Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
NetScaler Logo

Top 10 NetScaler Alternatives

Vendor: NetScaler
4.2 out of 5
Badge Ranked 1
Leave a review

Top NetScaler Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to NetScaler based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Imperva Application Security Platform, Azure Front Door, and Microsoft Azure Application Gateway. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. NetScaler surpasses its competitors by offering superior load balancing, advanced traffic management, and robust security features, ensuring optimal performance and reliability for businesses seeking seamless application delivery and exceptional user experiences.

NetScaler Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with NetScaler, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
NetScaler Logo
NetScaler Logo
Imperva Application Security Platform
4.3 out of 5
NetScaler offers flexible deployment and efficient device consolidation, ideal for pay-as-you-grow strategies. In comparison, Imperva provides robust application security with effective DDoS defense and bot protection, appealing to enterprises prioritizing comprehensive security solutions.
Download Imperva Application Security Platform vs. NetScaler Report
NetScaler's setup cost is significantly higher, offering extensive customization, while Imperva Application Security Platform provides a more budget-friendly option with essential security features.
View comparison
Pricing
NetScaler's setup cost is significantly higher, offering extensive customization, while Imperva Application Security Platform provides a more budget-friendly option with essential security features.
NetScaler Logo
Azure Front Door
4.4 out of 5
NetScaler Logo
Azure Front Door
4.4 out of 5
NetScaler's strength is in flexible deployment and performance features like SSL offload and caching, ideal for Citrix integration. In comparison, Azure Front Door excels in CDN and global routing, appealing to projects demanding efficient cloud service integration and scalability.
Download Azure Front Door vs. NetScaler Report
NetScaler has a higher setup cost than Azure Front Door, offering more flexibility in customization, while Azure Front Door provides a more budget-friendly option with straightforward installation.
View comparison
Pricing
NetScaler has a higher setup cost than Azure Front Door, offering more flexibility in customization, while Azure Front Door provides a more budget-friendly option with straightforward installation.
NetScaler Logo
NetScaler Logo
Microsoft Azure Application Gateway
3.7 out of 5
Citrix NetScaler provides flexible deployment, cost-effective scaling, and SSL offloading, suitable for high-security applications. In comparison, Microsoft Azure Application Gateway excels in traffic management and seamless Azure ecosystem integration, making it ideal for Azure-centric environments. Citrix offers extensive features; Azure offers potential cost savings.
Download Microsoft Azure Application Gateway vs. NetScaler Report
NetScaler has a lower setup cost compared to Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, which has a higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
NetScaler has a lower setup cost compared to Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, which has a higher initial investment.
NetScaler Logo
F5 Advanced WAF
4.3 out of 5
NetScaler Logo
F5 Advanced WAF
4.3 out of 5
NetScaler's flexibility with TriScale architecture and Citrix integration benefits manageability and security. In comparison, F5 Advanced WAF excels in security with DDoS mitigation. NetScaler suits those needing Citrix synergy, while F5 targets users prioritizing advanced web attack protection.
Download F5 Advanced WAF vs. NetScaler Report
NetScaler has a moderate setup cost, while F5 Advanced WAF presents a higher initial investment, highlighting the financial difference between these two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
NetScaler has a moderate setup cost, while F5 Advanced WAF presents a higher initial investment, highlighting the financial difference between these two solutions.
NetScaler Logo
Cisco DNA Center
4.0 out of 5
NetScaler Logo
Cisco DNA Center
4.0 out of 5
Citrix NetScaler excels with its flexible deployment models and strong integration with Citrix products. In comparison, Cisco DNA Center offers comprehensive network management and automation. Both solutions' premium pricing aligns with their advanced features, serving different organizational infrastructures and needs.
Download Cisco DNA Center vs. NetScaler Report
NetScaler has a lower initial setup cost compared to Cisco DNA Center, which is reflected in user reviews praising its cost-effectiveness, while Cisco DNA Center, although more expensive to set up, is noted for its comprehensive feature set.
View comparison
Pricing
NetScaler has a lower initial setup cost compared to Cisco DNA Center, which is reflected in user reviews praising its cost-effectiveness, while Cisco DNA Center, although more expensive to set up, is noted for its comprehensive feature set.
NetScaler Logo
Fortinet FortiWeb
3.9 out of 5
NetScaler Logo
Fortinet FortiWeb
3.9 out of 5
NetScaler offers robust load balancing, SSL offload, and centralized management, appealing to those seeking high availability. In comparison, Fortinet FortiWeb provides advanced machine learning and antivirus integration, ideal for those needing application-specific security within a seamless security ecosystem.
Download Fortinet FortiWeb vs. NetScaler Report
NetScaler offers competitive setup costs with robust initial implementation requirements, while Fortinet FortiWeb presents a streamlined setup process with higher initial costs.
View comparison
Pricing
NetScaler offers competitive setup costs with robust initial implementation requirements, while Fortinet FortiWeb presents a streamlined setup process with higher initial costs.
NetScaler Logo
AWS WAF
4.0 out of 5
NetScaler Logo
AWS WAF
4.0 out of 5
NetScaler offers flexible deployment and high customization for on-premises environments. In comparison, AWS WAF provides seamless cloud integration and scalability. Tech buyers may choose NetScaler for robust features and customization or AWS WAF for cost-effective pricing and ease of deployment.
Download AWS WAF vs. NetScaler Report
NetScaler has a higher setup cost compared to AWS WAF, which offers a more cost-effective initial setup.
View comparison
Pricing
NetScaler has a higher setup cost compared to AWS WAF, which offers a more cost-effective initial setup.
NetScaler Logo
NetScaler Logo
F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)
4.1 out of 5
F5 BIG-IP LTM offers advanced traffic management and robust hardware performance for complex environments. In comparison, NetScaler provides flexible deployment and multitenancy options. A tech buyer might choose F5 for adaptability and integration or NetScaler for its setup flexibility and reporting capabilities.
Download F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) vs. NetScaler Report
F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) involves significant initial setup costs, while NetScaler offers a more budget-friendly setup option, highlighting a cost disparity that could impact deployment decisions for organizations with varying budget constraints.
View comparison
Pricing
F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) involves significant initial setup costs, while NetScaler offers a more budget-friendly setup option, highlighting a cost disparity that could impact deployment decisions for organizations with varying budget constraints.
NetScaler Logo
HAProxy
4.1 out of 5
NetScaler Logo
HAProxy
4.1 out of 5
NetScaler offers flexible deployment with advanced features like SSL offload and GSLB, catering to diverse needs. In comparison, HAProxy provides a cost-effective, open-source solution focused on HTTP and TCP requests, appealing to organizations seeking budget efficiency.
Download HAProxy vs. NetScaler Report
NetScaler's setup cost is notably higher, offering comprehensive features valued by larger enterprises, whereas HAProxy provides a more budget-friendly setup, appealing to smaller businesses seeking a cost-effective solution.
View comparison
Pricing
NetScaler's setup cost is notably higher, offering comprehensive features valued by larger enterprises, whereas HAProxy provides a more budget-friendly setup, appealing to smaller businesses seeking a cost-effective solution.
NetScaler Logo
NetScaler Logo
Cloudflare Web Application Firewall
4.2 out of 5
NetScaler's advanced load balancing and application delivery features, including flexible deployment and strong security, attract tech buyers seeking robust solutions. In comparison, Cloudflare's ease of setup, threat protection, and cost-effectiveness appeal to those preferring straightforward, cloud-based services.
Download Cloudflare Web Application Firewall vs. NetScaler Report
NetScaler has a higher setup cost, while Cloudflare Web Application Firewall offers a more budget-friendly option, making them distinct choices for initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
NetScaler has a higher setup cost, while Cloudflare Web Application Firewall offers a more budget-friendly option, making them distinct choices for initial investment.
NetScaler Logo
Fortinet FortiADC
3.9 out of 5
NetScaler Logo
Fortinet FortiADC
3.9 out of 5
NetScaler excels in flexible deployment with strong Citrix integration, benefiting scalability and security. In comparison, Fortinet FortiADC is noted for competitive pricing and strong global DNS capabilities, making it appealing for enterprises seeking cost-effective, reliable application delivery solutions.
Download Fortinet FortiADC vs. NetScaler Report
NetScaler's setup cost is noted for being higher compared to Fortinet FortiADC, which offers a more budget-friendly initial deployment, highlighting a significant price difference in the entry costs between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
NetScaler's setup cost is noted for being higher compared to Fortinet FortiADC, which offers a more budget-friendly initial deployment, highlighting a significant price difference in the entry costs between the two solutions.
NetScaler Logo
NGINX Plus
4.3 out of 5
NetScaler Logo
NGINX Plus
4.3 out of 5
NetScaler provides a scalable solution with SSL offload and Citrix integration, ideal for diverse networking needs. In comparison, NGINX Plus offers efficient load balancing and adaptability in microservices, suitable for flexible deployments and budget-conscious organizations.
Download NGINX Plus vs. NetScaler Report
NetScaler's setup cost is higher, offering robust features, whereas NGINX Plus provides a more affordable initial investment with essential functionalities.
View comparison
Pricing
NetScaler's setup cost is higher, offering robust features, whereas NGINX Plus provides a more affordable initial investment with essential functionalities.
NetScaler Logo
NetScaler Logo
Akamai App and API Protector
4.2 out of 5
NetScaler is a robust choice for those seeking deep Citrix integration and comprehensive load balancing. In comparison, Akamai excels in web threat security, providing advanced protection against DDoS attacks and web threats, appealing to businesses prioritizing strong security measures.
Download Akamai App and API Protector vs. NetScaler Report
NetScaler requires initial investment for setup, while Akamai App and API Protector offers a more flexible setup cost structure, highlighting a significant difference in initial adoption cost between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
NetScaler requires initial investment for setup, while Akamai App and API Protector offers a more flexible setup cost structure, highlighting a significant difference in initial adoption cost between the two solutions.
NetScaler Logo
NetScaler Logo
Azure Web Application Firewall
4.2 out of 5
NetScaler provides comprehensive traffic management, integration with Citrix, and security options, appealing to enterprises requiring robust application delivery. In comparison, Azure Web Application Firewall offers seamless Azure integration, ease of configuration, and competitive pricing, attractive for businesses leveraging Microsoft's cloud services.
Download Azure Web Application Firewall vs. NetScaler Report
NetScaler's setup cost is higher with robust initial investment, while Azure Web Application Firewall offers a lower upfront setup cost, making it a more economical choice for those with budget constraints.
View comparison
Pricing
NetScaler's setup cost is higher with robust initial investment, while Azure Web Application Firewall offers a lower upfront setup cost, making it a more economical choice for those with budget constraints.
NetScaler Logo
Radware Alteon
4.3 out of 5
NetScaler Logo
Radware Alteon
4.3 out of 5
Radware Alteon excels in application delivery with SSL-TLS acceleration and comprehensive attack mitigation, customizable for diverse scenarios. In comparison, Citrix NetScaler offers flexible deployment with SSL offload, benefiting high-security needs and advanced traffic management, but users may face challenges with cost and usability.
Download NetScaler vs. Radware Alteon Report
Radware Alteon has a lower setup cost compared to NetScaler, highlighting a budget-friendly option. NetScaler users often cite higher setup expenses, indicating a contrast in initial investment needs between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Radware Alteon has a lower setup cost compared to NetScaler, highlighting a budget-friendly option. NetScaler users often cite higher setup expenses, indicating a contrast in initial investment needs between the two solutions.
NetScaler Logo
Kemp LoadMaster
4.7 out of 5
NetScaler Logo
Kemp LoadMaster
4.7 out of 5
Kemp LoadMaster is known for simplicity and stability, with strong security and ease of use with applications like Exchange. In comparison, NetScaler excels in content switching and global server load balancing, fitting larger enterprises needing comprehensive traffic management and security.
Download Kemp LoadMaster vs. NetScaler Report
Kemp LoadMaster offers a lower setup cost compared to NetScaler, with users highlighting cost-effectiveness. In contrast, NetScaler users note higher initial expenses justified by its advanced features and robust capabilities.
View comparison
Pricing
Kemp LoadMaster offers a lower setup cost compared to NetScaler, with users highlighting cost-effectiveness. In contrast, NetScaler users note higher initial expenses justified by its advanced features and robust capabilities.
NetScaler Logo
DX Spectrum
4.2 out of 5
NetScaler Logo
DX Spectrum
4.2 out of 5
DX Spectrum excels in network monitoring with topology views and fault isolation, suited for network insight, while NetScaler offers application delivery features like SSL offloading. In comparison, Spectrum faces configuration challenges, whereas NetScaler provides flexible deployments but suffers from licensing issues.
Download DX Spectrum vs. NetScaler Report
DX Spectrum has a lower setup cost compared to NetScaler, making it a more budget-friendly option for initial deployment, while NetScaler's higher setup cost might indicate additional features out of the box.
View comparison
Pricing
DX Spectrum has a lower setup cost compared to NetScaler, making it a more budget-friendly option for initial deployment, while NetScaler's higher setup cost might indicate additional features out of the box.
NetScaler Logo
NetScaler Logo
A10 Networks Thunder ADC
4.2 out of 5
A10 Networks Thunder ADC offers an all-inclusive licensing and cost-saving traffic management. In comparison, NetScaler provides flexible deployment and robust security, favored for Citrix integration. Tech buyers may choose A10 for affordability or NetScaler for comprehensive application delivery.
Download A10 Networks Thunder ADC vs. NetScaler Report
A10 Networks Thunder ADC offers a straightforward setup process, while NetScaler requires more detailed configuration, highlighting a significant difference in initial setup costs for each solution.
View comparison
Pricing
A10 Networks Thunder ADC offers a straightforward setup process, while NetScaler requires more detailed configuration, highlighting a significant difference in initial setup costs for each solution.
NetScaler Logo
NetScaler Logo
Barracuda Web Application Firewall
4.1 out of 5
Barracuda Web Application Firewall attracts interest with its competitive pricing and ease of deployment. In comparison, NetScaler's extensive features and advanced traffic management draw those prioritizing a robust security framework. Barracuda's affordability suits budget-conscious buyers, while NetScaler offers compelling depth for complex needs.
Download Barracuda Web Application Firewall vs. NetScaler Report
Barracuda Web Application Firewall offers a straightforward setup with competitive costs, while NetScaler involves a higher initial setup investment, highlighting a cost difference in initial deployments.
View comparison
Pricing
Barracuda Web Application Firewall offers a straightforward setup with competitive costs, while NetScaler involves a higher initial setup investment, highlighting a cost difference in initial deployments.
NetScaler Logo
NetScaler Logo
VMWare Avi Load Balancer
4.1 out of 5
Citrix NetScaler offers flexible deployment and robust application delivery. In comparison, VMware Avi Load Balancer provides agile deployment and intuitive analytics. Citrix NetScaler excels in security and integration, while VMware Avi Load Balancer is favored for cost-effectiveness and user-friendly features in cloud environments.
Download NetScaler vs. VMWare Avi Load Balancer Report
NetScaler offers a straightforward setup with lower initial costs, while VMWare Avi Load Balancer requires a higher investment but provides advanced features.
View comparison
Pricing
NetScaler offers a straightforward setup with lower initial costs, while VMWare Avi Load Balancer requires a higher investment but provides advanced features.
NetScaler Logo
NetScaler Logo
LoadBalancer Enterprise
4.4 out of 5
NetScaler excels in flexible deployment and extensive features like TriScale architecture and SSL offloading. In comparison, LoadBalancer Enterprise offers ease of use and low latency, appealing to those seeking simplicity over advanced features, while NetScaler may attract those valuing comprehensive capabilities.
Download LoadBalancer Enterprise vs. NetScaler Report
NetScaler has a higher setup cost compared to LoadBalancer Enterprise, which offers a more budget-friendly installation option.
View comparison
Pricing
NetScaler has a higher setup cost compared to LoadBalancer Enterprise, which offers a more budget-friendly installation option.
NetScaler Logo
NetScaler Logo
FortiWeb Web Application Firewall (WAF)
4.1 out of 5
NetScaler offers flexible deployment and advanced ADC functions, suitable for those prioritizing integration with Citrix. In comparison, FortiWeb focuses on machine learning and proactive threat detection, appealing to organizations seeking comprehensive protection with cost-effective deployment options.
Download FortiWeb Web Application Firewall (WAF) vs. NetScaler Report
NetScaler has a lower setup cost, making it more budget-friendly, while FortiWeb Web Application Firewall (WAF) requires a higher initial investment, reflecting its advanced features.
View comparison
Pricing
NetScaler has a lower setup cost, making it more budget-friendly, while FortiWeb Web Application Firewall (WAF) requires a higher initial investment, reflecting its advanced features.
NetScaler Logo
NetScaler Logo
Amazon Elastic Load Balancing
4.3 out of 5
NetScaler offers flexible deployment and excels in application delivery, making it suitable for complex, security-focused environments. In comparison, Amazon Elastic Load Balancing integrates seamlessly with AWS, providing cost-effective, scalable options for those invested in cloud-based ecosystems.
Download Amazon Elastic Load Balancing vs. NetScaler Report
NetScaler requires a significant upfront setup cost, making it suitable for enterprises, while Amazon Elastic Load Balancing offers a more flexible, pay-as-you-go pricing model, appealing to those seeking lower initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
NetScaler requires a significant upfront setup cost, making it suitable for enterprises, while Amazon Elastic Load Balancing offers a more flexible, pay-as-you-go pricing model, appealing to those seeking lower initial expenses.
NetScaler Logo
Airlock
5.0 out of 5
NetScaler Logo
Airlock
5.0 out of 5
NetScaler attracts tech buyers with its scalable, comprehensive traffic management features. In comparison, Airlock appeals to those prioritizing advanced security with innovative protection features. Buyers choose based on the need for cost-effective traffic solutions with NetScaler or premium security with Airlock.
NetScaler's setup cost is relatively higher with extensive configuration options, while Airlock offers a more affordable setup with straightforward deployment, highlighting a balance between initial investment and ease of implementation.
View comparison
Pricing
NetScaler's setup cost is relatively higher with extensive configuration options, while Airlock offers a more affordable setup with straightforward deployment, highlighting a balance between initial investment and ease of implementation.
NetScaler Logo
NetScaler Logo
Barracuda Load Balancer ADC
3.8 out of 5
Barracuda Load Balancer ADC excels in DDoS protection and application delivery, ensuring straightforward integration. In comparison, NetScaler offers superior traffic management and SSL offloading, appealing to enterprises needing high customization and scalability, while Barracuda attracts SMBs with cost-effective pricing and ease of deployment.
Download Barracuda Load Balancer ADC vs. NetScaler Report
Barracuda Load Balancer ADC has a significantly lower setup cost compared to NetScaler, making it an attractive choice for budget-conscious businesses. Conversely, NetScaler offers more extensive setup features that may justify its higher cost for some organizations.
View comparison
Pricing
Barracuda Load Balancer ADC has a significantly lower setup cost compared to NetScaler, making it an attractive choice for budget-conscious businesses. Conversely, NetScaler offers more extensive setup features that may justify its higher cost for some organizations.
NetScaler Logo
DataMiner
4.2 out of 5
NetScaler Logo
DataMiner
4.2 out of 5
NetScaler appeals to budget-conscious buyers with competitive pricing and straightforward deployment. In comparison, DataMiner offers extensive capabilities and is viewed as a valuable long-term investment. Both solutions cater to various needs, emphasizing different priorities in feature sets and pricing strategies.
Download DataMiner vs. NetScaler Report
NetScaler setup costs are relatively lower compared to DataMiner, offering a budget-friendly option for companies. DataMiner's higher setup fees reflect its extensive features and advanced capabilities, making it a premium solution for organizations seeking comprehensive management.
View comparison
Pricing
NetScaler setup costs are relatively lower compared to DataMiner, offering a budget-friendly option for companies. DataMiner's higher setup fees reflect its extensive features and advanced capabilities, making it a premium solution for organizations seeking comprehensive management.
NetScaler Logo
NetScaler Logo
Fortinet FortiWeb Cloud WAF-as-a-Service
4.5 out of 5
NetScaler emphasizes affordability and robust support, appealing to those seeking cost-effective load balancing and traffic management. In comparison, Fortinet FortiWeb Cloud WAF-as-a-Service attracts with advanced security features, appealing to buyers prioritizing superior threat detection despite a higher upfront investment.
Download Fortinet FortiWeb Cloud WAF-as-a-Service vs. NetScaler Report
NetScaler typically has a higher setup cost compared to Fortinet FortiWeb Cloud WAF-as-a-Service, offering distinct pricing structures that may influence deployment budgets differently.
View comparison
Pricing
NetScaler typically has a higher setup cost compared to Fortinet FortiWeb Cloud WAF-as-a-Service, offering distinct pricing structures that may influence deployment budgets differently.
NetScaler Logo
NetScaler Logo
Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall
4.5 out of 5
NetScaler prioritizes performance and analytics, appealing to cost-conscious organizations. In comparison, Ivanti's detailed security features and streamlined deployment attract those needing extensive threat protection. Despite higher costs, Ivanti offers significant long-term benefits, whereas NetScaler provides immediate affordability and support satisfaction.
NetScaler's setup costs are lower, offering cost efficiency, while Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall presents higher initial setup costs, focusing on extensive security features.
View comparison
Pricing
NetScaler's setup costs are lower, offering cost efficiency, while Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall presents higher initial setup costs, focusing on extensive security features.
NetScaler Logo
Akamai Ion
3.8 out of 5
NetScaler Logo
Akamai Ion
3.8 out of 5
NetScaler appeals with its cost-effectiveness and efficient resource management, ideal for budget-conscious businesses. In comparison, Akamai Ion's robust feature set with advanced optimization tools attracts organizations prioritizing superior web performance and long-term benefits. Akamai Ion justifies its pricing through enhanced delivery efficiency and return on investment.
Download Akamai Ion vs. NetScaler Report
NetScaler has an initial setup cost that is higher, while Akamai Ion provides a more budget-friendly setup option, highlighting a significant difference in upfront expenses between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
NetScaler has an initial setup cost that is higher, while Akamai Ion provides a more budget-friendly setup option, highlighting a significant difference in upfront expenses between the two solutions.
NetScaler Logo
NetScaler Logo
Array APV Series
1 out of 5
Array APV Series offers efficient load balancing and high performance, ideal for budget-conscious operations. In comparison, NetScaler provides advanced security and traffic management, appealing to those needing comprehensive features. NetScaler's deployment and support are robust, while Array APV is simple and reliable.
Download Array APV Series vs. NetScaler Report
The Array APV Series offers a cost-effective setup, while the NetScaler involves a higher initial investment, highlighting distinct financial commitments.
View comparison
Pricing
The Array APV Series offers a cost-effective setup, while the NetScaler involves a higher initial investment, highlighting distinct financial commitments.
NetScaler Logo
NetScaler Logo
Symantec Web Application Firewall
4.3 out of 5
NetScaler offers competitive pricing and strong customer support, benefiting from its load balancing and cloud integration. In comparison, Symantec Web Application Firewall provides advanced threat protection with detailed analytics, appealing to those prioritizing comprehensive security despite a higher initial cost.
Download NetScaler vs. Symantec Web Application Firewall Report
NetScaler's setup cost is generally considered higher compared to Symantec Web Application Firewall, which offers a more economical initial deployment.
View comparison
Pricing
NetScaler's setup cost is generally considered higher compared to Symantec Web Application Firewall, which offers a more economical initial deployment.
NetScaler Logo
NetScaler Logo
A10 Networks Lightning ADC
3.5 out of 5
NetScaler often outperforms A10 Networks Lightning ADC in deployment and customer service. In comparison, A10 Networks offers wider feature support, appealing to those seeking advanced capabilities. NetScaler offers better integration while A10 Networks Lightning ADC delivers cost-effective configurations, impacting decision-making in budget-focused environments.
Download A10 Networks Lightning ADC vs. NetScaler Report
NetScaler's setup costs are generally higher, reflecting its extensive features, while A10 Networks Lightning ADC offers more budget-friendly setup options, appealing to those looking for cost-effective solutions. The pricing difference highlights each product's market positioning.
View comparison
Pricing
NetScaler's setup costs are generally higher, reflecting its extensive features, while A10 Networks Lightning ADC offers more budget-friendly setup options, appealing to those looking for cost-effective solutions. The pricing difference highlights each product's market positioning.

Related categories

Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)
Network Management Applications
Web Application Firewall (WAF)