Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection comparison

Trellix and WithSecure are both solutions in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category. Trellix is ranked #9 with an average rating of 7.9, while WithSecure is ranked #46 with an average rating of 7.3. Trellix holds a 3.8% mindshare in EPP, compared to WithSecure’s 0.7% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of Trellix users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of WithSecure users who would recommend it.
Trellix Endpoint Security P...
Read 158 Trellix Endpoint Security Platform reviews
  • 9,620 Views
  • 7,119 Comparison Views
88% willing to recommend
WithSecure Elements Endpoin...
Read 8 WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection reviews
  • 1,528 Views
  • 1,528 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 9, 2025

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform and WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection compete in the endpoint security category. Trellix appears to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive suite and broader integration options.

Features: Trellix offers integrated threat intelligence, robust management tools, and strong encryption capabilities. Its centralized dashboards and real-time threat detection bolster data protection. WithSecure emphasizes ease of management with a clear portal interface and unique security layers like AMSI and DeepGuard.

Room for Improvement: Trellix could improve by reducing resource consumption and simplifying its user interface. Additionally, it faces challenges in reducing the complexity of setup and support response times. WithSecure needs to streamline patch management, reduce resource use, and enhance third-party integration.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Trellix supports diverse deployment environments, although its customer service varies in responsiveness and quality across regions. WithSecure also supports multiple environments and is known for simple deployment and consistent customer service.

Pricing and ROI: Trellix is described as expensive with a good ROI due to its extensive features and cost savings on recovery expenses. Its licensing flexibility depends on the package and deployment scale. WithSecure is considered cost-effective and scalable, emphasizing simplicity and reliable security with straightforward pricing structures.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Trellix Endpoint Security Platform vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection Report (Updated: July 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection
July 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 865,295 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Trellix Endpoint Security P...
Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
9th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
158
Ranking in other categories
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (9th), Extended Detection and Response (XDR) (10th)
WithSecure Elements Endpoin...
Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
46th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of Trellix Endpoint Security Platform is 3.8%, down from 4.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection is 0.7%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
 

Featured Reviews

Abdullah Al Hadi - PeerSpot reviewer
Customization capabilities allow clients to autonomously deploy policies
There are a few areas where Trellix Endpoint Security can improve. Firstly, the high CPU utilization when agents are installed can negatively impact client systems. Another issue is with end-users outside the network, where the agent handler sometimes fails to deploy the product properly. Improvements are needed in forensic analytics to detect specific vulnerabilities. It would also help if detection specifics were identified more quickly and the problem-solving process accelerated, especially to meet larger clients' expectations.
Read full review
Mark Feldman - PeerSpot reviewer
Central console streamlines patch monitoring and device management effortlessly
WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection is good and easy to set up. I provide an installation file for every client through my domain controller and GPO, and it works properly. We have faced no incidents with viruses or network breaches, and it's easy to monitor patches. I can use remote desktop from the central console. The solution also saves my time because, being the only one handling it, I can monitor all devices easily.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"FireEye Endpoint Security is easy to use and lightweight compared to others."
"I found the initial setup to be easy."
"The new central console is better than the earlier one."
"It's good that it periodically scans all my drives. I can stay up to date with the status of my drivers and update them if needed."
"This product has the capability to check a wide range of vulnerabilities and devices."
"We receive good protection with this solution."
"A great console with a user-friendly GUI."
"The reporting capabilities are a valuable feature. In enables more visibility on our network."
More Trellix Endpoint Security Platform pros
"On the cloud management page, the solution scales up very highly."
"WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection is good and easy to set up."
"We use the product for detecting network vulnerabilities and for software update purposes."
"Both incoming and outgoing traffic is protected."
"The most valuable features of WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection are the clear useful portal and overall company protection."
"There is a layer of security to prevent a malicious agent (malware) from interrupting or stopping services, deleting or modifying registry entries or even stopping the antivirus from acting, ensuring that there will be no interruption of protection."
"The notifications and patch management features are valuable."
"F-Secure is useful for keeping user machines up-to-date by pushing out security and critical updates."
 

Cons

"The central monitoring dashboard needs improvement."
"The solution lacks device control."
"We would like to see all the features available on cloud."
"The management console is a little bit difficult to understand for admins. You need a lot of time in order to become familiar with that. It is a little bit complicated and not too easy to understand. Its price can also be improved. Its price is higher than its competitors. McAfee also needs to have better cloud integration and more data centers in the EU. The cloud center should be in Europe or in Germany. In Germany, it is really important to have access to your data within the same country. Customer data needs to be placed and processed in the same country."
"The product needs to reduce the usage of RAM and CPU."
"The local technical support could be better."
"Performance is a problematic area in the solution needing improvement."
"One suggestion is they should reduce the constant notifications. Whenever I open my laptop, there are too many notifications from McAfee, and it gets annoying."
More Trellix Endpoint Security Platform cons
"The program and cloud service management is in English. It's not a problem for me, however, it might be for users who don't speak English or use it regularly."
"One problem is that the solution takes too much RAM from the client."
"There could be a dedicated security partner with essential knowledge."
"But the biggest one for us is patch management because this has been our top priority when looking at alternatives. Every solution needs to have patch management, if that's possible. It would cut costs on our side if that feature were included, so we don't need to pay for two separate pieces of software."
"Resource consumption is suboptimal and could be improved."
"There is no technical support available in the Middle East."
"I would like the part of Hash Analysis by external sources to be improved."
"The solution could improve by having more real-time responses. For example, when a license gets removed from a computer it does not update the records of the change. Additionally, when I installed Microsoft Windows Defender I was not able to send licenses through email to our tenants. The integration with other solutions could improve."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Annual license fee is good"
"The price of the product is similar to the ones in the market that offer the same features."
"We are on an annual subscription for McAfee MVISION Endpoint. The cost for the license could be less expensive."
"The license costs are very reasonable, around 1,000 to 1,200 rupees per year."
"I do licensing on an annual basis and this is what I always recommend to my clients over the monthly option."
"The product pricing is high."
"When comparing the solution to others it is a bit expensive. We are on a monthly license."
"The tool is affordable"
More Trellix Endpoint Security Platform pricing and cost advice
"We pay a yearly licensing fee of about €20 per computer."
"If you purchase licenses in bulk the price of the licenses can decrease."
"The product has average pricing."
"The cost of the solution depends on the size of the company and where the licenses are being ordered from."
"The price is comparable."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
865,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Government
13%
Manufacturing Company
13%
Computer Software Company
11%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Comms Service Provider
19%
Computer Software Company
17%
University
9%
Manufacturing Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

How does McAfee Endpoint Security compare with MVISION?
The flexible manageability of McAfee Endpoint Security is one of our favorite aspects of this solution. You can deploy various components as desired with McAfee Endpoint Security, whereas many othe...
See all answers
How does Crowdstrike Falcon compare with FireEye Endpoint Security?
The Crowdstrike Falcon program has a simple to use user interface, making it both an easy to use as well as an effective program. Its graphical design is such that it makes an extremely useful too...
See all answers
What do you like most about McAfee Endpoint Security?
It provides a robust defense against cybersecurity threats while offering user-friendly features like notifications and approval prompts.
See all answers
What do you like most about F-Secure Protection Service for Business?
The notifications and patch management features are valuable.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for F-Secure Protection Service for Business?
The pricing is scalable. We can purchase more licenses if needed. It's a more cost-effective solution compared to Darktrace, which requires a special device purchase.
See all answers
What needs improvement with F-Secure Protection Service for Business?
One problem is that the solution takes too much RAM from the client. It would help if it used less RAM in future versions.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform
Compared 15% of the time
Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform
Compared 8% of the time
CrowdStrike Falcon vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform
Compared 7% of the time
SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform
Compared 6% of the time
Tanium vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Tanium vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform
Compared 4% of the time
More Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Competitors
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection Logo
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection
Compared 28% of the time
Sophos EPP Suite vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection Logo
Sophos EPP Suite vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection
Compared 11% of the time
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection Logo
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection
Compared 10% of the time
CrowdStrike Falcon vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection
Compared 7% of the time
Bitdefender Total Security vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection Logo
Bitdefender Total Security vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection
Compared 6% of the time
More WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform
July 2025
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform reportDownload Trellix Endpoint Security Platform product report
Buyer's Guide
WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection
July 2025
WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection reportDownload WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection product report
 

Also Known As

McAfee Endpoint Security, McAfee Endpoint Protection, Intel Security Total Protection for Endpoint, McAfee Complete Endpoint Protection, Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)
F-Secure Elements Endpoint Protection, F-Secure Protection Service for Business
 

Overview

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform offers essential features like centralized management, threat prevention, and encryption, facilitating seamless scaling and integration with other systems while prioritizing user security.

This comprehensive platform focuses on endpoint protection, antivirus capabilities, and malware defense. It enhances cybersecurity with data loss prevention, advanced threat detection, and AI-driven features for reliable protection without impacting performance. Central management and advanced reporting streamline integration and ease of use. Flexible policy deployment through the management console and its robust security measures, such as DLP and device control, further increase protection. Challenges include high CPU and memory usage affecting performance, a complex interface, and lengthy deployment. Third-party integration and Windows Hello support need improvement. Additional concerns involve improved threat detection and faster technical support responses.

What are the key features of Trellix Endpoint Security Platform?
  • Centralized Management: Allows seamless integration and scaling with consistent control across environments.
  • Threat Prevention: Provides comprehensive antivirus and malware protection to secure systems.
  • Encryption: Ensures data security with robust encryption techniques.
  • Advanced Reporting: Facilitates detailed insights and analysis for better decision-making.
  • AI-Driven Detection: Offers reliable threat detection without impacting system performance.
What benefits should users look for in reviews?
  • Comprehensive Protection: Offers extensive security measures for protecting digital environments.
  • Ease of Integration: Simplifies the process of incorporating into current systems and processes.
  • Flexible Policy Deployment: Supports adaptable policy management to meet diverse requirements.
  • Scalability: Enables growth while maintaining efficiency and security.
  • Robust Security Features: Provides advanced security measures like DLP and device control.

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform is widely implemented in industries such as banking and government for securing mobile and desktop devices. Its capabilities cover network security, device control, and remote access protection, catering to diverse environments by offering robust cybersecurity management against advanced threats.

Trellix
WithSecure (formerly F-Secure) Elements Endpoint Protection is cloud-native, AI-powered endpoint protection that you can deploy instantly from your browser and manage easily from a single console. It integrates across all your endpoints, keeping your organization fenced in from attacks. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection is a module of the Elements cyber security platform. The cloud-based platform provides effective protection against ransomware and advanced attacks. Elements brings together vulnerability management, automated patch management, dynamic threat intelligence and continuous behavioral analytics. Use individual solutions for specific needs or combine them all seamlessly for maximum defense.
WithSecure
 

Sample Customers

inHouseIT, Seagate Technology
Information Not Available
Buyer's Guide
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection
July 2025
Free Report: Trellix Endpoint Security Platform vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection
Find out what your peers are saying about Trellix Endpoint Security Platform vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
865,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Trellix Endpoint Security Platform vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection report.
See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.