We purchased it through a reseller and the pricing was reasonable. We received Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management included in our licensing at no cost for the first year.
Technical Expert at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Top 10
Sep 25, 2025
For vulnerability management, we have a good price. We have a solid deal in place for the first and second years. However, as we expand to multiple locations, the pricing varies. For some clients, we have been able to adjust the pricing downwards due to lower costs for certain applications.
I don't have access to the pricing information, but I understand that Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management is expensive compared to other brands or vendors, although the price is worth it.
Information Security Engineer at a manufacturing company with 5,001-10,000 employees
Real User
Top 10
Aug 27, 2025
We are currently using a cheaper solution, and I sometimes get the feeling that our solution is less stable. When things go wrong and you don't get the expected results, it becomes very difficult to figure out why or what happened. I believe that the stability and reliability of Qualys offer great value for the money. I don’t know the exact pricing. From what I understand, Qualys is a bit cheaper than Tenable but more expensive than some other solutions available. Overall, I think it’s one of the best options out there, although it is on the pricier side. Nevertheless, I believe its pricing is fair given the value it provides.
The pricing is reasonable relative to the features provided, as it collects all module data and operates as a main, centralized inventory, making it a cost-effective solution.
Learn what your peers think about Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: January 2026.
Information Security Lead at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees
MSP
Top 5
Nov 4, 2024
Though the solution is considered expensive, if bundled with other services such as VMDR or cloud agents, its value would significantly increase. It is currently a bit costly, but with bundling, it could become attractive to more customers.
Senior Cyber Security Analyst at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Top 5
Oct 11, 2024
Qualys is competitively priced for its features. Its pricing is suitable for large organizations with more than 4,000 assets, but for smaller organizations with few assets, such as banks, the costs might be high. They should come up with packages that are suitable for small organizations.
It is cost-effective because, in a single tool, we are getting everything. All the solutions come in a single license or price. In my opinion, Qualys is one of the best solutions available in the market for vulnerability management, policy compliance, and security compliance.
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management can be expensive since it is an add-on to VMDR. The cost seems to be a barrier to entry for some organizations, and a lower price point might lead to more automatic adoption of CSAM.
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management provides key features including asset inventory management, end-of-life tracking, dynamic tagging, and integration with CMDB, offering extensive visibility and support for proactive threat response.Qualys offers comprehensive visibility across hardware and software assets, aiding in tracking unauthorized applications and facilitating automated vulnerability remediation. Its user-friendly interface and dynamic risk scoring enhance security posture...
I'm not entirely sure about the pricing; I don't know.
We purchased it through a reseller and the pricing was reasonable. We received Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management included in our licensing at no cost for the first year.
For vulnerability management, we have a good price. We have a solid deal in place for the first and second years. However, as we expand to multiple locations, the pricing varies. For some clients, we have been able to adjust the pricing downwards due to lower costs for certain applications.
I don't have access to the pricing information, but I understand that Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management is expensive compared to other brands or vendors, although the price is worth it.
We are currently using a cheaper solution, and I sometimes get the feeling that our solution is less stable. When things go wrong and you don't get the expected results, it becomes very difficult to figure out why or what happened. I believe that the stability and reliability of Qualys offer great value for the money. I don’t know the exact pricing. From what I understand, Qualys is a bit cheaper than Tenable but more expensive than some other solutions available. Overall, I think it’s one of the best options out there, although it is on the pricier side. Nevertheless, I believe its pricing is fair given the value it provides.
The pricing is reasonable relative to the features provided, as it collects all module data and operates as a main, centralized inventory, making it a cost-effective solution.
The Qualys Cybersecurity Asset Management pricing is well-aligned with our usage.
Though the solution is considered expensive, if bundled with other services such as VMDR or cloud agents, its value would significantly increase. It is currently a bit costly, but with bundling, it could become attractive to more customers.
Qualys is competitively priced for its features. Its pricing is suitable for large organizations with more than 4,000 assets, but for smaller organizations with few assets, such as banks, the costs might be high. They should come up with packages that are suitable for small organizations.
It is cost-effective because, in a single tool, we are getting everything. All the solutions come in a single license or price. In my opinion, Qualys is one of the best solutions available in the market for vulnerability management, policy compliance, and security compliance.
The pricing is fair. We don't have any objection to the current pricing model.
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management can be expensive since it is an add-on to VMDR. The cost seems to be a barrier to entry for some organizations, and a lower price point might lead to more automatic adoption of CSAM.