Barracuda Load Balancer ADC vs Kemp LoadMaster comparison

Barracuda Networks and Progress Software are both solutions in the Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) category. Barracuda Networks is ranked #14 with an average rating of 8.0, while Progress Software is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.5. Barracuda Networks holds a 2.0% mindshare in ADC, compared to Progress Software’s 6.9% mindshare. Additionally, 80% of Barracuda Networks users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 98% of Progress Software users who would recommend it.

Barracuda Load Balancer ADC

Read 5 Barracuda Load Balancer ADC reviews

722 Views
700 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

Kemp LoadMaster

Read 50 Kemp LoadMaster reviews

2,967 Views
2,581 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

Barracuda Load Balancer ADC

Kemp LoadMaster

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

Kemp LoadMaster and Barracuda Load Balancer ADC compete in network load balancing. Kemp LoadMaster has an advantage in pricing and customer support, while Barracuda Load Balancer ADC stands out with robust features.

Features: Kemp LoadMaster emphasizes high availability, comprehensive application delivery functions, and flexible deployment options. Barracuda Load Balancer ADC is noted for advanced security features, including DDoS protection and web application firewall capabilities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Kemp LoadMaster is recognized for straightforward installation and responsive technical support. Barracuda's setup, while more complex, benefits from strong online resources and thorough documentation. Kemp provides hands-on support, whereas Barracuda focuses on self-service options.

Pricing and ROI: Kemp LoadMaster offers competitive pricing and attractive ROI, making it economical for businesses focused on affordability. Barracuda Load Balancer ADC, with higher initial costs, provides strong ROI through its extensive features and security enhancements.

To learn more, read our detailed Barracuda Load Balancer ADC vs. Kemp LoadMaster Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Barracuda Load Balancer ADC vs. Kemp LoadMaster

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,733 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Barracuda Load Balancer ADC

Ranking in Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)

14th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Kemp LoadMaster

Ranking in Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)

10th

Average Rating

9.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Web Application Firewall (WAF) (22nd), Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection (17th)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) category, the mindshare of Barracuda Load Balancer ADC is 2.0%, up from 1.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Kemp LoadMaster is 6.9%, down from 7.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Kemp LoadMaster	6.9%
Barracuda Load Balancer ADC	2.0%
Other	91.1%

Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)

Featured Reviews

Moges Bekru

Network and Security Engineer at Malam Engineering PLC

Balances loads efficiently and saves costs but could improve initial setup

The typical use case for Barracuda Load Balancer ADC involves managing and distributing network traffic efficiently to maintain system performance. Clients use Barracuda Load Balancer ADC for its ability to handle and balance loads across servers I have seen improvements in Barracuda Load…

Read full review

IshtiaqKhalil

Information Security Engineer at BOK

Displays flexible, user-friendly interface with minor licensing challenges

The product could be improved with a more intuitive interface for complex configurations and more advanced analytics. Additionally, enhanced security features, like a more robust Web Application Firewall, and stronger APIs for better automation would be beneficial. Overall, the main areas for improvement are in strengthening the advanced features to better meet the demands of large-scale enterprise environments. key features for the next release should focus on three areas. First, an enhanced, next-generation security suite with a more powerful Web Application Firewall (WAF) and integrated bot protection. Second, more advanced and customizable analytics dashboards to provide deeper insights into application performance. Finally, greater support for modern, cloud-native environments, including better APIs for automation and seamless hybrid-cloud traffic management

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution is simple and powerful. I find the Barracuda Load Balancer ADC's load balancing function most valuable. It balances the traffic well. The security features, like the Web Application Firewall, are also very helpful."

"I would rate the stability of Barracuda Load Balancer as a ten out of ten; it has high stability."

"Barracuda's technical support is good - whenever we have an issue, they immediately connect and resolve it."

"The most useful features in Barracuda Load Balancer are its security capabilities, load balancing efficiency, and scalability."

"The price is very good, and it's not very expensive."

"The solution is easy to configure when changing the load balancing method to Round Robin or least connection."

"The feature that allows us to easily disconnect a server when we need and bring back online is the most valuable. It's a click of a button. This allows us to keep all systems up. We can then run updates, perform reboots whatever we need to one of the servers without taking production down."

"The most valuable feature so far has been the high-availability options that allowed us to add an additional Kemp LoadMaster VLM virtual appliance into our VMware vSphere environment, to provide failover for our existing LoadMaster."

"We had some issues in patching management, so we deployed this product for virtual patching, the IPS rule, and it gives us very good results because we have very critical servers."

"The most beneficial function of using the ADC is to ensure this resiliency."

"The pricing of the solution is valuable."

"Failover is seamless and our services are rock solid."

"From my personal experience, many firewalls provide Load Balancing functionalities, but Kemp Loadmaster has a lot of features and functionalities like what you can configure. So there are a lot of features but we use only five percent of it."

More Kemp LoadMaster pros

Cons

"The Barracuda Load Balancer ADC could be improved with more customization features. For example, F5 uses iRules for custom configurations. I haven't found something similar in Barracuda yet. The load balancer and WAF's basic and common features are enough, but we need more customization options."

"The quality of the solution's performance could be improved."

"There are areas of Barracuda Load Balancer's security that have room for improvement, particularly concerning handling traffic."

"Load Balancer ADC is competitively priced, but it's not feature-rich, and its technology is not that advanced."

"There are areas of Barracuda Load Balancer's security that have room for improvement, particularly concerning handling traffic."

"I think there should be more visual instructions on how to configure advanced features."

"The only thing I have struggled with is setting up automatic backups."

"They need to improve the UI environment. Currently, it's hard to navigate and use product."

"The only thing that I miss is that the TMG server was giving me live information about who is connected and what is the request about."

"The product is really good as-is out of the box. If there is one thing I would change is to have the license file not be coupled with the MAC address of the device. This is actually not really useful in a virtual environment where if you have a single VM with KEMP LoadMaster and you have not set up static MAC Address, if you, for example, recreate the VM and just load the disk file on a new VM it will get new MAC address and the NLB will not work as it will not see a proper license."

"There is room for improvement in the stability of the solution."

"Over the last several major versions, the GUI has remained virtually unchanged and still seems lacking."

"Third, the password history restriction needs improvement. For example, the password policy will restrict the user to always use a unique password combination. The password should not be reused for a minimum of three generations of passwords."

More Kemp LoadMaster cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Load Balancer ADC is cost-effective and is about half the price of F5."

"I rate the solution's pricing a five out of ten."

"Download Kemp's VLM trial and take it for a test drive; you will be impressed."

"They have multiple tiers of licensing and you can upgrade it easily."

"This is a cost-efficient product."

"The product definitely provides what the organization needs and its cost is reasonable considering the value it brings."

"From a cost perspective, Kemp is very competitive and is not hard to justify by any means."

"At $2,500 USD, this is absolutely a fantastic buy for the money!"

"Pricing for the perpetual licensing was fair to us for the features and ease of use we received."

"The Kemp LoadMaster is a tremendous value."

More Kemp LoadMaster pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

16%

Media Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

University

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	24
Midsize Enterprise	13
Large Enterprise	16

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Barracuda Load Balancer ADC?

Pricing for Barracuda Load Balancer ADC can be a consideration. However, it offers good value with its cost-saving benefits and efficient operation, balancing the initial financial outlay.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Barracuda Load Balancer ADC?

There are areas of Barracuda Load Balancer's security that have room for improvement, particularly concerning handling traffic. Also, more could be done to enhance the initial setup, as it can be c...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Barracuda Load Balancer ADC?

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Kemp LoadMaster?

My primary advice is to carefully analyze your total cost of ownership (TCO) rather than just the initial purchase price. Kemp LoadMaster is highly competitive on price and often provides a much be...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Kemp LoadMaster?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Kemp LoadMaster?

Our primary use case was traffic load balancing and distribution. The solution was essential for managing all inbound client traffic, including HTTPS and DNS requests, by routing it through our fir...

See all answers

Comparisons

NetScaler vs Barracuda Load Balancer ADC

Compared 24% of the time

F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) vs Barracuda Load Balancer ADC

Compared 23% of the time

VMWare Avi Load Balancer vs Barracuda Load Balancer ADC

Compared 11% of the time

Fortinet FortiADC vs Barracuda Load Balancer ADC

Compared 10% of the time

HAProxy vs Barracuda Load Balancer ADC

Compared 10% of the time

More Barracuda Load Balancer ADC Competitors

HAProxy vs Kemp LoadMaster

Compared 15% of the time

NetScaler vs Kemp LoadMaster

Compared 14% of the time

NGINX Plus vs Kemp LoadMaster

Compared 9% of the time

Fortinet FortiADC vs Kemp LoadMaster

Compared 9% of the time

Radware Alteon vs Kemp LoadMaster

Compared 3% of the time

More Kemp LoadMaster Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)

January 2026

Download Barracuda Load Balancer ADC product report

Buyer's Guide

Kemp LoadMaster

January 2026

Download Kemp LoadMaster product report

Also Known As

Barracuda Load Balancer

LoadMaster Load Balancer

Overview

Barracuda Load Balancer is ideal for organizations looking for a high-performance, yet cost-effective application delivery and security solution. With the broadest range of hardware and virtual models, Barracuda Load Balancer provides maximum flexibility for organizations looking to build highly secure and scalable application infrastructure, whether it's deployed on-premises or in the cloud.

Barracuda Networks

Kemp LoadMaster is a powerful load balancing solution that also serves as a web application firewall. Its primary use case is load balancing and application load balancing, making it an ideal solution for organizations that must distribute traffic across multiple servers. Kemp's integration with an active directory for ESP usage, hosting/deployment of SSL certificates, and pricing are some of its most valuable features.

Using Kemp has helped organizations mitigate cross-scripting vulnerabilities, cookie-related issues, and content security policy issues. It has also allowed them to handle everything with Kemp instead of working on each application individually.

Progress Software

Sample Customers

Fenwal Blood Technologies

Kent County Council, KEMP, SMA Solar Technology AG, RT Player , Victrix (Quebec, Canada), Texas A&M, Macmillan Cancer Support, Cisco, Austin Bank

Buyer's Guide

Barracuda Load Balancer ADC vs. Kemp LoadMaster

February 2026

Free Report: Barracuda Load Balancer ADC vs. Kemp LoadMaster

Find out what your peers are saying about Barracuda Load Balancer ADC vs. Kemp LoadMaster and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Barracuda Load Balancer ADC vs. Kemp LoadMaster report.

See our list of best Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) vendors.

We monitor all Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.