No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Bitsight vs SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Bitsight
Ranking in Attack Surface Management (ASM)
3rd
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.3
Number of Reviews
12
Ranking in other categories
IT Vendor Risk Management (2nd)
SOCRadar Extended Threat In...
Ranking in Attack Surface Management (ASM)
5th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.2
Number of Reviews
21
Ranking in other categories
Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP) (2nd), Digital Risk Protection (3rd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Attack Surface Management (ASM) category, the mindshare of Bitsight is 3.6%, down from 5.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence is 1.8%, up from 1.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Attack Surface Management (ASM) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Bitsight3.6%
SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence1.8%
Other94.6%
Attack Surface Management (ASM)
 

Featured Reviews

SA
Senior AIML Engineer at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees
Continuous monitoring has strengthened external security and improved customer trust
There are areas for improvement; we do notice sometimes finding vulnerabilities which gives us visibility to find them quickly. However, there could be a mechanism they can build on top of that for validation as they identify the issues. What will the real risk be for that identifiable issue? Sometimes it could be open because of the traffic; how they detected it could be seen as vulnerable, but upon testing, it might not be a real issue. It could be a false positive because there could be a honeypot that we built. My thinking is about validation, so if they can build that validation part before they expose the risk to the specific asset, that would help. Additionally, based on their reporting, they could also build risk scores and prioritization, which would also aid us. I would suggest adding dashboards and custom reporting, which could help us by enabling rich custom reports with filters. That is especially for leadership because they will not look at each technical area, but overall they would be looking at the risk score and what the assets or critical exposure areas are. Customizable reporting based on requirements would be valuable. I chose 9 out of 10 because the reporting and dashboards would be the first thing I would consider for improvement, and then the second is about the validation part, which could probably improve to 10 out of 10. I cannot think of too much for additional improvements. Maybe some good automation with the API solutions that could be integrated with the CI/CD pipeline or DevOps tools we are running would also be automated and tested.
yozkul - PeerSpot reviewer
Cyber Security Consultant at Cevizsoft Teknoloji AŞ
Centralized threat intelligence has improved our visibility and accelerated incident response
You can find out new threats and security incidents with SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence. You can see the new vulnerabilities when you are using your products. This is very useful. SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence has improved security in my organization, but there are some problems. Sometimes there are too many alarms, which can become quite tiring. We have a lot of information infrastructures, and SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence has improved our security, but we do experience some alert fatigue. There are a lot of web servers. We also integrated SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence with the SIEM. We can see together, and we can see all of the threats and new threats, especially. If you integrate all internal sources, IP addresses, and services to SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence, you can view all of the sources together in a single monitor and area. You can also view all the tickets and vulnerabilities and threats. This is very useful.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The product helps us identify the vulnerabilities of internet-facing applications."
"The solution is user-friendly."
"The security posture trends can be communicated visually, which is fantastic."
"Its customer service team responds quickly."
"My advice to others looking into using Bitsight is that it provides a lot of information that was not available before, and it is especially good in recon as it can identify many things about an organization that have never been found earlier, making it a valuable tool."
"The best thing about BitSight is the comprehensive list of risk vectors, covering compromised systems, diligence failures, and behavioral anomalies."
"Offers open ports from an external point of view."
"I prefer BitSight due to its patch management capabilities. The score is a valuable feature. I have contacted the customer support through e-mail and their response rate is fast. I rate the solution a nine out of ten."
"SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence's governance and security through its AI capabilities are impressive, as they aid greatly in CVE understanding and allow for network comprehension of threats, proving to be a formidable tool for open-source intelligence."
"There is all positive experience with SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence."
"The best feature that SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence offers is definitely the detection of leaks in the dark web."
"SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence has improved our organization's visibility into external cyber threats and helped us identify potential risks early."
"SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence has positively impacted my organization by enabling me to feed higher severity IOCs to other tools, automatically blocking malicious threat actors roaming in the market, while generating reports related to CVEs that we share with our vendors and respective teams for vulnerability validation and remediation."
"SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence has positively impacted our organization by helping us stay in good posture and shows us how many users have been impacted."
"SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence positively impacts my organization significantly by providing reports and high-level executive reporting that gives interesting visibility to top management or personnel with decision-making capacity, without requiring major additional effort to obtain this information."
"We proactively blocked the IOCs provided by SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence before breaches occurred in other banks and financial industries."
 

Cons

"At the moment, when the vulnerability score decreases, it remains the same for quite a while, even though issues are resolved in 24 hours."
"There may be room for improvement in the methodology for identifying findings, as occasional errors occur on the technical side."
"Data enrichment is the major issue."
"There are areas for improvement; we do notice sometimes finding vulnerabilities which gives us visibility to find them quickly. However, there could be a mechanism they can build on top of that for validation as they identify the issues."
"The solution’s benchmarking should be improved."
"I would rate Bitsight closer to nine, or somewhere between eight and nine, because the reasons I do not rate it a ten relate to opportunities for improvement I mentioned, such as broader risk, cyber risk intelligence, and emphasis on supply chain risk intelligence."
"We found that some of the findings are clear false positives, but they still report that, and based on that, the rating goes down until we rectify them."
"There has been quite a bit of data discrepancy in BitSight."
"The customer support for SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence is average, as the support team is responsive and knowledgeable, although it takes some time to get responses."
"Regarding the noise minimization capabilities within the Agentic Phishing workflow, I understand that it lacks an organization-level baseline, and I need the analysis provided from Agentic responses to include a severity level."
"I regard SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence as perfect for the moment, with some room for improvement in the user experience, but overall, it is a great tool."
"SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence could improve regarding the licensing scheme, which is credit-based, especially for specific activities, as it would be beneficial to have some flexibility in how these credits are consumed."
"In terms of improvement for SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence, I think the asset identification procedures could be better, as we receive a lot of false positives related to the specific flags we set."
"I think SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence can be improved by adding good keywords, as keywords are critical."
"The support quality is inconsistent."
"The reason I give it an 8.5 is that the standout feature is the fast notification regarding data leakage, but the negative aspect is the lack of customizable reporting."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product has a reasonable price."
"The solution's price is average."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Attack Surface Management (ASM) solutions are best for your needs.
920,574 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
16%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Government
7%
Insurance Company
7%
Outsourcing Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Comms Service Provider
11%
Manufacturing Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business3
Large Enterprise9
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business17
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise7
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for BitSight?
My experience with Bitsight's pricing, setup cost, and licensing reflects strong enterprise acceptance; I did not opt for only a one-year annuity-based contract but a multi-year one that was based ...
What needs improvement with BitSight?
BitSight is a good tool, but there are a few areas that could be better. Sometimes the asset mapping and findings are not fully accurate, which creates extra work to validate them. It is also not a...
What advice do you have for others considering BitSight?
I think I have mentioned the features comprehensively. I do not think anything else is left unsaid; I talked about continuous monitoring, benchmarking, dashboards, and attack surface visibility, al...
What needs improvement with SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence?
SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence could be improved by implementing an autonomous threat hunting option. I am not certain if this is currently implemented, but I would appreciate seeing that fe...
What is your primary use case for SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence?
My main use case for SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence is Digital Risk Protection, brand risk monitoring, threat intelligence, supply chain attacks, supply chain monitoring, VIP monitoring, ide...
What advice do you have for others considering SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence?
SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence earns a rating of ten on a scale of one to ten. I rate it a ten because of the quality of information that is always delivered when needed, and the support fro...
 

Interactive Demo

Demo not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Cabela's, Belgium Center for Cybersecurity, Fordham University, RBC, Max Life Insurance, Schneider Electric
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Bitsight vs. SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.
920,574 professionals have used our research since 2012.