Trellix Endpoint Security Platform vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection comparison

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection

Download the complete report

Helped 860,592 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Trellix Endpoint Security P...

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

9th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

158

Ranking in other categories

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (10th), Extended Detection and Response (XDR) (9th)

WithSecure Elements Endpoin...

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

48th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of Trellix Endpoint Security Platform is 3.9%, down from 4.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection is 0.8%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

Featured Reviews

Abdullah Al Hadi

Information Security Engineer at Nhq Distribution Ltd

Customization capabilities allow clients to autonomously deploy policies

There are a few areas where Trellix Endpoint Security ( /categories/endpoint-protection-platform-epp ) can improve. Firstly, the high CPU utilization when agents are installed can negatively impact client systems. Another issue is with end-users outside the network, where the agent handler sometimes fails to deploy the product properly. Improvements are needed in forensic analytics to detect specific vulnerabilities. It would also help if detection specifics were identified more quickly and the problem-solving process accelerated, especially to meet larger clients' expectations.

Read full review

Mark Feldman

IT-Manager at MKF-Schimanski-ERGIS GmbH

Central console streamlines patch monitoring and device management effortlessly

WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection ( /products/withsecure-elements-endpoint-protection-reviews ) is good and easy to set up. I provide an installation file for every client through my domain controller and GPO, and it works properly. We have faced no incidents with viruses or network breaches, and it's easy to monitor patches. I can use remote desktop from the central console. The solution also saves my time because, being the only one handling it, I can monitor all devices easily.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is a stable solution...The solution's technical support is good."

"The solution is a reliable and mature product. Its reporting function is robust, and the user interface is easy to use. End users can create customized reports with detailed reporting for any computer and export them in PDF or other formats. This reporting capability is very robust."

"The most valuable features of McAfee MVISION Endpoint are advanced threat protection, web filtering, and removable storage devices in the DLP."

"When Intel acquired McAfee they worked on the protocol so that all vendors can work on the same platform. It's a very big improvement in McAfee. All McAfee products talk to each other. Other vendor's products can join this platform as well so it makes it more powerful on the enterprise side for McAfee."

"The exploit guard and malware protection features are very useful. The logon tracker feature is also very useful. They have also given new modules such as logout backup, process backup. We ordered these modules from the FireEye market place, and we have installed these modules. We are currently exploring these features."

"Provides good mobile device protection."

"It's very stable and reliable."

"It is scalable and stable and the initial setup is the easiest part of using the product."

More Trellix Endpoint Security Platform pros

"There is a layer of security to prevent a malicious agent (malware) from interrupting or stopping services, deleting or modifying registry entries or even stopping the antivirus from acting, ensuring that there will be no interruption of protection."

"WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection is good and easy to set up."

"The notifications and patch management features are valuable."

"The most valuable features of WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection are the clear useful portal and overall company protection."

"On the cloud management page, the solution scales up very highly."

"Both incoming and outgoing traffic is protected."

"F-Secure is useful for keeping user machines up-to-date by pushing out security and critical updates."

"We use the product for detecting network vulnerabilities and for software update purposes."

Cons

"The price of the solution is high in Asia."

"Support-wise they need to be better."

"Technical support from the vendor is very bad."

"They can improve its resource consumption, such as memory, and maybe provide better or smaller updates. It always takes a lot of resources, but it has been getting better. I have been using McAfee products for the last 20 years or so, and I know it is getting better."

"There are two main areas that require improvement. One is the size of the packages. Although I'll admit manageability is good, if I want to deploy, let's say just the antivirus or just the firewall, each of those package sizes are quite large. They are sometimes as big as 200MB or 250MB. When I have operations in remote areas where connectivity is always poor, it's difficult. To deploy such a package in a remote location over the internet or something like that is always challenging."

"We have had some of our clients not happy with McAfee Endpoint Security because it blocks some of the applications they are trying to use. They should make it easier to unblock applications."

"Trellix lacked email protection when it was a McAfee product. They added this feature during the merger with FireEye, but it hasn't been fully integrated. The core features will be integrated into the next release. FireEye has several solutions for EDR and sandboxing."

"The initial setup can be a bit complicated for those unfamiliar with the product."

More Trellix Endpoint Security Platform cons

"Resource consumption is suboptimal and could be improved."

"But the biggest one for us is patch management because this has been our top priority when looking at alternatives. Every solution needs to have patch management, if that's possible. It would cut costs on our side if that feature were included, so we don't need to pay for two separate pieces of software."

"The program and cloud service management is in English. It's not a problem for me, however, it might be for users who don't speak English or use it regularly."

"One problem is that the solution takes too much RAM from the client."

"The solution could improve by having more real-time responses. For example, when a license gets removed from a computer it does not update the records of the change. Additionally, when I installed Microsoft Windows Defender I was not able to send licenses through email to our tenants. The integration with other solutions could improve."

"There is no technical support available in the Middle East."

"There could be a dedicated security partner with essential knowledge."

"I would like the part of Hash Analysis by external sources to be improved."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is mid-ranged and quite reasonable compared to other similar products."

"The solution is not an expensive tool. Compared to other options, it's mostly average-priced. I've deployed it for customers ranging from 100 nodes to over 5,000 nodes. Its renewal prices are very low, and it offers both perpetual and subscription licenses. With a perpetual license, the product will keep working as long as it's not end-of-life, which benefits companies."

"I am happy with the pricing."

"The price of McAfee is pretty similar to Symantec, and there are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees."

"McAfee's prices are flexible and can be quite competitive, although there are other solutions that are even more so."

"Pricing is fair."

"It was an annual fee. There was just one overall fee."

"The pricing is more or less the same as the other tools in the market."

More Trellix Endpoint Security Platform pricing and cost advice

"The price is comparable."

"We pay a yearly licensing fee of about €20 per computer."

"If you purchase licenses in bulk the price of the licenses can decrease."

"The product has average pricing."

"The cost of the solution depends on the size of the company and where the licenses are being ordered from."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

860,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

14%

Government

13%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Computer Software Company

10%

Computer Software Company

17%

Comms Service Provider

17%

Manufacturing Company

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

How does McAfee Endpoint Security compare with MVISION?

The flexible manageability of McAfee Endpoint Security is one of our favorite aspects of this solution. You can deploy various components as desired with McAfee Endpoint Security, whereas many othe...

How does Crowdstrike Falcon compare with FireEye Endpoint Security?

The Crowdstrike Falcon program has a simple to use user interface, making it both an easy to use as well as an effective program. Its graphical design is such that it makes an extremely useful too...

What do you like most about McAfee Endpoint Security?

It provides a robust defense against cybersecurity threats while offering user-friendly features like notifications and approval prompts.

What do you like most about F-Secure Protection Service for Business?

The notifications and patch management features are valuable.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for F-Secure Protection Service for Business?

The pricing is scalable. We can purchase more licenses if needed. It's a more cost-effective solution compared to Darktrace, which requires a special device purchase.

What needs improvement with F-Secure Protection Service for Business?

One problem is that the solution takes too much RAM from the client. It would help if it used less RAM in future versions.

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

Comparisons

Compared 16% of the time

Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

Compared 8% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

Compared 8% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

Compared 6% of the time

Tanium vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

Compared 5% of the time

More Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Competitors

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection

Compared 32% of the time

ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection

Compared 12% of the time

Sophos EPP Suite vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection

Compared 12% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection

Compared 6% of the time

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection

Compared 5% of the time

More WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection Competitors

Product Reports

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

Download Trellix Endpoint Security Platform product report

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform report

WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection

Download WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection product report

WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection report

Also Known As

McAfee Endpoint Security, McAfee Endpoint Protection, Intel Security Total Protection for Endpoint, McAfee Complete Endpoint Protection, Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)

F-Secure Elements Endpoint Protection, F-Secure Protection Service for Business

Overview

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform offers essential features like centralized management, threat prevention, and encryption, facilitating seamless scaling and integration with other systems while prioritizing user security.

This comprehensive platform focuses on endpoint protection, antivirus capabilities, and malware defense. It enhances cybersecurity with data loss prevention, advanced threat detection, and AI-driven features for reliable protection without impacting performance. Central management and advanced reporting streamline integration and ease of use. Flexible policy deployment through the management console and its robust security measures, such as DLP and device control, further increase protection. Challenges include high CPU and memory usage affecting performance, a complex interface, and lengthy deployment. Third-party integration and Windows Hello support need improvement. Additional concerns involve improved threat detection and faster technical support responses.

What are the key features of Trellix Endpoint Security Platform?

Centralized Management: Allows seamless integration and scaling with consistent control across environments.
Threat Prevention: Provides comprehensive antivirus and malware protection to secure systems.
Encryption: Ensures data security with robust encryption techniques.
Advanced Reporting: Facilitates detailed insights and analysis for better decision-making.
AI-Driven Detection: Offers reliable threat detection without impacting system performance.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Comprehensive Protection: Offers extensive security measures for protecting digital environments.
Ease of Integration: Simplifies the process of incorporating into current systems and processes.
Flexible Policy Deployment: Supports adaptable policy management to meet diverse requirements.
Scalability: Enables growth while maintaining efficiency and security.
Robust Security Features: Provides advanced security measures like DLP and device control.

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform is widely implemented in industries such as banking and government for securing mobile and desktop devices. Its capabilities cover network security, device control, and remote access protection, catering to diverse environments by offering robust cybersecurity management against advanced threats.

Trellix

WithSecure (formerly F-Secure) Elements Endpoint Protection is cloud-native, AI-powered endpoint protection that you can deploy instantly from your browser and manage easily from a single console. It integrates across all your endpoints, keeping your organization fenced in from attacks. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection is a module of the Elements cyber security platform. The cloud-based platform provides effective protection against ransomware and advanced attacks. Elements brings together vulnerability management, automated patch management, dynamic threat intelligence and continuous behavioral analytics. Use individual solutions for specific needs or combine them all seamlessly for maximum defense.

WithSecure

Sample Customers

inHouseIT, Seagate Technology

Information Not Available

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection