Azure Backup vs Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL] comparison

Microsoft and Quest Software are both solutions in the Backup and Recovery category. Additionally, 92% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of Quest Software users who would recommend it.

Azure Backup

Read 60 Azure Backup reviews

4,518 Views
4,382 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL]

Read 20 Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL] reviews

90% willing to recommend

Azure Backup

Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL]

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 26, 2025

Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL] and Azure Backup are both contenders in the backup and recovery solutions category. Quest Rapid Recovery seems to have the upper hand in on-premises solutions with diverse mounting and restoration options, while Azure Backup shines with its cloud-native capabilities and integration flexibility.

Features: Quest Rapid Recovery is known for its granular recovery points, the ability to mount backups as drives, and integration with virtual environments. Azure Backup excels in cloud integration, ease of configuration, and scalability, offering seamless integration with other Azure services.

Room for Improvement: Quest Rapid Recovery needs enhancements in GUI stability, better support, and file-level backup capabilities. Azure Backup could improve compression rates, support for on-premises services, and application-level integrations. Users also seek faster restore processes and improved customer notifications.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Quest Rapid Recovery primarily focuses on on-premises deployment with mixed feedback on technical support responsiveness. Azure Backup offers flexible deployments across cloud types and is praised for customer service, though technical support response times could improve.

Pricing and ROI: Quest Rapid Recovery is seen as expensive for virtual backups, requiring fees for maintenance and support, but it's valued for data protection ROI. Azure Backup operates on a consumption-based model with competitive pricing, offering flexibility and careful management to optimize cost-effectiveness.

To learn more, read our detailed Backup and Recovery Report (Updated: January 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Backup and Recovery

January 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,733 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Azure Backup

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Backup and Recovery (15th)

Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL]

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

5.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Featured Reviews

Sanjay Sahu

Project Manager at Capgemini

Has supported secure data storage with incremental backups and centralized monitoring

Azure Backup supports all the features that we need, so additional features are not an immediate need for me. The documentation for Azure Backup seems okay for me; it is good overall, but it should be more descriptive for each item. It should elaborate more on how backup and restore are fulfilled in different scenarios. One of the reviews indicates that Azure Backup needs improvements for specific backup options beyond just full VM snapshots. I believe it should be improved actually. Regarding specific backup options, I say there should be improvements compared to how they provided them in older days.

Read full review

Adam Augustín

Country Manager at Prianto Ltd

Granular recovery, replication is good and offers good speed

It is for any kind of company that uses their own servers. From a global perspective, our clients are small-sized companies. All the SMEs, compared to the Slovakian market, are quite small. It's a small market with small companies. They just want to enhance security and follow regulations It's…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Azure Backup is easy to manage from a single dashboard."

"Setting up Azure Backup is straightforward and the total deployment time was about a month."

"It's stable."

"One of the most valuable features is security and connectivity to the data."

"Azure Backup is easy to configure and restore."

"It offers seamless integration."

"First of all, you can schedule a backup for the client. You can schedule it as you like. You can also control the bandwidth, so the backup will not utilize. The internet will depend on the bandwidth."

"My customer's experience with Azure Backup's data recovery capabilities is good."

More Azure Backup pros

"Just knowing that the data is easily recoverable is our ROI. It definitely lowers risk."

"The most valuable feature of Quest Rapid Recovery for our organization is the VM recovery functionality."

"It is very easy to use and very easy to manage. The fact that I can easily recover data is valuable. I don't use it much. The only way I have been using it is that sometimes, people ask to recover the data, which is a very easy process. It takes only a few minutes to get in and get the data from the server."

"The local mount utility is most valuable. I do restores fairly regularly. Thankfully, I have not ever lost an entire server that I've had to resurrect, but I certainly have people who erroneously saved over a file or have deleted a file. So, we've done that quite a bit. We still have the DL4000 appliance, and we had, kind of, extrapolated that out over a five-year period. Now, we're in year six, so we had to add storage, which we did as a SAN next to DL4000, but prior to adding in that extra storage, we, here and there, would run into situations where for whatever reason, it would want to be pulling a new base image, and then we would run out of storage. So, we would utilize the archive feature and archive the old data that we want to hang on to, but we don't necessarily need it taking up current data storage. Being able to export out really old data is most valuable to us. Then, we just store that on a NAS that we keep in another building."

"One feature I found that's the most valuable in Quest Rapid Recovery is the VM standby feature which is very useful for my current customer. The solution also has a great replication feature. The third most valuable feature in Quest Rapid Recovery is the five-minute RPO and the fifteen-minute RTO. The solution is also very user-friendly."

"The most valuable feature is the disaster recovery process from the data center."

"Built-in encryption helps to secure our data as it travels from our on-site server to our off-site backup server."

"Not having to switch tapes is wonderful. It makes it so easy. We have an on-prem deployment that we also replicate to an offsite replication host. So by not having to deal with tapes and moving them off-site every day and every week, that's amazing ease of use for us."

More Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL] pros

Cons

"The reporting functionality of Azure Backup needs improvement."

"Azure Backup's licensing model is very challenging because it doesn't give a clear picture."

"For companies frequently accessing data or not using Microsoft Azure, the solution may not be very helpful."

"On-prem can be complex to set up but the cloud is simple."

"The monitoring and tagging features could be improved."

"The length of time it takes to restore is our main source of frustration. It would be beneficial to shorten the time it takes."

"We have a concern with the backup when were are working with VMs that are running in Barracuda Firewall because it usually fails."

"The solution is quite technical. I wouldn't describe it as user friendly. It could be simplified a lot to make it more accessible to the average user."

More Azure Backup cons

"The terminology didn't seem easily available. When I go to the website, it is hard to search for things. You get all the articles, then you finally get the search button. They need the search at the top of the knowledge base. Then, on occasion, if you get an error message in the system, which is very important, it says, "Click here for more information," but I never get more information. The search engine doesn't find it or it is some weird error. It has never worked for me."

"The on-premises deployment model shouldn't have a maintenance fee. If there's going to be technical support, they need it to be free or it should be paid on upon adopting the solution."

"There could be better space management for incremental data. When you use incremental data, the space in the appliance keeps on going up. There should be a better way to manage the space. You have to manage the incremental data to reduce the time."

"It is quite surprising to me that the configuration cannot be backed up automatically, and I think that Rapid Recovery should have an option for scheduled configuration backup."

"There is room for improvement in customer service and support. I would like to see faster response time."

"It's not really Quest's fault, but the only issue that I had during the time when I was doing a lot of our restores is whenever the server reboots, it has to bring all of the repositories back in again, which takes around five to six hours to pull eight terabytes back in again."

"I think the self-paced learning and knowledge base can always be improved so that users can self-service without having to contact either a reseller or Quest. I know there are things that I would have been looking for to try and solve. And the only way I could get there was to actually open a ticket rather than go through self-service through the portal."

"In case, if there is anything, it would be the speed of the operation to be finished. Even then, I can easily work on the storing function before the operation is finished."

More Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL] cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Support payment works by the level of partnership and the number of shares."

"It is incredibly cost-effective and offers fixed pricing, with no additional fees for the licensing."

"We are paying about $100,000 USD per year, just for a couple of servers."

"It is a very cheap cloud solution."

"Price-wise, it's similar to AWS."

"The price is somewhat high and could be lower."

"We have enterprise-level pricing. I rate the pricing a five out of ten."

"Overall, its cost is better because the VMs are already there, and whatever you back up, there is only the additional cost of that storage, whereas if I have to use Avamar in Azure, a separate cost is there for the Avamar server, and in addition, whatever I take as a backup, there is a separate license with Avamar for that. So, there is a double cost if we have to use Avamar in the cloud."

More Azure Backup pricing and cost advice

"Licensing fees are based on the amount of data that you want to store, which is related to how many customers you want to cover."

"I don't think the licensing for the product is very expensive."

"It's very expensive which is why I want to drop it. They charge us per core and we have a six-core server. It's expensive to pay for maintenance charges. I want to switch to something cheaper."

"The pricing is on the higher end."

"When I purchased the change to the license, it was $1,600. I think that was for changing the license. I don't believe that I had to purchase technical support in a while, so I must've bought maybe for five years, but I don't feel there was a huge cost involved in technical support. Its cost was definitely worth it because we've had a fantastic experience with them."

"I'm not aware of the exact cost of Quest Rapid Recovery because I'm from the technical team, but in general, the solution is quite competitive cost-wise."

"It is a little expensive. However, I haven't compared it to other solutions. Being a nonprofit, it is always good to have nonprofit discounts on products."

"I believe the basic license comes with six terabytes, whereas a lot of the other ones are four terabytes. From the price point, it seemed a lot better than the comparative models, such as Datto, Barracuda, and some of the others. I believe Barracuda was about $15,000 for four terabytes, and Quest was around $12,000 for six terabytes. Pricing is based on the period. There is just the maintenance fee that you have to pay annually, or you can pay for a three-year or four-year contract. This includes Premier Support."

More Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL] pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Backup and Recovery solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

University

Manufacturing Company

13%

Performing Arts

11%

Computer Software Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	26
Midsize Enterprise	12
Large Enterprise	23

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	16
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	2

Questions from the Community

How does Azure Backup differ from Veeam Backup & Replication?

Veeam has a version for Azure but there are organizations, like ours, that are considering moving to an Azure environment and wonder if Azure Backup is better than Veeam Backup and Replication (Vee...

See all answers

What do you like most about Azure Backup?

Azure Backup is easy to configure and restore.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Azure Backup?

The pricing of Azure Backup is fine; it is a low-cost solution.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Quest Rapid Recovery?

Dell solutions are approximately 30% to 35% more expensive than Veeam.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Quest Rapid Recovery?

The product is expensive.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Quest Rapid Recovery?

We have sold some of the products to our customers, mainly to remove competitors like Veeam and also other appliances that do not have the whole package integrated into just one appliance.

See all answers

Comparisons

Rubrik vs Azure Backup

Compared 20% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs Azure Backup

Compared 13% of the time

Commvault Cloud vs Azure Backup

Compared 9% of the time

Acronis Cyber Protect vs Azure Backup

Compared 5% of the time

N2W vs Azure Backup

Compared 4% of the time

More Azure Backup Competitors

Veeam Data Platform vs Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL]

Compared 12% of the time

NetVault Plus vs Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL]

Compared 11% of the time

Acronis Cyber Protect vs Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL]

Compared 9% of the time

Iron Mountain Connect vs Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL]

Compared 9% of the time

More Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL] Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Azure Backup

February 2026

Download Azure Backup product report

Buyer's Guide

Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL]

January 2026

Download Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL] product report

Also Known As

No data available

Dell AppAssure

Overview

Azure Backup is a scalable backup solution with zero capital investment and minimal operational expenses that can help a company achieve maximal data protection. Azure Backup’s System Center Data Protection Manager provides optional integrations that can enable you to protect both advanced workloads running in your datacenter in VMs as well as those that are on physical servers.

Azure Backup has many features that make it a most effective product. Included among these is its ability to easily scale up your storage capacity. It taps into the cloud to give you the ability to expand on a massive scale. This can be done without any monitoring or maintenance overhead.

Benefits of Azure Backup

Some of the benefits of using Azure Backup include:

The ability to control and track the performance of your network from a single centralized location. Azure Backup has a “single pane of glass” interface that enables users to monitor, operate, govern, and analyze their backups from one place. This eliminates any need to add additional management infrastructure. You can manage different workload types, subscriptions, vaults, and regions with Azure’s Backup Center.
A wide array of security features allows you to prevent malicious users from doing damage to the system, receive alerts if an unauthorized action takes place, and recover from any damage that results. Azure Backup has authentication requirements built in to protect vital functions, such as the ability to delete backed up data from unauthorized users. If something that impacts the backed up data takes place, users are immediately notified. Azure Backup saves any and all deleted backup data for two weeks. This enables administrators to use recovery points to recover their lost data.

Reviews from Real Users

There are a number of characteristics that make Azure Backup extremely effective. Two of these are the flexibility that it offers users and its overall effectiveness.

PeerSpot user Ayman Y., an IT manager at NOMAC, notes all of the different backup options that Azure Backup offers. He writes, “It has many features. First of all, you can schedule a backup for the client as you like. You can do a backup from the whole virtual machine as an image. You can do a backup only from files and folders. It has every option. All options are available for the backup, for the restore, for the bandwidth utilization to do backups, even virtual machines or a physical machine. If you need to do a backup of the whole image from the virtual machine, all these options are there.”

PeerSpot user Muzammil M., a senior operations engineer at the AlGosaibi Group, notes the effectiveness of Azure Backup when he writes, “Azure Backup is good because it is entirelycloud-based, which means that you can be 99.9% sure that your backup is safe. This is the reason that I suggest its use for companies that need to back up critical data.”

Microsoft

Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL] provides easy-to-use backup and recovery capabilities, emphasizing granular recovery and point-in-time restoration with simple installation, data replication, and user-friendly navigation.

Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL] helps manage infrastructure environments with features supporting disk backup, archiving, VM standby, and replication. Despite limitations like sluggish GUI, lack of support for tape and Mac, and high memory use, users appreciate its real-time data replication and strong reliability. The tool is employed in on-prem deployments and aids in disaster recovery, protecting data across cloud and on-premise servers, securing databases, and facilitating quick recovery during failures.

What are Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL]'s key features?

Ease of Use: Simplifies operations with a user-friendly interface.
Granular Recovery: Allows detailed data retrieval.
Point-in-Time Restoration: Enables specific time data recovery.
Real-time Replication: Ensures up-to-date data replication.
Compression and Deduplication: Streamlines data management.

What benefits can users expect from Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL]?

Improved Storage Efficiency: Enhanced by archiving and disk backup support.
Flexibility: Utilizing VM standby and replication features.
Reliability: Offers fast emergency recovery with minimal admin burden.

Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL] is integral for industries requiring robust data protection, encompassing crucial server and database backups in compliance-focused environments with SQL databases and Hyper-V hosts, ensuring swift and dependable recovery solutions.

Quest Software

Sample Customers

Russell Reynolds Associates, Somerset County Council, Kardem, PCL Construction

PRIME aerostructures GmbH, Tamworth Regional Council, Rhondda Housing Association, Stadtwerke Pforzheim GmbH & Co., Guangdong Aiyingdao Childrens Department Store, Nspyre, Tarrant Technology Partners, CloudRunner

Find out what your peers are saying about Veeam Software, Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Commvault and others in Backup and Recovery. Updated: January 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors.

We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.