Azure Stack vs Google Anthos comparison

Microsoft and Google are both solutions in the Hybrid Cloud Computing Platforms category. Microsoft is ranked #1 with an average rating of 7.8, while Google is ranked #11. Microsoft holds a 27.9% mindshare in HCCP, compared to Google’s 2.4% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 50% of Google users who would recommend it.

Azure Stack

Read 66 Azure Stack reviews

3,674 Views
2,617 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Google Anthos

Read 1 Google Anthos review

1,016 Views
451 Comparison Views

50% willing to recommend

Azure Stack

Google Anthos

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Azure Stack and Google Anthos based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, VMware, Nutanix and others in Hybrid Cloud Computing Platforms.

To learn more, read our detailed Hybrid Cloud Computing Platforms Report (Updated: May 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Hybrid Cloud Computing Platforms

May 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 851,491 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Azure Stack

Ranking in Hybrid Cloud Computing Platforms

1st

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Software Defined Data Center (SDDC) (2nd)

Google Anthos

Ranking in Hybrid Cloud Computing Platforms

11th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Hybrid Cloud Computing Platforms category, the mindshare of Azure Stack is 27.9%, down from 30.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Google Anthos is 2.4%, down from 7.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Hybrid Cloud Computing Platforms

Featured Reviews

Sarath-Boppudi

Data Strategist, Cloud Solutions Architect at Strategic Architects

Seamless integration and impressive scaling capabilities for efficient architectural solutions

The scalability of Azure Stack is commendable. It can scale up within two to three minutes upon request. SQL Server is a good use case for data warehouses. It is scalable and can be set to serverless to reduce costs when not in use. Power BI Fabric offers a useful way to stack data in data warehousing solutions. Azure Stack provides federated authentication which is seamless with on-premise infrastructure, offering good performance and throughput. The integration with Microsoft's environment is also efficient.

Read full review

AlbertoPascoe

Independent consultant at Freelance

Quick time to market; great return on investment

Now everything is always changing and getting more performance and getting better and I think that, this is my sense of the answer, I mean, everything is working well, comparing with other products. I don't remember any kind of set down of course or something like that I can mention. That's my understanding, yeah. The Google Anthos business model could improve. As I understand, Google Anthos is not an internal part of the ecosystem. In fact, the Google sales effort and technical team are separated. In other words, the DCP was not voluntarily talking to the GCP. For example, if you need to talk to someone inside GCP about the connection or the integration with Anthos, the person who can help you is not in GCP. You would need to speak with someone inside Google. From the client perspective, this is not good. Overall, the management of the solution could be improved. The initial Google Anthos setup could be improved.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution's most valuable features are security, configurability, and recoverability."

"The product is easy to use."

"It's more reliable, secure, and easy to deploy. It's much more stable as a platform."

"The user interface is nice and very simple to use."

"Azure Stack provides us with computational power. We also get an option to have it with Azure Cloud, which is beneficial. We don't need to buy any other extra servers or any virtual machines with high-end graphics."

"The tool has simplified our application development."

"Azure Stack is very stable."

"The solution is cheap and helps consolidate infrastructure to a converged space compatible with medium customers."

More Azure Stack pros

"The Google Anthos feature I find the most valuable is the easy of use. In Google Anthos, you don't need to move along too many screens and so on. The interface is really helpful and understanding of the tool comes easily."

Cons

"Certain elements are difficult to deploy."

"More integration with AI capabilities would be beneficial, along with improvements in monitoring and cost management."

"Azure Stack needs to improve integrations."

"Azure Stack could use some improvement when it comes to seamless support for disaster recovery scenarios of higher availability regarding multi-regions."

"Technical support is very poor. When we meet Microsoft in the coming weeks to discuss expansion, we'll be speaking to them directly about this."

"I think the monitoring tools needs some improvement."

"It should be improved in terms of integrations. It could be integrated more with external tools."

"Our only issue with Azure Stack so far is that the networking is very closed. You need to have the extended LAN to connect the internal LAN to the Azure Stack. Any connection we have needs site-to-site VPN connectivity instead of an internal connection, so Azure Stack has room for improvement in the networking area."

More Azure Stack cons

"The initial Google Anthos setup is not easy. Nothing is truly easy in the Google Anthos world."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The cost of Azure Stack is much cheaper than VCE."

"Azure Stack is cheaper than AWS."

"Azure Stack's price falls on the higher side of the spectrum. The licensing costs for Azure Stack in our region range somewhere between 40,000 to 50,000 USD."

"Azure Stack is a medium-priced product, so it is not overpriced, but the prices may be higher for certain services."

"The product is expensive, but it is fine for the value that the solution produces."

"In terms of pricing, my customers believe AWS is slightly more reasonably priced than Azure."

"The premium version is too costly."

"The pricing is reasonable."

More Azure Stack pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Hybrid Cloud Computing Platforms solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

851,491 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

Educational Organization

Financial Services Firm

16%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Azure Stack?

For hybrid cloud operations, the seamless transition it enables is key. Most enterprises have a lot of workloads on-premises, and they want a smooth way to move into the cloud. Some things are on...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Azure Stack?

Azure Stack pricing is generally reasonable, though it has been getting expensive recently due to inflation and changes in Microsoft’s charging strategy to US dollar-based billing.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Azure Stack?

More integration with AI capabilities would be beneficial, along with improvements in monitoring and cost management. Reducing costs slightly would also be desirable.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

VMware Cloud Foundation vs Azure Stack

Compared 42% of the time

AWS Outposts vs Azure Stack

Compared 34% of the time

Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) vs Azure Stack

Compared 15% of the time

Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure (NCI) vs Azure Stack

Compared 3% of the time

More Azure Stack Competitors

VMware Cloud Foundation vs Google Anthos

Compared 28% of the time

AWS Outposts vs Google Anthos

Compared 23% of the time

Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) vs Google Anthos

Compared 19% of the time

Red Hat OpenShift vs Google Anthos

Compared 12% of the time

More Google Anthos Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Azure Stack

May 2025

Download Azure Stack product report

Buyer's Guide

Hybrid Cloud Computing Platforms

May 2025

Download Google Anthos product report

Overview

Information not available

Microsoft

Anthos lets you build and manage modern hybrid applications on existing on-premises investments or in the public cloud. Built on open source technologies pioneered by Google - including Kubernetes, Istio, and Knative - Anthos enables consistency between on-premises and cloud environments. Anthos helps accelerate application development and strategically enable your business with transformational technologies like service mesh, containers, and microservices.

Google

Sample Customers

Weblink, Fathym, Sage, CFD Support Ltd, The UberCloud Inc.

HSBC, Target, 20th Century Fox, Twitter, American Cancer Society, PayPal, Bloomberg, Nielsen, McKesson

Buyer's Guide

Hybrid Cloud Computing Platforms

May 2025

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, VMware, Nutanix and others in Hybrid Cloud Computing Platforms. Updated: May 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

851,491 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Hybrid Cloud Computing Platforms vendors.

We monitor all Hybrid Cloud Computing Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.