Kemp LoadMaster and NetScaler are two leading solutions in the load balancing space, each offering distinct advantages and drawbacks. Kemp LoadMaster appears to have an upper hand in affordability and user-friendly deployment, while NetScaler excels with its advanced feature set, making it preferable for larger enterprises despite its cost.
Features: Kemp LoadMaster provides straightforward deployment and robust security features, such as intrusion prevention, geo-redundancy, and a Web Application Firewall. It effectively supports Microsoft applications and Azure integration. NetScaler delivers features like SSL offloading, comprehensive logging options, and in-depth security customization, catering to users with intricate application security needs.
Room for Improvement: Kemp LoadMaster could enhance its advanced configuration documentation and GUI interface while integrating more automated solutions and Active Directory administration. NetScaler, though feature-rich, would benefit from pricing adjustments to increase accessibility and augment security features, GUI navigation, and licensing flexibility.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Kemp LoadMaster shines in ease of deployment and customer support, offering uncomplicated setups and responsive assistance. NetScaler supports flexible deployment, including hybrid cloud setups, but users may experience a steeper learning curve. Its customer service is knowledgeable though variable in responsiveness.
Pricing and ROI: Kemp LoadMaster is credited for its economical pricing and excellent ROI, with lower licensing expenses providing immediate value. Conversely, NetScaler's higher pricing suits larger enterprises with extensive features that promise substantial ROI despite challenges for smaller budgets.
Kemp LoadMaster is a powerful load balancing solution that also serves as a web application firewall. Its primary use case is load balancing and application load balancing, making it an ideal solution for organizations that must distribute traffic across multiple servers. Kemp's integration with an active directory for ESP usage, hosting/deployment of SSL certificates, and pricing are some of its most valuable features.
Using Kemp has helped organizations mitigate cross-scripting vulnerabilities, cookie-related issues, and content security policy issues. It has also allowed them to handle everything with Kemp instead of working on each application individually.
One platform for a consistent application delivery and security experience because nobody has time to learn multiple systems to manage ADC deployments. NetScaler is built with a single code base using a software-based architecture, so no matter which ADC form factor you choose — hardware, virtual machine, bare metal, or container — the behavior will be the same.
We monitor all Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
