OpenText Functional Testing for Developers and Bitbar compete in the functional testing solutions category. OpenText is superior in features with its emphasis on integration and robust testing capabilities, whereas Bitbar offers impressive cloud-based accessibility and cross-platform support.
Features: OpenText Functional Testing for Developers provides strong integration with various software development tools, advanced automation, and reliable test execution. Bitbar offers extensive support for mobile and web testing with cloud access allowing easy scalability and accessibility across different platforms.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Bitbar's straightforward cloud deployment model enables quick and flexible implementation, and its customer support is well-received for prompt assistance. OpenText's deployment requires more setup with on-premise solutions, but its support is responsive and engaged.
Pricing and ROI: OpenText Functional Testing for Developers involves a higher initial setup cost, offset by substantial long-term ROI through its extensive features. Bitbar offers more competitive pricing with cloud flexibility, providing significant cost-effectiveness for scalable testing solutions.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| OpenText Functional Testing for Developers | 3.1% |
| Bitbar | 1.3% |
| Other | 95.6% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 2 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 12 |
| Large Enterprise | 29 |
OpenText Functional Testing for Developers offers robust automation capabilities with support for complex algorithms, multi-platform testing, and developer-friendly integration using C# and Java, facilitating seamless testing transitions and efficient automation workflows.
This testing tool is highly valued for its integration with ALM and Jenkins, along with its developer-focused environment adaptable to Eclipse and Visual Studio. With AI-based object recognition, an object repository, and test framework integration, it bolsters DevOps practices while reducing IT workloads. Supporting UFT to LeanFT transition, it caters to SAP, Java, .NET environments, and more. Enhanced with stable automation, extensive protocol support, and both on-premises and cloud deployments, it targets performance, regression, and functional testing, while recording and screengrabs enhance automation capabilities. Future improvements could include expanded browser compatibility, enhanced JavaScript and mobile support, and better object recognition.
What are the key features of OpenText Functional Testing for Developers?Organizations implement OpenText Functional Testing for complex test automation on desktop, web, and banking applications, supporting performance, regression, and functionality testing across environments like SAP, Java, and .NET. UFT aids in GUI, infrastructure, and ERP application automation, with deployment options including on-premises and cloud implementations. Enhanced screengrabs and recording features aid in practical test case development, while addressing emerging technology needs is a focus.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
