Trellix Endpoint Security Platform vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection comparison

Trellix and WithSecure are both solutions in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category. Trellix is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.0, while WithSecure is ranked #43 with an average rating of 7.5. Trellix holds a 3.7% mindshare in EPP, compared to WithSecure’s 1.0% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of Trellix users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of WithSecure users who would recommend it.

Trellix Endpoint Security P...

Read 159 Trellix Endpoint Security Platform reviews

9,310 Views
6,424 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

WithSecure Elements Endpoin...

Read 8 WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection reviews

1,518 Views
1,503 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Trellix Endpoint Security P...

WithSecure Elements Endpoin...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 21, 2025

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform and WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection are key players in the endpoint security market. While Trellix excels with its extensive integration capabilities, WithSecure is noted for its user-friendly approach.

Features: Trellix offers advanced threat prevention, EDR, and centralized management tools. WithSecure stands out with its clear portal, comprehensive protection, and patch management capabilities.

Room for Improvement: Trellix could improve by reducing resource consumption and simplifying deployment. Users mention issues with resource load and integration complexities. WithSecure should focus on better resource optimization, improved integration with other solutions, and enhanced dashboard visibility.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Trellix supports flexible deployments including cloud and hybrid models but needs improved response times in customer support. WithSecure also offers diverse deployment options with praised customer service for its user-centric approach.

Pricing and ROI: Trellix is on the higher end of pricing, justified by its wide range of features, leading to cost efficiencies and ROI. WithSecure provides cost-effective solutions for large deployments, though costs may increase with more devices. Trellix shines in providing value for complex environments.

To learn more, read our detailed Trellix Endpoint Security Platform vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Trellix Endpoint Security P...

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

7th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

159

Ranking in other categories

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (10th), Extended Detection and Response (XDR) (9th)

WithSecure Elements Endpoin...

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

43rd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of Trellix Endpoint Security Platform is 3.7%, down from 4.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection is 1.0%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform	3.7%
WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection	1.0%
Other	95.3%

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

Featured Reviews

Abhimanyu Das

Senior Associate at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Threat detection is effective, and the solution provides good control over device access, but it still needs better troubleshooting options for agent-related issues.

From an improvement perspective, I am looking for a way to troubleshoot situations where the endpoint agent becomes corrupted and requires reinstallation, as there is currently no option to resolve these issues without rebooting the system. I give it a rating of seven because, in today’s scenario, the portal is complicated to navigate. The Trellix Endpoint Security Platform dashboard is somewhat difficult to understand, and it takes considerable time to familiarize oneself with the tools and policies compared to other solutions. For on-premises deployment, I would also like to highlight that the architecture is quite complex, which is an area Trellix Endpoint Security Platform should consider improving.

Read full review

Mark Feldman

IT-Manager at MKF-Schimanski-ERGIS GmbH

Central console streamlines patch monitoring and device management effortlessly

WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection is good and easy to set up. I provide an installation file for every client through my domain controller and GPO, and it works properly. We have faced no incidents with viruses or network breaches, and it's easy to monitor patches. I can use remote desktop from the central console. The solution also saves my time because, being the only one handling it, I can monitor all devices easily.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable features are the prevention layer that detects the signature value and prevents threats in the network."

"The product helps us by contacting us if there are any virus attacks on our system."

"The product has a robust reporting feature"

"What I like best is the integrated end-to-end security that works with the security information and events manager."

"Provides good mobile device protection."

"The installation phase of the solution was very easy."

"The most valuable feature is user-based policy provision."

"It is a really strong solution for endpoint security."

More Trellix Endpoint Security Platform pros

"The notifications and patch management features are valuable."

"Both incoming and outgoing traffic is protected."

"WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection is good and easy to set up."

"F-Secure is useful for keeping user machines up-to-date by pushing out security and critical updates."

"The most valuable features of WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection are the clear useful portal and overall company protection."

"On the cloud management page, the solution scales up very highly."

"There is a layer of security to prevent a malicious agent (malware) from interrupting or stopping services, deleting or modifying registry entries or even stopping the antivirus from acting, ensuring that there will be no interruption of protection."

"We use the product for detecting network vulnerabilities and for software update purposes."

Cons

"It would be helpful if the controlling of connections coming to the PC could be done from McAfee's side so that we can block those connections."

"Every time we open a ticket with McAfee, their response differs and they are not consistent."

"There is room to improve with scalability."

"There are times the solution has some additional software added that is not fully integrated properly, such as Exchange Group Sheild. It is quite old and is not fully integrated properly and could be improved."

"The Linux support is very poor. I use base detection. Currently, they are providing malware protection and logon track features in Windows and Mac. These features aren't available in Linux. It will be helpful to extend these capabilities to Linux. We would also like assets grouping and device lock protection features, which are included in their roadmap."

"I would like to have the ability to have more control over the deployment in the next release. If you have this console in the cloud, you cannot make pilot groups for deploying the agents. We only have the current group. So, as soon as you inject the software, it will go directly into production, which doesn't work for us. We need to build up pilot groups slowly. We already requested to have this feature on the cloud, and we are still waiting."

"Continued available training is important for people coming in to use it."

"The detection and response capabilities need to be improved."

More Trellix Endpoint Security Platform cons

"The program and cloud service management is in English. It's not a problem for me, however, it might be for users who don't speak English or use it regularly."

"There could be a dedicated security partner with essential knowledge."

"One problem is that the solution takes too much RAM from the client."

"There is no technical support available in the Middle East."

"Resource consumption is suboptimal and could be improved."

"But the biggest one for us is patch management because this has been our top priority when looking at alternatives. Every solution needs to have patch management, if that's possible. It would cut costs on our side if that feature were included, so we don't need to pay for two separate pieces of software."

"I would like the part of Hash Analysis by external sources to be improved."

"The solution could improve by having more real-time responses. For example, when a license gets removed from a computer it does not update the records of the change. Additionally, when I installed Microsoft Windows Defender I was not able to send licenses through email to our tenants. The integration with other solutions could improve."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I don't think there are any extra expenses besides its licensing costs."

"We pay 650 Rand for a license. It is a perpetual license which we normally run for two years."

"It is reasonably priced."

"Licensing fees are paid yearly."

"This product is costly."

"The initial price is very good as they give good initial discounts, but it seems a little expensive once you renew the license."

"There are some extra expenses for using the product, in addition to licensing related to the maintenance of the product."

"Since the maintenance is done by our own team, the price of the subscription should really be cheaper."

More Trellix Endpoint Security Platform pricing and cost advice

"We pay a yearly licensing fee of about €20 per computer."

"The price is comparable."

"If you purchase licenses in bulk the price of the licenses can decrease."

"The cost of the solution depends on the size of the company and where the licenses are being ordered from."

"The product has average pricing."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

14%

Government

12%

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

Comms Service Provider

23%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	67
Midsize Enterprise	36
Large Enterprise	61

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Large Enterprise	1

Questions from the Community

How does McAfee Endpoint Security compare with MVISION?

The flexible manageability of McAfee Endpoint Security is one of our favorite aspects of this solution. You can deploy various components as desired with McAfee Endpoint Security, whereas many othe...

See all answers

How does Crowdstrike Falcon compare with FireEye Endpoint Security?

The Crowdstrike Falcon program has a simple to use user interface, making it both an easy to use as well as an effective program. Its graphical design is such that it makes an extremely useful too...

See all answers

What do you like most about McAfee Endpoint Security?

It provides a robust defense against cybersecurity threats while offering user-friendly features like notifications and approval prompts.

See all answers

What do you like most about F-Secure Protection Service for Business?

The notifications and patch management features are valuable.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for F-Secure Protection Service for Business?

The pricing is scalable. We can purchase more licenses if needed. It's a more cost-effective solution compared to Darktrace, which requires a special device purchase.

See all answers

What needs improvement with F-Secure Protection Service for Business?

One problem is that the solution takes too much RAM from the client. It would help if it used less RAM in future versions.

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

Compared 9% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

Compared 5% of the time

Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

Compared 5% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

Compared 5% of the time

Tanium vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

Compared 4% of the time

More Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Competitors

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection

Compared 15% of the time

Sophos Endpoint vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection

Compared 8% of the time

Bitdefender Total Security vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection

Compared 7% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection

Compared 7% of the time

Seqrite Endpoint Security vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection

Compared 3% of the time

More WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

January 2026

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform report

Download Trellix Endpoint Security Platform product report

Buyer's Guide

WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection

January 2026

WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection report

Download WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection product report

Also Known As

McAfee Endpoint Security, McAfee Endpoint Protection, Intel Security Total Protection for Endpoint, McAfee Complete Endpoint Protection, Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)

F-Secure Elements Endpoint Protection, F-Secure Protection Service for Business

Overview

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform offers essential features like centralized management, threat prevention, and encryption, facilitating seamless scaling and integration with other systems while prioritizing user security.

This comprehensive platform focuses on endpoint protection, antivirus capabilities, and malware defense. It enhances cybersecurity with data loss prevention, advanced threat detection, and AI-driven features for reliable protection without impacting performance. Central management and advanced reporting streamline integration and ease of use. Flexible policy deployment through the management console and its robust security measures, such as DLP and device control, further increase protection. Challenges include high CPU and memory usage affecting performance, a complex interface, and lengthy deployment. Third-party integration and Windows Hello support need improvement. Additional concerns involve improved threat detection and faster technical support responses.

What are the key features of Trellix Endpoint Security Platform?

Centralized Management: Allows seamless integration and scaling with consistent control across environments.
Threat Prevention: Provides comprehensive antivirus and malware protection to secure systems.
Encryption: Ensures data security with robust encryption techniques.
Advanced Reporting: Facilitates detailed insights and analysis for better decision-making.
AI-Driven Detection: Offers reliable threat detection without impacting system performance.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Comprehensive Protection: Offers extensive security measures for protecting digital environments.
Ease of Integration: Simplifies the process of incorporating into current systems and processes.
Flexible Policy Deployment: Supports adaptable policy management to meet diverse requirements.
Scalability: Enables growth while maintaining efficiency and security.
Robust Security Features: Provides advanced security measures like DLP and device control.

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform is widely implemented in industries such as banking and government for securing mobile and desktop devices. Its capabilities cover network security, device control, and remote access protection, catering to diverse environments by offering robust cybersecurity management against advanced threats.

Trellix

WithSecure (formerly F-Secure) Elements Endpoint Protection is cloud-native, AI-powered endpoint protection that you can deploy instantly from your browser and manage easily from a single console. It integrates across all your endpoints, keeping your organization fenced in from attacks. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection is a module of the Elements cyber security platform. The cloud-based platform provides effective protection against ransomware and advanced attacks. Elements brings together vulnerability management, automated patch management, dynamic threat intelligence and continuous behavioral analytics. Use individual solutions for specific needs or combine them all seamlessly for maximum defense.

WithSecure

Sample Customers

inHouseIT, Seagate Technology

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection

December 2025

Free Report: Trellix Endpoint Security Platform vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection

Find out what your peers are saying about Trellix Endpoint Security Platform vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Trellix Endpoint Security Platform vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection report.

See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.