

"Tags are very useful for us since we can tag virus applications in infrastructure types such as databases, operating systems, or web platforms."

"Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management provides accurate content that identifies all the endpoints, making it better in that way, and the review results for finding vulnerabilities and reporting also show that it identifies most of them, helping us complete tasks in 3.5 days instead of five."

"Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management offers comprehensive features to cover our entire attack surface."

"Getting different kinds of modules and inventory in one solution is good enough."

"ESAM covers the entire attack surface, discovers more, and provides complete details about the assets, such as the external interface and internal interface, correlating them so we get the complete details of the assets, which were not given by the other solution."

"Authorized and unauthorized software visibility is the best feature for me."

"I would rate Qualys CSAM a ten out of ten."

More Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management pros

Cons

"We can have fetch cycle issues."

"Axonius could improve by increasing their integrations with more technology vendors."

"For Axonius, I would suggest supporting more ticketing platforms and enhancing API integration directly into the platform rather than just the connector. This would allow for better integration from different systems, possibly into workflows, which I think is currently lacking."

"Regarding the improvement of Axonius, it goes halfway for both the tool and the user. If we set it up quickly from our end, and if the AD groups and all other groups assigned to tag the assets have been tagged correctly, Axonius could not show an error."

"Adding more detailed descriptions or YouTube videos about specific features would help improve the application."

"Axonius can improve on delivering compliance-related features."

"For us, the product's deployment phase was a little challenging because we had to deal with other departments and business units."

"One area Axonius can be improved is its integration process, as it is not straightforward; there is a lot involved in cloning the instance and other hard changes that I expect to be fully automated, suggesting an agentless method instead of utilizing agents, which feels somewhat legacy but could be improved."

"There can be further simplification to reduce the overall noise and provide ESAM-related data."

"In our reporting, we faced a challenge syncing with cloud devices."

"The main aspect that needs improvement is the user interface, which should be more intuitive."

"The Qualys CAPS service requires further exploration and improvement, particularly in its handling of protocols and reactivity with MAC and IP addresses for CAP agents."

"Currently, whenever the agent is running, it consumes over ten percent of my CPU, indicating that CPU consumption is another area Qualys needs to address."

"The product stability has notably declined over the last two months, and the performance to fulfill a page request is very slow compared to its previous performance."

"It is automatically exporting the vulnerabilities and the assets. However, it would be useful to have the ability to select or to filter which we would like to export."

"All required features are available in Qualys CSAM. However, it would be helpful if Qualys CSAM started incorporating AI models. An inclusion of threat details for AI and LLM-related risks would be beneficial."

More Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Axonius is quite a bit cheaper compared to other solutions."

"We are on a subscription model with them."

"Qualys is competitively priced for its features. Its pricing is suitable for large organizations with more than 4,000 assets, but for smaller organizations with few assets, such as banks, the costs might be high. They should come up with packages that are suitable for small organizations."

"The pricing is reasonable relative to the features provided, as it collects all module data and operates as a main, centralized inventory, making it a cost-effective solution."

"It is cost-effective because, in a single tool, we are getting everything. All the solutions come in a single license or price."

"The cost for Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management is high."

"Though the solution is considered expensive, if bundled with other services such as VMDR or cloud agents, its value would significantly increase. It is currently a bit costly, but with bundling, it could become attractive to more customers."

"The Qualys Cybersecurity Asset Management pricing is well-aligned with our usage."

"The pricing is fair. I would love to see the price come down a little bit, but we do get a lot of value out of it. We are squeezing every ounce of value we can out of the tool."

"The pricing is market-competitive."

More Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

900,747 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

Government

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	6

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	23

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Axonius?

For pricing, I would rate it as a 7, where one represents a high price and ten represents a low price.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Axonius?

I am generally satisfied with Axonius's reporting features. The reporting part could be simplified for the end user, and it might be beneficial to have tutorials or drafts from the vendor. I want t...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Axonius?

My use case for Axonius is extensive as I utilize it in multiple processes, and I would describe the use case for Axonius as great.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management?

I'm not entirely sure about the pricing; I don't know.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management?

I think the one thing Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management can do better is the package management and the updating process. Knowing that you can't update any of the packages until you've done the...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management?

I primarily use it for a small, single-site, multi-source setup with multi-WAN inputs. I have a main fiber connection and a couple of failovers while managing different networks across different se...

See all answers

Comparisons

Armis vs Axonius

Compared 14% of the time

JupiterOne vs Axonius

Compared 8% of the time

Armis Centrix™ for Asset Management and Security vs Axonius

Compared 6% of the time

OctoXLabs vs Axonius

Compared 6% of the time

runZero vs Axonius

Compared 6% of the time

More Axonius Competitors

Armis vs Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management

Compared 5% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management

Compared 4% of the time

Bitsight vs Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management

Compared 4% of the time

Rapid7 Metasploit vs Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management

Compared 4% of the time

Amazon Inspector vs Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management

Compared 3% of the time

More Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Axonius

June 2026

Download Axonius product report

Buyer's Guide

Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management

June 2026

Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management report

Download Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management product report

Overview

Axonius offers robust asset management, enhancing network visibility by consolidating data from various devices. It excels in automatic device categorization for up-to-date inventories, crucial for compliance and risk assessments. Key features include automated policy enforcement and comprehensive reporting tools, which streamline workflows and improve organizational productivity and security compliance. Integrations with other IT tools further enhance its efficiency.

Axonius

Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management provides key features including asset inventory management, end-of-life tracking, dynamic tagging, and integration with CMDB, offering extensive visibility and support for proactive threat response.

Qualys offers comprehensive visibility across hardware and software assets, aiding in tracking unauthorized applications and facilitating automated vulnerability remediation. Its user-friendly interface and dynamic risk scoring enhance security posture management. Users leverage it for vulnerability management and compliance, benefiting from real-time risk identification and efficient operations in cloud and on-premises environments.

What are the key features of Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management?

Asset Inventory Management: Provides detailed visibility over hardware and software assets.
End-of-Life Tracking: Helps identify technical debt by pinpointing outdated hardware and software.
Dynamic Tagging: Allows flexible classification and categorization of assets.
Real-Time Risk Identification: Detects risks as they arise, enhancing threat response capabilities.
CMDB Integration: Streamlines data integration for comprehensive asset insights.

What benefits should users look for in Qualys reviews?

Improved Security Posture: Enables proactive threat management and streamlined operations.
Efficient Remediation: Automates vulnerability management and patch deployment.
User-Friendly Operations: Simplifies cybersecurity operations with an intuitive interface.
Comprehensive Asset Visibility: Offers unparalleled insight into organizational assets.
Scalable Solutions: Facilitates asset tracking across cloud and on-premises environments.

Cybersecurity teams in various industries, such as financial services, healthcare, and manufacturing, utilize Qualys to manage technical debt through end-of-life tracking and facilitate robust patch management. It supports compliance and visibility initiatives, essential for maintaining data integrity and operational security in dynamic environments.

Qualys

Sample Customers

Extreme Engineering Solutions, AppsFlyer, Landmark Health, Natera

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Axonius vs. Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management

April 2026

Free Report: Axonius vs. Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management

Find out what your peers are saying about Axonius vs. Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

900,747 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Axonius vs. Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management report.

See our list of best Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM) vendors.

We monitor all Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.