Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 9, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.5
Bitdefender GravityZone offers competitive pricing and value, nearly matching top brands but excels with a 35% financial advantage.
Sentiment score
1.0
Cybereason EDR boosts network visibility, reduces threat response time by 50%, and offers ROI in 12-24 months.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
7.8
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security's technical support is generally well-received, valued for responsiveness and knowledge, with room for improvement.
Sentiment score
5.0
Cybereason's customer service is competent and knowledgeable, though escalations can cause delays, especially without partnership status.
I have never needed additional support, which shows how easy and friendly Bitdefender is.
Their technical support is helpful.
Nine is great actually since we have people available when we ask, and they know what they are talking about.
if you're a partner with them, they provide fairly good support through a concept called invest support.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
8.5
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security is highly scalable, easy to expand, but requires understanding for effective use in layered environments.
Sentiment score
6.2
<p>Cybereason Endpoint Detection &amp; Response is highly scalable, effectively supporting large organizations with seamless expansion and flexible adaptation.</p>
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.8
Bitdefender GravityZone is stable and reliable but faces dashboard clarity, resource issues on old systems, and occasional VPN problems.
Sentiment score
5.5
Cybereason EDR is reliable with occasional upgrade issues, but improves system speed, and support resolves performance concerns.
We inform Cybereason about any issues, and they work on a new solution, either with an update or a custom fix in anticipation of the next update.
 

Room For Improvement

Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security needs improvements in usability, support, documentation, resource management, and feature integration.
Cybereason needs better support, simpler deployment, and enhanced features, including automation, dashboard design, and compatibility improvements.
The initial file I download to deploy on end-user devices is about six hundred to seven hundred megabytes, and it should be scaled down to an agent size of maybe less than one hundred megabytes, max.
Normal users cannot handle these CLI operations effectively.
The phishing feature report showed zero results, and the patch management component is one of the two main issues that need improvement.
 

Setup Cost

Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security offers competitive, flexible pricing with customizable features, though some report high renewal fee increases.
Cybereason offers a competitively priced, comprehensive EDR solution with potential cost benefits for experienced users in enterprises.
 

Valuable Features

Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security is praised for its ease, comprehensive features, and efficient enhancement of security infrastructure.
Cybereason EDR offers real-time threat visibility, automatic isolation, and extensive threat-hunting for efficient endpoint management and minimal false positives.
In terms of threat detection, I would give it a ten out of ten since Bitdefender manages to catch threats that other products miss.
The best feature of Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security is that it is lightweight.
From my reseller perspective, the best features of Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security that stand out are the sandboxing and reporting capabilities.
What I find most valuable is the clarity of the platform.
 

Categories and Ranking

Bitdefender GravityZone Ent...
Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
33rd
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.9
Number of Reviews
29
Ranking in other categories
Virtualization Security (4th)
Cybereason Endpoint Detecti...
Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
37th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
5.6
Number of Reviews
22
Ranking in other categories
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (28th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security is 0.9%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response is 0.8%, down from 1.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
 

Featured Reviews

Rias Majeed - PeerSpot reviewer
Delivers lightweight protection while facing challenges with technical aspects
I have been working with Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security for quite a long time, but recently, I do not appreciate their changes, especially on the technical side. They moved some portions to remote GUI-based interfaces. The Command Line Interface (CLI) is not improving. Even experienced personnel are finding it difficult. There is a power user function where you can stop it temporarily for installing applications. Previously, we had the option to click on the power user button and enter the password to allow stopping that particular function. Now, we have to do it via CLI, which even technical personnel struggle to understand. Currently, everything is working fine except for the technical aspects we can control. If they can revert to the old system, that would be much better. When we raise this issue with Bitdefender, they cite security reasons for the change. However, while Cisco is moving away from CLI to GUI, Bitdefender is moving backward. Normal users cannot handle these CLI operations effectively.
Ivan Burke - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers useful threat hunting and response capabilities but struggles to justify cost for smaller deployments
I mostly work with incident response, so I work with a bunch of them interchangeably, but mostly with the EDR components; I also get involved with some of the XDR components, especially for the cloud. Regarding analysis features, such as deep behavioral detection, I do use it sometimes; I usually don't use the automated version of it, as I prefer threat hunting directly, depending on if the season is available. I know some of them have pretty good analytics engines, but I tend to do the threat hunting on my own. I manage incident response for a bunch of companies, so some of them have Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response integrated into Sentinel, some into Fortinet, and others into various tools. When considering cost-effectiveness, their pricing structure works such that if you're a large organization with more than a thousand endpoints to deploy to, then Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response is worthwhile. But for anything less than 300, it's too expensive; obviously, the more you buy, the better the price, making it cheaper for you. Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response best fits enterprise-level businesses such as huge corporations; however, we are in the process of removing it from many of our endpoint clients because it's not really showing enough value for them at the moment. We're trying to see how we can improve it with some of our clients, but at the moment, it's struggling compared to other EDR solutions that we have deployed. On a scale of one to ten, I rate Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response a six.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.
865,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
12%
Comms Service Provider
11%
Healthcare Company
7%
Government
6%
Computer Software Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Government
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security?
It is perfectly stable. We haven't received any complaints from customers regarding stability or performance. It's been smooth sailing so far.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security?
Regarding pricing, setup cost, and licensing, it is affordable. Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security helps clients save money on their security investments.
What needs improvement with Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security?
I have been working with Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security for quite a long time, but recently, I do not appreciate their changes, especially on the technical side. They moved some portio...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response?
Comparison with other products showed it be cheaper than some larger competitors. Set up cost for us were cheaper as we already had users experienced with the product in other business units. Initi...
What is your primary use case for Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response?
My main use case for Cybereason Endpoint Detection &amp; Response is mostly for incident response.
 

Also Known As

Bitdefender GravityZone Security for Virtualized Environments, GravityZone Security for Virtualized Environments
Cybereason EDR, Cybereason Deep Detect & Respond
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

SambaSafety, Morefield Communications, Northstar Ltd., Citrix, Greenman-Pedersen
Lockheed Martin, Spark Capital, DocuSign, Softbank Capital
Find out what your peers are saying about Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security vs. Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.
865,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.