Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security and Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum are leading security solutions. Bitdefender seems to have the upper hand in pricing and customer service, while Kaspersky wins in features and advanced protection.
Features: Bitdefender is known for comprehensive protection, ease of integration with platforms, and straightforward deployment. Kaspersky offers advanced threat detection, in-depth analytics and reporting tools, and robust feature sets.
Room For Improvement: Bitdefender needs better reporting features, improved system performance, and enhanced user documentation. Kaspersky requires lower resource consumption, a simpler setup process, and better user documentation.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Bitdefender is praised for quick implementation, ease of management, and excellent customer service. Kaspersky has a more complex deployment process and receives mixed reviews on customer service responsiveness.
Pricing and ROI: Bitdefender is more cost-effective with lower setup and maintenance costs, providing good ROI. Kaspersky has higher initial costs but offers substantial ROI over time, owing to its advanced protection capabilities, making it worth the investment for many users.
We have experienced significant return on investment and measurable benefits with Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security.
I have observed value for money from Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum.
I have never needed additional support, which shows how easy and friendly Bitdefender is.
They conduct annual health checks at no cost, making the experience smooth.
Their technical support is helpful.
Compared to other solution providers, the responses are not very clear when we need support.
We usually solve issues ourselves due to our experience, as paid support is not used.
I rate the technical support between seven and eight out of ten for Kaspersky.
It is very easy for me to scale.
Currently, I find it good and easily scalable.
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum is scalable for my environment.
In terms of stability, we haven't experienced any crashes, downtimes, or performance issues.
The solution is highly stable, scoring more than nine in terms of protection.
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum is stable.
The initial file I download to deploy on end-user devices is about six hundred to seven hundred megabytes, and it should be scaled down to an agent size of maybe less than one hundred megabytes, max.
Now, we have to do it via CLI, which even technical personnel struggle to understand.
Currently running on-premise, we are considering moving to the cloud-based Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security because it offers more features compared to the on-premises version.
To increase the benefits of the product, Managed Detection and Response (MDR) service from Kaspersky should be included.
The uninstallation needs better handling, specifically with automatic license deletions.
SonicWall can integrate with other products such as Sophos, SentinelOne, and several others, but not with Kaspersky.
Regarding pricing, setup cost, and licensing, it is affordable.
Maintaining Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security has been smooth.
Kaspersky is very cheap compared to solutions like CrowdStrike or other vendors.
The value from Kaspersky is very good, especially since we recently got a special deal.
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum is reasonably priced for the market.
In terms of threat detection, I would give it a ten out of ten since Bitdefender manages to catch threats that other products miss.
The best feature of Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security is that it is lightweight.
From my reseller perspective, the best features of Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security that stand out are the sandboxing and reporting capabilities.
It fulfills security and protection requirements against newly discovered malware, especially ransomware attacks.
Threat Response Automation in Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum is quite effective for enhancing security.
In the past month, we encountered an unknown type of malware, but the behavior was sufficient for Kaspersky to isolate the network based on this behavior, which proved very efficient.
Product | Market Share (%) |
---|---|
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security | 1.0% |
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum | 0.9% |
Other | 98.1% |
Company Size | Count |
---|---|
Small Business | 24 |
Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
Large Enterprise | 2 |
Company Size | Count |
---|---|
Small Business | 14 |
Midsize Enterprise | 6 |
Large Enterprise | 6 |
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security is a comprehensive cybersecurity solution designed to protect businesses from advanced threats. It offers a wide range of features, including endpoint protection, network security, and advanced threat intelligence. With its centralized management console, administrators can easily deploy and manage security policies across all endpoints.
The solution also includes advanced anti-malware and anti-ransomware capabilities, as well as web filtering and application control. Additionally, GravityZone Enterprise Security provides real-time visibility and reporting, allowing organizations to quickly identify and respond to security incidents.
With its robust security features and user-friendly interface, Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security is an ideal choice for businesses looking to enhance their cybersecurity posture.
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Optimum delivers straightforward defense-in-depth against complex and advanced threats with no additional overheads. Use automated and 'single-click' responses so you can ensure every last piece of the threat is rooted out of your system.
We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.