Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security Logo

Top 10 Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security Alternatives

Vendor: Bitdefender
4.1 out of 5
Leave a review

Top Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include CrowdStrike Falcon, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, and SentinelOne Singularity Complete. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security surpasses its competitors by offering advanced threat prevention, machine learning-driven analytics, and seamless integration, ensuring superior protection and security management for enterprise environments while enhancing performance and reducing complexity.

Bitdefender Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Bitdefender, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon
4.3 out of 5
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon
4.3 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon offers advanced threat intelligence with AI-driven detection, suitable for enterprises seeking robust endpoint protection. In comparison, Bitdefender GravityZone provides comprehensive security at competitive prices, appealing to organizations valuing ease of deployment and affordability across various environments.
Download Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security vs. CrowdStrike Falcon Report
CrowdStrike Falcon's setup cost is relatively higher, focusing on advanced capabilities, while Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security offers a more cost-effective setup with essential features.
View comparison
Pricing
CrowdStrike Falcon's setup cost is relatively higher, focusing on advanced capabilities, while Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security offers a more cost-effective setup with essential features.
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security Logo
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security Logo
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
4.1 out of 5
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint excels in Windows integration and offers cost-effective ROI. In comparison, Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security provides superior threat detection and machine learning capabilities. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint lacks cross-platform support, while Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security needs better third-party integrations. Microsoft offers quicker support.
Download Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security vs. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint Report
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint incurs significant setup costs, whereas Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security has lower setup costs. Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security offers a more cost-effective initial implementation compared to Microsoft Defender for Endpoint.
Watch a demo
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint incurs significant setup costs, whereas Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security has lower setup costs. Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security offers a more cost-effective initial implementation compared to Microsoft Defender for Endpoint.
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security Logo
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security Logo
SentinelOne Singularity Complete
4.3 out of 5
SentinelOne Singularity Complete excels in real-time threat detection and AI-driven automation. In comparison, Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security provides comprehensive security features like firewall and anti-phishing. SentinelOne is easier to deploy, while Bitdefender offers a more extensive security range for enterprises.
Download Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security vs. SentinelOne Singularity Complete Report
SentinelOne Singularity Complete has a higher setup cost compared to Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security. While SentinelOne offers extensive features, Bitdefender is more cost-effective for initial setup.
View comparison
Pricing
SentinelOne Singularity Complete has a higher setup cost compared to Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security. While SentinelOne offers extensive features, Bitdefender is more cost-effective for initial setup.
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security Logo
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security Logo
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks
4.2 out of 5
Cortex XDR excels in threat detection with advanced analytics, appealing to buyers focused on identifying sophisticated attacks. In comparison, Bitdefender GravityZone offers comprehensive features like robust endpoint protection and centralized management, catering to those seeking a holistic security solution. Cortex XDR's integration contrasts with Bitdefender’s cost-effectiveness.
Download Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security vs. Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks Report
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks features higher initial setup cost while Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security offers a lower setup expense. Cortex XDR provides robust threat detection, whereas Bitdefender is known for its simplified deployment.
View comparison
Pricing
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks features higher initial setup cost while Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security offers a lower setup expense. Cortex XDR provides robust threat detection, whereas Bitdefender is known for its simplified deployment.
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security Logo
HP Wolf Security
3.9 out of 5
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security Logo
HP Wolf Security
3.9 out of 5
HP Wolf Security excels in pricing and support, making it a competitive choice for cost-conscious businesses. In comparison, Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security offers advanced threat detection and comprehensive tools, appealing to those seeking superior features and performance.
Download Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security vs. HP Wolf Security Report
HP Wolf Security offers a competitive setup cost, while Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security presents a higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
HP Wolf Security offers a competitive setup cost, while Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security presents a higher initial investment.
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security Logo
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security Logo
Fortinet FortiClient
4.0 out of 5
Fortinet FortiClient is recognized for its ease of use, integrated VPN, endpoint security, and reliability. In comparison, Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security offers advanced threat detection, sandboxing, and multi-layered protection. Fortinet is cost-effective with straightforward deployment; Bitdefender requires more setup but provides comprehensive security.
Download Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security vs. Fortinet FortiClient Report
Fortinet FortiClient shows a straightforward setup process with minimal cost, whereas Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security presents a cost-effective setup but may require more initial configuration effort.
View comparison
Pricing
Fortinet FortiClient shows a straightforward setup process with minimal cost, whereas Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security presents a cost-effective setup but may require more initial configuration effort.
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security Logo
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security Logo
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform
4.0 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform is comprehensive, offering robust features like DLP and centralized management. In comparison, Bitdefender GravityZone emphasizes ease of use and competitive pricing, appealing to tech buyers seeking efficient updates and integration flexibility with a focus on cost-effective solutions.
Download Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Report
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform has a more straightforward setup process compared to Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security, which may involve higher initial configuration effort. Bitdefender offers advanced customization options, while Trellix emphasizes ease of implementation.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform has a more straightforward setup process compared to Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security, which may involve higher initial configuration effort. Bitdefender offers advanced customization options, while Trellix emphasizes ease of implementation.
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security Logo
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security Logo
Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business
4.0 out of 5
Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business offers affordability, easy integration, and responsive customer service, ideal for budget-conscious enterprises. In comparison, Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security provides advanced threat detection and extensive security modules; despite its higher price and complex setup, it ensures a solid long-term investment.
Download Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security vs. Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business Report
Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business is praised for its low setup cost, while Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security is recognized for having a slightly higher setup cost but offering comprehensive features.
View comparison
Pricing
Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business is praised for its low setup cost, while Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security is recognized for having a slightly higher setup cost but offering comprehensive features.
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security Logo
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security Logo
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security
4.1 out of 5
Trend Vision One offers intuitive management and automated threat response, while Bitdefender GravityZone provides comprehensive features and superior malware detection. In comparison, Trend Vision One's integration and deployment ease stand out, whereas Bitdefender GravityZone's detailed deployment process and advanced features justify its higher price.
Download Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security vs. Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Report
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security is noted for its relatively low setup cost, whereas Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security has a higher initial setup cost.
View comparison
Pricing
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security is noted for its relatively low setup cost, whereas Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security has a higher initial setup cost.
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security Logo
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security Logo
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform
4.1 out of 5
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform appeals for its strong malware detection, minimal system impact, and straightforward deployment, making it a cost-effective choice. In comparison, Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security offers superior threat intelligence and centralized management, justifying its higher cost with advanced features.
Download Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security vs. ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Report
The setup cost for ESET Endpoint Protection Platform is relatively low, while Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security has a higher setup cost. ESET offers a cost-effective solution compared to Bitdefender's higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
The setup cost for ESET Endpoint Protection Platform is relatively low, while Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security has a higher setup cost. ESET offers a cost-effective solution compared to Bitdefender's higher initial investment.
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security Logo
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security Logo
Microsoft Defender for Business
3.9 out of 5
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security offers robust features like ransomware protection and ease of use for scalable environments. In comparison, Microsoft Defender for Business integrates deeply with Microsoft 365, providing seamless ecosystems for threat analytics, but has room for enhancing integration with non-Microsoft platforms.
Download Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security vs. Microsoft Defender for Business Report
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security incurs higher setup costs compared to Microsoft Defender for Business, presenting a significant difference in upfront investment requirements.
View comparison
Pricing
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security incurs higher setup costs compared to Microsoft Defender for Business, presenting a significant difference in upfront investment requirements.
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security Logo
WatchGuard EPDR
4.2 out of 5
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security Logo
WatchGuard EPDR
4.2 out of 5
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security excels in cost-effectiveness, straightforward deployment, and responsive customer service. In comparison, WatchGuard EPDR stands out with its comprehensive feature set, superior threat intelligence, and perceived higher value despite a higher price point, appealing to tech buyers seeking advanced capabilities.
Download Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security vs. WatchGuard EPDR Report
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security has a higher setup cost, while WatchGuard EPDR is more cost-effective in terms of initial setup. The pricing difference reflects their unique features and capabilities, which cater to different security requirements.
View comparison
Pricing
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security has a higher setup cost, while WatchGuard EPDR is more cost-effective in terms of initial setup. The pricing difference reflects their unique features and capabilities, which cater to different security requirements.
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security Logo
Malwarebytes Teams
4.0 out of 5
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security Logo
Malwarebytes Teams
4.0 out of 5
Malwarebytes Teams attracts tech buyers with reliable threat protection and user-friendly management, ideal for those prioritizing ease of use. In comparison, Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security appeals to enterprises needing advanced features like EDR and robust integration for comprehensive security management.
Download Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security vs. Malwarebytes Teams Report
Malwarebytes Teams offers a straightforward setup with minimal costs, while Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security involves a higher initial setup expense.
View comparison
Pricing
Malwarebytes Teams offers a straightforward setup with minimal costs, while Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security involves a higher initial setup expense.
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security Logo
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security Logo
Norton Small Business
4.4 out of 5

Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security provides extensive features for advanced threat defense and centralized management, making it a robust choice for enterprises. In comparison, Norton Small Business offers ease of deployment and affordability, appealing to smaller organizations with simpler, more intuitive needs.

Download Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security vs. Norton Small Business Report
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security generally has a higher setup cost than Norton Small Business, making Norton a more budget-friendly option for smaller enterprises.
View comparison
Pricing
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security generally has a higher setup cost than Norton Small Business, making Norton a more budget-friendly option for smaller enterprises.
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security Logo
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security Logo
Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response
3.9 out of 5
Cybereason excels in customer support and straightforward deployment, attracting tech buyers seeking advanced threat detection, automated threat hunting, and quick remediation. In comparison, Bitdefender offers a feature-rich suite with comprehensive endpoint protection, ideal for those valuing extensive anti-malware and centralized policy management.
Download Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security vs. Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response Report
Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response has a higher initial setup cost compared to Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security, which offers a more budget-friendly solution for initial deployment.
View comparison
Pricing
Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response has a higher initial setup cost compared to Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security, which offers a more budget-friendly solution for initial deployment.
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security Logo
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security Logo
Seqrite Endpoint Security
3.8 out of 5
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security provides advanced threat protection and analytics, making it a strong choice for security-focused buyers. In comparison, Seqrite Endpoint Security offers robust web security and device control, appealing to those valuing user satisfaction and cost-effectiveness.
Download Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security vs. Seqrite Endpoint Security Report
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security has a higher setup cost compared to Seqrite Endpoint Security, making Seqrite a more budget-friendly option.
View comparison
Pricing
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security has a higher setup cost compared to Seqrite Endpoint Security, making Seqrite a more budget-friendly option.
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security Logo
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security Logo
ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform
4.6 out of 5
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security excels in endpoint security management with comprehensive features like EDR tools and ease of deployment. In comparison, ThreatLocker emphasizes zero trust and application control, offering robust support and visibility to administrators for application activity management.
Download Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security vs. ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform Report
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security has a competitive setup cost, whereas ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform may have a higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security has a competitive setup cost, whereas ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform may have a higher initial investment.
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security Logo
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security Logo
Trend Micro Worry-Free Services Suites
4.2 out of 5
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security is known for its robust malware detection, advanced threat protection, and efficient resource usage. In comparison, Trend Micro Worry-Free Services Suites excels with its comprehensive feature set, including automated updates and strong phishing protection. Bitdefender is praised for straightforward deployment, whereas Trend Micro has more complex installation. Pricing-wise, Bitdefender offers good value, while Trend Micro is seen as worth the investment for its extensive features.
Download Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security vs. Trend Micro Worry-Free Services Suites Report
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security has a lower setup cost compared to Trend Micro Worry-Free Services Suites. Trend Micro offers more extensive features but at a higher initial expense.
View comparison
Pricing
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security has a lower setup cost compared to Trend Micro Worry-Free Services Suites. Trend Micro offers more extensive features but at a higher initial expense.
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security Logo
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security Logo
OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​
3.9 out of 5
OpenText Core Endpoint Protection appeals with user separation, lightweight performance, and affordability. In comparison, Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security offers comprehensive features such as advanced threat detection and deep device insights, making it suitable for enterprise-level security needs.
Download Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security vs. OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​ Report
OpenText Core Endpoint Protection offers a lower setup cost compared to Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security, presenting a more budget-friendly option for businesses. Bitdefender, however, justifies its higher cost with advanced security features.
View comparison
Pricing
OpenText Core Endpoint Protection offers a lower setup cost compared to Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security, presenting a more budget-friendly option for businesses. Bitdefender, however, justifies its higher cost with advanced security features.
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security Logo
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security Logo
Trend Micro ServerProtect
3.9 out of 5
Trend Micro ServerProtect offers real-time scanning, malware protection, and ease of integration, appealing with competitive pricing and decent ROI. In comparison, Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security delivers advanced threat defense and superior ransomware protection, compensating its higher cost with advanced features and higher ROI.
Download Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security vs. Trend Micro ServerProtect Report
Trend Micro ServerProtect has a higher setup cost, while Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security offers a more affordable setup price, highlighting significant cost differences between the two.
View comparison
Pricing
Trend Micro ServerProtect has a higher setup cost, while Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security offers a more affordable setup price, highlighting significant cost differences between the two.
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security Logo
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security Logo
SonicWall Capture Client
4.0 out of 5
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security excels in advanced threat detection and comprehensive reporting tools. In comparison, SonicWall Capture Client is valued for real-time threat intelligence and quick installation. A tech buyer might choose Bitdefender for its extensive features, while SonicWall appeals with its robust performance and simple management.
Download Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security vs. SonicWall Capture Client Report
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security has a lower setup cost compared to SonicWall Capture Client. SonicWall Capture Client, however, provides a more robust initial security configuration.
View comparison
Pricing
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security has a lower setup cost compared to SonicWall Capture Client. SonicWall Capture Client, however, provides a more robust initial security configuration.
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security Logo
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security Logo
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum
4.2 out of 5
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security offers robust malware detection and ease of management, making it cost-effective with excellent customer support. In comparison, Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum excels in threat intelligence and advanced detection techniques, justifying a higher price with extensive capabilities.
Download Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security vs. Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum Report
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security has a higher setup cost compared to Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum. Kaspersky is praised for its lower initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security has a higher setup cost compared to Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum. Kaspersky is praised for its lower initial expenses.
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security Logo
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security Logo
WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection
4.0 out of 5
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security is valued for robust malware detection and a comprehensive dashboard. In comparison, WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection offers advanced threat intelligence and seamless integration. Bitdefender is more intuitive, while WithSecure provides superior threat detection features.
Download Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection Report
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security offers lower initial setup costs, while WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection has a moderately higher setup cost, reflecting differing features and deployment requirements between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security offers lower initial setup costs, while WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection has a moderately higher setup cost, reflecting differing features and deployment requirements between the two solutions.
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security Logo
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security Logo
Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise
4.0 out of 5

Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security is noted for advanced threat protection and low performance impact. In comparison, Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise offers better integration capabilities and a comprehensive security suite. Bitdefender may suit those prioritizing cost and ROI, while Symantec appeals for its extensive features and reliability.

Download Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security vs. Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Report
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security has a lower setup cost compared to Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise, highlighting a significant difference in upfront investment requirements between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security has a lower setup cost compared to Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise, highlighting a significant difference in upfront investment requirements between the two solutions.
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security Logo
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security Logo
Seqrite Endpoint Security Cloud
2.3 out of 5
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security offers advanced threat detection and machine learning. In comparison, Seqrite Endpoint Security Cloud provides user-friendly management and faster deployment. Bitdefender requires enhancements in usability, while Seqrite needs better integration. Bitdefender justifies higher costs by features; Seqrite offers transparent pricing and value.
Download Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security vs. Seqrite Endpoint Security Cloud Report
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security has relatively high setup costs, while Seqrite Endpoint Security Cloud offers more affordable setup fees. Bitdefender provides comprehensive protection features; Seqrite is more budget-friendly with essential security functionalities.
View comparison
Pricing
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security has relatively high setup costs, while Seqrite Endpoint Security Cloud offers more affordable setup fees. Bitdefender provides comprehensive protection features; Seqrite is more budget-friendly with essential security functionalities.
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security Logo
TEHTRIS EPP
1 out of 5
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security Logo
TEHTRIS EPP
1 out of 5

TEHTRIS EPP enhances cybersecurity measures with real-time threat detection and neutralization. Users praise its seamless integration, advanced analytics, and low system impact. Challenges include slow updates, limited documentation, and occasional compatibility issues. Customer support response time could be improved for better user satisfaction and experience.

View comparison

Related categories

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
Virtualization Security
Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)