Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection comparison

Bitdefender and WithSecure are both solutions in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category. Bitdefender is ranked #23 with an average rating of 8.3, while WithSecure is ranked #42 with an average rating of 8.0. Bitdefender holds a 0.9% mindshare in EPP, compared to WithSecure’s 1.0% mindshare. Additionally, 91% of Bitdefender users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of WithSecure users who would recommend it.
Bitdefender GravityZone Ent...
Read 31 Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security reviews
  • 1,958 Views
  • 1,899 Comparison Views
91% willing to recommend
WithSecure Elements Endpoin...
Read 8 WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection reviews
  • 1,580 Views
  • 1,564 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 9, 2024

Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security and WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection are leading solutions in endpoint protection. Bitdefender is appreciated for its pricing and support, while WithSecure Elements stands out for its features, making it worth the higher price.

Features: Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security users value its comprehensive malware detection, robust performance, and advanced threat control. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection users highlight its superior integration capabilities, automated threat responses, and detailed reporting.

Room for Improvement: Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security users suggest improvements in the software’s resource usage and reporting functionalities. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection users recommend better customization options and enhanced threat intelligence.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Bitdefender is praised for its smooth deployment and responsive customer service. WithSecure also offers a streamlined deployment process but falls short in customer support compared to Bitdefender.

Pricing and ROI: Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security users find the product cost-effective with a satisfactory ROI. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection users perceive the initial setup as expensive but ultimately consider the features worth the investment.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection Report (Updated: February 2026).
Buyer's Guide
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection
February 2026
Download the complete report
Helped 881,733 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Bitdefender GravityZone Ent...
Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
23rd
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
5.4
Number of Reviews
31
Ranking in other categories
Virtualization Security (4th)
WithSecure Elements Endpoin...
Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
42nd
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security is 0.9%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection is 1.0%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security0.9%
WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection1.0%
Other98.1%
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
 

Featured Reviews

Rias Majeed - PeerSpot reviewer
Rias Majeed
CTO at Exceed NetSec LLC
Delivers lightweight protection while facing challenges with technical aspects
I have been working with Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security for quite a long time, but recently, I do not appreciate their changes, especially on the technical side. They moved some portions to remote GUI-based interfaces. The Command Line Interface (CLI) is not improving. Even experienced personnel are finding it difficult. There is a power user function where you can stop it temporarily for installing applications. Previously, we had the option to click on the power user button and enter the password to allow stopping that particular function. Now, we have to do it via CLI, which even technical personnel struggle to understand. Currently, everything is working fine except for the technical aspects we can control. If they can revert to the old system, that would be much better. When we raise this issue with Bitdefender, they cite security reasons for the change. However, while Cisco is moving away from CLI to GUI, Bitdefender is moving backward. Normal users cannot handle these CLI operations effectively.
Read full review
Mark Feldman - PeerSpot reviewer
Mark Feldman
IT-Manager at MKF-Schimanski-ERGIS GmbH
Central console streamlines patch monitoring and device management effortlessly
WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection is good and easy to set up. I provide an installation file for every client through my domain controller and GPO, and it works properly. We have faced no incidents with viruses or network breaches, and it's easy to monitor patches. I can use remote desktop from the central console. The solution also saves my time because, being the only one handling it, I can monitor all devices easily.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Based on my experience, I rate Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security a nine out of ten."
"I find Bitdefender to be very light. When we were using the other versions, users would complain that they would make the computers slow. But since we have deployed Bitdefender, we haven't had that."
"Virus scan and the ability to remotely install are valuable features. Being able to manage everything in one place and set different policies and rules for different computer types are very useful features. It also has ransomware protection. It is very simple to use, and it is very effective."
"The most valuable feature is the IDS."
"Since implementing Bitdefender, the traffic to the firewall has significantly reduced, and network congestion has been resolved."
"The features I found most valuable in Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security include anti-malware, spyware detection, firewall, network detection, and user behavior analytics. The solution also gives you a heads-up about operating system misconfiguration."
"The solution is very scalable."
"The fact that it is almost plug and play means the policies I have to define are not very complicated."
More Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security pros
"Both incoming and outgoing traffic is protected."
"The notifications and patch management features are valuable."
"There is a layer of security to prevent a malicious agent (malware) from interrupting or stopping services, deleting or modifying registry entries or even stopping the antivirus from acting, ensuring that there will be no interruption of protection."
"We use the product for detecting network vulnerabilities and for software update purposes."
"F-Secure is useful for keeping user machines up-to-date by pushing out security and critical updates."
"On the cloud management page, the solution scales up very highly."
"The most valuable features of WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection are the clear useful portal and overall company protection."
"WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection is good and easy to set up."
 

Cons

"I think it would be helpful if I could get a live console directly on the machine. Additionally, if I could run scripts on the machines to respond to any incidents, that would be a great feature."
"The security features as per customers' requirements should be improved."
"The lack of detecting security threats and high memory usage need to be improved."
"Overall, Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security is quite good. It always has new features which customers can use for free, so I can't say that something is missing in the solution, though one area for improvement is that the cloud version of Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security still can't connect to a central SIEM. The on-premises version has that capability, but the cloud version doesn't."
"Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security could improve the RDP, I have problems sometimes."
"The solution must be more user-friendly."
"At this point in time, the download footprint is a bit big. What I mean is the initial file I download to deploy on end-user devices is about six hundred to seven hundred megabytes, and it should be scaled down to an agent size of maybe less than one hundred megabytes, max."
"There are compatibility concerns as Bitdefender does not support Windows 7."
More Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security cons
"One problem is that the solution takes too much RAM from the client."
"I would like the part of Hash Analysis by external sources to be improved."
"Resource consumption is suboptimal and could be improved."
"There could be a dedicated security partner with essential knowledge."
"But the biggest one for us is patch management because this has been our top priority when looking at alternatives. Every solution needs to have patch management, if that's possible. It would cut costs on our side if that feature were included, so we don't need to pay for two separate pieces of software."
"The program and cloud service management is in English. It's not a problem for me, however, it might be for users who don't speak English or use it regularly."
"The solution could improve by having more real-time responses. For example, when a license gets removed from a computer it does not update the records of the change. Additionally, when I installed Microsoft Windows Defender I was not able to send licenses through email to our tenants. The integration with other solutions could improve."
"There is no technical support available in the Middle East."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The licensing costs can vary."
"Good in terms of pricing and flexibility."
"The pricing is reasonable when I compare it to other security solutions, particularly Kaspersky, it stands out. It offers an excellent solution at a more favorable price point."
"We pay for an annual license which is affordable."
"It has very flexible licensing costs, and it's modular-based."
"The price is fair."
"The product's pricing is okay and it is yearly."
"In India, licensing is based on annual contracts. It's not extremely expensive, but not the cheapest either. I'd rate it somewhere around seven or eight out of ten."
More Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security pricing and cost advice
"The price is comparable."
"The cost of the solution depends on the size of the company and where the licenses are being ordered from."
"If you purchase licenses in bulk the price of the licenses can decrease."
"The product has average pricing."
"We pay a yearly licensing fee of about €20 per computer."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Comms Service Provider
12%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Marketing Services Firm
7%
Government
6%
Comms Service Provider
21%
Computer Software Company
10%
Manufacturing Company
8%
University
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business25
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise2
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business6
Large Enterprise1
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security?
Maintaining Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security has been smooth. We receive regular notifications about upgrades, and the process has been successful without issues.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security?
Because we bought Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security via Rectron as a distributor, they need to upskill their distributors. When we were deploying, the Rectron people did not know much, an...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security?
We primarily bought Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security for endpoint protection. We needed an endpoint protection solution that covered everything we required, and the pricing was also a fa...
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for F-Secure Protection Service for Business?
The pricing is scalable. We can purchase more licenses if needed. It's a more cost-effective solution compared to Darktrace, which requires a special device purchase.
See all answers
What needs improvement with F-Secure Protection Service for Business?
One problem is that the solution takes too much RAM from the client. It would help if it used less RAM in future versions.
See all answers
What is your primary use case for F-Secure Protection Service for Business?
Our primary use case for WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection ( /products/withsecure-elements-endpoint-protection-reviews ) is to secure our computers. We have a yearly license for it and use it...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

GravityZone Business Security vs Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security Logo
GravityZone Business Security vs Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security
Compared 8% of the time
CrowdStrike Falcon vs Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon vs Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security
Compared 7% of the time
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security Logo
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security
Compared 7% of the time
Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business vs Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security Logo
Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business vs Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security
Compared 6% of the time
Bitdefender Total Security vs Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security Logo
Bitdefender Total Security vs Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security
Compared 6% of the time
More Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security Competitors
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection Logo
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection
Compared 15% of the time
Bitdefender Total Security vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection Logo
Bitdefender Total Security vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection
Compared 8% of the time
CrowdStrike Falcon vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection
Compared 7% of the time
Sophos Endpoint vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection Logo
Sophos Endpoint vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection
Compared 7% of the time
Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection Logo
Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection
Compared 5% of the time
More WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security
February 2026
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security reportDownload Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security product report
Buyer's Guide
WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection
January 2026
WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection reportDownload WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection product report
 

Also Known As

Bitdefender GravityZone Security for Virtualized Environments, GravityZone Security for Virtualized Environments
F-Secure Elements Endpoint Protection, F-Secure Protection Service for Business
 

Overview

Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security is a comprehensive cybersecurity solution designed to protect businesses from advanced threats. It offers a wide range of features, including endpoint protection, network security, and advanced threat intelligence. With its centralized management console, administrators can easily deploy and manage security policies across all endpoints. 

The solution also includes advanced anti-malware and anti-ransomware capabilities, as well as web filtering and application control. Additionally, GravityZone Enterprise Security provides real-time visibility and reporting, allowing organizations to quickly identify and respond to security incidents. 

With its robust security features and user-friendly interface, Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security is an ideal choice for businesses looking to enhance their cybersecurity posture.

Bitdefender
WithSecure (formerly F-Secure) Elements Endpoint Protection is cloud-native, AI-powered endpoint protection that you can deploy instantly from your browser and manage easily from a single console. It integrates across all your endpoints, keeping your organization fenced in from attacks. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection is a module of the Elements cyber security platform. The cloud-based platform provides effective protection against ransomware and advanced attacks. Elements brings together vulnerability management, automated patch management, dynamic threat intelligence and continuous behavioral analytics. Use individual solutions for specific needs or combine them all seamlessly for maximum defense.
WithSecure
 

Sample Customers

SambaSafety, Morefield Communications, Northstar Ltd., Citrix, Greenman-Pedersen
Information Not Available
Buyer's Guide
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection
February 2026
Free Report: Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection
Find out what your peers are saying about Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.
DOWNLOAD NOW
881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection report.
See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.