Barracuda Load Balancer ADC vs Kemp LoadMaster comparison

Barracuda Networks and Progress Software are both solutions in the Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) category. Barracuda Networks is ranked #14 with an average rating of 8.0, while Progress Software is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.5. Barracuda Networks holds a 2.0% mindshare in ADC, compared to Progress Software’s 6.9% mindshare. Additionally, 80% of Barracuda Networks users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 98% of Progress Software users who would recommend it.

Barracuda Load Balancer ADC

Read 5 Barracuda Load Balancer ADC reviews

722 Views
700 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

Kemp LoadMaster

Read 50 Kemp LoadMaster reviews

2,967 Views
2,581 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

Barracuda Load Balancer ADC

Kemp LoadMaster

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

Kemp LoadMaster and Barracuda Load Balancer ADC compete in network load balancing. Kemp LoadMaster has an advantage in pricing and customer support, while Barracuda Load Balancer ADC stands out with robust features.

Features: Kemp LoadMaster emphasizes high availability, comprehensive application delivery functions, and flexible deployment options. Barracuda Load Balancer ADC is noted for advanced security features, including DDoS protection and web application firewall capabilities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Kemp LoadMaster is recognized for straightforward installation and responsive technical support. Barracuda's setup, while more complex, benefits from strong online resources and thorough documentation. Kemp provides hands-on support, whereas Barracuda focuses on self-service options.

Pricing and ROI: Kemp LoadMaster offers competitive pricing and attractive ROI, making it economical for businesses focused on affordability. Barracuda Load Balancer ADC, with higher initial costs, provides strong ROI through its extensive features and security enhancements.

To learn more, read our detailed Barracuda Load Balancer ADC vs. Kemp LoadMaster Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Barracuda Load Balancer ADC vs. Kemp LoadMaster

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,733 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Barracuda Load Balancer ADC

Ranking in Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)

14th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Kemp LoadMaster

Ranking in Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)

10th

Average Rating

9.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Web Application Firewall (WAF) (22nd), Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection (17th)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) category, the mindshare of Barracuda Load Balancer ADC is 2.0%, up from 1.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Kemp LoadMaster is 6.9%, down from 7.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Kemp LoadMaster	6.9%
Barracuda Load Balancer ADC	2.0%
Other	91.1%

Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)

Featured Reviews

Moges Bekru

Network and Security Engineer at Malam Engineering PLC

Balances loads efficiently and saves costs but could improve initial setup

The typical use case for Barracuda Load Balancer ADC involves managing and distributing network traffic efficiently to maintain system performance. Clients use Barracuda Load Balancer ADC for its ability to handle and balance loads across servers I have seen improvements in Barracuda Load…

Read full review

IshtiaqKhalil

Information Security Engineer at BOK

Displays flexible, user-friendly interface with minor licensing challenges

The product could be improved with a more intuitive interface for complex configurations and more advanced analytics. Additionally, enhanced security features, like a more robust Web Application Firewall, and stronger APIs for better automation would be beneficial. Overall, the main areas for improvement are in strengthening the advanced features to better meet the demands of large-scale enterprise environments. key features for the next release should focus on three areas. First, an enhanced, next-generation security suite with a more powerful Web Application Firewall (WAF) and integrated bot protection. Second, more advanced and customizable analytics dashboards to provide deeper insights into application performance. Finally, greater support for modern, cloud-native environments, including better APIs for automation and seamless hybrid-cloud traffic management

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The price is very good, and it's not very expensive."

"The solution is simple and powerful. I find the Barracuda Load Balancer ADC's load balancing function most valuable. It balances the traffic well. The security features, like the Web Application Firewall, are also very helpful."

"I would rate the stability of Barracuda Load Balancer as a ten out of ten; it has high stability."

"Barracuda's technical support is good - whenever we have an issue, they immediately connect and resolve it."

"The most useful features in Barracuda Load Balancer are its security capabilities, load balancing efficiency, and scalability."

"With Kemp 360 Central, our customers get a nice overview of their Kemp products and an easy way to upgrade firmware on all devices from a single interface."

"Exchange load balancing and reverse proxy for Skype for Business are key features."

"Great web balancing and remote access balancing."

"When you configure the listening services, you can implement a lot of security features like the Edge Security Pack that intercepts the requests and processes those before they are sent to the real servers."

"The user interface is very easy to work with."

"One of the most valuable features I like is the ability to block specific cipher suites like RC4, and older protocols like SSL 3.0."

"When the templates are used, there is not much left to configure and they just work!"

"We needed a Microsoft Threat Management Gateway server replacement solution for a customer and were impressed with the simplified deployment of the Kemp LoadMasters."

More Kemp LoadMaster pros

Cons

"There are areas of Barracuda Load Balancer's security that have room for improvement, particularly concerning handling traffic."

"The quality of the solution's performance could be improved."

"There are areas of Barracuda Load Balancer's security that have room for improvement, particularly concerning handling traffic."

"The Barracuda Load Balancer ADC could be improved with more customization features. For example, F5 uses iRules for custom configurations. I haven't found something similar in Barracuda yet. The load balancer and WAF's basic and common features are enough, but we need more customization options."

"Load Balancer ADC is competitively priced, but it's not feature-rich, and its technology is not that advanced."

"Some of the support documentation seems to make assumptions that the person installing or configuring is experienced with the product or concepts."

"They were still in the process of development, and for example, we set it up in a cluster. So it was one logistical unit built out of two physical devices. And the expected behavior, which I know from other devices, will be formed into a logic cluster. It's that you configure one unit. Then you bring the second unit into this cluster with the already configured primary unit. So the secondary box pulls all the configured ones from its neighbor, does everything automatically, and then synchronizes with this primary neighbor. And then it works, like, one logical unit. And this didn't work with the Kemp's initially, where they caused a lot of issues when building up a cluster, so there were some specials on how to set this up. When we built or set them up for the first time and the months afterward with no new software releases, there were a couple of problems, but in the end, they worked fine. So, they developed a lot and learned from what they've responded to, what we responded to them, and what needs fixing."

"When we go serverless, we may again have to revisit this because the configuration needs to be changed. With this change, we can run into a lot of other configurations that we haven't got into, which involve additional expenses. It would be challenging to convince management to buy at that price point. It would be a balancing act of justifying that expense and the value, that is, how it is going to save a bit of time and make our platform secure. It can have better configuration ability. A lot of iterations happen when we have multiple servers pointing to the same domain. If we do not orchestrate carefully, it gets into a loop, which takes away the precious time of the user who is trying to subscribe to a service. It takes a little longer time to realize services as well as web pages."

"The only thing that I miss is that the TMG server was giving me live information about who is connected and what is the request about."

"If you want logging for SMTP traffic, you have to enable ESP, which requires you to define allowed IP addresses. That’s irritating, to say the least."

"Overall, the Kemp LoadMaster has been an all-rounder great product and stable. The free trial and virtual edition make it a breeze for any potential customer to give it a spin before actually deciding to put it on the infrastructure or even talk to the CFO."

"The configuration of the basic services is pretty straight forward but for more complex solutions, there needs to be better documentation or knowledge base articles."

"So far, the only hitch we have run into is that would have been nice to have an easier method to add allow/whitelist entries into the Access Control lists for virtual services."

More Kemp LoadMaster cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Load Balancer ADC is cost-effective and is about half the price of F5."

"I rate the solution's pricing a five out of ten."

"Any decent product will cost money and if you want great support and a great product, then you will want to spend the money on it."

"Less expensive than Citrix."

"They have multiple tiers of licensing and you can upgrade it easily."

"I have control on the licensing and all the prices since I work for a partner."

"At $2,500 USD, this is absolutely a fantastic buy for the money!"

"The license varies according to the number of megabits."

"The product definitely provides what the organization needs and its cost is reasonable considering the value it brings."

"The price is lower than other options."

More Kemp LoadMaster pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

16%

Media Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

University

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	24
Midsize Enterprise	13
Large Enterprise	16

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Barracuda Load Balancer ADC?

Pricing for Barracuda Load Balancer ADC can be a consideration. However, it offers good value with its cost-saving benefits and efficient operation, balancing the initial financial outlay.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Barracuda Load Balancer ADC?

There are areas of Barracuda Load Balancer's security that have room for improvement, particularly concerning handling traffic. Also, more could be done to enhance the initial setup, as it can be c...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Barracuda Load Balancer ADC?

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Kemp LoadMaster?

My primary advice is to carefully analyze your total cost of ownership (TCO) rather than just the initial purchase price. Kemp LoadMaster is highly competitive on price and often provides a much be...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Kemp LoadMaster?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Kemp LoadMaster?

Our primary use case was traffic load balancing and distribution. The solution was essential for managing all inbound client traffic, including HTTPS and DNS requests, by routing it through our fir...

See all answers

Comparisons

NetScaler vs Barracuda Load Balancer ADC

Compared 24% of the time

F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) vs Barracuda Load Balancer ADC

Compared 23% of the time

VMWare Avi Load Balancer vs Barracuda Load Balancer ADC

Compared 11% of the time

Fortinet FortiADC vs Barracuda Load Balancer ADC

Compared 10% of the time

HAProxy vs Barracuda Load Balancer ADC

Compared 10% of the time

More Barracuda Load Balancer ADC Competitors

HAProxy vs Kemp LoadMaster

Compared 15% of the time

NetScaler vs Kemp LoadMaster

Compared 14% of the time

NGINX Plus vs Kemp LoadMaster

Compared 9% of the time

Fortinet FortiADC vs Kemp LoadMaster

Compared 9% of the time

Radware Alteon vs Kemp LoadMaster

Compared 3% of the time

More Kemp LoadMaster Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)

January 2026

Download Barracuda Load Balancer ADC product report

Buyer's Guide

Kemp LoadMaster

January 2026

Download Kemp LoadMaster product report

Also Known As

Barracuda Load Balancer

LoadMaster Load Balancer

Overview

Barracuda Load Balancer is ideal for organizations looking for a high-performance, yet cost-effective application delivery and security solution. With the broadest range of hardware and virtual models, Barracuda Load Balancer provides maximum flexibility for organizations looking to build highly secure and scalable application infrastructure, whether it's deployed on-premises or in the cloud.

Barracuda Networks

Kemp LoadMaster is a powerful load balancing solution that also serves as a web application firewall. Its primary use case is load balancing and application load balancing, making it an ideal solution for organizations that must distribute traffic across multiple servers. Kemp's integration with an active directory for ESP usage, hosting/deployment of SSL certificates, and pricing are some of its most valuable features.

Using Kemp has helped organizations mitigate cross-scripting vulnerabilities, cookie-related issues, and content security policy issues. It has also allowed them to handle everything with Kemp instead of working on each application individually.

Progress Software

Sample Customers

Fenwal Blood Technologies

Kent County Council, KEMP, SMA Solar Technology AG, RT Player , Victrix (Quebec, Canada), Texas A&M, Macmillan Cancer Support, Cisco, Austin Bank

Buyer's Guide

Barracuda Load Balancer ADC vs. Kemp LoadMaster

February 2026

Free Report: Barracuda Load Balancer ADC vs. Kemp LoadMaster

Find out what your peers are saying about Barracuda Load Balancer ADC vs. Kemp LoadMaster and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Barracuda Load Balancer ADC vs. Kemp LoadMaster report.

See our list of best Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) vendors.

We monitor all Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.