Axonius vs Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management comparison

Axonius and Qualys are both solutions in the Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM) category. Axonius is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.4, while Qualys is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.9. Axonius holds a 28.5% mindshare in CASM, compared to Qualys’s 10.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Axonius users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 97% of Qualys users who would recommend it.

Axonius

Read 8 Axonius reviews

3,061 Views
2,020 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Qualys CyberSecurity Asset ...

Read 35 Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management reviews

4,290 Views
729 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

Axonius

Qualys CyberSecurity Asset ...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 8, 2026

Axonius and Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management are competitors in the asset management sector, each excelling in distinct areas. Axonius holds an advantage in ease of integration and automation, while Qualys stands out with superior security features.

Features: Axonius offers integration capabilities with APIs for effortless connectivity across platforms, enabling streamlined data management and automation. It supports over 900 integrations, assists in deduplication and asset management, and features customizable dashboards for comprehensive insights. Qualys provides comprehensive security features like vulnerability management, external attack surface management, and a robust inventory system that manages assets through cloud agents. It enhances asset discovery, compliance, and vulnerability assessment with integrated tagging and dynamic updates.

Room for Improvement: Axonius could improve by expanding machine-learning functionalities and simplifying complex query building. It might also enhance its real-time analytics and integration stability with newer platforms. Qualys can work on reducing false positives and making its interface more intuitive. Streamlining the initial setup and tagging processes could improve user engagement. Better training resources could also aid in smoother platform utilization.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Axonius provides quick deployment processes with strong customer support, focusing on ease of onboarding and user satisfaction. Its agentless solution simplifies network integration. Qualys offers a thorough deployment model with detailed documentation and technical assistance, though it may be more time-consuming. The comprehensive support compensates for the complexity, offering dedicated technical help to users.

Pricing and ROI: Axonius presents competitive pricing with efficient integrations reducing operational costs and delivering a quick ROI. Its automation capabilities provide cost advantages to users. Qualys, though potentially more expensive initially, offers significant ROI through its extensive security features, improving organizational security posture over time. Its comprehensive asset management delivers lasting value for businesses focused on enhanced security standards.

To learn more, read our detailed Axonius vs. Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Axonius vs. Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,733 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Axonius

Ranking in Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM)

1st

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

IT Vendor Risk Management (5th)

Qualys CyberSecurity Asset ...

Ranking in Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM)

2nd

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Vulnerability Management (9th), Patch Management (4th), Attack Surface Management (ASM) (2nd), Software Supply Chain Security (3rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM) category, the mindshare of Axonius is 28.5%, down from 36.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management is 10.9%, up from 5.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Axonius	28.5%
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management	10.9%
Other	60.6%

Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM)

Featured Reviews

Sakkemgari Tamagari

Director of cloud security at Nuxeo

Centralized asset tracking has transformed governance and now speeds incident response

I would add that currently, the tool supports some integrations, but we would expect it to support broader integration with other security tools, observability, or any other cloud integrations. One area Axonius can be improved is its integration process, as it is not straightforward; there is a lot involved in cloning the instance and other hard changes that I expect to be fully automated, suggesting an agentless method instead of utilizing agents, which feels somewhat legacy but could be improved. The user interface needs improvement because it is a bit laggy sometimes, making it not straightforward when we want to identify things quickly, leading us to go in different directions which could be better tied together in one place.

Read full review

Arshad N. R.

Cyber Security Specialist at UBS Financial

Customized dashboards and quick deployment support comprehensive asset management

We use the True Risk Score for vulnerability prioritization, though we do not solely rely upon it since some assets may be decommissioned soon or not in use. From Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management, we primarily focus on internet-facing assets. We have created separate tasks for internet-facing assets and track the True Risk dashboard specifically for these assets. If the True Risk Score is higher for any internet-facing assets, then we take action accordingly. The True Risk Score is very helpful for prioritization. The initial setup was straightforward and easy. We needed to create customized tags, group them twice, and validate whether the operating system detection was true positive or false positive. We encountered some false positives, which required coordination with the IT team for verification. In six months, we had approximately 20-25 machines that needed verification on a weekly basis. We coordinated with the IT team to identify the exact operating system specifications.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I like that the tool has a user-friendly interface. It helps organizations and big companies improve business requirements and control processes."

"Overall, I would rate Axonius an eight out of ten."

"he best feature I found in Axonius is that it shows us the duration of eCheck, and it shows us what device is down and in which part of the system life cycle or the checking part the system is down in."

"The automation capabilities in Axonius have streamlined our security operations."

"The solution's technical support was good...The product's initial setup phase is pretty straightforward."

"With this solution in place, we are now 100% compliant along with security functions or operations area management."

"Axonius provides preconfigured dashboards that can be customized to your needs."

"I use it primarily with tagging, asset counts, and groups that we can put them in, and we also use it to tell if a device has been merged and seen in Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management, so that's beneficial for us too."

"Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management offers comprehensive features to cover our entire attack surface."

"I recommend Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management due to its superior asset information collection capabilities, including comprehensive hardware and software inventorying."

"We have had zero attacks since we enabled all the features in Qualys CSAM."

"I would rate the Qualys CSAM a ten out of ten for its overall performance."

"It provides most of the information needed regarding the assets, including the operating system and whether the assets are network devices or servers."

"The most valuable features of Qualys CSAM include the ability to manage authorized and unauthorized applications efficiently. This feature helps in validating applications and maintaining a secure environment."

"Overall, I would give Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management a nine out of ten."

More Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management pros

Cons

"For Axonius, I would suggest supporting more ticketing platforms and enhancing API integration directly into the platform rather than just the connector. This would allow for better integration from different systems, possibly into workflows, which I think is currently lacking."

"Axonius could improve by increasing their integrations with more technology vendors."

"We can have fetch cycle issues."

"Axonius can improve on delivering compliance-related features."

"For us, the product's deployment phase was a little challenging because we had to deal with other departments and business units."

"Adding more detailed descriptions or YouTube videos about specific features would help improve the application."

"Regarding the improvement of Axonius, it goes halfway for both the tool and the user. If we set it up quickly from our end, and if the AD groups and all other groups assigned to tag the assets have been tagged correctly, Axonius could not show an error."

"One area Axonius can be improved is its integration process, as it is not straightforward; there is a lot involved in cloning the instance and other hard changes that I expect to be fully automated, suggesting an agentless method instead of utilizing agents, which feels somewhat legacy but could be improved."

"We encountered some false positives, which required coordination with the IT team for verification."

"The deployment is somewhat complicated and could be made more user-friendly for most users."

"The UI and menu navigation has improved significantly, however, the menus could still be clunky, making navigation within the assets challenging."

"We have had challenges modifying the agent configuration. Particularly, when we want to change the tenant that the agent is pointing to, we have had difficulties making that reliable and working properly."

"Further research and development are needed to enhance integration with other cloud agents and products, particularly improving communication with external products and vendors."

"They should address the false positives generated in EASM. It is fetching assets that have Infosys as the keyword. They should fix that."

"The main aspect that needs improvement is the user interface, which should be more intuitive."

"Based on the company's budget, Qualys offers limited features, which can also be utilized in other environments."

More Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Axonius is quite a bit cheaper compared to other solutions."

"We are on a subscription model with them."

"The pricing for Qualys Cybersecurity Asset Management is reasonable, with an annual subscription costing around $1,000 per year or a monthly subscription starting at approximately $72 per month, depending on the specific package and features included."

"Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management can be expensive, especially if we already have VMDR."

"The pricing is market-competitive."

"Though the solution is considered expensive, if bundled with other services such as VMDR or cloud agents, its value would significantly increase. It is currently a bit costly, but with bundling, it could become attractive to more customers."

"Qualys offers excellent value for money."

"The Qualys Cybersecurity Asset Management pricing is well-aligned with our usage."

"The pricing is reasonable relative to the features provided, as it collects all module data and operates as a main, centralized inventory, making it a cost-effective solution."

"The pricing is fair. I would love to see the price come down a little bit, but we do get a lot of value out of it. We are squeezing every ounce of value we can out of the tool."

More Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

Government

Computer Software Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	4

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	23

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Axonius?

I think I am good so far with the pricing, setup cost, and licensing; I do not see any disturbances there, but it is working well.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Axonius?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Axonius?

My main use case for Axonius is config management and asset inventory. I use Axonius to maintain the asset inventory up to date and also to identify the owners quickly; these are the primary requir...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management?

I'm not entirely sure about the pricing; I don't know.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management?

I think the one thing Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management can do better is the package management and the updating process. Knowing that you can't update any of the packages until you've done the...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management?

I primarily use it for a small, single-site, multi-source setup with multi-WAN inputs. I have a main fiber connection and a couple of failovers while managing different networks across different se...

See all answers

Comparisons

Armis vs Axonius

Compared 25% of the time

ServiceNow vs Axonius

Compared 11% of the time

JupiterOne vs Axonius

Compared 10% of the time

runZero vs Axonius

Compared 7% of the time

Armis Centrix™ for Asset Management and Security vs Axonius

Compared 5% of the time

More Axonius Competitors

Armis vs Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management

Compared 7% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management

Compared 5% of the time

Amazon Inspector vs Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management

Compared 4% of the time

Bitsight vs Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management

Compared 4% of the time

runZero vs Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management

Compared 3% of the time

More Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Axonius

February 2026

Download Axonius product report

Buyer's Guide

Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management

January 2026

Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management report

Download Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management product report

Overview

Axonius offers robust asset management, enhancing network visibility by consolidating data from various devices. It excels in automatic device categorization for up-to-date inventories, crucial for compliance and risk assessments. Key features include automated policy enforcement and comprehensive reporting tools, which streamline workflows and improve organizational productivity and security compliance. Integrations with other IT tools further enhance its efficiency.

Axonius

Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management provides key features including asset inventory management, end-of-life tracking, dynamic tagging, and integration with CMDB, offering extensive visibility and support for proactive threat response.

Qualys offers comprehensive visibility across hardware and software assets, aiding in tracking unauthorized applications and facilitating automated vulnerability remediation. Its user-friendly interface and dynamic risk scoring enhance security posture management. Users leverage it for vulnerability management and compliance, benefiting from real-time risk identification and efficient operations in cloud and on-premises environments.

What are the key features of Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management?

Asset Inventory Management: Provides detailed visibility over hardware and software assets.
End-of-Life Tracking: Helps identify technical debt by pinpointing outdated hardware and software.
Dynamic Tagging: Allows flexible classification and categorization of assets.
Real-Time Risk Identification: Detects risks as they arise, enhancing threat response capabilities.
CMDB Integration: Streamlines data integration for comprehensive asset insights.

What benefits should users look for in Qualys reviews?

Improved Security Posture: Enables proactive threat management and streamlined operations.
Efficient Remediation: Automates vulnerability management and patch deployment.
User-Friendly Operations: Simplifies cybersecurity operations with an intuitive interface.
Comprehensive Asset Visibility: Offers unparalleled insight into organizational assets.
Scalable Solutions: Facilitates asset tracking across cloud and on-premises environments.

Cybersecurity teams in various industries, such as financial services, healthcare, and manufacturing, utilize Qualys to manage technical debt through end-of-life tracking and facilitate robust patch management. It supports compliance and visibility initiatives, essential for maintaining data integrity and operational security in dynamic environments.

Qualys

Sample Customers

Extreme Engineering Solutions, AppsFlyer, Landmark Health, Natera

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Axonius vs. Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management

December 2025

Free Report: Axonius vs. Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management

Find out what your peers are saying about Axonius vs. Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Axonius vs. Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management report.

See our list of best Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM) vendors.

We monitor all Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.